MRI is the preferred modality for the diagnosis of ankle joint pathology. Musculoskeletal radiologists aim to determine and report both chondral and/or osseous stability/instability of each lesion. The aim of this study was to specifically analyse the reliability of MRI reported findings in predicting the stability of OCL's in symptomatic patients. A single centre, single surgeon consecutive series of patients who had undergone an ankle arthroscopy procedure preceded by an MRI scan for symptomatic ankle pathology were included in this retrospective clinical study. All MRI scans were reported by a musculoskeletal radiologist. MRI reports and arthroscopic findings were extracted and analysed. Arthroscopy findings were taken as the gold standard.Background
Methods
The surgical correction of hammertoe deformity of the lesser toes is one of the most commonly performed forefoot procedures. In general, percutaneous Kirschner wires are used to provide fixation to the resected proximal interphalangeal joint. Although these wires are effective, issues such as pin tract infection as well as difficult postoperative management by patients make alternative fixation methods desirable. The biomechanical studies suggested that the bioabsorbable implant would be a suitable fixation device for the hammer toe procedure. These wire are made of a copolymer of 82% poly-L-lactic acid and 18% polyglycolic acid. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical outcome of these two implants. We compared 100 consecutive proximal interphalangeal joint fusions performed with each implant. There was no statistically significant difference in the fusion rate at six months using either implant. However, there was significant statistical difference in cost, rate of infection, implant migration, recurrence of deformity, patient’s return to driving, walking with routine foot wear and satisfaction. There was 11% rate of reactive inflammation in the absorbable wire group but no infection. The study shows the absorbable wires are safe for fusion of proximal inter phalangeal joints.
The aims of this study were to compare the outcome of epiphysiodesis in patients with limb length discrepancy (LLD) as a result of cerebral palsy with those as a result of other causes in order to test our hypothesis that the hemiplegic / monoplegic limb may respond differently to epiphysiodesis, to evaluate the accuracy of the Moseley method and evaluate whether there is any difference between the outcomes of left or right hemiplegic limbs with LLD bearing in mind that the left hand is used for bone age calculations. We reviewed the case notes and radiographs of 34 children who had undergone epiphysiodesis for the management of LLD by the same surgeon, using the Moseley method between February 1999 and May 2005 to final follow up at skeletal maturity. Of the 34 patients, 9 had a LLD as a result of cerebral palsy (4-Left, 5-Right) and 25 as a result of other causes. In the cerebral palsy group the mean residual LLD was 0.59cm and in the other group it was 1.18cm. Both groups were similar in terms of age and sex distribution. There was no demonstrable statistically significant difference in outcome between the 2 groups (unpaired T test, P=0.734). The Moseley method appeared accurate and there was no difference demonstrated in the outcome between left and right hemiplegic LLD. We conclude that the Moseley method is reliable. We have not found any evidence that the hemiplegic limb behaves any differently. We have not demonstrated any difference in the outcome of left or right hemiplegic limbs.
