STUDY OF OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE UNDERGONE EPIPHYSIODESIS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LIMB LENGTH DISCREPANCY

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare the outcome of epiphysiodesis in patients with limb length discrepancy (LLD) as a result of cerebral palsy with those as a result of other causes in order to test our hypothesis that the hemiplegic / monoplegic limb may respond differently to epiphysiodesis, to evaluate the accuracy of the Moseley method and evaluate whether there is any difference between the outcomes of left or right hemiplegic limbs with LLD bearing in mind that the left hand is used for bone age calculations.

We reviewed the case notes and radiographs of 34 children who had undergone epiphysiodesis for the management of LLD by the same surgeon, using the Moseley method between February 1999 and May 2005 to final follow up at skeletal maturity. Of the 34 patients, 9 had a LLD as a result of cerebral palsy (4-Left, 5-Right) and 25 as a result of other causes. In the cerebral palsy group the mean residual LLD was 0.59cm and in the other group it was 1.18cm. Both groups were similar in terms of age and sex distribution. There was no demonstrable statistically significant difference in outcome between the 2 groups (unpaired T test, P=0.734). The Moseley method appeared accurate and there was no difference demonstrated in the outcome between left and right hemiplegic LLD.

We conclude that the Moseley method is reliable. We have not found any evidence that the hemiplegic limb behaves any differently. We have not demonstrated any difference in the outcome of left or right hemiplegic limbs.