Introduction

The utilization of sonicate fluid cultures (SFC) has been shown to increase the detection rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in comparison to the use of conventional microbiological methods, because sonication enables a sampling of the causative bacteria directly from the surface of the endoprosthetic components. The hypothesis of this study is that not only will the detection rate of PJI be improved, but also the detection rate of polymicrobial infection in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision surgery.

Introduction

Sonicate fluid cultures (SFC) are more sensitive than conventional microbiological methods in identifying periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), because sonication enables a sampling of the causative bacteria directly from the surface of the endoprosthetic components. Because of their high sensitivity SFC can be positive while all other microbiological methods remain negative. It is therefore difficult to interpret a single SFC as being truly or falsely positive. The aim of this prospective study was to improve the interpretation of SFC in the diagnosis of PJI in patients after total hip arthroplasty through the use of multiple SFC.

Skeletal muscle injuries often lead to severe functional deficits. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is a promising but still experimental tool in the regeneration of muscle function after severe trauma. One of the most important questions, which has to be answered prior to a possible future clinical application is the ideal time of transplantation. Due to the initial inflammatory environment we hypothesized that a local injection of the cells immediately after injury would result in an inferior functional outcome compared to a delayed transplantation.

Twenty-seven female Sprague Dawley rats were used for this study. Bone marrow was aspirated from both tibiae of each animal and autologous MSC cultures obtained from the material. The animals were separated into three groups (each n=9) and the left soleus muscles were bluntly crushed in a standardized manner. In group 1 2×106 MSCs were transplanted into the injured muscle immediately after trauma, whereas group 2 and 3 received an injection of saline. Another week later the left soleus muscles of the animals of group 2 were transplanted with the same number of MSCs. Group 1 and 3 received a sham treatment with the application of saline solution in an identical manner. In vivo functional muscle testing was performed four weeks after trauma to quantify muscle regeneration.

Maximum contraction forces after twitch stimulation decreased to 39 ± 18 % of the non injured right control side after crush trauma of the soleus muscles as measured in group 3. Tetanic stimulation showed a reduction of the maximum contraction capacity of 72 ± 12 % of the value obtained from intact internal control muscles. The transplantation of 2 x 106 MSCs one week after trauma improved the functional regeneration of the injured muscles as displayed by significantly higher contraction forces in group 2 (twitch: p = 0.014, tetany: p = 0.018). Local transplantation of the same number of MSCs immediately after crush injury was able to enhance the regeneration process to a similar extent with an increase of maximum twitch contraction forces by 73.3 % (p = 0.006) and of maximum tetanic contraction forces by 49.6 % (p = 0.037) compared to the control group.

The presented results underline the effectivity of MSC transplantation in the treatment of severe skeletal muscle injuries. The most surprising finding was that despite of the fundamental differences of the local environment into which MSCs had been transplanted, similar results could be obtained in respect to functional skeletal muscle regeneration. We assume that the effect of the MSC after immediate injection can partly be explained by their known immunomodulatory competences. The data of our study provide evidence for a large time window of MSC transplantation after muscle trauma.

While significant component malalignment in the frontal and sagittal plane may lead to early loosening and pain, even small errors in the rotational component alignment are not tolerated due to its complex impact on knee joint kinematics and especially the patella tracking. It is accepted that navigated implantation of total knee arthroplasties improves accuracy in the frontal plane but it is yet unclear weather navigation leads to a more precise rotational component alignment. The study evaluated the influence of navigated implantation on femoral and tibial component alignment.

In a prospective randomized study 32 navigated and 28 conventionally implanted total knee arthroplasties were evaluated through a postoperative CT scan. In all cases the femoral component was referenced to the surgical epicondylar axis and the tibial component was referenced to the medial third of the tibial tuberosity. The angles between these bone landmarks and the components were measured on the CT scans and compared between both study groups.

The rotational malalignment of the femoral component in the conventional operating technique was 0.1° ± 2.2° (range 3.3° of internal rotation and 5.0° of external rotation). Navigated implanted femoral components showed a malalignment of 0.3° ± 1.4° (range 4.7° of internal rotation and 2.2° of external rotation), the difference was not significant. The rotational malalignment of the tibial component in the conventional technique was 7.5° ± 6.0° (range 27.1° of internal rotation and 15° of external rotation). Navigated implanted tibial components showed a malalignment of 6.9° ± 4.7° (range 21.2° internal rotation and 11.0° external rotation), the difference was not significant.

In conclusion the use of a navigation system did not improve the rotational alignment of the tibial or femoral component if only one bone landmark was used. Taking the relatively small errors of a navigation machine into account the error is attributable to the surgeon, who seems to be unable to precisely define bone landmarks. More than one landmark (e.g. additionally Whiteside’s line, posterior condyles, flexion gap for the femur and ankle joint for the tibia) should be used to define the component rotations. Consideration of different rotational landmarks is best done with a navigation system that, in contrast to the manual technique, has the possibility to show the degree of deviation of the components from each landmark.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of autologous periosteal cells for spinal fusion in humans. Lumbar spondylodesis has a slow consolidation rate with a consecutive lengthy period of inability to work and the risk of non-union. This study evaluates the applicability of a cell-matrix construct for spinal fusion using clinical and radiological parameters.

All experiments were approved by the university ethics committee. Lumbar spondylodesis of the segments L4/5 or L5/S1 was performed in 20 healthy patients (mean age 45 years). Indication for surgery was DDD resistant to conservative treatment. 10 weeks before fusion operation, a piece of periosteum was harvested from the proximal tibia of the patient. The material was chopped and digested. In the washed cell suspension cell number and viability were determined. The viability was greater 90% before seeding. After four passages, the cells were mixed with human fibrinogen, and soaked into polymer fleeces. Polymerization was achieved by adding thrombin. The 3D constructs were cultured for 3 weeks. The final application form were chips of 2mm thickness and 8mm diameter. Spondylodesis was performed using a ventral approach for implantation of 2 titanium cages and a dorsal approach for application of a transpedicular screw-rod system (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek). In 10 patients the chips were implanted ventrally within the cage. The other 10 patients obtained a dorsal intertransverse transplantation of the chips. Pre-operative, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery a clinical examination was performed, radiographs, and functional scores were obtained.

No implant associated side effects were noted. Especially, signs of infection or allergic reaction have not been observed. The harvest sites of all patients presented symptom-free after 3 months. The rate of consolidation was 60% after 6 months, 90% after 9 months, and 100% after 12 months. No clinical or radiological signs for implant failure or malpositioning were observed. 90% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery.

Cultured autologous periosteal cells are a suitable material for anterior as well as posterior spinal fusion in humans. They may accelerate the rate of fusion and reduce the risk of non-union. Rate and velocity of osseous consolidation need to be compared to that of patients treated with iliac crest autograft. A major advantage might be the lower rate of graft site morbidity.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the results with use of an oval cementless acetabular component for revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: 30 hips had an acetabular revision with an cementless oval acetabular component. No patient was lost to follow-up, but one died during the study period. All defects were classiþed during surgery according the AAOS classiþcation. All patients were evaluated radiographically and clinically and were followed for an average of thirty-six months (range, twenty four to fourty eight months). In 21 of the 30 hips no additional bone grafting was necessary. Results: There were 17 segmental defects (type 1), 12 combined defects (type III) and one case of pelvic discontinuity (type IV). At the time of follow-up, 27 (93.1%) of 29 cups were stable. One of the loosening affected the patient with pelvic discontinuity, the other a patient with a combined segmental defect including the medial wall. The average Harris Hip Score improved from 39 points (range: 15–73 points) preoperatively to 89 points (range 68–96 points) postoperatively. Complications included three dislocations without recurrency. The radiological follow-up examinations revealed good osteointegration of 27 implants. All postoperatively remaining defects were completly þlled in by bone at the follow up. Conclusion: The asymmetrical shape of the BOFOR enhanced the primary stabilty on the lateral columns with three point anchorage. We recommend this device when a patient has an oblong-shaped acetabular defect and the surgeon wants to correct an elevated hip center. However, the medial wall of the acetabulum (Kohlerñs line) should be intact.