In patients with bone sarcoma, placing mega prostheses in the proximal tibia is associated with high rates of infection. In studies with small numbers of patients and short follow-up periods, silver-coated mega prostheses have been reported to lead to reduced infection rates. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest one that has compared the infection rates with titanium versus silver-coated mega prostheses in patients treated for sarcomas in the proximal tibia. The infection rate in 98 patients with sarcoma or giant cell tumour in the proximal tibia who underwent placement of a titanium (n = 42) or silver-coated (n = 56) mega prosthesisAim
Method
Although the recurrence rate of giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) is relatively high exact data on treatment options for the recurrent cases is lacking. The possible surgical procedures range from repeated intralesional curettage to wide resection. 214 patients with histologically certified GCTB have been treated at the authors department from 1980 to 2007. 67 patients with at least one local recurrence were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 77.3 months. The data was evaluated according the re-recurrence rate with regard to the surgical procedure for the recurrence. The mean time until the first local recurrence was 22.0 months; the mean number of recurrences per patient was 1.4. The recurrence occurred in 69.7 % (46 out of 66 patients) within the first two years. If after intralesional procedures (curettage or intralesional resection) no adjunct was used the re-recurrence rate was 58.8 % (10 out of 17 patients) and decreased to 21.7 % (5 out of 23 patients) if a combination of all adjuncts (PMMA + burring) was used. The likelihood of re-recurrence was reduced by the factor 5.508 which was clearly significant (p = 0.016). In case of wide resection no re-recurrence occurred. Seven patients (10.5 %) developed pulmonary metastases. Fourteen patients (20.9 %) finally received an endoprosthesis; 12 due to tumor recurrence, 2 due to secondary arthritis. Recurrent GCTB can be treated by further curettage with additional burring and cementing with an acceptable re-recurrence rate of 21.7 %. The rate of patients finally needing an endoprosthesis is 20.9 %. Due to the high rate of pulmonary metastases recurrent GCTB may be considered as a severe disease.
A revision of a first generation KMFTR prosthesis due to stem breakage is a problem oncologic surgeons are regularly faced with. We designed an adapter which allows us to connect new MUTARS components to the original KMFTR devices. Thus it is possible to bypass an exchange of the whole prosthesis. We used this adapter in 10 patients. Time of revision was in average 16.6 years after primary implantation of the KMFTR prostheses. Reasons for revision were femoral stem breakage (n = 5), breakage of the tibial component (n = 3) and periprosthetic fracture (n = 2, one femoral, one tibial). The femoral stem (3 cases) and the tibial stem (2 cases) as well as the tibial plateau and body (2 cases) could be replaced by MUTARS parts and conjoined with the remaining KMFTR devices. Three cases were converted to MUTARS total femur. Postoperative complications were one aseptic loosening and one cone-dislocation. Pre-incidence function was restored in all cases. The average Musculoskeletal-Tumour-Society-Score was 82.9% of normal function. The results show that the new adapter facilitates to restore pre-incidental extremity function by performing a relatively modest revision.
