Ashford and St Peter's Hospital (ASPH) is a district general hospital in Chertsey, Surrey. It is a tertiary referral unit offering a circular frame service to manage complex trauma patients in the South East of England. This study analyses the patient pathway in 66 consecutive tertiary referrals from 2015–2020. All patients were managed with an Ilizarov frame for either a tibial plateau fracture or pilon fracture. The patient journey of 66 consecutive tertiary referrals for tibial plateau and pilon fractures were analysed. The following data was captured: patient demographics; type of injury; referring centre; date of injury; date of referral; date of arrival at ASPH; date of surgery and date of discharge. Using this data we aimed to identify areas of the pathway that can be improved. In addition, the 66 patients were split into two groups of 33 patients. 33 patients were referred via an electronic referral platform and 33 patients were referred verbally prior to the implementation of the electronic referral platform. The groups were compared to see the impact of an electronic referral platform on the patient's journey.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Proximal femoral fracture is a common, major health problem resulting in loss of functional independence and a high cost burden on society. Rehabilitation can potentially maximise functional recovery, but evidence of effectiveness is lacking. An enhanced rehabilitation intervention designed to improve self-efficacy and increase the amount and quality of practice of physical exercise and activities of daily living has been developed consisting of patient held workbooks and extra therapy sessions in the community. This study aims to define characteristics of the cohort of individuals this intervention is targeted to, assess acceptability of the intervention and feasibility of recruiting participants for a larger scale trial. An anonymous cohort study of all proximal femoral fracture patients admitted to three acute hospitals will provide details on residence pre-admission, type of fracture, type of surgery, adverse events and subsequent readmissions. A separate randomised feasibility study recruiting participants from this cohort will assess acceptability and feasibility of the study in terms of eligibility, recruitment, reasons for decline, retention and outcome measure completion. The success rate of identifying patients for the feasibility study and whether the recruited participants are representative of the cohort population will be evaluated by comparison of the feasibility participant screening and background data with that of the cohort.Background
Methods
This aim of this study was to identify common factors in patients with the shortest length of hospital stay following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This would then allow a means of targeting suitable patients to reduce their length of stay. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing primary THA at our institution between September 2013 and August 2014. Demographic data were collected from the patient record. The cohort was divided into those discharged to home within two days of operation and the rest of the THA population. The demographics (age, gender, ASA grade, body mass index (BMI), primary diagnosis, socioeconomic status (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, SIMD and SIMD health domain) were compared between groups. In addition for the early discharge group information on comorbidities, family support at home and independent transport were collected. The study cohort was 1292 patients. 119 patients were discharged home on the first post-operative day. Those discharged earlier were on average younger (p<0.0001), more likely to be male (p<0.0001) and had a lower ASA grade (p<0.00001). Other demographics did not differ between groups. Patients who were discharged early also appeared to have few comorbidities (Diabetes 5.9%, Cardiac disease 7.6%, Respiratory disease 9%), high levels of family support at home (95%) and high levels of independent transport arrangements (97%). Factors associated with those patients with the shortest lengths of stay were identified. Such factors could be used to target patients who are suitable for streamlined recovery programmes aimed at early discharge after THA and assist with service planning.
Health care is best delivered face to face, doctor to patient. However, in some places like Scotland, patients can be in remote areas, far from the nearest health care provider. Medical video conferencing (VC) enables patients and doctors to meet for consultations from wherever they may be without the need for travel, and is already used widely in countries like Australia and Canada. To do a pilot study of using the existing VC facility at our hospital for surgical pre-assessment of patients for elective foot/ankle and lower limb arthroplasty surgery. Methods- A prospective pilot study was performed at our hospital after approval from our ethics committee. Patient-records were vetted to include/exclude from the study and cases considered as “straightforward” were included. Two separate rooms with VC facility were set up in the orthopaedic outpatients, one with the patient and a trained physiotherapist, while the surgeon used the second room to discuss patient's complaints, do a physical examination, and discuss surgery where appropriate.Background-
Aim-
A tip-apex distance (TAD) greater than 25 mm is a strong predictor of screw cut-out in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). We aim to show you a simple and reliable way to check this. By calculating the sum of the distance from the tip of the screw to the apex of the femoral head on anteroposterior and lateral views the TAD is found. X-rays often have magnification errors and therefore measuring tools in digital x-ray systems will be inaccurate. The original method of calculating the TAD uses the known diameter of the screw to avoid magnification errors. We found that due to the no-cylindrical shape of the screw shaft there is potential of an inaccurate measurement. By using the distance across the highest points of the thread a more accurate TAD can be calculated. The distance across the highest points of the threads in all three of the most commonly used DHSs in the UK is 13 mm. If the measured distance from the tip of the screw to the apex of the femoral head in both the anteroposterior and lateral views is less than the measured distance across of the treaded diameter of the screw then the surgeon knows the TAD is less than 26 mm. This method can be used intraoperatively to check the TAD by looking at the fluoroscopy images in these two views.
Posterior soft tissue repair is often performed in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Many reports have shown the advantage of posterior soft tissue repair in reducing their prosthetic hip dislocation rates. We describe an easy and inexpensive way of passing sutures through small drill holes in the Greater Trocanter to re-attach muscle, tendon and capsule in a posterior soft tissue repair. By using a reversed monofilament suture on a straight needle held in artery forceps and passing this in a retrograde direction through a drill hole, a suture capturing device is produced. By capturing the long ends of sutures tied in the short external rotators and the posterior capsule of the hip through 2 drill holes in the Greater Trochanter, a posterior soft tissue repair can be performed. We have used this technique successfully in over 100 consecutive THAs. We conclude that the use of a monofilament suture used in the manner describe is an excellent and inexpensive way to aid in a posterior soft tissue repair in THAs. This is done without the cost of an additional dedicated suture passing device. The suture could also be used in the skin closure if desired.
Early failure of metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR) is now well established. We review 93 consecutive patients with CPT¯ stems MoM THR. Our series demonstrates a new mechanism of failure, which may be implant combination specific. Between January 2005 and June 2009, 93 consecutive MoM total hip replacements were preformed using CPT stems by 3 surgeons at our unit. 73 CPT¯ stems, Metasul¯ Large Diameter Heads (LDH) with Durom¯ acetabulae and 20 CPT¯ stems, Metasul¯ 28mm diameter heads in Allofit¯ shells (zimmer). Clinical outcomes were collected prospectively before surgery, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and at 5 years post surgery. Revision for any cause was taken as the primary endpoint and the roentgenograms and explanted prostheses were analyzed for failure patterns. In the LDH/Durom¯ group a total of 13 (18%) patients required revision (figs. 1) at a median of 35 months (range 6-44). 6 (8%) for periprosthetic fracture. All 6 periprostethic fractures were associated with minimal or no trauma and all had ALVAL identified histologically. To date there have been no failures in the CPT¯/28mm head Allofit¯ group. Several failures demonstrated bone loss in Gruen zones 8 ± 9 ± 10 (fig. 2). We demonstrate an unacceptably high rate of failure in CPT¯ MoM LDH hip replacements, with a high failure secondary to periprosthetic fracture and postulate a mechanism associated with local toxicity to metal ions. We strongly advise against this combination of prosthesis.
The Western Infirmary/Gartnavel General Hospital orthopaedic department is geographically located next to the Beatson Oncology Centre, a specialist regional oncology unit. Pathological femoral fractures are the commonest reason for surgical intervention in patients referred from the Beatson and we have used them as a model to establish the demographic data, referral patterns, treatment results, and survival characteristics in such a group of patients. We have collected prospective data for the last 4 years on referrals from patients under the care of oncology services.Introduction
Methods
With the advent of the advancement of manufacturing technologies hip resurfacing (HR) has become a serious option for a younger patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. The operation is technically demanding and correct placement of the femoral component is the critical step. We hypothesised that with computer navigation we can improve the placement of the femoral component and restore the biomechanics of the hip joint compared to currently available mechanical jigs. We compared the radiological results and operation time in 8 patients undergoing computer navigated hip resurfacings (cnHR) to 30 patients undergoing mechanical jig hip resurfacings (jigHR). Our results showed the average angle of the central pin in the femoral neck in the jigHR group was 141 degrees on the AP radiographs (range 131 to 154 degrees) and 6 degrees antevertion (range 0 to 8 degrees) on the lateral radiographs compared with 135 degrees (range 134 to 138 degrees)and 5 degrees (range 3 to 8 degrees)in the cnHR group. The position of the central pin in the neck immediately below the head was off-centre in the jigHR group on average by 4mm in both AP and lateral radiographs and never more than 2mm in the cnHR group in either view. Offset was increased on average 5mm in the jigHR group and decreased on average by 3mm in the cnHR group. The average operation time was 107 minutes in the jigHR group and 110 minutes in the cnHR group. We conclude that despite our relatively small sample group we have showed computer navigation gives consistent optimum positioning of the femoral component and improves the biomechanics of the hip. This was without increasing operating time.