Objectives

The surgical challenge with severe hindfoot injuries is one of technical feasibility, and whether the limb can be salvaged. There is an additional question of whether these injuries should be managed with limb salvage, or whether patients would achieve a greater quality of life with a transtibial amputation. This study aims to measure functional outcomes in military patients sustaining hindfoot fractures, and identify injury features associated with poor function.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to refine an accepted contaminated rat femur defect model to result in an infection rate of approximately 50%. This threshold will allow examination of treatments aimed at reducing infection in open fractures with less risk of type II error.

Blast and ballistic weapons used on the battlefield cause devastating injuries rarely seen outside armed conflict. These extremely high-energy injuries predominantly affect the limbs and are usually heavily contaminated with soil, foliage, clothing and even tissue from other casualties. Once life-threatening haemorrhage has been addressed, the military surgeon’s priority is to control infection.

Combining historical knowledge from previous conflicts with more recent experience has resulted in a systematic approach to these injuries. Urgent debridement of necrotic and severely contaminated tissue, irrigation and local and systemic antibiotics are the basis of management. These principles have resulted in successful healing of previously unsurvivable wounds. Healthy tissue must be retained for future reconstruction, vulnerable but viable tissue protected to allow survival and avascular tissue removed with all contamination.

While recent technological and scientific advances have offered some advantages, they must be judged in the context of a hard-won historical knowledge of these wounds. This approach is applicable to comparable civilian injury patterns. One of the few potential benefits of war is the associated improvement in our understanding of treating the severely injured; for this positive effect to be realised these experiences must be shared.

Hand injuries are common in military personnel deployed on Operations. We present an analysis of 6 years of isolated hand injuries from Afghanistan or Iraq. The AEROMED database was interrogated for all casualties with isolated hand injuries requiring repatriation between April 2003 and 2009. We excluded cases not returned to Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (RCDM). Of the 414 identified in the study period, 207 were not transferred to RCDM, 12 were incorrectly coded and 41 notes were unavailable. The remaining 154 notes were reviewed. 69% were from Iraq; only 14 % were battle injuries. 35% were crush injuries, 20% falls, 17% lacerations, 6% sport, 5% gun-shot wounds and 4% blast.

Injuries sustained were closed fractures (43%), open fractures (10%), simple wounds (17%), closed soft tissue injuries (8%) tendon division (7%), nerve division (3%), nerve/tendon division (3%) complex hand injuries (4%). 112 (73%) of the casualties required surgery. Of these 44 (40%) had surgery only in RCDM, 32 (28%) were operated on only in deployed medical facilities and 36 (32%) required surgery before and after repatriation. All 4 isolated nerve injuries were repaired at RCDM; 2 of the 4 cases with tendon and nerve transection were repaired before repatriation. Of the 10 tendon repairs performed prior to repatriation 5 were subsequently revised at RCDM.

This description of 6 years of isolated hand injuries in military personnel allows future planning to be focused on likely injuries and raises the issue of poor outcomes in tendon repairs performed on deployment.