The hip-shelf procedure is less often indicated since the introduction of peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO). Although this procedure does not modify pelvic shape, its influence on subsequent total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not known. We performed a case-control study comparing THA after hip-shelf surgery and THA in dysplastic hips to determine: 1) its influence on THA survival, 2) technical issues and complications related to the former procedure.

We performed a retrospective case-control study comparing 61 THA cases done after hip-shelf versus 63 THA in case-matched dysplastic hips (control group). The control group was matched according to sex, age, BMI, ASA and Charnley score, and bearing type. We compared survival and function (Harris, Oxford-12), complications at surgery, rate of bone graft at cup insertion, and post-operative complications.

The 13-year survival rates for any reason did not differ: 89% ± 3.2% in THA after hip shelf versus 83% ± 4.5% in the controls (p = 0.56). Functional scores were better in the control group (Harris 90 ± 10, Oxford 41/48) than in the hip-shelf group (Harris 84.7 ± 14.7, Oxford 39/48) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04). Operative time, bleeding and rate of acetabular bone grafting (1.6 hip-shelf versus 9.5 control) were not different (p > 0.05). Postoperative complication rates did not differ: one transient fibular nerve palsy and two dislocations (3.2%) in the hip-shelf group versus four dislocations in the control group (6.3%).

The hip-shelf procedure does not compromise the results of a subsequent THA in dysplastic hips. This procedure is simple and may keep its indications versus PAO in severely subluxed hips or in case of severe femoral head deformity.

Cementless distally locked stems were introduced in revision hip arthroplasty (RTHA) in the late 1980s to deal with severe femoral bone loss. These implants have not been assessed over the long-term, particularly the influence of the design and porous coating. Therefore we performed a retrospective case-control study at a minimum 10-years' follow-up comparing the straight Ultime™ stem with 1/3 porous coating versus the anatomical Linea™ stem with 2/3 proximal coating with hydroxyapatite.

We performed a single-center case-control study measuring survival, function based the Harris and Oxford-12 scores, and rate of thigh pain. X-rays were done at regular intervals and at follow-up. No femoral bone graft was used at insertion.

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex and follow-up (mean 12.2 years in Ultime and 10.8 years in Linea cohorts); however they differed in the severity of bone loss therefore the results were adjusted according to this variable. Ten-year survival considering revision for any reason was 63.5% ± 5.4 for Ultime and 91.6% ± 2.7 for Linea (p < 0.001). Merle d'Aubigné scores and Oxford-12 were higher in the Linea group 82.9 ± 12.4 and 26.3/48, respectively, versus 69.5 ± 16 and 21/48 in the Ultime group (p < 0.001). Thigh pain was observed in 30% of Ultime cases versus 3% of Linea cases. Bone reconstruction measured via cortical thickness was better in the Linea group and correlated to metaphyseal filling at insertion.

This study confirms the benefits of using of locked stems in RTHA with severe bone loss. Better metaphyseal filling and optimized porous coating help to minimize thigh pain and the revision rate.

Introduction

In valgus knees, ligament balance remain difficult when implanting a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), this leads some authors to systematically propose the use of constrained devices. Others prefer reserving higher constraints to cases where it is not possible to obtain final satisfactory balance: less than 5 of residual frontal laxity in extension in each compartment, and a tibiofemoral gap difference not in excess to 3mm between flexion and extension. The goal of the study was to assess if is possible to establish preoperative criteria that can predict a constrained design prosthetic implantation at surgery.

Purpose of the study: The objectives of this work were to assess the stability of outcome achieved after Duquennoy procedure to tighten the lateral capsule-ligament structures of the ankle joint. To do this, we reviewed the same series of patients at 3 and 25 years follow-up to analyse the very long-term stability, laxity, and stiffness of the ankle joint and any osteoarthritic degradation.

Material and methods: From 1975 to 1986, we performed 75 Duquennoy procedures on the lateral capsule and ligament structures of the ankle joint. At mean 25 years follow-up (2007) we were able to review 28 ankles (27 patients) with the same method as applied in 1980 (3 years follow-up). The function outcome was assessed with the Good, Karlsson, Duquennoy and Tegner scores. Clinically, other than joint range of motion, were noted varus laxity or anterior drawer. Static x-rays were obtained to search for signs of osteoarthritis and stress images to measure talocrural laxity, in comparison with the preoperative figures and the 1980 data.

Results: There were two early technique failures (one persistent talocrural instability, one subtalar instability). Good and Karlsson scores were good or excellent in 92% of cases. Patients were very satisfied with the operation and the VAS was 8.9/10. Pain and occasional instability were reported by 27% of patients. There was no talocrural no subtalar stiffness at last follow-up. Radiographic laxity declined significantly between the preoperative value and the last review. Only one patient presented a narrow talocrural space (less than 50% narrowing). Eight patients had osteophytes whose presence was not correlated with poor functional outcome. These osteophytes were also present on the controlateral side. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the mean function scores between 3 and 25 years follow-up (Duquennoy score). Similarly joint range of motion and radiographic laxity remained stable over time.

Discussion: The Duquennoy procedure to tighten the lateral capsule and ligament structures is a simple technique with rare complications which provides excellent results both in terms of ligament stability and in terms of preservation from degenerative osteoarthritis. These results remain stable over time. Conversely, the technique has no action on the subtalar joint and should not be proposed as treatment for associated subtalar laxity, if diagnosed.

Purpose of the study: Locked implants have yielded favourable results for femoral bone reconstruction for revision total hip arthroplasty, but defective integration has also been reported due to insufficient bioactive coating. The purpose of this work was to evaluate a locked pivot with a two-third proximal hydroxyapatite coating.

Material and methods: From 1996 to 2007, 158 femoral implants (Linea™) were implanted for hip arthroplasty revision. The 143 cases with more than one year follow-up were reviewed (14 deaths, 1 lost to follow-up); 83 revisions for aseptic loosening, 41 periprosthetic fractures, 19 revisions in an infected context. Patients were reviewed retrospectively by a non-operator observer. These were older patients (mean age 68 years, range 31–93) and 36 patients had complex situations requiring at least two prior prostheses; 25% had severe grade 3 or 4 (SOFCOT) bone lesions and 59% diaphyseal damage.

Results: Clinical improvement was significant, the Postel Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 7.7 + 4.3 (0–17) to 15.6 + 2.2 (8–18) at mean 50 months (14–131) (p< 0.001). At last follow-up, 14 patients (10%) reported thigh pain and only seven pivots (5%) had not achieved Engh osteointegration (five with thigh pain two without). There were no fractures. There was on non-union of the femorotomy. According to the Hoffman index, femoral bone regeneration was significant at the metaphyseal and diaphyseal levels. Eighteen of the 19 infections cured, all periprosthetic fractures healed. The implant survival was 88.9% at 91 months (65–96.7%). There were five pivot replacements for non integration and/or thigh pain which resolved in all cases; there were no other pivot replacements. The quality of the metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling was predictive of the quality of the bone fixation of the pivot (p< 0.01).

Discussion: Compared with older models of locked pivots, this implant reduced the rate of thigh pain while allowing constantly satisfactory bone reconstruction. The metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling index is the main factor predictive of clinical and radiological success by favouring osteointegration. Maximal filling, obtained with a full range of implant diameters and lengths, contributes to this good result.

Purpose of the study: Drilling along yields disappointing results for osteonecrosis of the femoral head due to the high failure rate despite prolonged rest and also because of the risk of fracture. To prevent these problems, we have developed a new drilling technique which was evaluated prospectively.

Material and methods: The procedure performed percutaneously uses a lateral cortical orifice measuring 5mm, non-concentrated autologous bone marrow was injected after drilling. Osteoinductive protein (BMP7) was associated in random fashion (groups BMP+ and BMP−). Ficat stage 1 and 2 necrosis was included. Outcome was the rate or revision for prosthesis.

Results: Forty hips (36 patients) were included and assessed at mean four years (range 2–6). The necrosis was related to: alcoholism (n=5), cortisone (n=25), barotraumas (n=2), metabolic disease (n=4), idiopathic condition (n=4). Group BMP- (drilling+bone marrow) included 24 hips and group BMP+ (drilling+bone marrow+BMP7) 16 hips. The groups were comparable regarding necrosis stage (15% stage 3, 65% stage 2, 20% stage 1) and mean Koo index (27 BMP+ vs 34 BMP-; NS). There were no infections and no fractures despite immediate and complete weight-bearing. The revision rate for prosthesis was higher in the BMP- group (67%) than in the BMP+ group (43%) but the difference did not reach significance (p=0.10). The failure rate was not affected by the severity of the necrosis in the BMP+ group: all stage 3 hips were revised in the BMP- group versus none in the BMP+ group. The only variable predictive of revision for prosthesis was the Koo index (p=0.02).

Discussion: Adjunction of BMP did not improve significantly the success rate of drilling with bone marrow adjunction but adding BMP appeared to limit the unfavourable impact of server necrosis observed in the BMP- group. To reach a statistical power of 80%, 40 cases would be needed in each arm. This threshold has not yet been reached. It can be noted however that the proposed method does ensures early weight bearing without the risk of complications. Similarly, since it is a percutaneous procedure, later arthroplasty is not compromised. The principle confounding factor, the richness of the bone marrow, was not assessed, motivating a new randomized trial with measurement of CFU-F.

Introduction: Leg length and offset restoration are known to improve function after total hip arthroplasty, and to minimize the risk of dislocation and limp. Anatomic data of the hip are needed to determine specifications for prosthesis design that restore patient hip anatomy more closely. Furthermore, femoral off-set values calculated on X-Rays may be inaccurate in case of external rotational contracture or high femoral ante-version. The goal of this study was to determine three-dimensional morphological data of the hip in case of primary osteoarthritis, especially for femoral off-set.

Material and Method: 223 hips with primary osteoarthritis have been analysed using a CT-scan and a specific software (HIP-PLAN^®) that allows image post-processing for re-orienting the pelvis or the femur to a standardized orientation. Femoral and acetabular anteversions were measured. The planar (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) values of femoral offset were determined. 3D values were measured as the distance between the femoral head centre and the diaphyseal femur axis; 2D values were calculated as the projection of this distance on the frontal plan.

Results: Measurements precision was good with correlation scores ranging between 0.91 and 0.99. Mean acetabular anteversion angle was 26° +/−6.6° when measured in the Anterior Pelvic Plane and 21.9° +/−6.6° in the frontal plane according to the method of Murray. Mean femoral anteversion was 21.9° +/−9.4 according to the method of Murphy. The Sum of acetabular and femoral anteversion was found to be out of the safe zone regarding dislocation risk in 47% of patients. Mean 3D femoral off-set was found to be 42.2 mm+/− 5, significantly increased by 3.5 mm +/− 2.5 when compared to the 2D femoral off-set values. Femoral off-set was above 45mm in 31% of cases and higher than 50 mm in 12% of cases. The tip of the great trochanter was located higher than the femoral head centre, at a mean distance of about 9 mm.

Discussion: When measured on X-rays, femoral off-set may be significantly under-estimated. This error is probably due to the external rotational contracture of the hip induced by osteoarthritis. If the implants are positioned using the anatomical preoperative anteversion angles, 47% of patients would not be in the safe zone regarding posterior dislocation risk.

Conclusions: Planar measurement using X-Rays underestimates significantly the femoral off-set. Neck and head modularity may be useful to achieve simultaneous restoration of femoral off-set and leg length in 12 to 31% of cases.

Purpose of the study: Two principle angles describe the orientation of the acetabular reconstruction of hip arthroplsty: lateral inclination and anteversion. Lateal inclination is easily determined on the plain x-ray but the measurement of anteversion generally requires axial computed tomography (CT). The values measured for acetabular anteversion depend on the planes chosen as reference. Similarly the measurement of acetabular inclination using conventional radiographs is often considered imprecise due to the large number of variables involved. Several reference planes are described in the literature. The purpose of this work was to characterise the values obtained using two reference planes, the anterior pelvic plan (APP) used for navigation and the pelvic axis (proposed by other authors).

Materials and Methods: We used the Hip-Plane-Sympios^® software to determine lateral inclination and anteversions using each reference plane. The APP was defined by three points: the anterosuperior border of the pubic symphysis, the anterior border of the two antero-superior iliac spines. The pelvic axis was defined by three points: the centre of the S1 plateau and the centres of the two femoral heads. A control reference plane (the plane of the CT table which corresponds to the conventional radiographic plane) was also used. Seventy-six patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were included in this protocol.

Results: Values measured for the APP were: mean acetabular inclination 52.5°± 4.1° (40–62°), mean acetabular anteversion 24.1°±5.8° (14–35°). Values measured for the pelvic axis were: mean acetabular inclination 47.6°± 4.5° (37–59°), mean acetabular anteversion 12.9°±7° (2–31°). In the plane of the CT table: mean acetabular inclination was 50.6°±4.2° (38–57°) and mean acetabular anteversion 20.2°±702° (1–40°). All of these values were significantly different from the others (p< 0.001). Use of the APP yields values higher than conventional values and those obtained using the pelvic axis, yet the distributions remained identical.

Discussion: The APP is used for total hip arthroplasty navigation systems. It is important to recognised that the angles measured in reference to this plane are greater than the classical radiographic values measured for acetabular inclination. The pelvic plane produces angles closer to the generally accepted anatomic values. Angles measured relative to the radiographic table are intermediary.

The use of two-dimensional plain X-rays for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty is unreliable. For example, in the presence of rotational hip contracture the lateral femoral off set can be significantly under-estimated. Pre-operative planning is of particular importance when using uncemented prostheses. The aim of this study was to determine the precision of a novel 3D CT-based preoperative planning methodology with the use of a cementless modular-neck femoral stem.

Pre-operative computerised 3D planning was performed using HIP-PLAN® software for 223 patients undergoing THA with a cement-less cup and cement-less modular-neck stem. Components were chosen that best restored leg length and lateral off set. Postoperative anatomy was assessed by CT-scan and compared to the pre-operative plan.

The implanted component was the same as the planned one in 86% of cases for the cup and 94% for the stem. There was no significant difference between the mean planned femoral anteversion (26.1° +/− 11.8) and the mean postoperative anteversion (26.9° +/− 14.1) (p=0.18), with good correlation between the two (coefficient 0.8). There was poor correlation, however, between the planned values and the actual post-operative values of acetabular cup anteversion (coefficient 0.17). The rotational centre of the hip was restored with a precision of 0.73mm +/3.5 horizontally and 1.2mm +/− 2 laterally. Limb length was restored with a precision of 0.3mm +/− 3.3 and femoral off set with a precision of 0.8mm +/− 3.1. There was no significant alteration in femoral off set (0.07mm, p=0.4) which was restored in 98% of cases. Almost all of the operative difficulties encountered were predicted pre-operatively.

The precision of the three-dimensional pre-operative planning methodology investigated in this study is higher than that reported in the literature using two-dimensional X-ray templating. Cup navigation may be a useful adjunct to increase the accuracy of cup positioning.