INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to report results from a prospective multicenter study of a bioresorbable type I collagen scaffold used to replace tissue loss following irreparable lateral meniscus injuries.

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to intra-operatively quantify the improvements in knee stability given both by anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and single-bundle with additional lateral plasty (SBLP) ACL reconstruction using a navigation system.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation and sub-luxation are common injuries. But few studies have compared arthroscopic and open stabilization of the shoulder at long-term follow up. The purpose of our study is to show whether an arthroscopic approach to repair Bankart lesion can obtain the same results at long follow up as an open procedure. We analyzed 110 non-randomized consecutive shoulders in 110 patients who underwent a surgical repair of recurrent anterior shoulder instability between 1990 and 1999. Eighty-two patients were available at long term follow up (74,5% retrieval rate). In particular, 49 patients (59.8%) (group A) were treated with arthroscopic transglenoid suture (modified Caspari) between 1990 and 1995 (mean 15,7 year FU), whereas, 33 patients (40.2%) (group B) were treated with open repair between 1995 and 1999 (mean 12,7 year FU). We evaluated the patients in terms of failure rates, Rowe and UCLA scores. The failure cases in the forty-nine patients treated with arthroscopic suture were 13, six dislocations and seven subluxations. The group A had also a Rowe score: function 24.2+8.2, stability 42.4+13.9, range of movement 18.6+3.8, total score 85.0+22.46. The UCLA score was: pain 8.8+1.7, function 8.6+2.1, muscle power 9.2+1.6, total score 26.4+4.8. Of the thirty-three patients treated with open repair, three had at least one post-op dislocations and four felt sometimes subluxations. The Rowe score in group B was: function 23.6+9.7, stability 41.2+14.9, range of movement 18.3+3.9, total score 83.2+24.4. Moreover the UCLA score was: pain 8.8+1.9, function 8.8+1.9, muscle power 9.2+1.2, total score 26.9+4.2. We showed that both techniques were fairly good in treatment of shoulder instability. In our series no significant difference was observed in redislocation rate and in Rowe and UCLA scores between the two groups. The recurrence rate (subluxations and dislocations) was high in both groups: the arthroscopic group had 26.5% and the open one had 21.2%. Our recurrence rate following open repair was higher than in many studies, while the rate after arthroscopic transglenoid procedure was almost equivalent. We hypothesize that one of the reasons for these higher recurrence rates may be the long term follow up. Another cause could be our decision to include subluxation as a failure value, even if there is no agreement about. In fact we believe it to be an important disability factor in sport as in life activities. After surgery, most of the patients returned to their preinjuried activities. But at long term follow up almost all patients have stopped high level sport activity. Moreover, at this long term follow up, some patients told us a feeling of muscle weakness in the last years. In conclusion patients had good impressions about their shoulders thanks to surgery, but also because of lower functional demand.

We performed a clinical, instrumental and radiographic study on a highly homogeneous series of 100 consecutive patients with unilateral ACL lesion at 7 years of minimum follow up, alternatively assigned to a single bundle reconstruction using patellar tendon (PT) or to a double bundle reconstruction using hamstrings (DB). Mean Tegner score was 4,8 for PT and 6,5 for DB (p=0,0005). Time for sport resumption was 6,6 months for PT and 3,8 months for DB (p=0,0052). There were no significative differences between the two groups regarding range of motion and functional subjective self-evaluation. Mean anterior displacement at instrumental evaluation performed with KT2000 showed no significative differences between the two groups. Objective clinical evaluation with IKDC was superior for DB group (A=86,5%; B=13,5%) respect to PT group (A=18,7%; B=75%; C=6,3%) (p< 0,0001). We found no differences regarding anterior knee pain between and Ahlback radiographic score the two groups and we have observed no recurrence of instability after surgical treatment. Double bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings has showed higher results respect to single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon in terms of Tegner score, IKDC, time for sport resumption.

We performed a retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 100 cases operated in our institute between February 1996 and March 2003 with a mean follow-up of 60 months to assess the efficiency of UKR performed with a new minimally invasive technique. The aim of this study is to correlate the clinical outcome of the patients with the pre- and post-op alignment, and with implant positioning on coronal and sagittal plane.

100 patients (23 ♂, 64 ♀) underwent cemented UKR (De Puy Preservation Uni with all poly tibial component), both for arthritis and osteonecrosis. At the pre-op clinical and radiographic evaluation, 82 patients presented a varus deformity, 5 patients a valgus deformity. The Hospital for Special Surgery Score (HSS) was used to determine the subjective and objective clinical status of the patients before and after the intervention.

Pre-op antero-posterior (AP) x-rays of the knee were executed to establish the femoro-tibial angle (FTA) and the angle between the affected tibial plateau and the tibial anatomical axis (PTA), while latero-lateral (LL) x-rays were performed to determine the posterior tibial slope (PS). To analyze ligamentous balancing, x-rays were performed both in supine and in plain weight bearing stance. Post-op, we performed supine AP e LL X-rays and at a mean follow-up of sixty months (12–84 months) we performed AP and LL plain weight bearing x-rays.

We considered a knee with FTA > 175° as varus knee, 170°< FTA< 175° as normal knee and an FTA < 170° as valgus knee. Moreover, we assumed a TPA > 90° for valgus knee and a TPA< 90° for varus knee.

According with HSS scoring system, at a mean follow-up of 60 months, 63 (76%) cases were excellent (100-85 points), 15 (18%) cases were good (84-70 points), 5 (6%) bad results (< 60 points). Our results demonstrate that patients with a pre-operative varus alignment of 7 degrees are slightly more likely to be selected for UKR. In our series, patients with an excellent clinical result presented pre-operatively a mean varus deformity of 7,9°. According to literature, we demonstrated that a small amount of undercorrection with a residual varus deformity of 3–5° is the goal to be reached in order to avoid both rapid degeneration of the non-replaced compartment as well as the premature loosening of the replaced compartment. We performed a mean axial correction of 5,1° leaving a mean axial varus deformity of 2,8° in the excellent group. In our series the group with excellent results also showed a post-operative PTS of 7,1°, while mean pre-operative PTS was 6,6°. Moreover, the further our radiographic findings were from the optimal position suggested, the worst were the results : a decrease was evident comparing excellent group with good group and this was even more marked comparing excellent group with bad results group.