ACL RECONSTRUCTION: PATELLAR TENDON VS DOUBLE BUNDLE ST/G: CLINICAL, INSTRUMENTAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY AT MINIMUM FOLLOW UP OF 7 YEARS

Abstract

We performed a clinical, instrumental and radiographic study on a highly homogeneous series of 100 consecutive patients with unilateral ACL lesion at 7 years of minimum follow up, alternatively assigned to a single bundle reconstruction using patellar tendon (PT) or to a double bundle reconstruction using hamstrings (DB). Mean Tegner score was 4,8 for PT and 6,5 for DB (p=0,0005). Time for sport resumption was 6,6 months for PT and 3,8 months for DB (p=0,0052). There were no significative differences between the two groups regarding range of motion and functional subjective self-evaluation. Mean anterior displacement at instrumental evaluation performed with KT2000 showed no significative differences between the two groups. Objective clinical evaluation with IKDC was superior for DB group (A=86,5%; B=13,5%) respect to PT group (A=18,7%; B=75%; C=6,3%) (p< 0,0001). We found no differences regarding anterior knee pain between and Ahlback radiographic score the two groups and we have observed no recurrence of instability after surgical treatment. Double bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings has showed higher results respect to single bundle ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon in terms of Tegner score, IKDC, time for sport resumption.