Magnesium calcium alloys are promising candidates for an application as biodegradable osteosynthesis implants [1,2]. As the success of most internal fracture fixation techniques relies on safe anchorage of bone screws, there is necessity to investigate the holding power of biodegradable magnesium calcium alloy screws. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the holding power of magnesium calcium alloy screws and commonly used surgical steel screws, as a control, by pull-out testing. Magnesium calcium alloy screws with 0.8wt% calcium (MgCa0.8) and conventional surgical steel screws (S316L) of identical geometries (major diameter 4mm, core diameter 3mm, thread pitch 1mm) were implanted into both tibiae of 40 rabbits. The screws were placed into the lateral tibial cortex just proximal of the fibula insertion and tightened with a manual torque gauge (15cNm). For intended pull-out tests a 1.5mm thick silicone washer served as spacer between bone and screw head. Six animals with MgCa0.8 and four animals with S316L were followed up for 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks, respectively. Thereafter the rabbits were sacrificed. Both tibiae were explanted, adherent soft tissue and new bone was carefully dissected around the screw head. Pull-out tests were carried out with an MTS 858 MiniBionix at a rate of 0.1mm/sec until failure of the screw or the bone. For each trial the maximum pull-out force [N] was determined. Statistical analysis was performed (ANOVA, Student's t-test). Both implant materials were tolerated well. Radiographically, new bone was detected at the implantation site of MgCa0.8 and S316L, which was carefully removed to perform pull-out trials. Furthermore, periimplant accumulations of gas were radiographically detected in MgCa0.8. The pull-out force of MgCa0.8 and S316L did not significantly differ (p = 0.121) after two weeks. From 6 weeks on the pull-out force of MgCa0.8 decreased resulting in significantly lower pull-out values after 8 weeks. Contrary, S316L pull-out force increased throughout the follow up. Thus, S316L showed significantly higher pull-out values than MgCa0.8 after 4, 6 and 8 weeks (p<0.001). MgCa0.8 showed good biocompatibility and pull-out values comparable to S316L in the first weeks of implantation. Thus, its application as biodegradable osteosynthesis implant is conceivable. Further studies are necessary to investigate whether the reduced holding power of MgCa0.8 is sufficient for secure fracture fixation. In addition, not only solitary screws, but also screw-plate-combinations should be examined over a longer time period. The study is part of the collaborative research centre 599 funded by the German Research Foundation.Acknowledgements
Degradable implants made of magnesium alloys as osteosynthesis material for weight-bearing bone are at present a main research area. With regards to biocompatibility, a MA with 0.8 wt. % Calcium (MgCa(0.8)) has been shown to possess advantageous qualities. Long-term investigations in animal models however, showed that the degradation rate of this magnesium alloy was relatively rapid and therefore the mechanical properties decreased early during the implantation period. An implant for osteosynthesis in weight-bearing bones however needs to exhibit adequate stability during the first few weeks of fracture healing. This cannot sufficiently be assured by the MgCa(0.8) alloy. It has been suggested in the literature, that the degradation rate of MA could be reduced using a fluoride coating. Therefore it was the aim of this study to investigate, whether the coating of degradable MA MgCa(0.8) implants with magnesium fluoride layer leads to decreased degradation rate and in consequence to an improvement of the mechanical properties using an animal model. Extruded pins (2.5 mm x 25 mm) of MgCa(0.8) were produced. Twenty of these pins were coated with a fluoride layer by submerging the implants in a bath with 40% hydrofluoric acid. With this procedure, the pins were covered with a thin (150–200μm thickness) MgF2 layer. Coated and uncoated pins were intramedullary implanted into both tibiae of ten New Zealand White Rabbits. Three and six months after surgery five animals of each group were euthanized and the tibiae were explanted for further analysis. Micro-computed tomography (μCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed of the explanted pins. In order to investigate changes of the mechanical properties, 3-point bending tests were carried out with MgCa(0.8) pins at the initial state and with the explanted pins, with and without the fluoride layer at both times. In addition, the mass loss of the pins was determined. To evaluate the degradation process of the MgCa(0.8) pins with the MgF2 layer, micrographs and element analyses (EDX) were accomplished after the three point bending tests. During the investigation period, the rabbits showed no signs of lameness or pain. The MgCa(0.8) alloy and the MgCa(0.8) alloy with the MgF2 layer showed significant differences regarding the mechanical properties in dependence of the implantation duration. Generally, the mechanical resistance decreases with increasing implantation time. The 3-point bending test showed, that the values of maximal force of the coated MgCa(0.8) implants after three month implantation duration were lower than those of the uncoated implants. After an implantation duration of six months, the values of maximal force of the implants coated with MgF2 were higher than those of the uncoated implants. Regarding the implant mass, the coated and uncoated MgCa(0.8) implants showed a loss of mass during the implantation period. The mass loss of the coated implants was only slightly lower. This difference was minor after three months and more obviously after six months. With μCT new endosteal bone formation could be seen close to all implants. A decrease of the cross section dimension could be demonstrated with μCT and SEM and changes of the surfaces due to pitting corrosion could be demonstrated in both the coated and uncoated MgCa(0.8) implants on the whole length, which was more obvious after six months. The micrographs showed corroded surfaces but not preferred corrosion on the grain boundaries. The element analysis showed a degradation layer on the implant surface, which was more bulky on implants after six month implantation duration. The mapping shows, that the fluoride molecules are clearly visible after three and six months around the margin of the implant. With the results of this study it could be demonstrated, that the coating of the MgCa(0.8) implants with a flouride layer did not have a positive influence on the mechanical properties and the degradation rate of the implant in the bone. This leads to the conclusion that MgF2-coated MgCa(0.8) implants are also not suitable for osteosynthesis in weightbearing bones.
and the tibia is commonly used for investigations of fracture repair with different implant materials Occurring forces in the animal model are of fundamental interest for the development of degradable bone implants to prevent implant failure. Therefore, a new method for the direct measurement of forces in the rabbit tibia was developed. The aim of this study was to determine maximal forces during weight bearing in the rabbit for future implementation into FEM-simulation.
We report our 4 years’ experience using of demineralized human bone matrix (DBM) in the treatment of complex pathology characterised by bone loss or less regenerating ability, such as congenital or secondary bone mal-union, osteomyelitis, aseptic prosthetic failure, complex bone loss fractures, etc. Considering the known limitations of autologous transplants (limited quantity, infections and fractures of donor sites, operative and bleeding time increase, abdominal herniations, etc.), we have searched in the literature for alternative materials that would be as similar to the osteoconduction and osteoinduction ability of autologous transplant as possible, respecting bio- and immunocompatiblity. Since May 2000 we have used DBM in 50 cases: the first 15 patients with mixed technique (DBM and autologous transplant) and then the other 35 only with DBM. We have controlled each patient clinically and by X-ray: average follow up 34 months. With the same type of pathology and operative technique we have observed a similar recovery with both techniques (DBM with or without autologous transplant); in addition, in patients treated with rigid osteo-synthesis or in patients with osteoporosis we have noted early bone regeneration and no complications with respect to rejection or to osteolysis at the surgical site. In our opinion, this confirms the good osteoconduction and osteoinduction ability of DBM.