Many orthopedic departments provide their patients with implant-specific identification cards. These cards should assist patients in various security checks and while undergoing revision surgery, especially if performed far from the primary hospital. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate patients’ use of these cards. In our department, each arthroplasty patient receives an implant-specific identification card. A phone survey was conducted among two groups of consecutive patients who underwent a lower limb arthroplasty – first group consisted of 108 patients operated a year earlier and second – 120 patients operated 3 years earlier. In the first group, 97 patients (90%) replied and in the second group – 83 patients (69%). The patients were asked the following: whether they received the card, where they keep it, what do they know about its purposes, and have they used the card for security or medical reasons. 17 patients (18%) in one-year group and 18 patients (22%) in three-years group didn’t remember the card. The rest of the patients knew the location of the card, but most of them (80% in one-year group and 72%in three-years group) knew only about the security usage of the card and not about the medical one. Many patients complained that they were not given adequate explanations about the card. Implant-specific identification cards have significant value for arthroplasty patients. However, patients use them mostly for security checks. The medical usage of this card should be explained when they receive it, so the patients can assist their surgeons while performing a revision surgery.
An additional telephone survey was conducted 6–8 weeks after the first conversation to assess the influence of the intervention.
Osteoporosis is a very common disease in the elderly, generally undertreated. Hip fracture is often the first clinical painful symptom of osteoporosis. It would seem that hip fracture should be a good opportunity to convince the patient of the importance of osteoporosis treatment. We conducted this study to check whether a simple intervention improved the compliance of osteoporosis treatment. 100 consecutive elderly patients with osteoporotic hip fracture received, during postoperative hospital stay, a 5–10 minutes long explanation about osteoporosis, its sequelae, treatment options and their effectiveness in further fracture prevention. Patients received an explanatory brochure and a letter to family physician that included a recent article on fracture rate reduction with osteoporosis treatment. Compliance was examined by telephone survey 3 and 6 months postoperatively. 100 consecutive patients with similar demographic characteristics who were treated for hip fracture prior to intervention served as a historical control. All patients received a recommendation for osteoporosis treatment in the discharge letter. At follow up, 40% of patients in the study group were receiving biphosphonates, as opposed to 20% in the control group (p<
0.01). 77% of control patients received no treatment for osteoporosis compared to 37% of patients after intervention (p<
0.01). Giving the patient a short explanation about osteoporosis combined with a letter to family physician, resulted in a significant improvement in their compliance The orthopaedic surgeon, who treats the patient at the first painful symptom of osteoporosis, has an excellent opportunity to improve patient’s understanding of the disease and her or his compliance to treatment.
Three dimensional imaging tool for early detection and follow up of the osteolytic cysts is needed. The conventional CT incorporates streak artifacts around metallic implants that make the interpretation of the images extremely unreliable. We report our preliminary experience with new 16-slice CT techniques that improve the diagnosis of osteolysis.
We present our experience with 40 infected total knee arthroplasties that were treated in our department during the last 10 years. Three patients suffered from early postoperative infection and were treated by debridement and antibiotic therapy with complete cure. 25 patients had chronic infection with loosening. 17 patients were treated by two-stage revision, six were treated by arthrodesis and in three patients excision arthroplasty was performed due to general poor conditions. 12 patients had late acute hematogenous infection and nine of them underwent debridement, either open or arthroscopic, and antibiotic therapy. Overall, 90% of the patients had no clinical, radiological or laboratory evidence of infection.
Antibiotic treatment and second stage revision surgery were followed successfully.
In all three cases consumption of unpasteurized dairy products was documented. All three patients had serum brucella antibody titer of 1:1600.
The fractures in need of reduction and fixation of the plateau fracture involve raising the depressed articular fragment, the possible addition of bone graft augmentation and buttressing of the osteochondral fragment with a plate. These buttress plates may hold the cortical rim of the plateau but many times fail in maintaining the reduction of the intra-articular surface of the plateau. This again results in degenerative changes in the joint and pain. Internal fixation of these fractures with small fragment plates may be a solution to this problem, as demonstrated by the 5 presented cases treated operatively. The plates are smaller in size and are held by more screws, which are more proximal to the articular surface. This way they allow better control and maintenance of the anatomic reduction and in combination with an a-traumatic dissection and less stress shielding effect, result in a low rate of local complications.
We tested the hypothesis that it is possible to accelerate fracture healing by changing the mechanical environment used in current methods i.e., from initial rigidity or micromovement followed by dynamisation to initial macromovement followed by rigidity (micro-movement). It is accepted that callus formation requires movement at the fracture site and this callus response is limited to the first few weeks after fracture. Logically, early macromovement at the fracture site would be beneficial for callus formation. Additional callus is not produced by further movement. Indeed, it may be counter-productive, just as continuing movement around two ends of a wooden stick bonded with glue will retard and even prevent “union”. We postulate that continuing movement at the fracture site after the callus response has ceased will also delay union. As a result, rigidity rather than dynamisation is required in the later stage of fracture healing. After testing an animal model, we built an external fixator which allowed 5 mm of axial movement without “self-locking” and could be compressed at a later date in order to prevent further movement. A trial containing 15 patients with unilateral tibial shaft fractures (closed or grade 1 open) was undertaken after permission was obtained from the Helsinki Ethical Committee. So far, 13 patients have been entered into the trial. They have completed therapy and are at least one year post-fracture (12 months to 22 months). Age range is from 20 to 49. The group is composed of nine males and one female. Under general anaesthetic, an external fixator was applied and the fracture reduced. The patients started ankle exercises (active and passive) the following day, with as much weight-bearing on the fractured leg as possible on the day after. The patients were seen every two weeks and AP and lateral radiographs were taken. The fracture was compressed two to six weeks later. The percentage of body weight that the patient was able to tolerate through the fractured limb was measured by using the scales of Meggit’s step test. The fixators were removed when there was radiographic union and the patient could take at least 80% of body weight through the fractured limb. Mean time duration up to removal of the fixator was 10.8 weeks (range 7 to 15.4 weeks). We conclude that it is possible to increase the speed of bone healing by changing the mechanical environment to initial macromovement followed by elimination of movement.