Prognostic stratification of patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma may improve the clinical management and the design of clinical trials.

Data from 773 patients [median age 15 years (3-40)] treated at our Institute from 1983 to 2000 with high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) were analyzed. After multivariate analysis including age, site, tumour volume (cut-off 200 mL), serum LDH and Alkaline Phosphatase (SAP), histology (osteoblastic and chondroblastic vs others), high LDH and SAP, osteoblastic and chondroblastic histotypes resulted independent prognostic factors of DFS.

Patients were grouped according to a score from 0 (absence) to 3 (one to 3 adverse factors). The scoring system was implemented by the addition of PgP expression and grade of chemotherapy-induced necrosis.

A score of 0, 1, 2, 3 was given to 14%, 38%, 32% and 16% of patients respectively.10-year DFS was 80% (95%CI 72-89) for score of 0, 58% (95%CI 52-64) for 1, 53% (95%CI 46-59) for 2 and 40% (95%CI 32-50) for 3 (p= 0.001). PgP expression (168 patients) identified patients with 100% probability of DFS (score of 0 and negative PgP) and patients with 18% (95%CI 52-64) DFS (score of 3 and positive PgP).

Good (GR) and poor responder (PR) patients had the same probability of DFS in case of score of 0 [GR82% (95% CI 72-91), PR79% (95% CI 65-93)] and score of 3 [GR43% (95% CI 32-55) PR36% (95% CI 21-51)]. Different probability of DFS in case of score of 1 [GR64% (95% CI 57-72) PR47% (95% CI 36-59)] and score of 2 [GR63% (95% CI 55-71) PR36% (95% CI 21-51)].

It is possible to stratify outcomes of patients with non metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity by means of a simple score based on easily available clinical parameters. This scoring system is worth to be validated on larger series.

Prolonged survival have been reached in the last two decades in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma due to combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

We report the analysis of 493 patients treated according to 4 different protocols in 23 years (Jan1983- Dec 2006).Aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of late toxicities as Second Malignant Neoplasms (SMN), Cardiomyopathies and sterility.

Methods: We reviewed our database to find out all those patients aged from 1 to 40 yrs with localized Ewing’s sarcoma who were treated with chemotherapy according to 4 different protocols from 1983 to December 2006. Data were updated at Dec 2008

Results: 493 patients had adequate follow up and meet the eligibility criteria. Median age was 16 yrs (1–40) female/male: 183/310.Median overall survival 69 ms (4–302).220 patients died and 273 are alive. 44 pts received HDCT + PBSCR.Eleven SMN were found : 2 AMLeukemia, 2 parotid adenocarcinoma, 1 melanoma, 1 thyroid cancer and 5 radioinduced osteosarcoma. The interval between Ewing’s sarcoma diagnosis and leukaemia diagnosis was shorter then interval between Ewing’s sarcoma and RT osteosarcoma. Six patients reported a Cardiomyopathy : in 4 cases it was mild and pts are well compensated,2 patients needed heart transplant,. One of these two pts received also a kidney transplant due to chronic renal failure due to previous chemotherapy. Fertility: 17 women became pregnant after chemotherapy, 20 women experienced postTx amenorrea: 7 pts received RT in pelvic area, 9 did HDCT, 3 pts were over 30 yrs old. 9 male became father. 8 male patients did sperm analysis 3 azospermia, 4 oligospermia and 1 normal sperm count. No congenital abnormalities in offsprings were reported.

Conclusions: In this casuistic the Cumulative Risk to have a SMN at 5 yrs is 1.8% and 2.9% at 10 yr. The SMN cumulative incidence in Ewing’s sarcoma seems to be lower then in our previous casistic in osteosarcoma patients (ASCO 2006).

Introduction: The role of surgery for local control in the multimodal management of Ewing’s sarcoma has substantially increased during the past 20 years. However, selection bias due to location (extremities vs axial skeleton) and relatively non-homogeneous treatment received by patients in multi-institutional trials may limit objective evaluation and comparison of the relative role of surgery and radiation therapy in this setting. Purpose of this study was to review a large series of patients homogeneously treated at a single institution.

Methods: 268 patients with non-metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma of the extremities treated by contemporary multimodal management were reviewed. Chemotherapy was administered according to 4 sequential protocols of adjuvant (1) and neoadjuvant (3) treatment. Local control consisted of surgery in 136 patients, surgery and radiation therapy in 70 patients, and radiation therapy in 60 patients. Two patients underwent only chemotherapy.

Results: The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 62 and 69 per cent respectively. The rates of 5-year EFS and local control were significantly lower in patients treated with radiation therapy compared to patients treated by surgery or surgery and radiation therapy (48 vs 66 per cent, p=0.002; 80 vs 94 per cent, p= 0,0001). In group 3 (Radiation Therapy only) there were also 6 secondary malignancies.

Conclusion: Surgery was associated with better survival and local control in this series. In our opinion, surgery should always be considered in the local treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma of the extremities. Postoperative Radiation Therapy must be added in cases of inadequate surgical margins.