There is a need for non-radiographic, objective outcome measures for children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Standing balance and stability is altered in children with AIS. The Margin of Stability (MoS) has been used to compare gait stability in clinical populations. Our objective was to compare the MoS in anterior-posterior (MoSAP) and mediolateral (MoSML) directions in girls with AIS to Controls. Girls with AIS and healthy girls walked at three speeds on an instrumented treadmill wearing retroreflective markers, surrounded by motion capture cameras. The MoSAP/ML was calculated at left and right heel strike. Data was processed in Visual 3D. A two-way ANOVA was used to compare MoSAP/ML between group, speed and the interaction between group and speed. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to compare the MoS to Cobb angle. Statistical significance was accepted when A priori power analysis suggested 12 participants per group. Three Cases and four Controls were recruited. Girls with AIS all had right-sided main thoracic curves (Lenke type 1a, 61.3° ± 10.0°). MoSAP was significantly bigger for Cases compared to Controls on the left ( Girls with Lenke type 1a AIS are more stable in the AP direction and less stable in the ML direction than Controls during treadmill walking. AP stability increases and ML stability decreases with increasing Cobb angle. This research suggests that the MoS could be used as an outcome measure for children with AIS. Continued work is required to increase the power of this study. Further work could consider these changes during walking overground, measuring an MoS or MoS-like measure using a wearable device, and in different curve types.
We propose a simple classification for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) based on two components which include the curve type and shoulder level and suggest a treatment algorithm for AIS. Few Classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have helped in communicating, understanding and selecting a treatment for this condition; however, most of these classifications are complex and include many subtypes, making it difficult for the orthopaedic surgeon to use them in clinical practice. The variable reliability and reproducibility of these studies make recommendations and comparisons between various operative treatments a difficult task. Furthermore, none of these classifications has taken the shoulder imbalance into account, despite its importance as a clinical parameter and outcome measure.Purpose of the study
Introduction