In order to define the optimum timing of surgery for a hip fracture, we undertook a systematic review of all previously published studies on this topic. Data from the retrieved studies were extracted by two independent reviews and the methodology of each study assessed. In total, 43 studies involving 265,137 patients were identified. Outcomes considered were mortality, post-operative complications, length of hospital stay and return of patients back home. There were no randomised trials on this topic. Six studies of 8535 patients have the most appropriate methodology, which was prospective collection of data with adjustment for confounding variables. These studies found no effect on mortality for any delays in surgery. One of these studies found fewer complications for those operated on early but this was not found in the other study to report on these outcomes. Two of these studies reported on hospital stay, which was reduced for those operated on early. Six studies of 229,418 patients were retrospective reviews of patient administration databases with an attempt at adjusting for confounding factors. They reported a reduced mortality, hospital stay and complications for those operated on early. Thirty-one other studies of variable methodology reported similar findings of reduced complications with early surgery, apart from one study of 399 patients which reported an increased mortality and morbidity for those operated on within 24 hours of admission. In conclusion those studies with more careful methodology were less likely to report a beneficial effect of early surgery, particularly in relation to mortality. But early surgery (within 48 hours of admission) does seem to reduce complications such as pressure sores and reduces hospital stay.
Approximately one third of our patients survived between 1 to 4 years and another third survived between 5 to 10 years with one patient surviving over 10 years with nearly returning to their pre-injury status. We suggest that satisfactory post operative function is achievable with either internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty. We conclude that these fractures should be treated with the same urgency and expertise as similar fractures in non-amputees as long term survival and good quality of life can be expected.
Meta analysis of the available data was done to address two main areas of concern with regards to treatment: Reduction and the timing of treatment.
Hip fractures are one of the leading causes of morbidity in the elderly population. A large reduction in morbidity can be achieved if these individuals can have definitive treatment rapidly. However, this is not always achievable to a multi factorial host of contributing factors. Therefore, to enable us to understand some aspect of why these delays, if any occur, the following study was undertaken. The purpose of the study is to relate the place at which the patient fell, to the time of day for admission to casualty. This will enable us to ascertain whether there is a relationship between the location of injury and the time taken to admission into hospital; if there is such a correlation, then it will enable us to identify factors which will expedite an individuals attendance to hospital.
The mean Oxford Knee Society ratings was 52 (range 47–55; SD, 3.18) preoperatively, and 19 (range 14–24; SD, 3.72) at final follow up. The pre op mean range motion was 84.28° (range 45°–120°; SD 21.73). At final follow up the average range of motion was 107.5° (range 95°–120°; SD 8.93). Accord There were no clinical failures or cases of postoperative instability and no cases of radiographic loosening or wear.
It is common practice in wrist arthroscopy to suspend the patient’s arm using Chinese finger traps and to distract the wrist joint by applying weight to the arm at the elbow. It is possible that this may cause significant pressure to be applied to the fingers, and potentially damage the digital nerves. We examined the pressure applied by finger traps and consider the risk this poses to the digital nerves. Standard finger traps were suspended from a spring balance and the author’s fingers inserted along with a length of rubber tubing. The tubing was filled with saline and connected to a digital compartment pressure monitor. The hanging mass was gradually increased and the pressure in the rubber tubing noted. This pressure was taken as analogous to the pressure affecting the neurovascular bundle. Pressure increases linearly with increasing mass. A pressure of 500mmHg has been suggested as necessary to cause nerve injury1. Using non-invasive technique it was not possible to accurately measure the absolute pressure acting on the digital nerves. However the increase in pressure was noted. Using weight to distract the wrist during arthroscopy has potential to cause nerve injury. We suggest that pressure insufflation combined with Chinese finger traps with minimum weight traction provides a more than satisfactory view at wrist arthroscopy and can avoid potential digital nerve injury. However traction through finger traps for other purposes such as fracture reduction may be used with caution.
In order to define the optimum timing of surgery for a hip fracture, we undertook a systematic review of all previously published studies on this topic. Data from the retrieved studies was extracted by two independent reviews and the methodology of each study assessed. In total, 43 studies involving 265137 patients were identified. Outcomes considered were mortality, post-operative complications, length of hospital stay and return of patients back home. There were no randomised trials on this topic. Six studies of 8535 patients have the most appropriate methodology, which was prospective collection of data with adjustment for confounding variables. These studies found no effect on mortality for any delays in surgery. One of these studies found fewer complications for those operated on early but this was not found in the other study to report on these outcomes. Two of these studies reported on hospital stay, which was reduced for those operated on early. Six studies of 229418 patients were retrospective reviews of patient administration databases with an attempt at adjusting for confounding factors. They reported a reduce mortality, hospital stay and complications for those operated on early. Thirty-one other studies of variable methodology reported similar findings of reduced complications with early surgery apart from one study of 399 patients, which reported an increased mortality and morbidity for those operated on within 24 hours of admission. In conclusion those studies with more careful methodology were less likely to report a beneficial effect of early surgery, particularly in relation to mortality. But early surgery (within 48 hours of admission) does seem to reduce complications such as pressure sores and reduces hospital stay.