Abstract
Introduction: The optimal treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains controversial.
Material and Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomised trials comparing interventions for treating patients with calcaneal fractures. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality, using a 12-item scale, and extracted data. Where appropriate results were pooled.
Results: Six trials met the inclusion criteria. Two reports reported on the same group of patients at differing follow-up intervals. All six included trials had methodological flaws. Another two trials are ongoing. Four trials (134 patients) compared open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with non-operative management. Pooled results showed no difference in residual pain (24/40 versus 24/42; OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.36), but a lower proportion of the operative group was unable to return to the same work (11/45 vs 23/45; OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.71), and was unable to wear the same shoes as before (12/52 vs 24/54; OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.84). One large-scale study showed that the outcomes (SF-36, visual analogue scale (VAS), Bohler’s angle) after non-operative treatment were not different to those after ORIF. ORIF gave superior results for return to work, return to normal activities and ability to wear the same shoes. The subtalar fusion rate was reduced after ORIF. Excluding patients receiving Workers’ Compensation, the outcomes were significantly better in some groups of surgically treated patients. One trial (23 patients), evaluated impulse compression therapy. At one year there was a mean difference of 1.40 pain VAS units (95% CI 0.02 to 2.82) in favour of the treated group. The impulse compression group had greater subtalar movement at three months, and patients returned to work three months earlier.
Conclusions: The relatively poor quality of existing trials means that current evidence is only tentative. It remains unclear whether the possible advantages of surgery are worth its risks.
Correspondence should be addressed to A.H.N. Robinson, BOX 37, Department of Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge. CB2 0QQ, England.
