Aims

Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA and TKA) are successful treatments for osteoarthritis, but the solid metal implants disrupt the natural distribution of stress and strain which can lead to bone loss over time. This generates problems if the implant needs to be revised. This study investigates whether titanium lattice UKA and TKA implants can maintain natural load transfer in the proximal tibia.

Aims

In the native hip, the hip capsular ligaments tighten at the limits of range of hip motion and may provide a passive stabilizing force to protect the hip against edge loading. In this study we quantified the stabilizing force vectors generated by capsular ligaments at extreme range of motion (ROM), and examined their ability to prevent edge loading.

Aims

Cementless acetabular components rely on press-fit fixation for initial stability. In certain cases, initial stability is more difficult to obtain (such as during revision). No current study evaluates how a surgeon’s impaction technique (mallet mass, mallet velocity, and number of strikes) may affect component fixation. This study seeks to answer the following research questions: 1) how does impaction technique affect a) bone strain generation and deterioration (and hence implant stability) and b) seating in different density bones?; and 2) can an impaction technique be recommended to minimize risk of implant loosening while ensuring seating of the acetabular component?

In this in vitro study of the hip joint we examined which soft tissues act as primary and secondary passive rotational restraints when the hip joint is functionally loaded. A total of nine cadaveric left hips were mounted in a testing rig that allowed the application of forces, torques and rotations in all six degrees of freedom. The hip was rotated throughout a complete range of movement (ROM) and the contributions of the iliofemoral (medial and lateral arms), pubofemoral and ischiofemoral ligaments and the ligamentum teres to rotational restraint was determined by resecting a ligament and measuring the reduced torque required to achieve the same angular position as before resection. The contribution from the acetabular labrum was also measured. Each of the capsular ligaments acted as the primary hip rotation restraint somewhere within the complete ROM, and the ligamentum teres acted as a secondary restraint in high flexion, adduction and external rotation. The iliofemoral lateral arm and the ischiofemoral ligaments were primary restraints in two-thirds of the positions tested. Appreciation of the importance of these structures in preventing excessive hip rotation and subsequent impingement/instability may be relevant for surgeons undertaking both hip joint preserving surgery and hip arthroplasty.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:484–91.

Acetabular cup orientation in hip arthroplasty is critical to prevent edge loading and impingement. Aerial alignment guides position the cup at a specified angle to the orthogonal planes, but only if the pelvis is in strict lateral-decubitus. Computer navigation can also be used to position the acetabular cup, but there are limitations associated with defining the pelvic reference plane. It can also be postulated that a fixed angle of inclination and anteversion is not suitable for every patient and every cup design. This paper describes the development and testing of instrumentation that allows patient specific acetabular cup placement without knowing the exact pelvic orientation.

Stage 1 determines the cup position during a trial reduction. A Judd nail retractor is left in the pelvis during the trial reduction. A single-use laser pointer is attached to the top of this nail, is free to move and can be locked in position. The trial acetabular cup has a handle protruding at a fixed angle from the face of the cup. At the end of this handle is another single-use laser pointer that projects a laser beam parallel to the axis of the cup onto the wall/ceiling. Keeping the handle parallel to the medio-lateral axis to control inclination angle, the leg is moved through a range of motion (ROM). The anteversion of the trial cup is adjusted until a position is found where flexion extension ROM is possible without impingement and satisfactory abduction-adduction is achieved with stability. Once this position is found, the Judd nail laser (fixed to the pelvis) is adjusted until its projected point, on the wall/ceiling, coincides with that from the trial handle. The Judd nail laser is then fixed in position, the hip dislocated and trial components removed.

Stage 2 aligns the definitive acetabular cup. The introducer has a laser pointer pointing parallel to its axis (away from the patient) and is attached to the definitive cup. The definitive cup is placed in the acetabulum and the introducer adjusted until its projected laser coincides with that from the Judd nail. The cup is then in the same orientation as determined during the trial reduction and can be impacted.

To demonstrate the accuracy of the laser alignment method, the position of the definitive cup was compared to that of the trial cup in polyurethane foam models. With the laser points projected onto an object > 2m away, the accuracy was ±2°.

To compare the laser guided instrumentation with the conventional aerial device, the ROM of the definitive cup was assessed in Sawbones resurfaced pelvis/femur models. The pelvis orientation was rotated by ±10° about the medio-lateral axis and the superio-inferior axis to investigate the effect of the pelvis being unknowingly out of lateral-decubitus. In the worst case of pelvis position, the aerial halved the required flexion and allowed double the required extension. The laser guided instrumentation maintained the physiological range of flexion/extension regardless of pelvis position and is therefore considered an improvement on current technology and a viable alternative to computer navigation.