Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 105 - 105
1 Feb 2003
Bentley G Biant LC Hunter M Nicolau M Carrington R Williams A Goldberg A Akmal M Pringle J
Full Access

Mosaicplasty1 and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation2 (ACI) are both modern cartilage repair techniques used to repair symptomatic articular cartilage defects in the knee, based on small osteochondral grafts and cultured chondrocytes respectively. The aim is the restoration of articular cartilage, but until now there is no data comparing the two methods.

100 consecutive patients aged 15–45 with a symptomatic articular cartilage lesion in the knee suitable for cartilage repair were randomised at arthroscopic assessment to undergo either mosaicplasty or ACI. 42 patients underwent mosaicplasty, 58 had ACI. Mean age at time of surgery was 31 years and the average defect size 4. 66 cm2.

46% of the defects were post-traumatic, 19% had osteochondritis dissecans, 14% had chondromalacia patella and 16% had lesions of unknown aetiology. 53% had a medial femoral condyle lesion, 25% patella, 18% lateral femoral condyle, 3% trochlea and there was one defect of the lateral tibial plateau.

The mean duration of symptoms was 7. 2 years and the average number of previous operations (excluding arthroscopies) was 1. 5. Only 6 patients had no prior surgical interventions to the affected knee. The mean follow-up was 1. 7 years.

Patients were evaluated using Modified Cincinnati and Stanmore Functional rating systems, visual analogue scores and clinical assessment. Arthroscopy and biopsy was performed at one year and repair assessed with the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system.

Clinical results at one year showed 70% of mosaic-plasty patients and 87% of ACI patients had a good or excellent result. Arthroscopy at one year demonstrated more complete healing in ACI patients. Eleven (26%) of the mosaicplasty group subsequently failed clinically and arthroscopically, with peak failure at 2 years.

At one year follow-up, both techniques of articular cartilage repair can be useful in selected patients. ACI is preferred for lesions of the patella. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the durability of articular cartilage repair using these methods, in particular mosaicplasty which showed signs of progressive failure over 2 years.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 106 - 106
1 Feb 2003
Bentley G Hunter M Biant LC Nicolau M Carrington R Williams A Goldberg A Akmal M Pringle J
Full Access

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation’ (ACI) is a cartilage repair technique that involves implantation of cultured chondrocytes beneath a membrane of autologous periosteum. In this study a porcine biodegradable membrane was also used to assess its effectiveness. The aim is to restore articular cartilage to symptomatic defects, rather than initiating a fibrocartilagenous repair.

We undertook a prospective study of 125 consecutive patients who underwent ACI. Average age at the time of surgery was 30. 9 years (range 14 – 49), 55% of patients were male. The average size of the defect was 4. 35 cm².

44% of defects were attributable to known traumatic incidents, 2 1 % had osteochondritis dessicans, 18% chondromalacia patella, 12% had defects of unknown aetiology and 5% other.

The average duration of symptoms prior to this surgery was 7. 16 years. The mean number of previous operations (excluding arthroscopies) was 1. 6. Only 9 patients had no previous major surgery to the affected knee. 44% had defects of the medial femoral condyle, 31% patella, 20% lateral femoral condyle and 5% had a trochlea lesion. 26% of the defects were covered with periosteum and 74% with a porcine collagen membrane (chondrogide)

Minimum follow-up was six months, 70 patients had minimum follow-up of one year. Mean follow-up 18 months.

Patients were assessed using Modified Cincinnati and Stanmore Functional rating systems, visual analogue scores and clinical evaluation.

Arthroscopy and biopsy was performed at one year and the repair assessed using the International Cartilage Research Society grading system.

At one year follow-up overall 41 % patients had an excellent result, 48% good, 8% fair and 3% poor. For defects of the medial femoral condyle, 88% had a good or excellent result, 85% for the lateral femoral condyle and 80% for the patella.

61 patients were arthroscopically assessed at one year. 50/61 (82%) demonstrated ICRS grade 1 or 2 repair. Healing of the defect occurred with either a periosteum or chondrogide defect cover.

Results at one year suggest that ACI is a successful articular cartilage repair technique in selected patients. Long-term follow-up is required to assess the durability of the repair.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 242 - 242
1 Nov 2002
Bentley G Goldberg A Biant L Hunter M Carrington R
Full Access

Many methods have been described over the past 5 years for repair of articular cartilage defects. The best reported results have been from the use of autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT)(1) and mosaicplasty.(2) There have, however, been no prospective clinical trials of these two methods. In this trial 70 patients were prospectively randomized to receive either autologous chondrocyte transplantation (37) or mosaicplasty (33) in the knee. 37 patients were female and 33 male. The average age was 32 years (16 – 44). The indications for surgery were persistent pain and mechanical symptoms in the knee with an isolated defect of the articular cartilage. 38 (56%) were post-traumatic, 12 (16%) due to osteochondritis dissecans, 10 (14%) due to previous meniscectomy, and 10 (14%) due to chondromalacia patellae. The size of the defects ranged from 2cm2 to 12cm2 (mean 4.8cm2). There were 35 defects on the medial femoral condyle, 13 on the lateral femoral condyle, 17 on the patella and 5 on the trochlear. 31 patients were undergoing primary surgery and 39 secondary surgery. All were independently reviewed using the Visual Analogue Pain Score, the Cincinatti Pain Score and the Stanmore Score. Patients were arthroscoped at one year with MRI scan and biopsies where possible.

Results: The visual analogue pain score improved overall from a mean of 5.4 (range 3.4 – 7.4) pre-operatively to 3.9 (1.8 – 5.1) at one year review. Similarly the Cincinatti pain score improved from 6.5 pre-operatively to 10.2 post-operatively and the Cincinatti function score improved from 46 to 62 at one year before sport commenced. Overall 71% (49) patients were excellent or good on the clinical scoring scales, 15% (11) were fair, and 14% (10) were poor. The 10 poor results were no different from the main group with regard to age, sex, pain level or site or size of lesion. However, 5 were secondary procedures, 2 had multiple lesions, and 3 had had previous ruptured anterior cruciate ligaments. Arthroscopy and biopsy of 21 lesions so far after one year has shown mature articular cartilage in 2, and immature cartilage in 19. In all cases there was bonding of the repair tissue to the underlying bone. This study is already clarifying the role of ACT and mosaicplasty in the management of cartilage defects in the knee and also the necessity for the use of periosteal covering membrane.