Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ARTICULAR CARTILAGE REPAIR IN THE YOUNG ADULT KNEE – A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION VS MOSAICPLASTY



Abstract

Mosaicplasty1 and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation2 (ACI) are both modern cartilage repair techniques used to repair symptomatic articular cartilage defects in the knee, based on small osteochondral grafts and cultured chondrocytes respectively. The aim is the restoration of articular cartilage, but until now there is no data comparing the two methods.

100 consecutive patients aged 15–45 with a symptomatic articular cartilage lesion in the knee suitable for cartilage repair were randomised at arthroscopic assessment to undergo either mosaicplasty or ACI. 42 patients underwent mosaicplasty, 58 had ACI. Mean age at time of surgery was 31 years and the average defect size 4. 66 cm2.

46% of the defects were post-traumatic, 19% had osteochondritis dissecans, 14% had chondromalacia patella and 16% had lesions of unknown aetiology. 53% had a medial femoral condyle lesion, 25% patella, 18% lateral femoral condyle, 3% trochlea and there was one defect of the lateral tibial plateau.

The mean duration of symptoms was 7. 2 years and the average number of previous operations (excluding arthroscopies) was 1. 5. Only 6 patients had no prior surgical interventions to the affected knee. The mean follow-up was 1. 7 years.

Patients were evaluated using Modified Cincinnati and Stanmore Functional rating systems, visual analogue scores and clinical assessment. Arthroscopy and biopsy was performed at one year and repair assessed with the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system.

Clinical results at one year showed 70% of mosaic-plasty patients and 87% of ACI patients had a good or excellent result. Arthroscopy at one year demonstrated more complete healing in ACI patients. Eleven (26%) of the mosaicplasty group subsequently failed clinically and arthroscopically, with peak failure at 2 years.

At one year follow-up, both techniques of articular cartilage repair can be useful in selected patients. ACI is preferred for lesions of the patella. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess the durability of articular cartilage repair using these methods, in particular mosaicplasty which showed signs of progressive failure over 2 years.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

1 Hangody L et al. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice. Orthopaedics21(7): 751–6 1998 Google Scholar

2 Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte implantation. New England Journal of Medicine. 331 (14): 889–95 1994 Google Scholar