Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent among athletes and a leading cause of time away from competition. Stability of the knee involves the ACL for limiting anterior tibial translation and the ALL (anterolateral ligament) to restrain internal rotation of the tibia. Present indications for treatment with a combined ACL-ALL reconstruction remain unclear and mostly subjective. We mathematically modeled the tibial plateau geometry to try and identify patients at risk of ACL injury, and develop an objective trigger point for the decision to proceed with additional surgery to optimize rotational stability in these higher risk patients. We hypothesized that an increased convexity and steepness of the posterior aspect of the lateral plateau would subject knees to higher rotational torques leading to potentially a higher risk of ACL injury.

The study design was a case-control study involving ACL reconstruction cases (n=68) and matched controls (n=68) between 2008–2015 at our institution. We used a two-dimensional approach, evaluating sagittal MRI images of the knee to model the posterior convexity of the lateral tibial plateau. Points were selected along the articular surface, and a least-squares regression was used to curve-fit a power function (y = a xn). In the equation, larger coefficient a and n represented steeper slopes. The cases and controls were compared using a Mann-Whitney-U test, and the statistical significance was set at α < 0.05. A subgroup analysis for females and males was also performed for the curve-fit coefficients.

We observed a significant difference in the tibial surface geometry between our ACL reconstruction cases and matched controls (Figure 1). The modeled power equation for our ACL cases had larger coefficients compared to controls for all groups. For all pooled subjects, coefficient a (ACL recon cases = 0.90 vs controls = 0.68, p < 0.0001) and coefficient n (ACL recon cases = 0.34 vs controls = 0.30, p = 0.07) (Table 1). For the statistically significant coefficient a, we found it had a sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 77.5% for the statistically significant coefficient a, we found it had a sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 77.5% for predicting injury, using a cut off coefficient of a = 0.78. The odds ratio was 12.6 [5.5 – 29].

The posterolateral cartilaginous slope of the tibial plateau was mathematically modeled in patients with ACL injury. Patients with ACL injury demonstrated abnormally steep and fast slopes compared to controls that may play predispose to ACL injury by increasing anterior translation forces and internal rotation torques sustained by their knee joint. A steeper slope may also explain high-grade pivot shifts on physical exam that are thought to be a relative indication for adding an associated ALL reconstruction. Our findings are promising for adding more objectivity to surgical decision-making, especially with identifying high-risk patients that may be candidates for combined ACL-ALL reconstructions.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Aim:

To determine the efficacy and safety of the Magec system in early onset scoliosis (EOS).

Aim:

To measure truncal parameters for patients treated with growing rod systems for early onset scoliosis (EOS).

Purpose

Retrospective review of growth sparing spinal instrumentation.

Purpose

To evaluate efficacy of blood conservation strategies on transfusion requirements in adult scoliosis surgery and establish a protocol for cross matching.

Spinal cord injury following trauma is initially dealt with by acute hospitals. The early management including stabilization is usually performed by these centres. This is followed by onward referral to one of the Regional Spinal Injury Units.

There is concern of both sides of the fence regarding mobilization following spinal cord injury. The acute hospitals want to avoid the problems of prolonged recumbency and the Regional Spinal Injury Units wish to avoid the problems of early aggressive mobilization.

Therefore, we set out to discover if there was a standard approach to mobilising these patients following surgical stabilization, because of the oversubscribed resources of the spinal injury units and the wish to start mobilizing the injured as soon as possible.

A comparative audit of the Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and North American Units.

Regional Spinal Injury Units in United Kingdom and North America

Clear Management Plan

Mobilisation Schedule

We had replies from all Regional Spinal Injury Units in the UK and from seven in North America.

The Regional Spinal Injury Units all had differing approaches. Only a few were able to convey a clear management plan and mobilization schedule. Whereas the North American Units provided a ‘mobilize as able’ plan in all cases.

The North American Units had a ‘mobilize as able’ policy, whereas the UK units had a mixed approach. A coherent collaboration between the spinal surgeons stabilizing these injuries and the spinal injury units providing rehabilitation would improve patient management.

We aimed to evaluate the effects of implementing blood conservation strategies on transfusion requirements in adult patients undergoing scoliosis correction surgery. We retrospectively studied 50 consecutive adult patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery (anterior, posterior or combined) between 2003 and 2007. All patients had a standard transfusion protocol. Age, BMI, pre and post operative haemoglobin, levels fused, duration of surgery, hospital stay, anti-fibrinolytics used and blood transfused was noted.

50 patients with mean age 24.6 years and mean BMI 21.9 kg/m2 were studied. 14 patients had anterior surgery, 19 patients had posterior surgery and 17 had combined anterior and posterior procedures. Mean number of levels fused was 9.5 (6–15) and mean duration of surgery was 284.6 minutes (135–550 minutes). Antifibrinolytics were used in 31 patients (62%), Aprotinin in 21(42%) and Tranexamic acid in 10 (20%). Mean blood loss in patients who received anti fibrinolytics was 530mls while mean blood loss in the other patients was 672mls. (p< 0.05). Blood transfusion was not required in any of the patients undergoing anterior correction only while 7 patients (41%) undergoing anterior and posterior correction and 3 patients (15.8%) undergoing posterior correction only required blood transfusion. Mean volume of cell saved blood re-transfused was 693.8 mls and mean hospital stay was 9.2 days. Mean pre-op haemoglobin was 13.2 g/dl (10.4–17.4) and mean post-op haemoglobin was 10.7 g/dl (7.7–15). 4 patients (8%) required intra and post-operative blood transfusion while 6 patients (12%) required blood transfusion postoperatively.

In conclusion, the use of anti-fibrinolytics like Aprotinin and Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in scoliosis surgery. In the current scenario, with Aprotinin no longer available for use, our study would recommend the use of Tranexamic acid alongwith other blood conservation measures. In our unit we do not have blood cross matched for anterior surgery alone.

Background: The simultaneous occurrence of spina bifida occulta (SBO) and spondylolysis has been noted previously. The occurrence of SBO and spondylolysis are approximately 17% and 5% respectively.

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of SBO when a symptomatic spondylolysis has been proven.

Method: Analysis of four years of lumbar spine CT scans was performed. Patients with spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis caused by a pars defect were identified. These patients’ CT images were then reviewed to establish the patients who also had SBO.

Results: In this unit 650 CT scans of lumbar spines were performed in the last five years. Of these scans 100 (15%) were found to have a pars defect. The average age was 34.6. On CT 30 (30%) patients were shown to have SBO. Of the total 23 were under 18 years old and 13 (56%) of these patients had SBO associated with the spondylolysis. In the over 18 year olds 21 (27%) patients had SBO associated with spondylolysis.

On review of the 550 other scans the average age was 51.9 years old. The incidence of SBO within this group is 10%. Only 6% of these patients were under 18. Out of these 33 patients 30.3% (10 patients) had SBO. Over 18 the incidence of SBO was only 8.5%.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that the occurrence of SBO within the group with a spondylolysis is much higher than in the group where no spondylolysis is present. There is higher incidence of SBO in the younger patients with spondylolysis. 56% of paediatric patients with symptomatic spondylolysis will have SBO. Clinicians should be aware of this fact preoperatively to decide on the technique of repair of the symptomatic lysis.

Background: Satisfaction following anterior and/or posterior spinal fusion varies greatly between individuals. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the post-operative scars following surgical correction of scoliosis.

Methods: Prospective study; 31 patients (range 10–37 years), minimum of 2 months post-operation, interviewed in clinic or over the telephone using a questionnaire.

Results: Overall, 18 (58%) patients were disappointed with their scar; it was not what they expected, Patients with anterior scars or both anterior and posterior scars were the most disappointed groups.

39% of patients felt they were inadequately informed or not informed of the nature of scar. However, over 50% of those who had a specialist spinal nurse (SSN) consultation reported the scar to be as they expected. Scar length was the main source of disappointment. 55% reported their scars as being raised (keloid), particularly at the ends. Scar colour and shape was an issue for 23%, whilst 39% experienced prolonged healing. 19 patients had a pre-op consultation with the SSN, 11 did not get this opportunity, 1 declined.

Conclusion: Clearly there’s a need for improved education and understanding with regard to the nature of the scoliosis surgical scar(s). Input from a SSN is important and surgeons must clarify exactly what they mean when discussing operations with patients. This could be done with the aid of pictograms or leaflets detailing issues discussed in consultations along with the opportunity to meet patients who have already had surgery. These measures may lead to increased patient satisfaction with surgery.

Ethics approval: Audit

Interest Statement: None

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of sheer off self limiting screw drivers and to assess repeatability with age.

It has been reported that overzealous tightening of halo pins is associated with co-morbidity. Our unit has recently received a tertiary referral where the patient over tightened a pin leading to intracranial haematoma, hence our interest in this subject. The torque produced by six new and nine old screw drivers was tested using an Avery Torque Gauge and a Picotech data recorder. These devices are designed to produce a torque of 0.68 Nm, any greater than this is potentially hazardous. Accepted error for each device was +/− 10%. The average torque produced by the new screw drivers was 0.56 Nm with a range of 0.35–0.64 Nm (SD 0.120). The older screw drivers produced an average torque of 0.67 Nm ranging from 0.52–0.85 Nm (SD 0.123).

In conclusion, sheer off self limiting screw drivers are not accurate devices. The older devices are more likely to produce a torque exceeding a safe range and therefore we would recommend the use of new devices only.

Ethics approval: none audit.

Interest statement: none local grant.

Background: It remains unclear and controversial whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) should be mandatory.

Aim: (1) To review our own practice, (2) conduct a national survey of United Kingdom Consultants, and (3) to perform a literature review.

Methods: Our own practice was established by identifying patients with AIS and examining whether an MRI scan was performed preoperatively. A survey of Consultants practice in the UK (British Scoliosis Members) was conducted by either an e-mail or telephone conversation. Finally, a literature survey was performed to establish current views.

Results: 118 patients with AIS were identified between 2003 and 2007. 78% of these patients underwent pre-operative MRI scans. Neural axis abnormalities were found in 8% of these patients. They included syrinx’s, chiari malformations, tonsillar herniation, cord tethering, central canal dilatation and undiagnosed spina bifida. Only 1 patient required intervention by the neurosurgeons. 92% of respondents to the national survey routinely performed preoperative MRI scans. The literature was not conclusive with regards to mandatory preoperative imaging.

Conclusion: Despite the literature showing little evidence, our survey shows a widespread consensus in clinical practice across the UK that routine preoperative MRI should be performed from a risk management viewpoint. It is mandatory in our unit to perform pre-operative MRI scans on all patients with AIS and would recommend that this becomes standard practice in all other units.

Ethics Approval: None/Audit

Interest Statement: None

In a high-risk technically advanced speciality like spine surgery, detailed information about all aspects of possible complications could be frightening for the patients, and thereby increase anxiety and distress. Therefore, aim of this study was to

Analyze written evidence of the consenting procedure pertaining to (a) nature of operation (b) benefits intended as a result of the operation (c) risks specific to the particular type of operation (c) general risks of spine surgery and anaestheia.

Methods: 70 adult elective, consecutive patients who had been listed for Lumbar discectomy /decompression surgery were chosen. The patients were presented with questionnaire of broad-based and open-ended questions designed to elicit theirs views in each of the following areas: expectation, knowledge of risks and alternatives, and personal attitude to information and satisfaction.

The study had a non-randomized design and patients divided into TWO groups Group A and group B.

The patients in the group A received standard information and were consented in a routine way without being given written proforma with all complications. The patients in the group B were given the same information as patients in the control group, with written information about common and rare complications. Patients in both groups were assessed on an ‘impact of events scale’ and hospital anxiety and depression scale immediately before ad after the consent process and again after surgery when they were discharged from the hospital.

For comparison of the proportion of Yes and No answers in 2 groups, Fisher’s exact test was used, and for comparison of more than 2 groups, the Chi-square test was used. For graded answers and other ordinal scales, the Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparison of 2 groups and the Kruskal–Wallis test for comparison of more than 2 groups. Spearman’s test was used when assessing the correlation between 2 variables measured on an ordinal scale.

Results: Many patients (71%) agreed that the consent form made clear what was going to happen to them, and 77%) reported that it made them aware of the risks of the operation they were to undergo. Over a third (36%) saw it as a safeguard against mixups in the operating theatre. Few patients’ decision to accept surgery appeared to depend on risk information; 8% of patients said that they might have changed their decision, had they been advised of the risks of permanent stroke and myocardial infarction. However, 92% were clear that their decision to accept treatment would not have altered. The women in the group B had symptoms of definite anxiety to a significantly higher degree than the men before the operation. Post-operatively, patients receiving extended information were significantly more satisfied with both the written and oral information about common and rare complications than patients in the control group There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for anxiety or depression, as measured by the HADS, either before or after the operation between Group A and B. Provision of extended information describing most of the possible complications did not have any negative effects on the patients. The patients receiving the extended information were more satisfied and experienced to a higher degree that they could discuss alternative treatment methods with the surgeon. Discussion: Provision of extended information describing most of the possible complications did not have any negative effects on the patients. “Ignorance is bliss” may prove to be an excellent preoperative strategy for patients when outcome is good but detrimental to long term adjustment where significant postoperative complications arise. This raises the possibility that a separate consent could be used where these risks are pre-printed and explained in vocabulary easily understood by patients. The added advantages of this form would be less confusion for the patient and there would be written evidence that patients had understood each of the major risks involved with the proposed procedure. This proposed consent form would also reduce the chance that important risks and complications are omitted when consent is being taken, as well as tackling the issue of variability of experience or lack of knowledge by the person obtaining consent.

Introduction: Scoliosis surgery involves major blood loss, at times exceeding estimated blood volume.

Aim: To evaluate the effects of implementing blood conservation strategies (including cell salvage, controlled hypotension and anti-fibrinolytic drugs) on transfusion requirements in adult patients undergoing scoliosis correction surgery. To establish a protocol for cross matching of blood.

Study Design: We retrospectively studied 50 consecutive adult patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery (anterior, posterior or combined) between 2003 and 2007. All patients were anaesthetised by the same anaesthetist who implemented a standard transfusion protocol. Age, BMI, pre and post operative haemoglobin, levels fused, duration of surgery, hospital stay, antifibrinolytics used and blood transfused was noted.

Results: 50 patients with mean age 24.6 years and mean BMI 21.9 kg/m2 were studied. 14 patients had anterior surgery, 19 patients had posterior surgery and 17 had combined anterior and posterior procedures. Mean number of levels fused was 9.5 (6–15) and mean duration of surgery was 284.6 minutes (135–550 minutes). Anti-fibrinolytics were used in 31 patients (62%), Aprotinin in 21(42%) and Tranexamic acid in 10(20%). Mean blood loss in patients who received anti fibrinolytics was 530mls while mean blood loss in the other patients was 672mls. (p< 0.05). Blood transfusion was not required in any of the patients undergoing anterior correction only while 7 patients (41%) undergoing anterior and posterior correction and 3 patients (15.8%) undergoing posterior correction only required blood transfusion. Mean volume of cell saved blood re-transfused was 693.8 mls and mean hospital stay was 9.2 days. Mean pre-op haemoglobin was 13.2 g/dl (10.4–17.4) and mean post-op haemoglobin was 10.7 g/dl (7.7–15). 4 patients (8%) required intra and post-operative blood transfusion while 6 patients (12%) required blood transfusion postoperatively.

Conclusion: Use of anti-fibrinolytics like Aprotinin and Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in scoliosis surgery. In the current scenario, with Aprotinin no longer available for use, our study would recommend the use of Tranexamic acid alongwith other blood conservation measures.

In our unit we do not have blood cross matched for anterior surgery alone.

Introduction: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a diarthrodial joint and can often be a source of chronic low back pain complex. We present a percutaneous technique for SIJ fusion and the functional and radiological outcome following the arthrodesis.

Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the functional and radiological outcome following percutaneous technique for SIJ fusion with HMA (Hollow modular anchor-age) screws.

Materials and Methods: 15 consecutive patients operated for SIJ fusion between Sep 2004 and Aug 2007 were included in the study. The diagnosis was confirmed with MRI and diagnostic injections. Pre-operative and post-operative functional evaluation was performed using SF-36 questionnaire and Majeed’s scoring system. Postoperative radiological evaluation was performed using plain radiographs. The Hollow modular anchorage (HMA) screws (Aesculap Ltd, Tuttlingen) packed with bone substitute were implanted percutaneous under fluoroscopic guidance

Results: The study group included 11 females and 4 males with a mean age of 48.7 years. Mean follow-up was 14 months. Mean SF-36 scores improved from 37 to 80 for physical function and from 53 to 86 for general health. The differences were statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test; p < 0.05). Majeed’s score improved from mean 37 preoperative to mean 79 postoperative. The difference was statistically significant (student t test, p< 0.05). 13 had good to excellent results. The remaining 2 patients had improvement in SF-36 from mean 29 to 48. Persisting pain was potentially due to coexisting lumbar pathology. Intra-operative blood was minimal and there were no post operative or radiological complications in any patient.

Conclusion: Percutaneous HMA screws are a satisfactory way to achieve sacro-iliac stabilisation.

Background: Radicular pain has been reported even in the absence of a compressive lesion. It has been postulated that annular tears provide a conduit for pro-inflammatory substances, which can leak around the nerve root causing radiculitis. A link between the side of back pain and the side of the annular tear has been reported.

Objective: To establish whether the side of the annular tear may influence the side of the leg in a non-compressive setting.

Methods and patients: We identified 121 patients from the patients referred to our unit with back and radicular leg pain. The mean age of the cohort was 50 yrs and 49% were male. All these patients were investigated with an MRI scan that demonstrated no compression of the nerve root. We used strict exclusion criteria to exclude the patients with any neural compression, previous lumbar operation, degenerative deformity or an associated pathology such as peripheral neuropathy.

Results: The annular pathology was described as annular tears (47 patients) and non compressive disc bulges (106 patients). The odds ratio for the concurrence of an annular tear causing ipsilateral leg pain is 1.05 and for a non-compressive disc bulge causing ipsilateral leg pain is 2.14

Conclusion: A non-compressive disc bulge is more likey to cause radicular symptoms than an annular tear. Though, both these annular lesions can cause ipsilateral nerve root symptoms.

Objective: To assess the correlation between the side of the annular pathology and the radicular symptoms, in the absence of a compressive root lesion.

Materials and Methods: 121 patients underwent MRI scan fro axial back and radicular symptoms. The mean age was 49.9 yrs (24–80). The sex distribution was equal. We excluded the patients that had a compressive lesion, previous operations, spinal deformity, spondylolyses, an underlying pathology (tumour, trauma or infection) or a peripheral neuropathy. Annular pathology was documented as annular tear or a non-compressive disc bulge with its location and side. We also recorded marrow endplate changes and facet arthrosis.

Results: Bilateral radicular symptoms were reported in 16 (13.2%): right side in 33 (27.3%) and left in 47 (38.8%) patients. Additionally, 82 patients (67.8%) had axial back pain. 33 patients (27.3%) were noted to have a right sided annular pathology (tear or bulge) and 72 (59.5%) had a left sided annular lesion. 21 patients (17.4%) had a central annular tear and 43 (35.5%) had a generalised disc bulge. 14 patients (11.6%) with right sided symptoms also had annular pathology, while 38 patients (31.4%) with left sided symptoms had a left sided annular lesion. There was no statistical correlation between the side of symptoms and the side of the lesion (r = −0.00066, p=0.994), any particular annular pathology (annular tear r=0.085, p=0.35; disc bulge r-0.083, p=0.36). There was no correlation between the axial back pain and the annular pathology (r=0.004; p=0.97) and facet joint or marrow end plate changes (r= −,29, p=0.76).

Conclusions: Although annular pathology can cause the radicular symptoms, our results suggest that they do not influence the side of the symptoms.

Objective: To assess the temporal geometric sagittal profile changes on serial radiographs of fractures of the thoracic and thoraco-lumbar spine.

Materials and methods: We have included 103 patients with thoracic or lumbar fractures were treated at our unit between June 2003 and May 2006. The patients were suitable for non-operative treatment. The mean age of the cohort was 46.9±2.4 (16–90). The sex distribution was equal. 94 patients had a single level lesion. 19 fractures were in the thoracic spine; 64 in the thoraco-lumbar (T11-L1) and 29 between L2 and L5. The radiographs were scored using the AO classification by 2 senior orthopaedic trainees. The radiographs were analysed at the Spine Research Laboratory. The results were computed using Stat, a statistical software.

Results: The changes were assessed over a mean period of 5.6 mo (range 1–49 mo; 95% CI 4.1–7.1 mo). Weighted kappa score of 0.58 was computed for the primary fracture type and 0.22 for the fracture sub-types. The inter-observer rater agreement was similar to that reported in literature. 7 patients showed a significant collapse. We report the association between the fracture types and the extent of collapse. We have also assessed the association between the medium to long term symptoms, the fracture types and the extent of collapse at the fracture sites and the adjacent disc.

Conclusion: Some fracture sub-types are more likely to collapse and cause long term symptoms. Identifying these fractures at the outset would help clarify surgical indications.

Objective: To do assess changes in patients’ symptoms and the operative plan.

Materials and methods: 147 patients on a spinal surgery waiting list were assessed at a mean wait of 15.8 ± 1.3 months. 89 (61%) were male and 58 (39%) were female at a mean age of 49.7 yrs (16–78). 123 patients had a degenerative condition (20 cervical; 03 lumbar); 20 patients were seen for scoliosis; 2 with a post-traumatic kyphosis and 1 each with ankylosing spondylitis and a psudarthrosis.

Outcomes assessed: Changes in patients symptoms; changes from the initial operative plan when listed; requirement for re-imaging due to the wait.

Results: 31 patients reported improved symptoms at the re-assessment, while 96 were worse off and 20 were unchanged. 137 had axial pain when listed which changed to 116 at review (p=0.0018). 130 had radicular pain when listed which improved to 80 on re-assessment (p< 0.0001). However 19 reported an increase in the axial and 17 in the radicular symptoms. 71 patients (48.3%) required to be re-imaged at the re-assessment due to changes in the clinical picture. 42 patients received the procedure as originally listed. 30 patients were taken off the list, 24 received a different operation, and 38 had an interim or a definitive needling procedure while 13 await a re-assessment.

Conclusions: On the basis of the observations on our cohort, 1 in 5 operations were cancelled; 65% had an increased severity of the symptoms and just 1 in 3 patients were operated as planned while 48% required re-imaging. A long wait inevitably leads to changed symptoms and a review of these patients is mandatory. The review and the re-imaging adds to the burden on the already over-loaded system.

Introduction: Sacroiliac joint pathology can contribute to lowback pain and sciatica. Its frequency and significance is controversial.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of positive SI joint pathology on MRI scans.

Methodology: 353 MRI reports and scans carried out over a one year period for backpain and sciatica were reviewed. Demographic data and clinical notes of patients who had positive SI joint pathology on MRI scans were analysed. Correlation between clinical suspicion of SI joint pathology and MRI findings was studied.

Results: 12 scans showed pathology in the SI joint, an overall incidence of 3.3%.8(66%) were males and 4(33%) females. Only 4(33%) of these patients had Plain Film abnormality. Average age of 41.2 years (33–54). One patient was known case of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Other positive pathology included oedema, sclerois and bridging osteophytes. Clinicians requested inclusion of SI joint in 43 patients. 8 of these were positive, an incidence of 18.6%. In 130 patients, the SI joints were imaged as routine. This yielded positive pathology in 4 patients (3%).

Conclusion: Our study concludes that 18.6% of patients who are suspected to have SI joint involvement clinically have positive pathology on MRI scans.

Routine inclusion of imaging of the SI joint as part of lumbosacral spine MRI for back pain and sciatica shows only 3% positive results.

SI joint should be imaged only if clinically suspected.

Aim: To assess if commonly used scoliosis instrumentation activates metal detectors at airport security gates.

Methods: 20 patientswho had travelled by air following scoliosis surgery were included. The type of instrumentation, number of journeys, body mass index and whether the alarm was triggered off by the airport security detector was recorded. We asked the patients opinion regarding provision of documentary evidence of surgery.

Results: 10 patients had posterior instrumentation, 5 patients -Paediatric ISOLA,4 patients had anterior instrumentation and one patient, anterior and posterior instrumentation. 12 patients (60%) had travelled more than four times by air following surgery corresponding to 48 passes through an airport archway detector.5 patients out of 20 had set off the alarm while passing through the metal detector everytime of which 4 had posterior instrumentation and 1 anterior instrumentation. None of the patients with ISOLA instrumentation set of the alarm. Two patients had set off the alarm every time they passed through the metal detector and both of them had posterior instrumentation. 14 patients(70%) suggested that we should provide documentary evidence of surgery to avoid delays in the airport security check. 25 % of patients set of the metal detector alarm following scoliosis instrumentation.

Conclusion: Patients with posterior instrumentation are more likely to set off the alarm compared to patients with ISOLA instrumentation. It is important to be aware that scoliosis instrumentation can activate airport archway detectors in our present security climate and to provide documentation to patients in order to avoid embarassment and delays.