Varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is typically associated with peritalar instability, which may result in altered subtalar joint position. This study aimed to determine the extent to which total ankle replacement (TAR) in varus ankle OA can restore the subtalar position alignment using 3-dimensional semi-automated measurements on WBCT. Fourteen patients (15 ankles, mean age 61) who underwent TAR for varus ankle OA were retrospectively analyzed using semi- automated measurements of the hindfoot based on pre-and postoperative weightbearing WBCT (WBCT) imaging. Eight 3-dimensional angular measurements were obtained to quantify the ankle and subtalar joint alignment. Twenty healthy individuals were served as a control groups and were used for reliability assessments. All ankle and hindfoot angles improved between preoperative and a minimum of 1 year (mean 2.1 years) postoperative and were statistically significant in 6 out of 8 angles (P<0.05). Values The post-op angles were in a similar range to as those of healthy controls were achieved in all measurements and did not demonstrated statistical difference (P>0.05). Our findings indicate that talus repositioning after TAR within the ankle mortise improves restores the subtalar position joint alignment within normal values. These data inform foot and ankle surgeons on the amount of correction at the level of the subtalar joint that can be expected after TAR. This may contribute to improved biomechanics of the hindfoot complex. However, future studies are required to implement these findings in surgical algorithms for TAR in prescence of hindfoot deformity.
Several emerging reports suggest an important involvement of the hindfoot alignment in the outcome of knee osteotomy. At present, studies lack a comprehensive overview. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review all biomechanical and clinical studies investigating the role of the hindfoot alignment in the setting of osteotomies around the knee. A systematic literature search was conducted on multiple databases combining “knee osteotomy” and “hindfoot/ankle alignment” search terms. Articles were screened and included according to the PRISMA guidelines. A quality assessment was conducted using the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) - and modified methodologic index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) scales. Three cadaveric, fourteen retrospective cohort and two case-control studies were eligible for review. Biomechanical hindfoot characteristics were positively affected (n=4), except in rigid subtalar joint (n=1) or talar tilt (n=1) deformity. Patient symptoms and/or radiographic alignment at the level of the hindfoot did also improve after knee osteotomy (n=13), except in case of a small pre-operative lateral distal tibia- and hip knee ankle (HKA) angulation or in case of a large HKA correction (>14.5°). Additionally, a pre-existent hindfoot deformity (>15.9°) was associated with undercorrection of lower limb alignment following knee osteotomy. The mean QUACS score was 61.3% (range: 46–69%) and mean MINORS score was 9.2 out of 16 (range 6–12) for non-comparative and 16.5 out of 24 (range 15–18) for comparative studies. Osteotomies performed to correct knee deformity have also an impact on biomechanical and clinical outcomes of the hindfoot. In general, these are reported to be beneficial, but several parameters were identified that are associated with newly onset – or deterioration of hindfoot symptoms following knee osteotomy. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess how diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms based on the identified criteria could be implemented to optimize the overall outcome of knee osteotomy. Remark: Aline Van Oevelen and Arne Burssens contributed equally to this work
The mean EMG frequency was significantly lower for the PL (pathologic leg, 138.3 Hz; normal leg, 158.3 Hz, p<
0.001). Lower mean EMG intensity was found in the pathologic PL and GM. The mean EMG frequency of the TA was lower in the patient group, its intensity higher.
There is evidence that positioning of the talar component too posteriorly may cause pain and limit dorsiflexion of the foot (probably because the posterior aspects of the deltoid ligament are over-tensioned), thereby the intrinsic forces are also increased which may cause unacceptable high shear forces at the bone-implant interface and/or component instability. In all but one of the seven revised talar components (out of the author’s first 400 cases), the component was positioned too posteriorly. There is a potential risk for dislocation of the meniscal component either laterally or medially as long as no appropriate alignment and/or ligament balancing have been achieved during surgery. The author encountered this problem only in two of the first twenty cases; thereafter, no such complications occurred probably because of better understanding alignment and balancing the ankle. A potential concern in uncemented resurfacing prostheses is the use of screws that may create stress shielding. The HINTEGRA® ankle, however, uses oval holes on the tibial side so that some settling of the component during osteointegration is possible. As screw fixation is located eccentric to the load transfer area, the potential for stress shielding is in addition minimized.
The AOFAS Hindfoot Score improved from 42.1 (14–61) points preoperatively to 78.6 (44–100) points at follow-up. 205 ankles (60.5%) were completely pain free. The average range of motion was clinically 32.2° (range, 15° to 55°), and under fluoroscopy (that is, true ankle motion) 30.4° (range, 7° to 62°). Four ankles were revised to TAA (component loosening, 3; pain, 1), and 2 ankles (component loosening and recurrent misalignment, 1; pain, 1) were revised to ankle arthrodesis. Overall survivorship at 6 years was 98.2%, being 97.9% for the talar component and 98.8% for the tibial component. Four ankles (1.2%) were successfully revised, and the obtained result at latest follow-up did not differ from those ankles without complications. Whereas, 2 ankles (0.6%) were revised to ankle arthrodesis. In another series of 37 patients (37 ankles: STAR, 26 ankles; HINTEGRA, 3 ankles; AGILITY, 3 ankles, Büchel-Pappas, 2 ankles; MOBILITY, 2 ankles; SALTO, 1 ankle) with failed total ankle arthroplasty, revision arthroplasty was performed with the HINTEGRA® ankle. All but one surgery were successful. At a mean follow-up of 3.6 (1.2–6.4) years, 29 patients (78.4%) were satisfied with the obtained result. The AOFAS Hindfoot Score improved from 39.2 (23–58) points pre-operatively to 72.8 (54–95) points. All but on implants were radiographically stable; in one case, the tibial component showed, at one year, still a radioluscency which may be considered as loosening. As the patient is completely pain free, no revision surgery was done. In another series of 29 patients (30 ankles), a painful ankle fusion was taken down and ankle arthroplasty was performed with the HINTEGRA® ankle. All surgeries were successful. At a mean follow-up of 3.4 (2–7.6) years, 24 patients (80%) were satisfied with the obtained result. The AOFAS Hindfoot Score improved from 34.1 (18–47) points preoperatively to 69.4 (48–90) points. The obtained motion for dorsi-/plantar flexion was clinically 23.5° (10°–40°) [52.6% of contra lateral ankle), and radiographically (“true ankle motion”) 24.5°(8°–24°) [54.4% of contra lateral ankle]. The author’s overall experience: more than 750 replacements with the HINTEGRA® ankle in the last 8 years. The learning curve was rather long as some adjustments had to be performed, and there was need of some time to understand “ligament balancing” in ankle replacement in more detail. However, since then, an extremely high satisfaction rate was obtained, and most patients are doing very well. The revision rate has also turned down to <
2% despite, with increased experience, more complex cases may have been considered for ankle replacement.
Methods: 100 lateral view X-rays were taken. Dimensions assessed were the talar area covered by the tibia, the angle of the distal tibial joint plane to the tibial axis (tilt), the width of the tibia on the joint level, the height of the talus, the joint radius of the ankle joint and the offset of the centre of rotation from the tibial axis. Results: The tibial coverage of the talus was 88.1 degrees (SD = 0.36), the angle of the distal tibial joint plane to the tibial axis (tilt) was 83 degrees (SD 3.6), the width of the distal tibia 33.6 mm (SD = 2.4), the radius of the ankle joint 18.6 mm (SD = 4.0) with an anterior offset of the centre of rotation of 1.7 mm and the height of the talus was 28.2 mm (SD = 2.1). Conclusions: In case of symptomatic deformity any reconstruction, i.e. correcting osteotomies, ligament reconstruction, arthrodeses or arthroplasty, should aim to correct the foot in a physiological way; respecting the original dimensions of the hindfoot to achieve maximal benefit. Anterior-posterior translation of the talus may be a source of pain, restriction of motion and a cause of degenerative joint disease because of eccentric joint loading. This is also true for the height of the talus, which may have a significant impact on the hindfoot physiology. To achieve good biomechanical function, the positioning of the talus in relation to the tibia needs to be planned carefully prior to surgery. Poor coverage of the talus by the tibia and too much tilt of the distal tibia lead to higher joint forces and may be the cause of instability. Surgical procedures may fail if this is not recognized preoperatively. Several easily accessible measures on X-rays were found to be reliable to describe the hind-foot, as only small variation was found on the evaluated X-rays. If reconstruction of the hindfoot is required, care should be taken to identify the physiological joint geometry.