Abstract
Introduction: Recent studies suggest that preservation of the calcaneocuboidal joint and a single medial approach may lead to equally good results as a conventional triple arthrodesis for painful malalignment or arthritis of the hindfoot. The theoretical advantage of a single medial approach for subtalar and talonavicular fusion is a lower risk for postoperative wound healing problems. The aim of our study was to assess the capability of the modified triple arthrodesis to correct hindfoot malalignment.
Methods: We retrospectively measured radiological parameters in 36 consecutive feet in 34 patients who underwent a modified triple arthrodesis. All operations were done with a single medial incision using rigid internal fixation with screws. Radiological evaluation was done at a mean of 15 months (range 6 to 34) postoperatively.
Results: The following angles showed a significant (p< 0.001) improvement: the talonavicular coverage from 23° (range,−51 to 51°) to 10° (range, −13 to 32°), the dorsoplantar talar-first metatarsal angle from 18° (range, −19 to 76°) to 9° (range, −11 to 28°), the lateral talo-calcaneal angle from 38° (range, 14 to 57°) to 28° (range, 12 to 44°), and the lateral talar-first metatarsal angle from −15° (range, −51 to 23°) to −4°(range, −18 to 22°). We encountered neither primary wound healing problems, nor bony nonunion.
Conclusions: In our study all radiological parameters improved postoperatively. We therefore believe that this is a safe and effective technique in the management of hindfoot deformity with predictable outcome even in patients with severe malalignment.
Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org
