Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 176 - 176
1 Mar 2013
Fujita Y Fukuhara Y Saito K Matsuzaki K Takahashi M Yokoi A
Full Access

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the common complications after total hip replacements (THRs). To reduce the risk of VTE, early rising, active movement of the foot, the use of a foot pump or graduated compression stockings and prophylactic administration of anticoagulant drugs are important. Further, intraoperative factors should be taken intoãζζconsideration.

Objective

The objective of this study is to assess the influence of surgical approaches, which are a modified Watson-Jones approach and a posterolateral approach, on the frequency of VTE after primary THRs.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIV | Pages 80 - 80
1 Oct 2012
Yanagimoto S Tezuka M Kameyama M Inoue K Nakayama S Komiyama T Okada E Takeda K Fujita Y Funayama A
Full Access

We have used CT-based total hip navigation system from 2003, to set the acetabular socket in optimal position. At first, we had used CT-based land-mark matching system. It needs matching procedure during surgery, touching paired points in surgical exposure. From 2006, we started to use new navigation system, called CT-based fluoroscopy-matching system, which was developed by BrainLAB Company (Vector-vision 2.7.1., 3.5.1.). For this new system, pre-surgical image matching procedure is need. Fluoroscopic images with 2 different directions must be taken in operation room. Then fluoroscopic images and CT reconstructive images were matched in computer with special program. Matching procedure was done before surgical incision. We compared the advantage of these two systems about technical problem, radiation exposure, time need for procedure, and accuracy. And then we discussed how to use these two different systems for THA patients.

Accuracy was compared for 241 THA patients using these navigation systems. 152 cases were with CT-based land-mark matching system and 89 patients with CT-based fluoroscopy matching system. Final verification angle of acetabular socket setting in navigation during surgery was recorded for each case. The operative angle, which is referred from Murray, is used to show the socket setting angle (inclination and anteversion) in these navigation systems. Post-operative CT scan was taken to evaluate the actual socket setting angle. The values between verification angle during surgery and post-operative CT measured angle were calculated and compared statistically.

Results were followed. New CT-based fluoroscopy matching method (F method): Average setting angle (operative angle) of socket in these 89 cases were 42.9 +/− 5.1 degree in inclination angle, and 28.5 +/− 7.9 degree in anteversion angle. The absolute difference in 89 cases between final verification angle and post-operative CT measurement angle was 2.9 degree (on average) +/− 2.5 degree in inclination angle, and 2.8 degree (on average) +/− 2.6 degree in anteversion angle. Conventional CT-based land-mark matching method (L method): The absolute difference in 152 cases between final verification angle and post-operative CT measurement angle was 4.2 degree (on average) +/− 3.2 degree in inclination angle, and 4.4 degree (on average), +/− 3.7 degree in anteversion angle. Absolute differences of setting angle in fluoroscopy matching groups showed statistically low compared with land-mark matching groups (P<0.01).

Technical problems: L method is difficult to learn actual procedure. F method is easy to learn procedure. Image matching was done automatically by computer program. Radiation exposure during surgery: L method needs no additional radiation. F method needs radiation to get 2 fluoroscopic images. Total amount time need for navigation: L method needs extra 10 minutes during surgery in case of skilled-doctor. F method needs extra 20 minutes before starting surgery in case of all kind doctors. The accuracy of acetabular socket setting: Absolute errors in socket setting with theses two systems were within 5 degree together on average. These results showed the usefulness of both systems. Compared the accuracy between these 2 systems, F methods showed high accuracy. The accuracy of F methods is always high. It has no influence with deformity around hip joint, because fluoroscopic image matching was done with lower part of pubic bone, especially around symphysis pubis.

For ordinary THA cases with skilled-doctor, CT-based land-mark matching system is useful, because this system is very convenient and needs only extra 10 minutes during surgery. For severe deformed cases with all kind doctors, CT-based fluoroscopy matching system is useful, because this system showed high accuracy even for severe deformed cases. Before surgical incision, fluoroscopic matching procedure has finished. This system needs no extra time after surgery starts.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 432 - 432
1 Nov 2011
Enomoto H Nakamura T Yanagimoto S Kaneko H Fujita Y Funayama A Suda Y Toyama Y
Full Access

In the light of the increasing popularity of femoral resurfacing implants, there has been growing concern regarding femoral neck fracture. This paper presents a detailed investigation of femoral neck anatomy, the knowledge of which is essential to optimise the surgical outcome of hip resurfacing as well as short hip stem implantation.

Three-dimensional lower limb models were reconstructed from the CT-scan data by using the Mimics (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). We included the CT data for 22 females and nine males with average age of 60.7 years [standard deviation: 16.4]. A local coordinate system based on anatomical landmarks was defined and the measurements were made on the unaffected side of the models.

First, the centre of the femoral head was identified by fitting an optimal sphere to the femoral head surface. Then, two reference points, one each on the superior and the inferior surface of the base of femoral neck were marked to define the neck resection line, to which an initial temporary neck axis was set perpendicular. Cross-sectional contours of the cancellous/cortical border were defined along the initial neck axis. For each cross-sectional contour, a least-square fitted ellipse was determined. The line that connects the centre of the ellipse at the base of the femoral neck and the centre of the femoral head was defined as the new neck axis. The above process was repeated to reduce variances in the estimation of the initial neck axis. The neck isthmus was identified according to the axial distributions of the cross-sectional ellipse parameters.

The short axis of the ellipse decreased monotonically since it was calculated from the center of the femoral head to the neck resection level (base of neck), whereas the long axis changed with the local minima. The cross section at which the long axis of the fitted ellipse had the local minima was determined as the neck isthmus.

The following measurements were made on the proximal part of the femur. The neck axis length measured from the center of the femoral head to the lateral endosteal border of the proximal femur was 67.3 mm [6.4]. The length between the center of the femoral head and the neck isthmus was 22.5 mm [2.7]. The diameter of the ellipse long axis at the neck isthmus was 27.6 mm [3.5] and was 23.6 mm [3.3] for the short axis.

The center of the neck isthmus did not align with the neck axis. The deviation of the isthmus from the neck axis which we defined as the isthmus offset was 0.7 mm [0.4].

If an alternative neck axis was defined between the center of the femoral head and the center of the neck isthmus, there would be a certain degree of angular shift with respect to the original neck axis. An angular shift of 1.8 degrees between the two axes can be expected for a 0.7-mm isthmus offset. In the worst case, an angular shift of 4.59 degrees was estimated for a subject with the largest isthmus offset of 1.93 mm.

Further investigations would be necessary to determine the axis configuration that represents the clinically relevant centre of the femoral neck. In order to reduce the deviations in the three-dimensional determination of the femoral neck axis, the reference anatomical landmarks and methods of evaluation should be carefully selected.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 405 - 406
1 Apr 2004
Fujita Y Yanagimoto S Sakamaki T
Full Access

Objective: We had performed bipolar hemi-arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip, with the technique of ace-tabular reaming until 1991. We studied the long-term results of this procedure radiographically.

Materials and methods: 62 patients (70 hips) were followed up for at least eight years after bipolar hemi-arthroplasty without cement. The diagnosis of all patients was osteoarthritis of the hip, which mainly came from dysplasia of the hip. The patients consisted of 13 men and 49 women. The average age at the operation was 43 years old (36–74 years old). The average duration of follow-up was 11 years (8–14 years). Smooth-surface press-fit type stem (Omnifit, Osteonics) was implanted for all cases. Focal osteolysis around component, the migration of the outer head and the subsidence of stem, were evaluated radiographically. By reviewing serial A-P radiographs, the first recognition of osteolysis and the extension of the lesion were researched.

Results: The mean migration of the outer head was 3.0mm medially and 9.1mm superiorly. The mean subsidence of stem was 7.2mm at final follow-up. The ace-tabular focal osteolysis was identified in 31 hips (44 %) and was first recognized at average 3.1years(1–9years) postoperatively. The femoral focal osteolysis was identified in 33 hips (47%) and was first recognized at average 2.3 years (1–9years) postoperatively. After the first recognition of osteolysis, the lesion was progressively spreading, especially on femoral side.

Conclusion: From these results, bipolar hemi-arthroplasty with the technique of acetabular reaming should not be indicated for osteoarthritis of the hip. This procedure causes osteolysis, which is progressive, and the migration of the outer head so often that it is difficult to preserve acetabular bone stock.