Abstract
In the light of the increasing popularity of femoral resurfacing implants, there has been growing concern regarding femoral neck fracture. This paper presents a detailed investigation of femoral neck anatomy, the knowledge of which is essential to optimise the surgical outcome of hip resurfacing as well as short hip stem implantation.
Three-dimensional lower limb models were reconstructed from the CT-scan data by using the Mimics (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). We included the CT data for 22 females and nine males with average age of 60.7 years [standard deviation: 16.4]. A local coordinate system based on anatomical landmarks was defined and the measurements were made on the unaffected side of the models.
First, the centre of the femoral head was identified by fitting an optimal sphere to the femoral head surface. Then, two reference points, one each on the superior and the inferior surface of the base of femoral neck were marked to define the neck resection line, to which an initial temporary neck axis was set perpendicular. Cross-sectional contours of the cancellous/cortical border were defined along the initial neck axis. For each cross-sectional contour, a least-square fitted ellipse was determined. The line that connects the centre of the ellipse at the base of the femoral neck and the centre of the femoral head was defined as the new neck axis. The above process was repeated to reduce variances in the estimation of the initial neck axis. The neck isthmus was identified according to the axial distributions of the cross-sectional ellipse parameters.
The short axis of the ellipse decreased monotonically since it was calculated from the center of the femoral head to the neck resection level (base of neck), whereas the long axis changed with the local minima. The cross section at which the long axis of the fitted ellipse had the local minima was determined as the neck isthmus.
The following measurements were made on the proximal part of the femur. The neck axis length measured from the center of the femoral head to the lateral endosteal border of the proximal femur was 67.3 mm [6.4]. The length between the center of the femoral head and the neck isthmus was 22.5 mm [2.7]. The diameter of the ellipse long axis at the neck isthmus was 27.6 mm [3.5] and was 23.6 mm [3.3] for the short axis.
The center of the neck isthmus did not align with the neck axis. The deviation of the isthmus from the neck axis which we defined as the isthmus offset was 0.7 mm [0.4].
If an alternative neck axis was defined between the center of the femoral head and the center of the neck isthmus, there would be a certain degree of angular shift with respect to the original neck axis. An angular shift of 1.8 degrees between the two axes can be expected for a 0.7-mm isthmus offset. In the worst case, an angular shift of 4.59 degrees was estimated for a subject with the largest isthmus offset of 1.93 mm.
Further investigations would be necessary to determine the axis configuration that represents the clinically relevant centre of the femoral neck. In order to reduce the deviations in the three-dimensional determination of the femoral neck axis, the reference anatomical landmarks and methods of evaluation should be carefully selected.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diane Przepiorski at ISTA, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Phone: +1 916-454-9884; Fax: +1 916-454-9882; E-mail: ista@pacbell.net
