A metal ion study was undertaken in patients who had received an articular surface replacement. The design of these components is optimised in line with lubrication theory and produces low levels of wear in hip joint simulators. Patients were recruited in four centres. Whole blood samples were analysed for metal ion levels using high resolution ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrophotometry). A total of 75 patients was enrolled into the study and 65 and 47 patients were assessed after 12 and 24 months implantation respectively. Results are included irrespective of clinical outcome.Introduction
Methods
The Harris Hip Score improved from a pre-operative mean of 56.99 to 97.12 at the latest follow up, and 60% of patients were scored at 100. At the latest follow up, 91% of patients scored 6 or above on the UCLA activity score; indicating at least regular participation in moderate exercise. There were no dislocations and no clinically evident DVT’s or PE’s There have been 11 revisions for fracture (1.06%). Five of these were intra-operative fractures, and six of these took place in patients aged over 50years. Fractures occurred in 3.1% of patients 65 years or more and in 0.5% of patients under 65 years(P<
0.05). In addition there were three revisions for cup loosening (0.29%) all in women over 60 years, three for unexplained pain (0.29%), one for impingement and subluxation, and one for infection(0.1%) Five patients have died with the resurfacing in situ (0.51%), for unrelated causes. The 3-year cumulative survival rate for all patients and all components was 97.4%. For 425 patients under 55 years the cumulative survival rate was 99.4%, aged under 65 years was 98.3%, and aged over 65 yrs was 94.8 %.
There have been 3 revisions for cup loosening (0.29%) and 3 for pain (0.29%). 5 patients have died (0.51%). There was one revision for infection and one for impingement. Average Harris Hip Score rose from 57.0 to 97.1, and 60% of patients scored 100. UCLA activity score was 6 or over in 91%, and the median score was 7.5. All failures were evident by 12 months The Cumulative Survival Rate at 3 years was 97.4%,, 99.5% for 55 years and under, 98.3% for under 65 years, and 94.2 % 65 years and over.
The average age of primary hip replacement patient was 70 years. (male patients 68 years and 71 years in females.) Over the 13 year period, the average age of male patients was noted to decline steadily from 71 in 1993 to 66 in 2003. But the average age of female patients remained constant at around 71 years. The number of patients below age 60 years undergoing hip replacement procedures was analysed. Only 8% of patients were under 60 years of age in 1993 rising to 23% in 2005. Between 2000 and 2005 this figure was at or above 20%. Surface hip replacement was started at our hospital in 1999. The number of patients treated with surface hip replacement as a proportion of all primary hip procedures has increased to 32% in 2005. The average age of these patients was 57 years. The sex difference was approximately 1:1 as compared to 1:2 in total hip replacement. The average age of primary knee replacement patients was 73 years, 72 yrs for males and 73 yrs for females. No change in average age was noted over the period. The proportion of patients under age of 60 years varied between 4 and 9%
The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcome of re-operations performed at this district general hospital on total knee replacements over a period of nine and a half years: we also compare the reasons for re-operation as well as their timing. Total knee replacements performed at this hospital and other centres requiring re-operation involving an open procedure were included in this study (total number =58). Patients were assessed both before and after re-operation using the knee society score. Data was recorded with respect to the type of original pros-thesis, reason for and time to re-operation as well as the nature of the re-operation procedure itself. Pre- and post-operative knee society scores showed a mean improvement of 20 with respect to the function scores and 65 with respect to knee scores. 50% of re-operations were for aseptic loosening with a further 25% each for infection and instability. In conclusion, re-operation for total knee replacement is shown to have had a satisfactory outcome in most cases. The results for revision surgery using a two stage procedure, in the treatment of infected total knee replacements, showed this to be very effective.