header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLI | Pages 133 - 133
1 Sep 2012
Esser M Gabbe B de Steiger R Bucknill A Russ M Cameron P
Full Access

Traumatic disruption of the pelvic ring has a high risk of mortality. These injuries are predominantly due to high-energy, blunt trauma and severe associated injuries are prevalent, increasing management complexity. This population-based study investigated predictors of mortality following severe pelvic ring fractures managed in an organised trauma system.

Cases aged greater than 15 years from 1st July 2001 to 30th June 2008 were extracted from the population-based state-wide Victorian State Trauma Registry for analysis. Patient demographic, pre-hospital and admission characteristics were considered as potential predictors of mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of mortality with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated.

There were 348 cases over the 8-year period. The mortality rate was 19%. Patients aged greater than 65 years were at higher odds of mortality (AOR 7.6, 95% CI: 2.8, 20.4) than patients aged 15–34 years. Patients hypotensive at the scene (AOR 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3, 13.2), and on arrival at the definitive hospital of care (AOR 3.7, 955 CI: 1.7, 8.0), were more likely to die than patients without hypotension. The presence of a severe chest injury was associated with an increased odds of mortality (AOR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.3, 6.1), while patients injured in intentional events were also more likely to die than patients involved in unintentional events (AOR 4.9, 95% CI: 1.6, 15.6). There was no association between the hospital of definitive management and mortality after adjustment for other variables, despite differences in the protocols for managing these patients at the major trauma services (Level 1 trauma centres).

The findings highlight the importance of the need for effective control of haemodynamic instability for reducing the risk of mortality. As most patients survive these injuries, further research should focus on long term morbidity and the impact of different treatment approaches.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 319 - 319
1 May 2006
Williamson O Gabbe BJ Urquhart D Cameron P
Full Access

The aim of this study was to determine predictors of persisting moderate/severe pain post orthopaedic injury.

Data were obtained from patients presenting to the two adult level 1 trauma centres in Victoria, Australia between August 2003 and August 2004. The maximum self reported pain levels at discharge and at 6 months post injury were determined using 11-point visual analogue scales (VAS). Moderate/severe pain was defined as a VAS score of 5 or greater. Associations between categorical variables were determined using chi-square tests and adjusted using multivariate logistic regression to determine possible predictors of persistent pain.

Data were obtained from 742 patients (age 15–100 years, 60.7% male). 37.1% had moderate/severe pain 6 months post injury. Moderate/severe pain at discharge was associated with an increased risk (OR 2.46 (95%CI 1.72–3.52), p< 0.0001) and isolated upper extremity injuries were associated with a reduced risk (OR 0.43 (95%CI 0.24–0.75), p=0.003) of moderate/severe pain 6 months post injury. Age (p=0.98), gender (p=0.37) and the presence of multiple orthopaedic (p=0.76) or non-orthopaedic injuries (p=0.58) were not predictors of moderate/severe pain 6 months post injury.

The severity of pain at discharge was the main predictor of moderate/severe pain 6 months following orthopaedic trauma. Further studies are needed to determine if improving pain control prior to discharge can reduce the incidence of persistent pain following orthopaedic injury.