Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Introduction: Recent studies suggest that preservation of the calcaneocuboidal joint and a single medial approach may lead to equally good results as a conventional triple arthrodesis for painful malalignment or arthritis of the hindfoot. The theoretical advantage of a single medial approach for subtalar and talonavicular fusion is a lower risk for postoperative wound healing problems. The aim of our study was to assess the capability of the modified triple arthrodesis to correct hindfoot malalignment.
Methods: We retrospectively measured radiological parameters in 36 consecutive feet in 34 patients who underwent a modified triple arthrodesis. All operations were done with a single medial incision using rigid internal fixation with screws. Radiological evaluation was done at a mean of 15 months (range 6 to 34) postoperatively.
Results: The following angles showed a significant (p<
0.001) improvement: the talonavicular coverage from 23° (range,−51 to 51°) to 10° (range, −13 to 32°), the dorsoplantar talar-first metatarsal angle from 18° (range, −19 to 76°) to 9° (range, −11 to 28°), the lateral talo-calcaneal angle from 38° (range, 14 to 57°) to 28° (range, 12 to 44°), and the lateral talar-first metatarsal angle from −15° (range, −51 to 23°) to −4°(range, −18 to 22°). We encountered neither primary wound healing problems, nor bony nonunion.
Conclusions: In our study all radiological parameters improved postoperatively. We therefore believe that this is a safe and effective technique in the management of hindfoot deformity with predictable outcome even in patients with severe malalignment.