Currently about 4–6% of all femur fractures consist of distal femoral fractures. Different methods and implants have been used for the surgical treatment of distal femoral fractures, including intramedullary nails. Retrograde nail. By contrast with antegrade nails, surgical approach or retrograde nailing exposes the knee joint which may lead to tendency of infection and increased knee pain. Present study aims to compare the biomechanical behaviour of distal angular condyler femoral intramedullary nail (DACFIN), retrograde nail and plate fixation. Fifteen 4th generation Saw bones were used to evaluate the biomechanical differences between the groups (Group 1: Plate fixation, Group 2: Retrograde nailing, Group 3: DACFIN; (n=5)). Biomechanical test was performed by using an electromechanical test device Shimadzu (AG-IS 5kN, Japan). Displacement values were recorded by using a Non-contact Video Extensometer (DVE-101/201, Shimadzu, Japan) during the loading each femur with 5 cycles of 500 N at a rate of 10 N/s to determine axial stiffness. The faliure stiffness was measured by axial load to each constructat a displacement rate of 5 mm/min. Torsional loading applied to all groups in amount of 6 Nm of torque with a velocity of 18 degrees/min.Background
Methods
