Abstract
Background
Currently about 4–6% of all femur fractures consist of distal femoral fractures. Different methods and implants have been used for the surgical treatment of distal femoral fractures, including intramedullary nails. Retrograde nail. By contrast with antegrade nails, surgical approach or retrograde nailing exposes the knee joint which may lead to tendency of infection and increased knee pain. Present study aims to compare the biomechanical behaviour of distal angular condyler femoral intramedullary nail (DACFIN), retrograde nail and plate fixation.
Methods
Fifteen 4th generation Saw bones were used to evaluate the biomechanical differences between the groups (Group 1: Plate fixation, Group 2: Retrograde nailing, Group 3: DACFIN; (n=5)). Biomechanical test was performed by using an electromechanical test device Shimadzu (AG-IS 5kN, Japan). Displacement values were recorded by using a Non-contact Video Extensometer (DVE-101/201, Shimadzu, Japan) during the loading each femur with 5 cycles of 500 N at a rate of 10 N/s to determine axial stiffness. The faliure stiffness was measured by axial load to each constructat a displacement rate of 5 mm/min. Torsional loading applied to all groups in amount of 6 Nm of torque with a velocity of 18 degrees/min.
Results
The mean torsion stiffness value of Group 3 (6.33 Nm/degree) was signifacantly higher than Group 1 (1.18 Nm/degree) and Group 2 (2.11Nm/degree), p<0.05). The failure stiffness, Group 3 (1725 N/mm) was significantly higher than Group 1 (1275 N/ mm) and Group 2 (1290 N/mm). However, In axial stiffness, the mean value of Group 2 (2554 N/mm) was higher than Group 3 (1822 N/mm), and signifantly higher than Group 1(468 N/mm), p<0.05).
Conclusions
DACFIN is more stiffer than retrograde nail and plate fixation during torsional and failure load conditions. But in axial stiffness retrograde nail was stiffer. DACFIN provide intramedullary femur condyle fracture fixations without open knee joint.
Level of evidence
Level 5
Disclosure
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to the present study.
