Development of artificial cartilage has been one of the future goals in the field of orthopaedic surgery. A few investigators have applied polyvinyl-alcohol hydrogel (single-network) to develop the artificial cartilage. However, it could not be applicable for clinical use due to insufficiency of the strength, the toughness, and the friction properties. The authors have conducted a fundamental study to apply a novel double-network (DN) hydrogel to develop the artificial cartilage. This hydrogel is composed of two independently crosslinked hydrophilic networks of poly-2-acrylamido-2-methyl-propanesulfonic acid (PAMPS) and poly-N,Nā²-Dimetyl acrylamide (PDMAAm) that are physically entangled with each other. This study evaluated the in vivo influence of a PAMPS/PDMAAm DN hydrogel on counterface cartilage in rabbit knee joints and its ex-vivo frictional properties on normal cartilage. In the first experiment, the DN gel was implanted in a surgically created defect in the femoral trochlea of rabbit knee joints and the left knee was used as the control. Evaluations using a confocal laser scanning microscopy demonstrated that the DN gel did not affect the surface microstructure (surface roughness, the number of small pits) of the counterface cartilage in vivo at 4 and 12 weeks. The histology also showed the DN gel had no pathological damage on the cartilage matrices and cells at 4 weeks. However, 2 of the 5 DN gel-implanted knees showed mild irregularity on the counterface cartilage surface at 12 weeks. In the second experiment, the friction property between the normal and artificial cartilage was determined using a joint simulator apparatus. The ex-vivo mean friction coefficient of the DN gel to normal cartilage was 0.029, while that of the normal-to-normal cartilage articulation was 0.188. The coefficient of the DN gel-to-normal cartilage articulation was significantly lower that of the normal-to-normal cartilage articulation (p<
0.0001). This study suggested that the PAMPS/PDMAAm DN gel has very low friction coefficient on normal cartilage and has no significant detrimental effects on counterface cartilage in vivo, and can be a promising material to develop the artificial cartilage.
All lesions occurred around the prosthetic rim, and the mean size of osteolysis per knee was 2.1 +/ā1.5 cc (range, 0.4ā4.7 cc). Only seven lesions in 6 knees were diagnosed as osteolysis on plain radiographs: 2 lesions at anterior femoral condyle and 5 lesions at tibial condyles. None of the lesions around the posterior condylar flanges detected on CT was identified on plain radiographs. None of the implants showed radiographic loosening or required reoperation.