Following the implementation of the Ionising Radiations (Medical Exposure) Regulations Act 2000 and recommendation from International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the establishment of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for all radiological examinations became mandatory. There are no recommended or published standards or national dosage guidelines in the UK of diagnostic reference levels available for fluoroscopy-guided diagnostic and therapeutic spinal procedures. The aim of this study is to establish reference dose area product (DAP) levels for the diagnostic spinal procedures requiring fluoroscopy as a basis for setting DRLs.

All patient data consisted of diagnostic spinal procedures done in 2009 at Newcastle General Hospital under care of 4 spinal surgeons. Radiation data were collected on specific type of the procedure, DAP and screening time. Nerve root blocks, facet joint blocks and facet joint rhizolysis were included for data collection and analysis for this study. The third-quartile values were used to establish the DRLs.

There were 387 nerve root blocks with a mean exposure per injection 171.3 cGycm² (range, 3.0 to 2029.1; third quartile 209.4). Facet joint injections were 669 at a mean radiation dose 41.3 cGycm² (range, 1.9 to 541.0; third quartile 48.9). In a total 430 facet joint rhizolysis, the mean exposure was 44.4 cGycm² (range, 7.7 to 154.5; third quartile 58.4). The mean screening times were 36.7s (range, 0.4-281s; third quartile 41s) for nerve root blocks, mean 11.2s (range, 1.8-37s, third quartile 13.3s) for single facet joint block and mean 14.6s (range, 0.1-162s, third quartile 15.1s) for single facet rhizolysis.

We found the third-quartile values for setting DRLs for single level nerve root block, single facet joint block and single facet joint rhizolysis to be 209.4, 48.9 and 58.4 cGycm² respectively. We recommend that all spinal units in the UK should establish their own local DRLs to help in establishing national dosage guidelines for fluoroscopy-guided diagnostic and also therapeutic spinal procedures.

This is a prospective study to determine if we could identify patients who may benefit from preoperative catheterisation in lower limb arthroplasty.

211 consecutive patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty were recruited. There were 131 female (62%) and 80 male (32%), the mean age (+−1 S.D.) was 68+−12 years old. Patients’ demographic details and pre-operative urinary symptoms were recorded. Previous urological surgery and past history of urinary catherisation were also documented. The anaesthetist who was blinded from the study selected the type of anaesthesia and the post-operative analgesia regime. All patients were required to produce mid-stream urine sample before surgery and at post-operation. Urine tract infection was confirmed on a positive microbiological culture. Regression analysis was used to assess various co-variables to identify the high-risk groups.

35 female (56%) and 27 male (44%) were catheterised, the mean age (+−1 S.D.) was 72+/−14 years old. The frequency of catheterisation was unrelated to the surgical procedure, the type of anaesthesia or the postoperative pain control regime. Age over 65 years old and nocturia were significant indicators for urinary catheterisation (p< 0.05). Patients with urinary incontinence and nocturia were strong determinant for urinary catheterisation (p< 0.03). Males over the age 65 years with a past history of urinary catheterisation (p=0.037) were more likely to be catheterised than females of the same group (p=0.947). This has become more evidential if patients have coexisting urinary incontinence and nocturia (p=0.005). Females over the age of 65 years with urinary incontinence were also significant (p=0.013).

The sensitivity for urinary catheterisation in patients over the age of 65 years with previous history of catheterisation, urinary incontinence or nocturia was 89.7%. This group of patients would benefit from pre-operative urinary catheterisation.

Background: It is often useful to gauge the flexibility of curves while assessing patients with scoliosis. Our aim was to discover if there were any reliable x-ray predictors of stiffness.

Methods: Previously the flexibility index has been shown to be an accurate measure of curve stiffness. A random selection of fifty x-ray sets was analyzed for parameters that might predict flexibility. These were then compared to the flexibility index generated from bending films. We recorded age; Cobb angle; bending film Cobb angle; Perdriolle rotation assessment; percentage wedging of the apical vertebrae and translation of the apex of the curve from a central sacral/cervical line. We then calculated the flexibility index. All measurements were taken from immediately pre operative standing AP x-rays and fulcrum bending films (1). The group was then assessed as a whole and subgroups were analyzed. Large curves (> 50 degrees) were compared to small (< 50 degrees) curves and thoracic curves were compared with thoracolumbar curves. Correlation between the flexibility index and the other parameters was then studied. We used Pearson correlation coefficient for parametric data and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient to study the non parametric data. P values were then assigned using a statistics software package.

Results: Age and apical translation were not related to curve stiffness. The Cobb angle was the only strong predictor of flexibility (p-0.002) looking at all curve types together. The Cobb angle was, however, more useful in larger curves and did not reach statistical significance in the small curve subgroup. In small curves Perdriolle rotational assessment was a more useful measurement (p-0.02). In the thoracic curve subgroup the percentage wedge of the apical vertebrae was a strong predictor (p-0.007).

Conclusion: Our sample had a strong bias toward an adolescent age group (5–61) mean age 17 and probably did not have enough of a spread to demonstrate the previous relationship between age and stiffness (2). The study re enforces the value of the Cobb angle in predicting curve stiffness but suggests caution using it in smaller curves. It also suggests a role for Perdriolle measurement in small curves and percentage apical wedge in thoracic curves.

Study Design: Retrospective review.

Objectives: Rugby union has recently become a highly-paid professional sport. Players requiring anterior cervical discectomy wish to know the effect this will have on their career. To answer this question, the result of the above procedure in professional rugby players was studied.

Methods: A retrospective notes review and telephone interview were conducted on 19 professional rugby players who had a cervical discectomy between 1998 and 2003. Pre and post operative symptoms and numbers returning to rugby after surgery were assessed.

Results: Neck pain was eradicated in eight (42%) of the players, nine (47%) achieved partial relief and two were not helped. Brachalgia was eradicated in fifteen (79%) individuals, improved in two (10.5%) and two (10.5%) had no relief. Fourteen (74%) returned to rugby union, the majority at six months post operatively (range – five to 17 months). Thirteen (68.5%) returned to their pre-operative level of rugby; one dropped to a lesser division and five have never played rugby again (three due to physical inability, one due to club reluctance to insure and one because of a separate injury). Two of the players that returned to rugby have subsequently retired because of neck symptoms. They played three and two years post-operatively at first-class level.

Conclusion: Return to rugby union after anterior cervical discectomy is both likely and safe and therefore need not be a career ending procedure.

Aims: To show that the treatment of buckle fractures in children in a soft bandage, rather than a plaster cast, is an effective and safe method of treatment. Methods: In order to determine the difference between the two groups it was decided to compare the range of movement at three weeks. Power calculations were performed. This gave a required sample size of 23 for each group. The project was submitted for ethical approval in July 1999. Patients enter the trial after parents agree and sign the consent form. Allocation to either plaster or bandage is random and parents draw previously sealed envelopes themselves. Patients are seen each week and measurements taken of their range of movement. Results: Thirty seven patients have completed the study. 17 have been allocated to bandage the rest to cast. Those in bandage show an excellent range of movement at the þrst week with no reported problems on their questionnaires. One patient has transferred from bandage to plaster at the request of the parents. Conclusion: Results suggest a positive result for treatment in bandage with no reported adverse effects and, a highly desirable result for the patient. We would hope to suggest a change in treatment policy for such fractures.

Objectives: To show that the treatment of buckle fracture in children in a soft bandage, rather than a plaster cast, is an effective and safe method of treatment, with an earlier return to normal function.

Methods: In order to determine the difference between the two groups it was decided to compare the range of movement at three weeks. Power calculations were performed using the minimum difference for a two-sample t-test method and assuming a non-central distribution. The calculation was performed on Minitab release version 12.1 Assuming a required difference of 5 degrees and a standard deviation of 5 degrees also with a required power of 0.9(90%) this gave a required sample size of 23 for each group i.e a total of 46 patients. Guidelines for the parents, consent forms, doctor and nurse protocols, a guidance poster for the A& E, treatment profiles for each patient and a questionnaire for parents were written. The project was submitted for ethical approval in July 1999 and granted at the end of that month. Patients enter the trial after parents agree and sign the consent form. Allocation to either plaster or bandage is random and parents draw previously sealed envelopes themselves. Those allocated to bandage are seen each week and measurements taken of their range of movement.

Results: Thirty seven patients have completed the study. 17 have been allocated to bandage the rest to cast. Those in bandage show an excellent range of movement at the first week with no reported problems on their questionnaires. One patient has transferred from bandage to plaster at the request of the parents. Problems encountered have been compliance of those in bandage to return for follow up after two weeks and, ensuring all patients enter the trial and attend the right clinic.

Conclusion: Results suggest a positive result for treatment in bandage with no reported adverse effects and, a highly desirable result for the patient. We would hope to suggest a change in treatment policy for such fractures.

To determine whether the Dynamic Condylar Screw, DCS, is suitable in treating pathological subtrochanteric fractures of the femur and the incidence of failure with this device.

Nineteen sequential and unselected patients with twenty femurs with pathological subtrochanteric fractures, or impending fractures, were identified, which had been treated with DCS. Mean age was seventy. Follow up was until functional union (minimum follow up 18 months) or until death. Primary tumour was identified in seventeen of the nineteen cases.

Grade of surgeon was recorded as was the use of adjunctive measures at the time of surgery (PMMA). Subsequent failure, cause and need for revision was noted.

Operative morbidity was low and initial pain relief good in all cases. Two fractures went on to unite. Eight original implants survived until the patient died (mean survival time 24 days). Ten implants failed (50%). Failure resulted from fracture through the DCS plate in eight cases and cut out of the screw in the other two. Of these, five patients (6 femurs) went on to further operative procedures. The others were either deemed unfit (3 cases) or refused further surgery (1 case).

In the light of newer intramedullary techniques we feel the DCS should be used with caution in this type of fracture. DCS in this fracture is associated with a high degree of failure.