Bio-impedance analysis (BIA) provides a convenient method for the estimation of whole body and segmental measurement of skeletal muscle mass (SMM). BIA-measured SMM parameters may be effectively used for the normalisation of muscle strength and removing body-size dependence. Despite an increasing interest in using bio-impedance analysis (BIA) for the estimation of segmental skeletal muscle mass (SMM); existing data is sparse. On the other hand, there is a need for better understanding of the influence of SMM on gender-related differences in muscle strength. Using BIA technique, this study aimed to measure the SMM, determine its correlation with muscle strength, and examine its relation with gender-related differences in muscle strength.Summary Statement
Introduction
Applying appropriate upper limb regional-specific and joint-specific tools along with suitable psychologic tools provides an effective assessment of supportive, interventional, and treatment strategies in TE. Tennis elbow (TE) is a painful pathologic condition with its origin in the common wrist extensor muscles at the lateral epicondyle. As the second most frequently diagnosed musculoskeletal disorder in the neck and upper limb in a primary care setting, with an annual incidence of 4 to 7 cases per 1000 patients in general practice (with a peak at 35 to 54 yrs of age), TE has considerable socioeconomic costs. As pain relief and improvement in functional performance are the 2 common aims of all treatment strategies, the importance of using appropriate tools for the assessment of pain and functional disability in TE is evident. In view of the high prevalence of TE, uncertainties about its treatment, and its substantial socioeconomic consequences, using more specific, patient-centred assessment tools is essential for providing more useful information on the level of pain and functional disability in TE. The Study aimed to: 1) compare pain and functional disability in tennis elbow (TE) patients with healthy controls; and 2) evaluate the relationship between the 2 major psychologic factors (anxiety and depression) and TE.Summary Statement
Background
Discovery system produced effective functional improvement in both primary and revision total elbow replacement. The incidence of major complications was in an acceptable range. The search for the ideal elbow prosthesis continues as instability and loosening remain the prime reasons for total elbow replacement (TER) failure. The Discovery Elbow System (Biomet) is one of the latest generations of linked prosthesis and has been used in UK since 2003. We report outcome of TER using this system.Summary Statement
Introduction
Evaluation of the early results of the implementation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis “Comprehensive Reverse” in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasties. September 2010–December 2012, 48 patients (32 women, 16 men) underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using Comprehensive Reverse system. Average age of 69.88. A total of 46 patients were followed. In 22 patients the operation was performed for revision. Patients were pre-and postoperatively evaluated using Oxford, Constant, SF-12 scores, radiographs, pain and range of motion. Mean follow-up 13 months.Objective:
Material and Methods:
Rehabilitation after shoulder arthroplasty is a fundamental in enabling patients achieve a good functional outcome. Therapists must consider the underlying diagnosis, operative technique employed and rotator cuff integrity, amongst other factors, in order to select the most appropriate exercise regime. There is an absence of comprehensive studies in the literature with regard to shoulder rotational exercises. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the shoulder girdle muscle activation strategies during eight commonly cited rotational shoulder exercises. Thirty healthy subjects with no history of shoulder problems participated in the study. EMG was recorded from 16 shoulder girdle muscles (surface electrodes: anterior, middle and posterior deltoid, upper, middle and lower trapezius, upper and lower latissimus dorsi, upper and lower pectoralis major; fine wire electrodes: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and rhomboid major) using a telemetry based EMG system. Five external and three internal rotation exercises were included (table 1). Signal acquisition and processing were in accordance with standardised guidelines. Amplitude normalisation was to external and internal rotation maximum voluntary contraction as appropriate. Mean EMG amplitudes between exercises were compared using repeated measures ANOVA. Data for muscle groups was calculated by averaging the activation of the component muscles.Introduction
Method
The procedures of total elbow and shoulder replacements increased 6% to 13% annually from 1993 to 2007 with revision-related burden increasing from 4.5% to 7%. The revisions of the shoulder and elbow prostheses due to aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, infections have led to the use of standard or custom-made implants due to significant bone loss. This study reports our experience in the management of complicated primary and revisions of total shoulder and elbow replacements with significant humeral bone loss and in metabolic diseases of the elbow and shoulder treated with bone resection using The Mosaic Humeral Replacement System. A total of 20 patients underwent total elbow or shoulder arthroplasty using the Mosaic Humeral Replacement System (Biomet, UK). The Mosaic system was used in 8 shoulder arthroplasties (Group A) and in 12 elbow arthroplasties (Group B). The underlying pathologis in Group A included 2 malunited proximal humerus fracture, 1 humeral osteomyelitis, 1 shoulder chondrosarcoma, 1 aggressive Gigantic Cell Tumor with prosthetic fracture, 2 metastatic lytic lesion, and 1 failed fixation of non-union proximal humerus. Figure 1 shows Mosaic implant after complex fracture of proximal humerus. Reasons for Mosaic arthroplasty in Group B included 3 humeral component revisions due to periprosthetic fracture, 1 prosthesis breaking-up with fractures, 1 revision of loose Souter Strathclyde prosthesis, 1 loose prosthesis due to infection, 1 highly comminuted elbow fracture, 1 aseptic loosening of humeral component of total elbow replacement, 3 revision of total elbow replacement due loosening and 1 pathological distal humerus fracture due to metastasis. Figure 2&3 shows pre- and post-operative Mosaic implant following complex periprosthetic fracture of distal humerus.Background
Patients and Materials
The quest for the perfectly designed elbow prosthesis continues as instability and loosening remain the foremost reasons for the failure of total elbow replacement (TER). The Discovery® Elbow System (Biomet, UK) (Figure 1), which has been used in UK since 2003, is one of the latest generations of linked prosthesis. This system was designed to decrease polyethylene-bushing wear, improve anatomic stem design, restore elbow joint biomechanics, and produce a hinge that could be easily revised. This report describes the short term outcome of TER using the Discovery® Elbow System. A total of 60 TERs including 48 primary and 12 revisions were performed between 2003 and 2008. Patients included 21 males (37%) and 36 females (63%) with a mean age of 63 years. The indications for primary TER were advanced rheumatoid arthritis (n=19), osteoarthritis (n=16), post traumatic osteoarthritis (n=9), acute fractures (n=3), and haemophilic arthropathy (n=1). The outcome was assessed using pain score, Liverpool Elbow Score (LES), and range of movement during a mean follow-up of 26 months. Associated complications were documented. Radiological assessment included evaluation for loosening, instability and periprosthetic fractures.Background
Patients and Methods
The Copeland shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty (CSRA) (Figure1) is a cementless, pegged humeral head surface replacement which has been in clinical use since 1986. The indications for CSRA are more or less the same as conventional stemmed arthroplasty. This procedure can be considered for all patients who require shoulder replacement due to GHJ arthritis resulted from primary or secondary OA, RA, and other variations of inflammatory arthritis. It is also suggested as the first choice option for relatively young patients with post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis (AVN), and instability arthropathy. This observational study reports functional and radiological outcome in CSRA during 4 years follow-up. 109 consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis (45.9%), rheumatoid arthritis (39.4%), rotator cuff arthropathy (9.2%), and avascular necrosis (5.5%) underwent CSRA. Patients including 68 females (63%) and 41 males (37%) underwent this procedure (63 right-sided and 46 left-sided including 9 bilateral shoulders). The outcome assessment included pain and satisfaction, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Score (CS), and SF-12. Imaging was reviewed for glenoid morphology (Walch classification) (Figure2) and humeral head migration. The average follow-up period was 4 years, (range: 1 to 10 years).Background
Methods
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) provides an alternative to standard total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of selected complex shoulder problems including failed shoulder replacements. The purpose of this report is to present outcome of RTSA using Comprehensive Reverse System (CRS) as either primary or revision treatment choice. Between September 2010 and April 2012, 54 patients (36 females, 18 males) with the mean age of 68.4 (±10) underwent RTSA-CRS. In 27 patients RTSA-CRS was performed as a revision due to failed previous arthroplasty. Primary underlying conditions included AVN (2), massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (2), primary osteoarthritis (7), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (2), rheumatoid arthritis (6), and rotator cuff arthropathy (8). It was not possible to complete the operation in 6 patients (4 revisions group 2 AVN cases) due to substantial glenoid erosion. Preoperative CT scan was performed in 50% of patients to assess the bony stock of the glenoid. In some patients ultrasound and MRI were performed to acquire additional information. A total of 46 patients were followed-up by means of antroposterior and axial plain X-rays, pain and satisfaction level (VAS/0–10), stiffness, Constant Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, SF-12 (Physical and mental Subscales), and range of movement for a mean duration of 6.5 months (±4.2).BACKGROUND
PATIENTS AND MATERIALS
Shoulder motion results from a complex interaction between the interconnected segments of the shoulder girdle. Coordination is necessary for normal shoulder function and is achieved by synchronous and coordinated muscle activity. During rotational movements, the humeral head translates on the glenoid fossa in the anterior-posterior plane. Tension developed by the rotator cuff muscles compresses the humeral head into the glenoid fossa. This acts to limit the degree of humeral head translation and establishes a stable GH fulcrum about which the arm can be moved. Previous studies have been limited by the use of contrived movement protocols and muscular coordination has not been previously considered with regard to shoulder rotation movements. This study reports the activation profile and coordination of 13 muscles and 4 muscle groups during a dynamic rotational movement task based on activities of daily living. Eleven healthy male volunteers were included in the study. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from 13 muscles (10 surface and 3 fine-wire intramuscular electrodes) using a wireless EMG system. EMG was recorded during a movement task in which the shoulder was consecutively rotated internally (phase 1) and externally (phase 2) with a weight in the hand. Muscle group data was calculated by ensemble averaging the activity of the individual component muscles. Mean signal amplitude and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) analysed muscle activation and coordination, respectively.Introduction
Methods
