Background

Endoprosthetic reconstruction is an established method of treatment for primary bone tumours in children. Traditionally these were implanted with cemented intramedullary fixation. Hydroxyapatite collars at the shoulder of the implant are now standard on all extremity endoprostheses, but older cases were implanted without collars. Uncemented intramedullary fixation with hydroxyapatite collars has also been used in an attempt to reduce the incidence of problems such as aseptic loosening. Currently there are various indications that dictate which method is used.

Aims: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate hemiplevis replacements in patients with periacetabular tumours in terms of the functional results and implant survivorship of the prosthesis. The second aim was to evaluate the complications and how they might be prevented in the future.

Methods: Case notes, hospital databases and radiographs were reviewed in 51 patients treated in a 16 year period with a custom made hemipelvis replacement (Stanmore Implants Worldwide). There were 13 deaths and 4 were lost to follow up. Of the remaining 34 patients there were 18 males and 16 females with a mean age of 48.6 (range 14 – 71).

Results: At a mean follow-up of 78 months (range 7 – 204), 70% of patients were still alive and the most common diagnosis was chondrosarcoma (17 cases). There were 2 cases of prosthesis failure and 22 of the 34 patients had one or more complications (12 cases of infection (8 deep and 4 superficial), 4 nerve palsies, 2 dislocations and 7 others). 13 patients had to have a second operation. The mean MSTS score was 63.8% and the TESS score was 59.8%

Conclusion: Infection was the most common complication and was the most significant reason for reoperation. This method of reconstruction is associated with a high morbidity rate and should be performed only at specialist centres, but the functional and oncological outcomes are satisfactory.

Purpose: We report a series of 58 patients with metastatic bone disease treated with resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction over a 5 year period at our institution.

Introduction: The recent advances in adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy in cancer treatment has resulted in improved prognosis of patients with bone metastases. Most patients who have an actual or impending pathological fracture should have operative stabilisation or reconstruction. According to BOA guidelines patients should undergo a single procedure which allows early full weight bearing and lasts the expected lifespan of the patient. The use of modern modular endoprostheses allows these criteria to be met.

Methods and Results: We retrospectively identified all patients diagnosed with metastatic disease to bone between 1999 to 2003. 171 patients were diagnosed with bone metastases. Metastatic breast and renal cancer accounted for 47% of the lesions. 58 patients with bone metastasis to the appendicular skeleton had an endo-prosthetic reconstruction. There were 28 males and 30 females. 11 patients had lesions in the upper extremity and 47 patients had lesions in the lower extremity. Mean age at presentation was 62 years (24 to 88 years). 19 patients are still alive, 34 patients had died and 5 were lost to follow-up. Patients died of disease at a mean of 22 months (2 to 51 months) from surgery. Mean follow-up was 55 months (24 to 78 months). There were 5 wound infections, 1 aseptic loosening, 3 dislocations, 1 subluxation and 1 prosthesis rotated requiring open repositioning. Patients were followed up and evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Society Tumour Score (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score. The mean MSTS score was 73% (57 to 90%) and TESS was 71% (84 to 95%).

Conclusions: We conclude that endoprosthetic replacement for the treatment of bone metastases in selected cases achieves the aims of restoring function, allowing early weight bearing and alleviating pain. The complication rate is low.

Introduction: Since 1975, 6 types of extendable endo-prostheses have been developed at Biomedical Engineering, UCL, and Stanmore Implants Worldwide in conjunction with the surgeons at this centre.

Aims: To establish whether developments in design have had the desired effect of improving both implant survivorship and functional outcome.

Methods: This was a retrospective study using case notes, hospital databases and a radiological review, combined with contemporary functional outcome assessments (MSTS, TESS, SF36).

Results: 161 consecutive prostheses in 138 paediatric patients, between the years of 1983 – 2005, were implanted for primary bone tumours. Mean age was 10.3 (3 – 18), 81 were males and 57 females. There were 136 primary procedures and 25 revisions.

6 prostheses that used ball bearings to achieve length (designed in 1981) were implanted, 3 (50 %) were revised due to mechanical failure.

19 prostheses that utilised external C-washes (1998) to achieve length were implanted, 6 (32 %) were revised, half of these for mechanical failure.

Of the 98 minimally invasive prostheses (1992) that utilized an Allan key and screw-jack mechanism to lengthen, 14 (14 %) were revised, half of these for infection.

17 non-invasive extendable endoprostheses (2001) that are lengthened by electromagnetic coupling have been implanted so far. There has only been 1 (6 %) revision. This was due to full extension being reached.

Conclusions: Design improvements in growing endoprostheses since 1983 have led to improved survivorship. Initially this led to a reduction in mechanical failure and latterly to a reduction in infection, as indications for revision.

Key Words: Bone tumour, children, endoprosthesis, survivorship.

Background: Extra-compartmental limb soft tissue sarcomas are notoriously difficult to treat. These tumours can exhibit macro or microscopic spread beyond the confines of normal anatomical barriers and require radical resection, often necessitating excision of bone as well as soft tissue. This will inevitably affect the patient’s functional outcome. The primary operations for these aggressive sarcomas include wide local excision of soft tissue and adjacent involved bone, radical resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction and amputation.

Methods: 85 patients who underwent such an operation between 1995 to 2000 were reviewed and categorised according to whether they received wide local excision, endoprosthesis reconstruction or amputation. Patient demographics, sarcoma details, recurrence and survival rates were identified and compared between the three groups. Functional outcomes in the 45 patients still alive were assessed using TESS and MSTS scores.

Results: Mean age was 61 years (range 8 to 92). There were 51 males and 34 females. Anatomical distribution was as follows: arm 26, leg 47, pelvis 8 and other 4. The commonest histology subtypes were MFH, leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma. 17 had wide local excision of bone and soft tissue, 32 underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction and 36 underwent primary amputation. Recurrence rates were highest in the endoprosthesis group at 19%. Five year survival was worst in the amputation group at 49%. Functional outcomes were highest in the wide local excision group, and similar in the other two surgical groups.

Conclusions: Unsurprisingly survival is poorest in the primary amputee group because of the highly aggressive nature of these sarcomas, despite having the most radical treatment. The similar functional outcomes shown between endoprosthesis reconstruction and primary amputation may be influential when considering cases in which this decision is unclear and function is the main issue at stake.