Abstract
Background: Extra-compartmental limb soft tissue sarcomas are notoriously difficult to treat. These tumours can exhibit macro or microscopic spread beyond the confines of normal anatomical barriers and require radical resection, often necessitating excision of bone as well as soft tissue. This will inevitably affect the patient’s functional outcome. The primary operations for these aggressive sarcomas include wide local excision of soft tissue and adjacent involved bone, radical resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction and amputation.
Methods: 85 patients who underwent such an operation between 1995 to 2000 were reviewed and categorised according to whether they received wide local excision, endoprosthesis reconstruction or amputation. Patient demographics, sarcoma details, recurrence and survival rates were identified and compared between the three groups. Functional outcomes in the 45 patients still alive were assessed using TESS and MSTS scores.
Results: Mean age was 61 years (range 8 to 92). There were 51 males and 34 females. Anatomical distribution was as follows: arm 26, leg 47, pelvis 8 and other 4. The commonest histology subtypes were MFH, leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma. 17 had wide local excision of bone and soft tissue, 32 underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction and 36 underwent primary amputation. Recurrence rates were highest in the endoprosthesis group at 19%. Five year survival was worst in the amputation group at 49%. Functional outcomes were highest in the wide local excision group, and similar in the other two surgical groups.
Conclusions: Unsurprisingly survival is poorest in the primary amputee group because of the highly aggressive nature of these sarcomas, despite having the most radical treatment. The similar functional outcomes shown between endoprosthesis reconstruction and primary amputation may be influential when considering cases in which this decision is unclear and function is the main issue at stake.
The abstracts were prepared by Mrs Leslie O’Leary. Correspondence should be addressed to her at British Orthopaedic Association, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE or at l.oleary@boa.ac.uk
