Introduction

The trapezio-metacarpal joint (TMCJ) is subject to constant multiplanar forces and is stabilised by the bony anatomy and ligamentous structures. Ligament reconstruction can correct the hypermobility and potentially prevent osteoarthritis. Eaton and Littler proposed a surgical technique to reconstruct the volar ligamentous support of this joint. In our cadaveric biomechanical study, we aimed to evaluate the resultant effect of this technique on the mobility of the thumb metacarpal.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the early results of gleno-humeral reconstruction after tumour excision with a new design of endoprosthesis.

The prosthesis is a fixed fulcrum gleno-humeral replacement consisting of a hydroxyapatite (HA) coated glenoid component with a polyethylene liner and a cemented stem with HA coated collar. Between 1997 and 2000 we inserted the prosthesis into 15 patients with primary bone tumours of the proximal humerus. There were nine males and six females with a mean age of 38 years (range: 8–71 years). Twelve stems were cemented and three uncemented. Two skeletally immature patients had an extendible stem inserted, one subsequently having a successful lengthening procedure. The mean follow-up was 28 months (range: 12–41 years). Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MTS) scoring system.

There were two early dislocations and one superficial wound infection. Three patients died of their disease and one underwent forequarter amputation for local recurrence. The remaining eleven had satisfactory functional outcomes with a mean MTS score of 81%. Radiologically there has been no evidence of early loosening. Microscopic analysis of the components in the amputated arm showed excellent osseointegration around the HA coated components.

Aims. To investigate the risk factors for unsuccessful radial head reduction (RHR) in children with chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated surgically. Methods. A total of 209 children (mean age 6.84 years (SD 2.87)), who underwent surgical treatment for CMFs between March 2015 and March 2023 at six institutions, were retrospectively reviewed. Assessed risk factors included age, sex, laterality, dislocation direction and distance, preoperative proximal radial metaphysis width, time from injury to surgery, reduction method, annular ligament reconstruction, radiocapitellar joint fixation, ulnar osteotomy, site of ulnar osteotomy, preoperative and postoperative ulnar angulation, ulnar fixation method, progressive ulnar distraction, and postoperative cast immobilization. Independent-samples t-test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors associated with unsuccessful RHR. Results. Redislocation occurred during surgery in 48 patients (23%), and during follow-up in 44 (21.1%). The mean follow-up of patients with successful RHR was 13.25 months (6 to 78). According to the univariable analysis, time from injury to surgery (p = 0.002) and preoperative dislocation distance (p = 0.042) were identified as potential risk factors for unsuccessful RHR. However, only time from injury to surgery (p = 0.007) was confirmed as a risk factor by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and chi-squared test confirmed that a time from injury to surgery greater than 1.75 months increased the rate of unsuccessful RHR above the cutoff (p = 0.002). Conclusion. Time from injury to surgery is the primary independent risk factor for unsuccessful RHR in surgically treated children with CMFs, particularly in those with a time from injury to surgery of more than 1.75 months. No other factors were found to influence the incidence of unsuccessful RHR. Surgical reduction of paediatric CMFs should be performed within the first two months of injury whenever possible. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):581–591

Aim. Arthroscopic interventions have revolutionized the treatment of joint pathologies. The appropriate diagnostics and treatment are required for infections after ligament reconstructions using non-resorbable material such as tendon grafts, anchors, and sutures, prone to biofilm formation. The infection rate is around 1% for knee and shoulder, while up to 4% for Achilles tendon reconstructions. Despite high number of these procedures worldwide, there is limited evidence about the best treatment protocol. Our study aimed to provide a general protocol for the treatment of small implants for soft tissue reconstruction. Method. Between 2019 and 2023, we treated 48 infections of ligament, meniscus, and tendon reconstructions out of 7291 related procedures performed in the same time period. Early infection (<30 days) were treated with an arthroscopic debridement and implant retention (DAIR), except Achilles tendons had open DAIR, while those with delayed or chronic infection (>30 days) were treated with extensive debridement and lavage combined with one-stage exchange (OSE) or implant removal. During surgery, at least 5 microbiological s and samples for histopathology were obtained. The removed material was sonicated. After surgery, all patients were one week on iv. antibiotics, followed by oral antibiofilm antibiotics for 6 weeks including rifampicin and/or a quinolone. All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Failure was defined as the need for additional revision surgery after finished iv. antibiotic treatment. Results. Among 48 patients, 38 were early and 10 were late acute or chronic infections. The incidence of infection for our cohort was 0.7%. We observed 27 infections after ligament reconstruction of the knee, 15 of the shoulder, 5 of the ankle, and 1 infection of the elbow joint. 40 patients were treated with DAIR, 5 with OSE, and 3 with implant removal. We had 11 C. acnes, 10 S. aureus, 6 S. epidermidis, 2 P. aeruginosa, 2 S. lugdunensis, 10 mixed flora, and 3 culture-negative infections. 12 patients received antibiotics before surgery, and all culture-negative infections were related to this subgroup. We observed 2 failures, both in a combination of proximal tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction of the knee joint. The success rate of our protocol was 96%. Conclusions. Prompt surgical treatment followed by 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment cured 96% of infections of small implants after reconstruction procedures of knee, shoulder, and ankle joints. Our study is the first to provide a treatment protocol for infections of small implants after ligament reconstruction procedures

Aims

For rare cases when a tumour infiltrates into the hip joint, extra-articular resection is required to obtain a safe margin. Endoprosthetic reconstruction following tumour resection can effectively ensure local control and improve postoperative function. However, maximizing bone preservation without compromising surgical margin remains a challenge for surgeons due to the complexity of the procedure. The purpose of the current study was to report clinical outcomes of patients who underwent extra-articular resection of the hip joint using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis.

Aims

Therapeutic agents that prevent chondrocyte loss, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, and osteoarthritis (OA) progression are required. The expression level of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats and discoidin I-like domains-containing protein 3 (EDIL3) in damaged human cartilage is significantly higher than in undamaged cartilage. However, the effect of EDIL3 on cartilage is still unknown.

Objectives. An optimal reconstruction of the joint anatomy and physiology during revision total knee replacement (RTKR) is technically demanding. The standard navigation systems were developed for primary procedures, and their adaptation to RTKR is difficult. We present a new navigation software dedicated to RTKR. The rationale of this new software was to allow a virtual planning of the joint reconstruction just after removal of the primary prosthesis. Methods. The new software was developed on the basis of a non-image based navigation system which has been extensively validated for implantation of a primary TKR. Following changes have been implemented: 1) to define and control the vertical level of the joint space on both tibia and femoral side; 2) to measure the tibio-femoral gaps independently in flexion et en extension on both medial and lateral tibio-femoral joints; 3) to virtually plan and control the vertical level and the orientation of the tibia component; 4) to virtually plan and control the sizing and the 3D positioning of the femoral component (figure 1); 5) to virtually plan and control the potential bone resection; 6) to virtually plan and control the potential bone defects and their reconstruction (bone graft or augments) (figure 2); 7) to virtually plan and control the size, the length and the orientation of the stems extensions independently on the femoral and on the tibia side (figure 3). The validity of the concept has been tested by 20 patients operated on for RTKR for any reason, with a routine reconstruction with a cemented, unconstrained revision implant. The accuracy of the experimental software was assessed 1) during the procedure after implantation of the RTKR by measuring the medial and lateral laxity in full extension and 90° of knee flexion with the navigation system, and 2) on post-operative radiographs. Results. No system failure was observed. The virtual planning of the reconstruction was possible in all cases. The intra-operative control of the different reconstruction steps was possible in all cases. The mean coronal tibio-femoral angle was 0+3°, and no outlier was observed. Coronal and sagittal orientation of the prosthetic components was considered satisfactory in all directions for 16 cases. The desired vertical level of the joint space was achieved in all cases. The desired patella height was achieved in 15 cases. The measurement of the knee laxity was satisfactory in 16 cases. A good bone-prosthesis contact was achieved in 17 cases for the tibia, but it was not possible to analyze accurately this criterion for the femur. Conclusion. The software used in the current study allowed performing a straightforward reconstruction of the knee joint anatomy and physiology during RTKR. The virtual planning prevented to perform repetitive trials with different technical solutions which are often necessary during conventional RTKR. The operating time may be consequently decreased

Insufficiency of the lateral collateral ligamentous complex causes posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). During reconstruction surgery the joint capsule is repaired, but its biomechanical influence on elbow stability has not been described. We hypothesized that capsular repair reduces ROM and varus angle after reconstruction of the lateral collateral complex. Six fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were used. Varus laxity in supination, pronation and neutral forearm rotation with 1 Nm load and forearm rotaitonal range of motion (ROM) with 0.3 Nm torque were measured using a Microscribe 3DLX digitizing system (Revware Inc, Raleigh, NC). Each specimen was tested under four different conditions: Intact, Complete Tear with LUCL, RCL and capsule tear, LUCL/RCL reconstruction + capsule repair and LUCL/RCL reconstruction only. Reconstruction was performed according to the docking technique (Jones, JSES, 2013) and the capsule was repaired with mattress sutures. Each condition was tested in 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion. A two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test was used to detect statistical differences between the conditions. Total ROM of the forearm significantly increased in all flexion angles from intact to Complete tear (p<0.001). ROM was restored to normal in 30° and 60° elbow flexion in both reconstruction conditions (p>0.05). LUCL/RCL Reconstruction + capsule repair in 90° elbow flexion was associated with a significantly lower ROM compared to intact (p=0.0003) and reconstruction without capsule repair (p=0.015). Varus angle increased significantly from intact to complete tear (p<0.0001) and restored to normal in both reconstruction conditions (p>0.05) in 30° and 60° elbow flexion. In contrast varus angle was significantly lower in 90° elbow flexion in both reconstruction conditions compared to intact (both p<0.0001). Reconstruction of the lateral collateral complex restores elbow stability, ROM and varus laxity independent of capsular repair. Over tightening of the elbow joint occurred in 90° elbow flexion, which was aggravated by capsular repair. Over all capsular repair can be performed without negatively affecting elbow joint mobility

Introduction. An optimal reconstruction of the joint anatomy and physiology during revision total knee replacement (RTKR) is technically demanding. A new software was developed to allow a virtual planning of the joint reconstruction just after removal of the primary prosthesis. Material. Following changes have been implemented to the standard navigation software: 1) to define and control the vertical level of the joint space on both tibia and femoral side, and to allow performing the potential change decided prior to the revision procedure according to the preoperative imaging planning; 2) to measure the tibio-femoral gaps independently in flexion et en extension on both medial and lateral tibio-femoral joints; 3) to virtually plan and control the vertical level and the orientation of the tibia component; 4) to virtually plan and control the sizing and the 3D positioning of the femoral component; 5) to virtually plan and control the potential bone resection; 6) to virtually plan and control the potential bone defects and their reconstruction (bone graft or augments); 7) to virtually plan and control the size, the length and the orientation of the stems extensions independently on the femoral and on the tibia side. Methods. The validity of the concept has been tested by 20 patients operated on for RTKR for any reason, with a routine reconstruction with a cemented, unconstrained revision implant. The accuracy of the experimental software was assessed 1) during the procedure after implantation of the RTKR by measuring the medial and lateral laxity in full extension and 90° of knee flexion with the navigation system, and 2) on post-operative radiographs: coronal tibio-femoral angle, coronal and sagittal orientation of both tibia and femur components, vertical level of the reconstructed joint space, patella height, quality of the bone-prosthesis contact of both tibia and femur components. Results. No system failure was observed. The virtual planning of the reconstruction was possible in all cases. The intra-operative control of the different reconstruction steps was possible in all cases. The mean coronal tibio-femoral angle was 0+3°, and no outlier was observed. Coronal and sagittal orientation of the prosthetic components was considered satisfactory in all directions for 16 cases. The desired vertical level of the joint space was achieved in all cases. The desired patella height was achieved in 15 cases. The measurement of the knee laxity was satisfactory in 16 cases. A good bone-prosthesis contact was achieved in 17 cases for the tibia, but it was not possible to analyse accurately this criterion for the femur. Discussion. The software used in the current study allowed performing a straightforward reconstruction of the knee joint anatomy and physiology during RTKR. The virtual planning prevented to perform repetitive trials with different technical solutions which are often necessary during conventional RTKR. The operating time may be consequently decreased

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to compare two reconstruction procedures in terms of efficacy for tumor eradiation, reconstruction complications, and potential joint consequences. Material and methods: This retrospective study included 43 patients with a giant-cell tumor located in the knee. Patients were treated by curettage combined with phenolization. Mean follow-up was seven years. Bone defects were filled with cement in 22 patients and with a fragmented allograft in 21. The reconstruction and potential joint degradation were assessed on standard x-rays obtained in the two groups. Results: There were four cases of local recurrence (9%), two in each group. Three patients in the cement group required revision because of joint degradation in two and cement intrusion into the joint in the third. In the allograft group, two patients developed complications (fracture and massive resorption). Plan x-rays revealed joint deterioration in 10/17 patients with an allograft. The difference was significant (p=0.019). Conclusion: The rate of local recurrence and complications after reconstruction requiring a revision procedure was not significantly different in the two groups. There was however a significantly greater radiographic degradation in patients with a bone defect filled with cement compared with those with a defect filled with a fragmented allograft

In the treatment of acute elbow dislocation promising clinical results have been reported on articulated external fixation and surgical reconstruction of major joint stabilizers. However, it remains unclear whether or not surgical reconstruction of the major joint stabilizers sufficiently stabilizes the elbow joint or if augmentation by a hinged elbow fixator is beneficial to provide early stability and motion capacity. The aim of the present study was to compare the stabilizing potential of surgical reconstruction versus augmentation by a hinged external elbow in a model of sequentially induced intability of the elbow. Materials and Methods: 8 unpreserved human upper extremities were mounted to a testing apparatus which was integrated within a material testing machine. In a first series, varus and valgus moments were induced to the intact elbow joint at full extension, as well as at 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of flexion and the mean angular displacement at 2.5, 5, an 7.5 Nm was calculated. Instability was then induced by sequentially dissecting the lateral and the medial collateral ligament, the radial head, and the posterior capsule. The elbow joint was then sequentially restabilized by osteosynthesis of the radial head and refixation of the lateral and medial collateral ligament using bone anchors. In each sequence, elbow stability was tested with and without augmentation by a hinged external fixator according to the first testing series described above. Biomechanical data of surgical reconstruction alone and surgical reconstruction augmented by external fixation were compared using an analysis of variance. Results: In the intact elbow, varus-valgus displacement with 7.5 Nm ranged from 8,3 ± 2,4° (0°) to 11,4 ± 4,2° (90°). With the fixator applied, varus-valgus displacement was significantly lower and ranged from 4,2 ± 1,3° (0°) to 5,3 ± 2,2° (90°). After complete destabilization of the elbow joint, maximum varus-valgus displacement ranged from 17,4 ± 5,3° (0°) to 23,6 ± 6,4° (90°). Subsequent reconstruction of the collateral ligaments, the posterior capsule, and the radial head proved to stabilize the elbow joint compared with the unstable situation, however, mean varus-valgus displacement remained significantly higher when compared to the intact elbow joint. During each sequence of instability, the hinged external fixator provided constant stability not significantly different to the intact elbow joint while guiding the elbow through the entire range of motion. Conclusion: The stabilizing potential of surgical reconstruction alone is inferior to augmentation of a hinged external elbow fixator. In order to proved primary stability and early motion capacity, augmentation of a hinged external elbow fixator in the treatment of acute dislocation of the elbow is recommended

Surface replacement of the hip has become established as an alternative treatment to total hip replacement in the younger, active, male patient. By the very nature of preserving the femoral head and neck, there may be failures due to femoral neck fracture and femoral component loosening. Additionally, revisions of hip resurfacing for acetabular loosening may be necessary. Other scientific papers have described problems that may arise as a result of the metal-on-metal bearing either due to excess metal production or an immunologic-mediated reaction to the metal debris. Grammatopolous et al. describe poor results of revisions of surface replacements due to massive tissue destruction at the time of revision surgery, persistent pain, and swelling. In my experience with hip resurfacing, this complication is extremely rare. In my series of 925 resurfacings with a minimum of 2 year follow up, 12 revisions (1.3%) have been performed. Of these revisions, only 3 (0.3%) were for complications related to the metal-on-metal bearing; 2 for edge-loading and excess metal production, and 1 for metal hypersensitivity. None of the revision cases have had abductor destruction, or nerve/vascular involvement. Reconstruction of the joint was carried out with standard and revision components; post-operative function of these patients has been comparable to that of a primary total hip replacement. With careful monitoring of the post-operative resurfacing patient, problems can be identified early and surface replacement conversion can be performed with excellent results

The aim of this study was to analyze complications and functional outcomes after individual and module endoprosthesis. From 1993 to 2008 in our clinic 42 patients with bone sarcomas were treated with resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of large joints. In 29 patients we have applied individual, in 13 patients module prosthesis. We have assessed complications and functional results. For individual prosthesis: pyoseptic complications-4 (9,52%) pts, orthopedic events-9 (21,43%) pts, local recurrences-5 (11,90%); functional results: “excellent”-10,34% (3/29), “good”-48,28% (14/29), “satisfactory”-24,14% (7/29), “non-satisfactory”-17,24% (5/29). For module prosthesis: Only in one patient local recurrence has been observed. Functional results are so: “excellent”-23,1% (3/13), “good”-69,2% (9/13), “satisfactory”-7,7% (1/13), “non-satisfactory”-0. We conclude that using of module endoprosthesis allows achieving good functional results with low rate postoperative complication

Pilon fractures present a unique challenge to the patient and orthopaedic surgeon. Care for the soft tissue envelope is as important as management of this articular fracture. Assessment of the degree of energy causing the fracture and careful planning of the joint reconstruction will lead to acceptable results in most cases. Forty-five patients (AO-ASIF classification) treated between 2003 and 2008 were examined clinically and radiologically at an average of 24 months after injury. The patients were treated in three different ways: primary internal fixation with a plate following, which was reserved for patients with closed fractures without severe soft tissue trauma; one-stage minimally invasive osteosynthesis for reconstruction of the articular surface with long-term transarticular external fixation of the ankle for at least eight weeks and hybrid external fixation. Objective evaluation criteria were infection rate, pseudarthrosis, amount of posttraumatic arthritis, range of ankle movement. In 65% of all pilon tibial fractures we observed an uncomplicated course of healing. Early complications were mainly soft tissue infections, whereas we found pseudarthrosis to be the most frequent late complication. The complication rate depends mainly on the type of fracture, the soft tissue damage and the type of treatment. In the case of low-grade soft tissue damage, good to excellent results were accomplished. In the case of higher-grade soft tissue damage, the problem of soft tissue coverage and reconstruction of the joint surface could be solved with good results by the hybrid external fixation. Herewith it is important to use limited open reduction of displaced fragments and fixation by cannulated screws and K-wires

Introduction. Accurate alignment of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a known factor that contributes to improvement of post-operative kinematics and survivorship of the prosthetic joint. Recently, CAOS has been introduced into TKA in effort to reduce positioning variability that may deviate from the mechanical axis. However, literature suggests that clinical outcomes following TKA with CAOS may not present a significant improvement from traditional methods of implantation. This would infer that achieving correct alignment, alone, might be insufficient for ensuring an optimal reconstruction of the joint. Therefore, this study seeks to evaluate the importance of soft-tissue balancing, through the quantification of joint kinetics collected with intraoperative sensors, with or without the combined use of CAOS. Methods. Seven centers have contributed 215 patients who have undergone primary TKA with the use of intraoperative sensors. Of the 7 surgeons contributing patients to this study, 3 utilize CAOS; 4 utilize manual techniques. Along with standard demographic and surgical data being collected as per the multicenter study protocol, soft-tissue release techniques and medial-lateral intercompartmental loads—as indicated by the intraoperative sensors—were also captured pre- and post-release. “Optimal” balance was defined as a medial-lateral load difference of ≤ 15 lbs. A chi-squared analysis was performed to determine if the percentage of soft-tissue release was significantly different between the two groups: patients with CAOS, and patients without CAOS. Results. Of the 215 patients (35% with CAOS, 65% without CAOS) who have received TKA, using intraoperative sensors to assess mediolateral balance, 92.6% underwent soft-tissue release. Stratifying this data by surgical technique: 89% of the patients with CAOS, and 94% of patients without CAOS, were released. A chi-squared analysis—with 3 degrees of freedom; and 99% confidence—was executed to determine if the 5% difference between the two groups was significant. The analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups, thus we can conclude that soft-tissue release is as equally necessary in the CAOS TKA group, as it is in the traditional TKA group. Discussion. It is widely accepted that correct alignment of TKA components contributes to improved kinematic function of the affected joint. Recently, technology has been developed to digitally guide surgeons through bony cuts, thereby decreasing the incidence of deviation from the mechanical axis. However, alignment may not be the foremost contributing factor in ensuring an optimal joint state. In this evaluation, 92.6% of the cohort required some degree of releasing of ligamentous structures surrounding the knee joint, regardless of intraoperative technique used. A chi-squared analysis of the data supports the claim that soft-tissue release is used in nearly all cases, irrespective of the use of CAOS (p < 0.001). This suggests that soft-tissue release is necessary in nearly all cases, even after appropriate alignment has been digitally verified. The data strongly supports the idea that obtaining an optimally functioning joint is multifactorial, and that alignment may play a more minor role in achieving ideal joint reconstruction than previously assumed, being superseded by the necessity to achieve soft-tissue balance

Most of the major acute injuries of the hand will involved the tendons, either flexor or tendon lesions or both. In programming the repair of tendons we have to evaluate all the others structures affected that need to be repair and remember that we should provide a good coverage of these structures. In some situations it will be possible to suture the tendons directly, but in others we might need tendon grafts or to transfer some motor units for reconstruction of others, including the use of tendons of amputated parts. In other situations with grate tissue destruction and loss of pulleys of the flexor tendons it might be reasonable to do the reconstruction at a later procedure and to utilize silicone rods to maintain the space for a later reconstruction. Tendon adhesions, joint stiffness, boutonniere and swan neck deformities are some of the complications that we might expect to have, even with a good rehabilitation program, and to solve at a later surgical procedure

Chronic instability of the acromioclavicular joint is relatively common and normally occurs following a fall onto the point of the shoulder. Reconstruction of the joint (Weaver-Dunn procedure) is often required in service personnel, and numerous methods of fixation have been used, including vicryl tape, PDS loops and the use of a hook plate. Many of these operative methods require a second operation to remove the plates and/or screws, and are associated with a failure rate of up to 30%. The ‘Surgilig’ was designed as a method of revision for failed Weaver-Dunn procedures. However this study evaluates its use in the primary operation. We prospectively followed up the Modified Weaver Dunn procedures using surgilig. The post-operative x-rays were reviewed at six weeks, 3 months and then 6 months when the patients were discharged to assess the radiological success of the procedure. We have performed this procedure in 11 patients. Of the eight patients that have reached the six month postoperative time so far, at which they would be discharged from clinic follow-up, none have had radiological failure of the fixation. One patient even had weight-bearing x-rays taken at 6 weeks, with no detrimental effect. Even though a small study, the initial results for primary fixation of acromioclavicular joint disruption with surgilig are extremely encouraging. The study suggests that surgilig should continue to be used in its current role. As patient numbers increase, a follow-up study should be conducted to evaluate these preliminary findings

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents one of the most safe and effective medical procedures. However, with an unchanged rate of 3% in primary and 10% in revision THAs, despite alleged surgical technique and implant design improvements, dislocation continues to be a matter of concerns with important functional and financial consequences. A number of parameters influence the risk for dislocation including patient specific factors, surgeon experience, femoral head size, implant orientation, and surgical approach. The latter has been less investigated during the past 15 years, as it was supposed that large femoral heads or specifically designed implants such as dual mobility sockets would notably decrease the risk for dislocation. Also, minimally invasive approach including the anterior approach, and rapid recovery have been aggressively marketed, making the transtrochanteric approach rarely if ever used by most surgeons. Also, this surgical technique is demanding and time consuming, not exactly what is expected in the 21st century. However, there are some clear advantages to the transtrochanteric approach both in primary and revision THAs: it gives a large view on the acetabulum allowing for anatomic reconstruction of the artificial joint and correct implants orientation; it allows for preservation of the entire periarticular muscles and tendons including the external rotators (external obturator+++); and it permits to balance the abductors tension by lowering and/or translating the greater trochanter. These advantages can notably reduce the rate of dislocation in both primary and revision THAs. Data from our institution including senior and junior surgeons have showed rates of dislocation ranging from 0.1 to 1.7% in primary THAs and from 1.5 to 2.3% in revision THAs. Our rate of nonunion is less than 2% even in revision using a specifically designed trochanteric claw plate almost systematically used in revision THAs to allow for a more rigid fixation. Finally, the transtrochanteric approach can be extended to the femur to cope with specific situations. The surgical tips and tricks of this approach will be discussed in the presentation

Aim: Our aim was to reduce the invasiveness of the THA approach in both primary and revision operations, in order to reach a better functional outcome, to facilitate patient’s rehabilitation and to minimize the encountered operation risks such as dislocation. To achieve our goal, we modified the conventional surgical technique by sparing and reconstructing the joint capsule as well as implanting an individually adapted hip ball size. Material and Methods: The LI-THA differs from the conventional THA in the following aspects:. Selecting the most appropriate size of hip ball among a different variety ranging from 28–44 mm in diameter, in order to simulate the size of the resected femur head and increase the joint stability as much as possible. Sparing and completely reconstructing the joint capsule, especially its acetabular origin. Muscular and iliotibial tract incisions are made parallel to the direction of fibres in order to facilitate optimal surgical reconstruction. Small skin incision together with using absorbable subcuticular skin closure technique to reduce postoperative wound complications. 1004 cases of primary THA and 36 cases of THA revision were evaluated after applying the less invasive technique. A questionnaire was designed to evaluate the patient’s satisfaction regarding pain and function, necessary reoperations, complications such as dislocation or wound dehiscence and leg length discrepancy. Additionally, Symptoms and function were assessed by WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Results: 1004 LI-THA and 36 LI-THA revisions were performed over a period of 82 months. 2 cases of early infection and 2 cases of postoperative haematomas needed surgical intervention. One of the two recorded dislocations was a result of excessive sinking of the endoprosthetic stem. Both of which were successfully surgically corrected. The length of stay was 3 days shorter in comparison to the conventional technique. Conclusion: The LI-THA is a modified conventional method associated with a low complication rate, which can be used in almost all cases of primary THA and most cases of THA revision. Sparing and reconstruction of the joint capsule as well as implanting the largest possible hip ball chosen from different sizes – ranging from 28 to 44 mm – are the most important modifications, which improve the joint stability and indirectly aid the exact reconstruction of leg length. Based on its low complication rate and short length of stay, the LI-THA is both medically and economically recommended

Introduction: Extent of fibular resection dramatically alters limb function. Aim of our study was to evaluate the functional outcome following resections for 23 malignant tumors of fibula. Methods: 23 biopsy proven malignant tumors of fibula were included in the study. There were 11 cases of Ewings sarcoma (PNET), 8 osteosarcomas, 2 malignant fibrous histiocytoma and 1 each of synovial sarcoma and chondrosarcoma. Following chemotherapy (wherever indicated) limb salvage surgery was done in all cases. There were 9 proximal, 6 middle and 9 cases of distal third of fibula. Type I resection was done in all proximal and 4 tumors of middle third fibula. Type II fibular resection with reconstruction of ankle joint was done in 10 cases. Reversal of contralateral fibula to reconstruct the ankle was done in 7 cases. Allograft was used in 3 patients. Results: Average follow up was for 4.5 years (2 to 7 years). 17 patients (68%) were alive after 4 years of surgery. Local recurrence was seen in 3 cases and these were treated by above knee amputation. 3 patients died within 1 year of surgery. 82% of survivors had a good to excellent functional outcome according to the MSTS functional evaluation criteria and 65% were able to bear full weight and had unlimited activity. Recurrence was commonest in patients with PNET. All patients undergoing reversed fibular grafting showed good functional outcome. Discussion and Conclusion: Results of limb salvage in malignant fibular lesions is infrequently reported. Site of fibular lesion is critical in salvage surgery and need for further reconstruction. Good results are obtained with reversed contralateral fibular reconstruction of the ankle