Aims. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common pre- and postoperative issue in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. The conventional technique for measuring LLD has historically been on a non-weightbearing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph; however, this does not capture many potential sources of LLD. The aim of this study was to determine if long-limb EOS radiology can provide a more reproducible and holistic measurement of LLD. Methods. In all, 93 patients who underwent a THA received a standardized preoperative EOS scan, anteroposterior (AP) radiograph, and clinical LLD assessment. Overall, 13 measurements were taken along both anatomical and functional axes and measured twice by an orthopaedic fellow and surgical planning engineer to calculate intraoperator reproducibility and correlations between measurements. Results. Strong correlations were observed for all EOS measurements (r. s. > 0.9). The strongest correlation with AP radiograph (inter-teardrop line) was observed for functional-ASIS-to-floor (functional) (r. s. = 0.57), much weaker than the correlations between EOS measurements. ASIS-to-ankle measurements exhibited a high correlation to other linear measurements and the highest ICC (r. s. = 0.97). Using anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS)-to-ankle, 33% of patients had an absolute LLD of greater than 10 mm, which was statistically different from the inter-teardrop LLD measurement (p < 0.005). Discussion. We found that the conventional measurement of LLD on AP pelvic radiograph does not correlate well with long leg measurements and may not provide a true appreciation of LLD. ASIS-to-ankle demonstrated improved detection of potential LLD than other EOS and radiograph measurements. Full length, functional imaging methods may become the new gold standard to measure LLD. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(12):960–968

Aims. Leg length inequality following total hip replacement remains common. In an effort to reduce this occurrence, surgeons undertake pre-operative templating and use various forms of intra-operative measurements, including computer navigation. This study aims to delineate which measurement technique is most appropriate for measuring leg length inequality from a pelvic radiograph. Method. Three observers took a total of 9600 measurements from 100 pelvic radiographs. Four lines were constructed on each of the radiographs, bisecting the acetabular teardrops (Methods 1/2), ishial spines (Method 3/4), inferior sacroiliac joint (Method 5/6) and inferior obturator foramen (Method 7/8). Measurements were taken from these lines to the midpoint on the LT and to the tip of the GT. The effect of pelvic positioning was also assessed using radiographs of a synthetic pelvis and femur using the same eight methods by a single observer (ED). Intra-observer variability was analysed using within subject standard deviation. Inter-observer variability was analysed using the coefficient of inter-observer variability (CIV). Results. When considering the 100 pelvic radiographs measurement methods 3 (SD 3.5, CIV 0.34) and 8 (SD 3.3 CIV 0.33) showed the best inter and intra observer variability. Methods 4 and 6 performed badly for inter and intra observer variability (SD 3.8 CIV 0.4 and SD 4.6 CIV 0.4). Methods 1, 2, 5 and 7 performed well in one aspect but poorly in the other. When considering the effect of pelvic positioning using radiographs of the synthetic pelvis and femur construct, methods 3 and 7 performed best (SD 6.7 and SD 7.4). Discussion. Measuring from the ischial tuberosities to the LT has the best intra- and interobserver variability. It also performs well despite pelvic malposition. As techniques improve in the measurement of intra-operative leg length, a more accurate measurement of leg length is needed to validate these technologies by

Introduction

Patients with abnormal spinopelvic mobility are at increased risk for hip instability. Measuring the change in sacral slope (ΔSS) with standing and seated lateral radiographs is commonly used to determine spinopelvic mobility pre-operatively. Sacral slope should decrease at least 10 degrees to demonstrate adequate accommodation. Accommodation of <10 deg necessitates acetabular component position change or use of a dual mobility implant. There is potential for different ΔSS measurements in the same patient based on sitting posture.

Introduction: Bone strength is determined by several factors including bone mineral density and the geometrical structure of bone tissue. Plain X-ray is not used regularly for bone mineral density measurements due to different x-ray exposure used for each patient. The different radiation energies have major effects on the optical density of the obtained films. Therefore dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the golden standard for bone density estimation. However it is relatively expensive and relatively inaccessible.

Objective: To evaluate a new computerized analysis of digitized plain radiographs of the proximal femur to allow the evaluation of bone mineral density in human subjects.

Material and Methods: 14 people hospitalized for proximal femoral fracture had their uninvolved proximal femur BMD estimated with a DEXA in the 5 typical regions defined by the DEXA test. Plain proximal femur radiographs of these patients were taken with a standard wedge and digitized into the computer to generate a digital image. The gray levels in the digital image were analyzed and normalized to yield the mineral content at the 5 regions defined by DEXA. The data obtained were correlated with the DEXA results.

Results: The correlation between BMD (DEXA) and gray level measurement of the proximal femur (R=0.261) was not significant. This correlation was significantly improved after modification of the gray levels to 0.549 (P< 0.032).

Conclusion: This computerized analysis and modification of gray levels in digitized radiographs improved significantly the possibility to evaluate bone mineral density of the proximal femur from plain X-rays.

Aims. Appropriate acetabular component placement has been proposed for prevention of postoperative dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Manual placements often cause outliers in spite of attempts to insert the component within the intended safe zone; therefore, some surgeons routinely evaluate intraoperative pelvic radiographs to exclude excessive acetabular component malposition. However, their evaluation is often ambiguous in case of the tilted or rotated pelvic position. The purpose of this study was to develop the computational analysis to digitalize the acetabular component orientation regardless of the pelvic tilt or rotation. Methods. Intraoperative pelvic radiographs of 50 patients who underwent THA were collected retrospectively. The 3D pelvic bone model and the acetabular component were image-matched to the intraoperative pelvic radiograph. The radiological anteversion (RA) and radiological inclination (RI) of the acetabular component were calculated and those measurement errors from the postoperative CT data were compared relative to those of the 2D measurements. In addition, the intra- and interobserver differences of the image-matching analysis were evaluated. Results. Mean measurement errors of the image-matching analyses were significantly small (2.5° (SD 1.4°) and 0.1° (SD 0.9°) in the RA and RI, respectively) relative to those of the 2D measurements. Intra- and interobserver differences were similarly small from the clinical perspective. Conclusion. We have developed a computational analysis of acetabular component orientation using an image-matching technique with small measurement errors compared to visual evaluations regardless of the pelvic tilt or rotation. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):360–367

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion. We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index. In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001). Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion. We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index. In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). The mean pelvic tilt change of 6.51° measured on post-operative Xrays was not significantly different (p=.650). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001). Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery

Pelvic x-ray is a routine part of the primary survey of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines. However, pelvic CT is the gold standard in the diagnosis of pelvic fractures. This study aims to confirm the safety of a modified ATLS algorithm omitting pelvic x-ray in hemodynamically stable polytraumatized patients with clinically stable pelvis, in favour of later pelvic CT scan. A retrospective analysis of polytraumatized patients in our emergency room was conducted between 2005 and 2006. Inclusion criteria were blunt abdominal trauma, initial hemodynamic stability and clinically stable pelvis. We excluded patients requiring immediate intervention. We reviewed the records of 452 patients. 91 fulfilled inclusion criteria (56% male, mean age 45 years). 43% were road traffic accidents and 47% falls. In 68/91 (75%) patients, both pelvic x-ray and CT examination were performed; the remainder had only pelvic CT. In 6/68 (9%) patients, pelvic fracture was diagnosed by pelvic x-ray. None false positive pelvic x-ray was detected. In 3/68 (4%) cases a fracture was missed in the pelvic x-ray, but confirmed on CT. 5 (56%) were classified type A fractures, and another 4 (44%) B 2.1 in computed tomography (AO classification). One A 2.1 fracture was found in a clinically stable patient who only received CT scan (1/23). In hemodynamically stable patients with clinically stable pelvis, x-ray sensitivity is only 67% and it may safely be omitted in favor of a pelvic CT examination. The results support the safety and utility of our modified ATLS algorithm

Increasing the accuracy of information provided through X-Rays maximises pre-operative planning. Aim of this project is to determine the necessity of calibration probes that would improve the accuracy of pre-operative templating. This is a retrospective study involving leg length and pelvis X-Rays performed across the NHS Lanarkshire from 01/03/2023 until 31/04/2024. A total of 87 leg length X-Rays were identified, 18 had a calibration probe present. Leg length was measured on each and the X-Rays were calibrated against the existing probe. In 66.7% of cases there was a major leg length discrepancy of over 2cm between the pre-calibrated and post-calibrated X-Rays. Pelvic X-Rays of 80 patients that underwent total hip replacement were reviewed. Preoperative templating was compared to the implants inserted. An average of 1.94 discrepancy in the size of the acetabular implant was identified whilst in 30 cases the size of the femoral stem was incorrect by at least 1 size. Magnification of 119.7% on X-Rays was found to provide the most accurate templating. Seventy seven cases of pelvic X-Rays before and after hip hemiarthroplasty were also reviewed. The implant head was templated incorrectly in 74% of cases and the stem in 51%. It was identified that pelvic X-Ray magnification of 121.7% would provide the most accurate results. X-Rays with no calibration probes provide inaccurate measurements leading to faulty preoperative planning. Standardised use of a calibration sphere is strongly suggested and whenever that is not available, we suggest magnification of 121%

Human error is usually evaluated using statistical descriptions during radiographic annotation. The technological advances popularized the “non-human” landmarking techniques, such as deep learning, in which the error is presented in a confidence format that is not comparable to that of the human method. The region-based landmark definition makes an arbitrary “ground truth” point impossible. The differences in patients’ anatomies, radiograph qualities, and scales make the horizontal comparison difficult. There is a demand to quantify the manual landmarking error in a probability format. Taking the measurement of pelvic tilt (PT) as an example, this study recruited 115 sagittal pelvic radiographs for the measurement of two PTs. We proposed a method to unify the scale of images that allows horizontal comparisons of landmarks and calculated the maximum possible error using a density vector. Traditional descriptive statistics were also applied. All measurements showed excellent reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.9). Eighty-four measurements (6.09%) were qualified as wrong landmarks that failed to label the correct locations. Directional bias (systematic error) was identified due to cognitive differences between observers. By removing wrong labels and rotated pelves, the analysis quantified the error density as a “good doctor” performance and found 6.77°-11.76° maximum PT disagreement with 95% data points. The landmarks with excellent reliability still have a chance (at least 6.09% in our case) of making wrong landmark decisions. Identifying skeletal contours is at least 24.64% more accurate than estimating landmark locations. The landmark at a clear skeletal contour is more likely to generate systematic errors. Due to landmark ambiguity, a very careful surgeon measuring PT could make a maximum 11.76° random difference in 95% of cases, serving as a “good doctor benchmark” to qualify good landmarking techniques

The lateral wall thickness (LWT) in trochanteric femoral fractures is a known predictive factor for postoperative fracture stability. Currently, the AO/OTA classification uses a patient non-specific measure to assess the absolute LWT (aLWT) and distinguish stable A1.3 from unstable A2.1 fractures based on a threshold of 20.5 mm. This approach potentially results in interpatient deviations due to different bone morphologies and consequently variations in fracture stability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore whether a patient-specific measure for assessment of the relative LWT (rLWT) results in a more precise threshold for prediction of unstable fractures. Part 1 of the study evaluated 146 pelvic radiographs to assess left-right symmetry with regard to caput-collum-angle (CCD) and total trochanteric thickness (TTT), and used the results to establish the rLWT measurement technique. Part 2 reevaluated 202 patients from a previous study cohort to analyze their rLWT versus aLWT for optimization purposes. Findings in Part 1 demonstrated a bilateral symmetry of the femur regarding both CCD and TTT (p ≥ 0.827) allowing to mirror bone's morphology and geometry from the contralateral intact to the fractured femur. Outcomes in Part 2 resulted in an increased accuracy for the new determined rLWT threshold (50.5%) versus the standard 20.5 mm aLWT threshold, with sensitivity of 83.7% versus 82.7% and specificity 81.3% versus 77.8%, respectively. The novel patient-specific rLWT measure can be based on the contralateral femur anatomy and is a more accurate predictor of a secondary lateral wall fracture in comparison to the conventional aLWT. This study established the threshold of 50.5% rLWT as a reference value for prediction of fracture stability and selection of an appropriate implant for fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures

Accurate measurement of pelvic tilt (PT) is critical in diagnosing hip and spine pathologies. Yet a sagittal pelvic radiograph with good quality is not always available. Studies explored the correlation between PT and sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle from anteroposterior (AP) radiographs yet demonstrated conflicting conclusions about its feasibilities. This study aims to perform a cohort-controlled meta-analysis to examine the correlation between the SFP angle and PT and proposes an application range of the method. This study searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies that evaluated the correlation between SFP angle and PT. The Pearson's correlation coefficient r from studies were tabulated and compared. Pooled r for overall and gender/age (teenage or adult) controlled subgroup were reported using Fisher's Z transformation. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using Egger's regression test for the funnel plot asymmetry. Eleven studies were recruited, with nine reported r (totalling 1,247 patients). The overall pooled r was 0.61 with high inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 75.95%). Subgroup analysis showed that the adult group had a higher r than the teenage group (0.70 versus 0.56, p < 0.001). Although statistically insignificant (p = 0.062), the female group showed a higher r than the male group (0.72 versus 0.65). The SFP method must be used with caution and should not be used in the male teenage group. The current studies did not demonstrate that the SFP method was superior to other AP landmarks correlating to PT. Identical heterogeneity was observed among studies, indicating that more ethnicity-segregated and gender-specific subgroup studies might be necessary. More data input analysing the errors will be useful

Acetabular retroversion (ARV) is a cause of femoroacetabular impingement leading to hip pain and reduced range of motion. We aimed to describe the radiological criteria used for diagnosing ARV in the literature and report on the outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and hip arthroscopy (HA) in its management. A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, COCHRANE database in December 2022. English-language studies reporting outcomes of PAO, or open or arthroscopic interventions for ARV were included. From an initial 4203 studies, 21 non-randomised studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies evaluated HA for ARV, with average follow-up ranging from 1 to 5 years, for a cumulative number of 996 patients. Only 3/11 studies identified ARV using AP standardized pelvic radiographs. The most frequent signs describing ARV identified were: Ischial Spine Sign (98% of patients), Posterior Wall Sign (PWS, 94%) and Crossover Sign (COS, 64%); with mean Acetabular Retroversion Index (ARI) ranging from 33% to 35%. 39% of HA patients had all three radiographic signs. Clinically significant outcomes were reached by 33–78% of patients. Eight studies evaluated PAO for ARV, with a follow-up ranging from 2 to 10 years, for a cumulative number of 379 patients. Five of the eight studies identified ARV using standardized radiographs. ISS, COS and PWS were positive in 54%, 97% and 81% of patients, respectively with 52% of PAO patients having all three radiographic signs. Mean ARI ranged from 36–41%. Clinically significant results were reported in 71%–78% of patients. The diagnostic criteria for ARV is poorly defined in the literature, and the quality of evidence is low. Studies on HA are more likely to have used lenient diagnostic criteria. It remains difficult to recommend which cases maybe more suitable for treatment by HA rather than PAO

Pelvic tilt (PT) is always described as the pelvic orientation along the transverse axis, yet four PT definitions were established based on different radiographic landmarks: anterior pelvic plane (PT. a. ), the centres of femoral heads and sacral plate (PT. m. ), pelvic outlet (PT. h. ), and sacral slope (SS). These landmarks quantify a similar concept, yet understanding of their relationships is lacking. Some studies referred to the words “pelvic tilt” for horizontal comparisons, but their PT definitions might differ. There is a demand for understanding their correlations and differences for education and research purposes. This study recruited 105 sagittal pelvic radiographs (68 males and 37 females) from a single clinic awaiting their hip surgeries. Hip hardware and spine pathologies were examined for sub-group analysis. Two observers annotated four PTs in a gender-dependent manner and repeated it after six months. The linear regression model and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied with a 95% significance interval. The SS showed significant gender differences and the lowest correlations to the other parameters in the male group (-0.3< r <0.2). The correlations of SS in scoliosis (n = 7) and hip implant (female, n = 18) groups were statistically different, yet the sample sizes were too small. PT. m. demonstrated very strong correlation to PT. h. (r > 0.9) under the linear model PT. m. = 0.951 × PT. h. - 68.284. The PT. m. and PT. h. are interchangeable under a simple linear regression model, which enables study comparisons between them. In the male group, SS is more of a personalised spinal landmark independent of the pelvic anatomy. Female patients with hip implant may have more static spinopelvic relationships following a certain pattern, yet a deeper study using a larger dataset is required. The understanding of different PTs improves anatomical education

Background: Acetabular retroversion has been proposed to contribute to the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. For the diagnosis of this condition, conventional AP pelvic radiographs may represent a reliable, easily available diagnostic modality as they can be obtained with a reproducible technique allowing the anterior and posterior acetabular rims to be visible for assessment. This study was designed to. establish a method to directly quantify anatomic acetabular version on AP pelvic radiographs and to. determine the validity of the radiographic “cross-over-sign” to detect acetabular retroversion. Methods: Using 43 desiccated pelves (86 acetabuli) the anatomic acetabular versions were measured at three different transverse planes (cranially, centrally and caudally). From these pelves, standardized AP pelvic radiographs were obtained. To directly measure central acetabular version (AV), a modified radiographic method is introduced for the use of AP pelvic radiographs. Moreover, the validity of the radiographic “cross-over-sign” to detect cranial acetabular retroversion was determined. Results: The mean central and caudal anatomic AV were approximately 20°, the mean cranial AV was 8°. Cranial retroversion (AV < 0°) was present in 19 of 86 hips (22%). A linear correlation was found between the central and cranial AV. Below 10° of central AV, all acetabuli were cranially retroverted. Between 10° and 20°, 30% of the acetabuli were cranially retroverted and above 20°, only one of 45 acetabuli was cranially retroverted. The radiographic measurement of the central AV (20.3° ± 6.5) correlated strongly with the anatomic AV (20.1° ± 6.4). The sensitivity of the ‘cross-over-sign’ to detect an cranial acetabular anteversion of less than 4° was 96%, its specificity 95%, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values 90% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: The cranial AV is on average 12° lower than the central AV, with the latter directly measurable from AP pelvic radiographs. A central AV of less than 10° was associated with cranial retroversion. The presence of a positive ‘cross-over-sign’ is a highly reliable indicator of cranial AV of < 4°

Introduction: It could be shown that an ample number of classical hip parameters for radiographic quantification of hip morphology on anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs vary significantly with individual pelvic tilt and rotation. This could be proven not only for classical hip parameters (e.g. the lateral centre edge angle) but also for more recently described radiographic features such as acetabular retroversion. The resulting misdiagnosis and misinterpretation can potentially impair a correct therapy for the patient. We developed fast and easy-to-use computer software to perform three-dimensional (3D) analysis of the individual hip joint morphology using two-dimensional (2D) AP pelvic radiographs. Landmarks extracted from the radiograph were combined with a cone beam x-ray projection model and a strong lateral pelvic radiograph to reconstruct 3D hip joints. Twenty-five parameters including quantification of femoral head coverage can be calculated for a neutral orientation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of this method for tilt and rotation correction of the acetabular rim and associated radiographic parameters. Methods: The validation comprised three steps:. External validation;. internal validation; and. intra-/interobserver analysis. A series of x-rays of 30 cadaver pelves mounted on a flexible holding device were available for step 1 and 2. External validation comprised the comparison of radiographical parameters of the cadaver hips when determined with our software in comparison with CT-based measurements or actual radiographs in a neutral pelvic orientation as gold standard. Internal validation evaluated the consistency of the parameters when each single pelvis was calculated back from different random orientations to the same neutral pelvic position. The intra-/interobserver analysis investigated the reliability and reproducibility of all parameters with the help of 100 randomized, blinded AP pelvic radiographs of a consecutive patient series. Results:. All but one parameter (acetabular index) showed a substantial to almost perfect correlation with the CT-measurements. Internal validity was substantial to almost perfect for all parameters. There was a substantial to almost perfect reliability and reproducibility of all parameters except the acetabular index. Conclusion: The software could be shown to be an accurate, reliable and reproducible method for correction of AP pelvic radiographs. This computer-assisted method allows standardized evaluation of all relevant radiographic parameters for detection of anatomic morphologic differences. It will be used to study the influence of pelvic malorientation on the radiographic appearance of each individual parameter. In addition, it allows evaluating the clinical significance of standardizing pelvic parameters

Aims. To monitor the performance of services for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in Northern Ireland and identify potential improvements to enhance quality of service and plan for the future. Methods. This was a prospective observational study, involving all infants treated for DDH between 2011 and 2017. Children underwent clinical assessment and radiological investigation as per the regional surveillance policy. The regional radiology data was interrogated to quantify the use of ultrasound and ionizing radiation for this population. Results. Evidence-based changes were made to the Northern Ireland screening programme, including an increase in ultrasound scanning capacity and expansion of nurse-led screening clinics. The number of infant hip ultrasound scans increased from 4,788 in 2011, to approximately 7,000 in 2013 and subsequent years. The number of hip radiographs on infants of less than one year of age fell from 7,381 to 2,208 per year. There was a modest increase in the treatment rate from 10.9 to 14.3 per 1,000 live births but there was a significant reduction in the number of closed hip reductions. The incidence of infants diagnosed with DDH after one year of age was 0.30 per 1,000 live births over the entire period. Conclusion. Improving compliance with the regional infant hip screening protocols led to reduction in operative procedures and reduced the number of pelvic radiographs of infants. We conclude that performance monitoring of screening programmes for DDH is essential to provide a quality service. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):495–500

The long-term result of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) strongly depends on the correct component positioning of the acetabular cup and stem. To measure cup orientation out of a postoperative anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiograph is highly inaccurate due to the wide variation of individual pelvic tilt and rotation. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a 2D-3D matching software (HipMatch) that allows matching a postoperative AP pelvic radiograph with a preoperative CT to accurately measure cup orientation corrected for individual pelvic orientation. The software is based on a spline-based multi-resolution 2D-3D image registration algorithm and a Markov random field theory based on similarity measurement. Based on a cone projection (imitating the path of the x-rays), the software is able to match the three-dimensional CT-based data set with the contours of the projected pelvis on the AP pelvic radiograph. This gives the possibility to correct the measured cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) by measuring it according to an anatomical defined coordinate system (anterior pelvic plane). The validation of the software consisted of accuracy, reproducibility and observer reliability measurements using cadaver and clinical data. For the cadaver validation 10 human pelves (20 hips) were used. From each pelvis 2 CT scans, one with and one without an inserted cup were acquired. The CT scan with the cup was used as the ground truth. With the cup inserted 4 AP pelvic radiographs with the pelvis in an unknown arbitrary position during acquisition were performed resulting in 80 measurements for accuracy. These measurements were performed by 2 observers at 2 different occasions resulting in a total of 320 measurements for reproducibility and observer reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for quantification of reproducibility and observer reliability and the Bland-Altman analysis was used to detect systemic errors. The clinical validation included 33 patients with a pre- and a postoperative CT and 49 patients with only a postoperative CT in addition to the postoperative radiographs. In the cases with only a postoperative CT, for the 2D-3D matching the postoperative CT after manual excision of the cup from the CT slice sticks was used. In all cases the postoperative CT was used as the ground truth. For each patient all the available postoperative radiographs were used resulting in 236 measurements of accuracy. In the cadaver validation the cup orientation ranged from 34° – 57° for the inclination and from 1° – 24° for the anteversion measured on the CT. The accuracy showed a mean difference for the inclination of 0.9° ± 1.6° (−3.2° – 4.0°) and of 1.2 ± 2.4° (−5.3° – 5.6°) for the anteversion. The ICC for the reproducibility ranged from 0.96 to 0.99 and for the interobserver reliability from 0.95 to 0.98. No relevant systematic error was detected. In the clinical validation the cup orientation measured on the postoperative CT ranged for the inclination from 22° – 57° and for the anteversion from 7° – 35°. In the clinical setup the accuracy showed a mean difference for inclination of 1.8° ± 1.6° (−4.0° – 5.3°) and of −1.1° ± 2.9° (−5.9° – 5.7°) for the anteversion. The 2D-3D matching technique showed a good accuracy and a very good reproducibility and observer reliability. This technique allows to measure the exact cup orientation out of an AP pelvic radiograph with the help of a preoperative CT and to correct the parameters for the individual pelvic position. Therefore this software is a powerful tool to measure accuracy of CT-based computer-assisted cup placement in a large clinical series

Late presentation of DDH continues to remain a major problem particularly in the developing countries. Femoro-Acetabular Zones (FAZ) system is created to find a relation between acetabular maturity and severity of dislocation, in one hand, and the success of closed reduction, on the other hand. We hypnosis that the lower the acetabular index and the closer the femoral head to the acetabulum, the more likely the success of treatment. Thus, a retrospective study was performed on late diagnosed DDH hips that underwent closed treatment at a particular hospital in the Middle East. FAZ are drawn on the AP view of the pelvic x-ray and is based on a perpendicular from the acetabular index at the lateral margin of the superior acetabular rim then another perpendicular to Perkin's line is drawn. This gives three zones, graded I-III. The center of femoral metaphysis is identified denoting the position of the femoral head in relation to the zone classification. FAZ system was applied on 65 pelvic radiographs; mean patient age was 24 months (range: 12 to 36 months) with a minimum follow up of 3 years. Overall, 37 of 65 hips (57%) achieved a satisfactory outcome (Severin I&II), while 22 hips (33%) were found to be unsatisfactory (Severin III). 6 hips (10%) needed an open reduction (p-value 0.001). FAZ could perfectly predict the successful cases. FAZ system is a simple and novel classification and if employed, could reasonably predict the outcome of non-surgical treatment of DDH after walking age

Introduction. The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) improves hip joint mechanics in patients with symptomatic dysplasia. As a consequence of the multi-planar acetabular re-orientation, the course of the iliopsoas tendon over the hip may be affected, potentially resulting in iliopsoas tendon-related pain. At present, little information regarding the incidence of iliopsoas-related pathology following PAO exists. We aimed to identify the incidence of iliopsoas-related pain following PAO. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any risk factors associated with this pathology. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the PAO's performed from 2014–2017, for symptomatic dysplasia in our unit (single-surgeon, minimum 1-year follow-up). All patients with adequate pelvic radiographs were included. Radiographic parameters of dysplasia were measured from pre- and post-operative AP pelvic radiographs using a validated software (SHIPS). 1. The degree of pubis displacement was classified according to our novel system. Cases were defined as those with evidence of iliopsoas-related pain post PAO (positive response to iliopsoas tendon-sheath steroid/local anaesthetic injection). Results. A total of 241 patients were included (mean age 28 years). We identified 23 cases (10.6%) with iliopsoas tendon-related pain post-PAO. Three of these cases required an open iliopsoas tendon release and 1 required a revision of their PAO. This was successful in treating symptoms in all. The remainder required either 1–2 iliopsoas tendon-sheath steroid injections to successfully treat their symptoms. We found no significantly associated risk factors with regard to demographics, severity or type of dysplasia, and degree of pubis displacement. Conclusion. The minimally-invasive PAO remains a successful technique for treating symptomatic dysplasia. Despite this, we report a 10.6% incidence of iliopsoas tendon-related pain following surgery. In the vast majority this is successfully treated with an iliopsoas tendon-sheath steroid injection. The ability to identify and treat patients with this pathology early during their post-operative PAO recovery will enable patients to maximise their rehabilitation outcomes