Background. The overall incidence of neurological symptoms attributed to lumbar misplaced screws has been described to occur in 3.48% of patients undergoing surgery. These lumbar radicular neurological lesions are undetected with conventional intraoperative neurophysiological and radiological controls. The hypothesis of this study was that direct stimulation of the pedicle screw after placement in the lumbar spine may not work as well as for screws placed in the thoracic pedicles. A more suitable method for the lumbar spine could be the stimulation of the pedicle track with a ball-tipped probe. Methods. Comparative observational study on the detection of malpostioned lumbar pedicle screws using two different techniques in two different periods: t-EMG screw stimulation (2011–2012) and track stimulation (2013–2014). A total of 1440 lumbar pedicle screws were placed in 242 patients undergoing surgery for vertebral deformities in the last four years (2011–2014). In the first two years, 802 lumbar screws were neuromonitored using t-EMG during. In the last two years, 638 screws were placed after probe stimulation of the pedicle track. Standardised t-EMG conventional registration and fluoroscopy were afterwards performed in all cases. Results. Six patients (4.4%) in the t-EMG group without signs of screw misplacement developed radicular pain. After checking with CT scan, a caudal prominence of the screw at the inferior aspect of the pedicle was detected in 7 screws (0.9%) and they were removed. After removal, probe stimulation was performed at the middle track showing abnormal thresholds (3.9–9.7mA). In the second group (track stimulation), 11 cases (10.8%) had thresholds below 7 mA. In these cases, the intrapedicular route was changed. None of these 106 patients presented postoperative radiculopathy and CT scans showed that all screws were well positioned. Conclusions. The t-EMG stimulation of lumbar pedicle screws offer some false negatives cases. However, the record in the middle pedicle track is able to detect misplaced screws and prevent the development of lumbar radiculopathy. Therefore, systematic pedicle track stimulation is strongly recommended in the lumbar spine. Level of Evidence. Level III

Introduction. We prospectively examined the effect of pedicle screw placement at a young age (<5 years) for early-onset spinal deformity on the growth and development of pedicles and the spinal canal. Methods. Patients with early-onset deformity who received pedicle screw placement before the age of 5 years and had preoperative and final follow-up axial imaging were included. To increase sample size, patients who had the same criteria but with no preoperative axial images were also included. Anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the canal and pedicle length were measured on axial images cutting through the middle of the pedicle (figures 1 and 2). Results. 13 patients (five male, eight female) met inclusion criteria. Average age at surgery was 46·6 months (29–60), and average follow-up 49·8 months (24–82). 77 instrumented and 32 non-instrumented levels were studied. The table summarises measurements. In the nine patients without preoperative axial imaging, pedicle lengths and canal diameters seemed to accord with previously published normative morphological data for this age group. Conclusions. Animal studies have shown the potential slowing of pedicle and canal growth in immature spines with pedicle screws. This is the first study to examine the behaviour of instrumented immature human vertebrae prospectively. Early application of pedicle screws does not seem to cause adverse effects on pedicle and canal growth in young patients. This discordance between human and animal studies may have three explanations: (1) although the neurocentral cartilage is still visible it may not be physiologically active in this age group; (2) a single screw across may not exert sufficient compression; (3) or the canal may have means of remodelling that is yet not known

Aims. Anchorage of pedicle screw rod instrumentation in the elderly spine with poor bone quality remains challenging. Our study aims to evaluate how the screw bone anchorage is affected by screw design, bone quality, loading conditions, and cementing techniques. Methods. Micro-finite element (µFE) models were created from micro-CT (μCT) scans of vertebrae implanted with two types of pedicle screws (L: Ennovate and R: S. 4. ). Simulations were conducted for a 10 mm radius region of interest (ROI) around each screw and for a full vertebra (FV) where different cementing scenarios were simulated around the screw tips. Stiffness was calculated in pull-out and anterior bending loads. Results. Experimental pull-out strengths were excellently correlated to the µFE pull-out stiffness of the ROI (R. 2. > 0.87) and FV (R. 2. > 0.84) models. No significant difference due to screw design was observed. Cement augmentation increased pull-out stiffness by up to 94% and 48% for L and R screws, respectively, but only increased bending stiffness by up to 6.9% and 1.5%, respectively. Cementing involving only one screw tip resulted in lower stiffness increases in all tested screw designs and loading cases. The stiffening effect of cement augmentation on pull-out and bending stiffness was strongly and negatively correlated to local bone density around the screw (correlation coefficient (R) = -0.95). Conclusion. This combined experimental, µCT and µFE study showed that regional analyses may be sufficient to predict fixation strength in pull-out and that full analyses could show that cement augmentation around pedicle screws increased fixation stiffness in both pull-out and bending, especially for low-density bone. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):797–806

Study design. Prospective clinical and radiological analysis of children with complex cervical deformities for the safety of cervical pedicle screw insertion. Objectives. To analyse the possibility, safety and efficacy of cervical pedicle screw insertion in complex pediatric cervical deformities, where conventional stabilisation techniques would not have provided rigid fixation. Summary of Background Data. Although the usage of cervical pedicle screws (CPS) in adults has become established, the feasibility and safety of its application in children has not been described previously in the literature. Methods. Sixteen children of mean age 9.7 ± 2.6 years (range: 3 - 13) requiring spinal stabilization for cranio-vertebral junction anomalies (n=10), cervico-thoracic kyphosis/ kyphoscoliosis (n=5) and cervical tumor excision (n=1) formed the study group. Feasibility of CPS insertion was assessed by computerised tomography images. Standard 3.0 mm titanium pedicle screws were inserted using intraoperative Iso-C C arm based 3 D computer navigation and the containment was post operatively evaluated with CT scan. Results. Based on preoperative CT imaging, 55 pedicles were selected for screw fixation. Intra operatively CPS was successfully inserted at 51 levels and at four sclerosed pedicles (7.3%), screws could not be inserted. At 42 levels, the screws were inserted in the classical description of pedicle screw application and in nine deformed vertebra, the screws were inserted in a non-classical fashion, taking purchase in the three columns of the cervical vertebra. Forty five (88.3%) screws were fully contained, six (11.7 %) had a non-critical breach and none had a critical breach. No perioperative complications related to pedicle screw insertion were noted. Conclusion. Safe insertion of cervical pedicle screws is possible in children. Iso-C navigation provides real time virtual imaging and improves the safety and accuracy of successful pedicle fixation even in altered vertebral anatomy. Pedicle width morphometrics do not restrict screw insertion

Aims. The aim of this study was to systematically compare the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted (RA) technique with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted (CT) pedicle screw insertion for spine disease. Methods. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the safety and accuracy of RA compared with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion for spine disease from 2012 to 2019. This meta-analysis used Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance method with mixed-effects model for heterogeneity, calculating the odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, and risk of bias were analyzed. Results. Ten RCTs with 713 patients and 3,331 pedicle screws were included. Compared with CT, the accuracy rate of RA was superior in Grade A with statistical significance and Grade A + B without statistical significance. Compared with CT, the operating time of RA was longer. The difference between RA and CT was statistically significant in radiation dose. Proximal facet joint violation occurred less in RA than in CT. The postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of RA was smaller than that of CT, and there were some interesting outcomes in our subgroup analysis. Conclusion. RA technique could be viewed as an accurate and safe pedicle screw implantation method compared to CT. A robotic system equipped with optical intraoperative navigation is superior to CT in accuracy. RA pedicle screw insertion can improve accuracy and maintain stability for some challenging areas. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(10):653–666

Introduction. To introduce a new classification method and analyze related risk factor about lateral wall perforation associated with lower cervical pedicle screw and free-hand insertion technique. Methods. A Retrospective study was made to analyze 214 patients (1024 screws) with various cervical spine disorders, involved in pedicle screw instrumentation at C3-7 from July 2004 to July 2009. Researchers assessed the position of the screws in the pedicle by carefully probing intraoperatively and studying postoperative thin-slice computed tomography scan. Perforation of lateral wall was classified into two phases. Phase I refers to the burst of the pedicle by screw, which means that the length of screw threads penetrating the external cortex of pedicles on CT scan is 2 mm, whereas in Phase, the length is >2 mm. The Penetrated screws and related factors were analyzed though Backward Stepwise (Wald) Logistic regression. Results. During the follow-up, 2 screws were reported to be broken and 1 screw loosened. Of the screws inserted, total of 129 screws 12.60% have shown violated of lateral pedicle walls, included 101 screws (9.86%) causative of Phase I and 28 screws (2.73%) of Phase II. Two variance were deduced in the regression analysis, which concerned to ratio variance between inner and lateral walls, PRC 0.695, OR value = 2.003and angle difference variance between screws implanted and measurements preoperativePRC −1.542, OR value = 0.214). Conclusions. Free-hand lower cervical pedicle screw insertion in this series was comparatively safety. Phase I Penetration was believed to be safe of vertebral artery and Phase II faced to higher risk of artery damage. The main risk factor of lateral wall perforation was the ratio variance between inner and lateral wall, while the main protection factor was the angle difference variance between screws implanted and CT measurements

INTRODUCTION. The correct placement of pedicle screws is a major part of spine fusion and it requires experienced trained spinal surgeons. In the era of European Working Time Directive (EWTD), surgical trainees have less opportunity to acquire skills. Josh Kauffman (Author of The First 20 Hours) examined the K. Anders-Ericsson study that 10,000 hours is required to be an expert. He suggests you can be good at anything in 20 hours following 5 methods. This study was done to show the use of accelerated learning in trainees to achieve competency and confidence on the insertion of pedicle screws. METHODS. Data was collected using 3 experienced spine surgeons, 8 trainees and 1 novice (control) on the cadaveric insertion of pedicle screws over a 4 day didactic lecture in the cadaver lab. Each candidate had 2 cadavers and 156 screw placements over 4 hour shifts. Data was collected for time of pedicle screw insertion for each level on the left and right side. A pre-course and post-course questionnaire (Likert scale) was conducted. RESULTS. There were 8 candidates (surgeons) involved. 1 spinal SpR, 6 spine fellows and 1 junior consultant. A physiotherapist was the control novice. The surgeons and the control got significantly faster over time. The control made significantly more errors than the surgeons. Surgeons were significantly faster by the end (p value < 0.05). The control got faster over time and by the end, was no longer significantly slower than the surgeon when they first started. CONCLUSION. Pedicle screw insertion can cause significant morbidity, which includes paralysis. As a trainee, this is not an easy skill to acquire or practice. This focused pedicle screw course shows that a junior spinal surgeon can achieve improved competency and confidence in 20 hours but furthermore a complete novice can learn to insert pedicle screws and reach a level of competence almost at the level of the trainee in 20 hours as well

Introduction: Pedicle screws are now commonly used to instrument the thoracic spine and offers improved three point fixation and therefore theoretically offers better derotation of the spine during corrective manoeuvres in scoliosis surgery. Aim: To compare thoracic scoliosis correction using either pedicle hooks or pedicle screws. Methods: Two patient groups were studied. Data was collected prospectively and this is a review of the radiological data. All patients had structural thoracic scoliosis. Group 1, 14 patients (9 female and 5 male) mean age 14.6, were treated with posterior correction of scoliosis using the standard USS II technique using pedicle hooks and screws. Group 2, 14 patients (11 female and 3 male) mean age 15.3 were treated using pedicle screws alone to correct the apical deformity, using a variation of the original USS technique. Pre and postoperative Cobb angle, apical vertebral rotation (AVR, Perdriolle method) and apical vertebral translation (AVT) were measured. Unpaired “t” test was used to compare the magnitude of correction in both groups. The mean follow up period was 30 months (range: 27–42). Results: The mean corrections of Cobb angle, AVR and AVT, in group I were 61.1% (range: 48.5–83.9), 33.3% (range: 8.6–100) and 62.9% (range: 43.2–91.4), respectively. In Group 2 the corrections were: 57.4% (range: 21.4–81.7), 57.2% (range:16.7–100) and 58.7% (range: 34–80.9). There were no statistically significant differences between the correction of Cobb angle or AVT in both groups (P=0.479 and 0.443 respectively). However, the pedicle screws proved to be more effective at correcting the AVR (P= 0.017). No complications occurred and correction has been well maintained with a minimum of 2 year follow-up. Conclusion: Pedicle screws can safely and effectively replace the pedicle hooks in the classical USS technique. They are more effective at correcting the rotational deformity, although do not provide a better correction of Cobb angle. These technical results now need to be correlated with relevant clinical outcomes

Aim: To compare thoracic scoliosis correction using either pedicle hooks or pedicle screws. Methods and results: Two patient groups were studied. Data was collected prospectively and this is a review of the radiological data. All patients had structural thoracic scoliosis. Group 1, 14 patients (9 female and 5 male) mean age 14.6, were treated with posterior correction of scoliosis using the standard USS II technique using pedicle hooks and screws. Group 2, 14 patients (11 female and 3 male) mean age 15.3 were treated using pedicle screws alone to correct the apical deformity, using a variation of the original USS technique. Pre and postoperative Cobb angle, apical vertebral rotation (AVR, Perdriolle method) and apical vertebral translation (AVT) were measured. Unpaired “t” test was used to compare the magnitude of correction in both groups. The mean follow up period was 6.7 months (range:3–18). The mean corrections of Cobb angle, AVR and AVT, in group I were 61.1% (range:48.5–83.9), 33.3% (range:8.6–100) and 62.9% (range:43.2–91.4), respectively. In Group 2 the corrections were: 57.4% (range:21.4–81.7), 57.2% (range:16.7–100) and 58.7% (range:34–80.9). There is no statistically significant difference between the correction of Cobb angle or AVT in both groups (P=0.479 and 0.443 respectively). However, the pedicle screws proved to be more effective at correcting the AVR (P= 0.017). No complications occurred and correction has been well maintained. Conclusion: Pedicle screws can safely and effectively replace the pedicle hooks in the classical USS technique. They are more effective at correcting the rotational deformity, although do not provide a better correction of Cobb angle. These technical results now need to be correlated with relevant clinical outcomes

Objectives. This presentation discusses the experience at our Centre with treating traumatic thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and also looks at clinical and radiological outcomes as well as complications. Design. This is a retrospective study reviewing all cases performed between Jan 2013 and June 2019. Subjects. In our study there were 257 patients in total, of which there were 123 males and 134 females aged between 17 and 70. Methods. We reviewed the case notes and imaging retrospectively to obtain the relevant data. Results. A total of 257 patients were included, 123 males and 134 females; the mean age was 47.6 years. The majority of injuries were from fall from significant height. In 98 cases the fracture involved a thoracic vertebra and in 159 cases a lumbar vertebra. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation was performed either one level above and below fracture or Two levels above and below the fracture depending upon the level of injury. Forty two cases were treated with additional short pedicle screws at the level of fracture. More than 15% (39) of patients presented with a neurological deficit on admission and more than 80% (32) of those showed post-operative improvement in their neurology as per Frankel Grading system. The mean Operative time was 117minutes +− 45, and mean length of hospital stay was 7.2 +− 3.8 days, with significant improvement in Visual analogue score. Percutaneous fixation achieved a satisfactory improvement in radiological parameters including sagittal Cobb angle (SCA) post-operatively in all patients. The vast majority of patients achieved a good functional outcome according to modified Macnab criteria. Follow up was for a maximum of two years, with relevant imaging at each stage. Ten (3.8%) patients had wound infection with three patients requiring wound debridement. Four patients had upper level screws pulled out and in Four cases one screw was misplaced. All eight had revision surgery. Conclusions. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a safe surgical option with comparable outcomes to open surgery and a potential reduction in perioperative morbidity. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is the primary surgical technique to treat traumatic thoracolumbar fractures at our Centre. There were no major complications in our series, with good functional outcome following surgery

Objectives. Cement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL). Materials and Methods. A total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL). The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined. Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage. Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness. The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra. Results. Mean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.001) than for uncemented screws. There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.5). In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions. Conclusion. Conventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws. In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine. Cite this article: C. I. Leichtle, A. Lorenz, S. Rothstock, J. Happel, F. Walter, T. Shiozawa, U. G. Leichtle. Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426

We present an analysis of manual and computer-assisted preoperative pedicle screw placement planning. Preoperative planning of 256 pedicle screws was performed manually twice by two experienced spine surgeons (M1 and M2) and automatically once by a computer-assisted method (C) on three-dimensional computed tomography images of 17 patients with thoracic spinal deformities. Statistical analysis was performed to obtain the intraobserver and interobserver variability for the pedicle screw size (i.e. diameter and length) and insertion trajectory (i.e. pedicle crossing point, sagittal and axial inclination, and normalized screw fastening strength). In our previous study, we showed that the differences among both manual plannings (M1 and M2) and computer-assisted planning (C) are comparable to the differences between manual plannings, except for the pedicle screw inclination in the sagittal plane. In this study, however, we obtained also the intraobserver variability for both manual plannings (M1 and M2), which revealed that larger differences occurred again for the sagittal screw inclination, especially in the case of manual planning M2 with average differences of up to 18.3°. On the other hand, the interobserver variability analysis revealed that the intraobserver variability for each pedicle screw parameter was, in terms of magnitude, comparable to the interobserver variability among both manual and computer-assisted plannings. The results indicate that computer-assisted pedicle screw placement planning is not only more reproducible and faster than, but also as reliable as manual planning

To determine whether neurophysiological electrical pedicle testing (EPT) is a useful aid in the detection of malpostioned pedicle screw tracts. EPT data from 246 screws in 32 spinal operations on 32 patients over a 5 year period (2009–2014) were recorded and analysed. In addition to physical palpation, a ball-tipped electrode delivered stimuli and the output was recorded by evoked electromyogram (EMG). When breach threshold values were recorded, the surgeon rechecked the tract for breaches and responded appropriately. In addition, standard motor evoked potential (MEP) and sensory evoked potential(SEP) spinal cord monitoring was performed. There were 24(9.8%) pedicle breaches by tract testing and 8(3.3%) by screw testing. In 11 instances in 7 patients where the tract testing showed a breach, the tract was redirected and subsequent screw testing showed adequate integrity of the pedicle. The total time for tract and screw testing was 25 seconds. There were no associated changes in MEP or SEP monitoring with any of the recorded pedicle breaches and none of the patients had any post-operative neurological deficit. EPT for the pedicle screw and tract is a safe, simple, practical and reliable technique which improves the accuracy of screw placement. Further studies would be required to confirm (and possibly revise) the threshold levels and to demonstrate whether EPT reduces the risk of misplaced screws or post-operative neurological deficit

Pedicle screw fixation is a technically demanding procedure with potential difficulties and reoperation rates are currently on the order of 11%. The most common intraoperative practice for position assessment of pedicle screws is biplanar fluoroscopic imaging that is limited to two- dimensions and is associated to low accuracies. We have previously introduced a full-dimensional position assessment framework based on registering intraoperative X-rays to preoperative volumetric images with sufficient accuracies. However, the framework requires a semi-manual process of pedicle screw segmentation and the intraoperative X-rays have to be taken from defined positions in space in order to avoid pedicle screws' head occlusion. This motivated us to develop advancements to the system to achieve higher levels of automation in the hope of higher clinical feasibility. In this study, we developed an automatic segmentation and X-ray adequacy assessment protocol. An artificial neural network was trained on a dataset that included a number of digitally reconstructed radiographs representing pedicle screw projections from different points of view. This model was able to segment the projection of any pedicle screw given an X-ray as its input with accuracy of 93% of the pixels. Once the pedicle screw was segmented, a number of descriptive geometric features were extracted from the isolated blob. These segmented images were manually labels as ‘adequate’ or ‘not adequate’ depending on the visibility of the screw axis. The extracted features along with their corresponding labels were used to train a decision tree model that could classify each X-ray based on its adequacy with accuracies on the order of 95%. In conclusion, we presented here a robust, fast and automated pedicle screw segmentation process, combined with an accurate and automatic algorithm for classifying views of pedicle screws as adequate or not. These tools represent a useful step towards full automation of our pedicle screw positioning assessment system

The evolution of operative technology has allowed correction of complex spinal deformities. Neurological deficits following spinal instrumentation is a devastating complication and the risk is especially high in those with complex sagittal and coronal plane deformities. Prior to intraoperative evoked potential monitoring, spinal cord function was tested using the Stagnara Wake up test, typically performed after instrumentation once the desired correction has been achieved. This test is limited as it does not reflect the timeframe in which the problem occurred and it may be dangerous to some patients. Intraoperative neuromonitoring allows timely feedback of the effect of instrumentation and curve correction on the spinal cord. Pedicle screws that are malpositioned can result in poor fixation or neuronal injury. Evoked EMG monitoring can aid in accurate placement. A positive EMG response can alert the surgeon to a potential pedicle breech and allow them to reassess the placement of their hardware intraoperatively. The stimulation threshold is affected by the amount of surrounding bone acting as an insulator to electrical conduction and is variable in different regions of the spine. In the non-deformed, lumbar spine stimulation thresholds have been established. Such guidelines have not been well-developed for the thoracic spine, or for severely scoliotic spines. Thus our primary objective was to compare the stimulation threshold of the apical pedicle on the concave side to the stimulation threshold of the pedicles at the upper and lower instrumented levels. Intraoperative EMG stimulation thresholds were done at 192 apical pedicles on the concave side of the deformity and then compared to those thresholds found at 169 terminal level pedicles. Only pedicles for which a stimulation threshold was found were reported and excluded those where a breech was suspected. The lowest stimulation required for an EMG response was documented to a maximum stimulation of 20 mA. The mean threshold at the apex was 16.62 milliamps (mA) compared to 18.25mA at the terminal levels. This was compared with the t-test and showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). In this study we report only the thresholds for the concave side, the pedicle that is most likely to be reduced in size. The threshold for stimulation is reduced compared to those seen at the highest and lowest instrumented level. Most of the apexes are located in the mid-thoracic spine with the highest instrumented levels being in the high thoracic spine and the lowest levels being in the lumbar spine. This study provides preliminary evidence that the apical, concave pedicle has a lower threshold than the end pedicles and one cannot rely on established thresholds from different areas of the spine. The surgeon should be cognisant of these differences when instrumenting at the apical level. Ongoing work is examining the convex apex threshold as well as the relationship between the effect of age and a diagnosis other than adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Objectives. To employ a simple and fast method to evaluate those patients with neurological deficits and misplaced screws in relatively safe lumbosacral spine, and to determine if it is necessary to undertake revision surgery. Methods. A total of 316 patients were treated by fixation of lumbar and lumbosacral transpedicle screws at our institution from January 2011 to December 2012. We designed the criteria for post-operative revision scores of pedicle screw malpositioning (PRSPSM) in the lumbosacral canal. We recommend the revision of the misplaced pedicle screw in patients with PRSPSM = 5′ as early as possible. However, patients with PRSPSM < 5′ need to follow the next consecutive assessment procedures. A total of 15 patients were included according to at least three-stage follow-up. Results. Five patients with neurological complications (PRSPSM = 5′) underwent revision surgery at an early stage. The other ten patients with PRSPSM < 5′ were treated by conservative methods for seven days. At three-month follow-up, only one patient showed delayed onset of neurological complications (PRSPSM 7′) while refusing revision. Seven months later, PRSPSM decreased to 3′ with complete rehabilitation. Conclusions. This study highlights the significance of consecutively dynamic assessments of PRSPSMs, which are unlike previous implementations based on purely anatomical assessment or early onset of neurological deficits.and also confirms our hypothesis that patients with early neurological complications may not need revision procedures in the relatively broad margin of the lumbosacral canal. Cite this article: X-J. Lin. Treatment strategies for early neurological deficits related to malpositioned pedicle screws in the lumbosacral canal: A pilot study. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:46–51

Summary Statement. Pedicle screws provide robust fixation and rigid immobilization. There has been no attempt to correlate the anatomic dimensions of thoracic and lumbar pedicles with the accuracy of navigated insertion. This study demonstrates that comparable accuracy using this technique. Introduction. Pedicle screws provide robust mechanical fixation, which makes their use attractive; their use enables fixation of the three spinal columns. There remains concern about the potential both for misplacement; various investigators have studied the accuracy of pedicle screw insertions, comparing different techniques. What is not clear, however, is whether there is any relation between the variables of pedicles’ anatomic dimensions, screw dimensions and accuracy. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between these variables. Patients & Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive pedicle screws that were inserted in the thoracic and lumbar spine at our institution. Screws were inserted using the navigated method (Stealth Station® TREON™, Medtronic, Louisville, CO). The accuracy of the screw insertion was measured using the classification system developed by Gertzbein and Robbins; pedicle dimensions were measured from post-operative computed tomography scans. The corresponding pre-operative scans were then used to measure the pedicle dimensions at the other levels. The magnitude of a cortical breach in the pedicle was represented by a letter: A (no breach), B (<2mm), C (>2mm, <4mm), D (>4mm, <6mm) and E (>6mm). In addition, measurements were made of the anatomic dimensions of the pedicles. The combination of these two measures allowed for direct correlation to be made between the accuracy of screw insertion, screw dimensions and pedicle anatomy. We then computed the proportion of each pedicle (width) occupied by a screw. Results. A total of 765 screws were reviewed, 493 were in the thoracic spine and 272 in the lumbar spine. Of the screws in the thoracic spine, 472 (96%) were either fully in the pedicle or less than 2mm beyond the cortex (within the A+B classification); when considered separately, 323 (66%) were completely within the pedicle (A) and 149 (30%) were less than 2mm beyond the cortex. A total of 21 (4%) screws were beyond 2mm but within 6mm (C+D). In the lumbar spine, 270 (99%) were either completely within the cortex or less than 2mm exposed (classified as A or B). The nadir of pedicle width was at T4. From L1 to L5, measured pedicle width also rose. This pattern was followed, although it was less profound, when screw diameter was measured in the lumbar spine (and even less so in the thoracic vertebrae). The height of pedicles was noted to progressively increase, peaking at the thoraco-lumbar junction. The mid thoracic region was associated with screws occupying the greatest proportion of pedicle diameter. Discussion/Conclusion. The use of pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine remains relatively safe. The accuracy of navigated insertion was found to compare well to previous series’. Although there is some association between the anatomical dimensions of pedicles and the dimensions of screws, this doesn't seem to be a strong association. Based on the findings in this series, future studies that relate the long term outcome (e.g. failure or screw loosening) with proportion of pedicle diameter taken up by a screw may be warranted

Summary. Optimum position of pedicle screws can be determined preoperatively by CT based planning. We conducted a comparative study in order to analyse manually determined pedicle screw plans and those that were obtained automatically by a computer software and found an agreement in plans between both methods, yet an increase in fastening strengths was observed for automatically obtained plans. Hypothesys. Automatic planning of pedicle screw positions and sizing is not inferior to manual planning. Design. Prospective comparative study. Introduction. Preoperative planning in spinal deformity surgery starts by a proper selection of implant anchors throughout the instrumented spine, where pedicle screws provide the optimum choice for bone fixation. In the case of severe spinal deformities, dysplastic pedicles can limit screw usage, and therefore studying the anatomy of vertebrae from preoperative images can aid in achieving the safest screw position through optimal fastening strength. The purpose of this study is to compare manually and automatically obtained preoperative pedicle screw plans. Materials and Methods. CT scans of 17 deformed thoracic spines were studied by two experienced spine deformity surgeons, who placed 316 pedicle screws in 3D using a software positioning tool by aiming for the safest trajectory that permitted the largest possible screw sizes. The resulting manually obtained screw sizes, trajectory angles, entry points and normalised fastening strengths were compared to those obtained automatically by a dedicated computer software that, basing on vertebral anatomy and bone density in 3D, determined optimal screw sizes and trajectories. Results. Statistically significant differences were observed between manually and automatically obtained plans for screw sizes (p < 0.05) and trajectory angles (p < 0.001). However, for automatically obtained plans, screws were not smaller in diameter (p < 0.05) or shorter in length (p < 0.001), while screw normalised fastening strengths were higher (p < 0.001). Conclusions. In comparison to manual planning, automatically obtained plans did not result in smaller screw diameters or shorter screw lengths, which is in agreement with the definition of the pull-out strength, but in different screw trajectory angles, which is reflected by higher normalised fastening strengths. Captions. Fig. 1. Visual comparison among automatically obtained (green colour) and manually defined pedicle screw placement plans by two experienced spine surgeons (red and blue colour) for three different patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, shown from top to bottom in a three-dimensional view, left sagittal, right sagittal and coronal view. Fig. 2. Histograms of differences between observers and (left column), between observer and automated method (middle column), and between observer and automated method (right column), shown from top to bottom for differences in pedicle screw pedicle screw diameter, sagittal inclination, and normalised fastening strength. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Purpose: There is scant literature with respect to reproducibility in radiological measurements of vertebral morphology. The purpose was to determine the reliability of measurement of various parameters of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis. Method: Ten patients with AIS were investigated with standardised low dose multi-slice helical CT. Axial reconstructions in the plane of the T8 (apical) vertebra were performed prone, as per Jamieson et al (2008). Antero-posterior (AP) canal diameter, left and right pedicle width, canal width, left and right mid-point to medial pedicle length, left and right pedicle length, and cord length, left and right transverse angles, and left and right canal area were measured by our spine surgeons and spine surgery fellow. Statistical analysis for intra-class coefficients (ICC) for intra and inter observer reliability was then performed. Results: Intra-observer reliability was excellent, with a mean ICC score of 0.930 (range 0.608–0.996), across all fourteen variables. Inter-observer reliability was very good with a mean ICC score of 0.890 (range 0.360–0.987), across all variables. There was poor inter-observer reliability for measurement of the transverse pedicle angles (0.360 – 0.446). The intra-observer reliability for transverse pedicle angles, whilst good (0.608–0.861), was worse than any of the other intra-observer reliabilities. Conclusion: We demonstrate excellent intra, and inter observer reliability for measurement of apical vertebrae morphology in AIS. This tool can be utilized in the further study of pedicle dysplasia. Measurement of transverse pedicle angle was less reliable than any of the other measurement variables. A standardised measurement of the morphology of vertebral canal, pedicles and vertebral body morphology is reliable both within individual observers, and across a group of observers. A standardised measure for further investigation has been validated which will enable study of the evolution of pedicle dysplasia over time. This will lead to a better understanding of the etiology of pedicle dysplasia in scoliosis

Study design. Literature review of the best available evidence on the accuracy of computer assisted pedicle screw insertion. Background. Pedicle screw misplacement rates with the conventional insertion technique and adequate postoperative CT examination have ranged from 5 to 29 % in the cervical spine, from 3 to 58 % in the thoracic spine, and from 6 to 41% in the lumbosacral region. Despite these relatively high perforation rates, the incidence of reported screw-related complications has remained low. Interestingly, the highest rates of neurovascular injuries have been reported from the lumbosacral spine in up to 17% of the patients. Gertzbein and Robbins introduced a 4-mm “safe zone” in the thoracolumbar spine for medial encroachment, consisting of 2-mm of epidural and 2-mm of subarachnoid space. Later, several authors have found the safety margins to be significantly smaller, suggesting that the “safe zone” thresholds of Gertzbein and Robbins do not apply to the thoracic spine, and seem to be too high even for the lumbar spine. The midthoracic and midcervical spine, as well as the thoracolumbar junction set the highest demands for accuracy in pedicle screw insertion, with no room for either translational or rotational error at e.g. T5 level. Computer assisted pedicle screw insertion (navigation) was introduced in the early 90's to increase the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion. Material. PubMed literature search revealed two randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the in vivo accuracy of conventional and computer assisted pedicle screw insertion techniques. Three meta-analyses have assessed the published reports on the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with or without computer assistance, one additional meta-analysis concentrated on the functional outcome of computer assisted pedicle screw insertion. Results. The RCTs by Laine et al and Rajasekaran et al achieved significantly higher screw placement accuracy with computer assistance than with the conventional techniquebased on anatomical landmarks. In a degenerative patient population, Laine et al reported a misplacement rate of 4.6% with computer assistance compared to 13.4% with the conventional technique. In addition to this quantitative difference, a qualitative difference in the misplaced screws was noticed: in the conventional group, 28 out of 37 misplaced screws were either inferior or medial, whereas in the computer assisted group, 1 out of 10 misplaced screws was situated in these ”danger zones”. In deformity surgery, Rajasekaran et al reported a 2% pedicle screw misplacement rate with a computer assisted technique compared to 23% with the conventional technique. Interestingly, in their study, the average screw insertion time in the computer assisted group was significantly shorter than with the conventional technique. The three meta-analyses, assessing up to 37 337 pedicle screws, reported significantly higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws with computerassistance compared with the conventional methods. The superiority of the computer assisted technique was even more obvious with abnormal surgical anatomy. CT-based and 3D-fluoroscopy-based navigation methods provided better accuracy compared to 2Dfluoroscopy-based navigation. No statistically significant benefit with computer assistance in the incidence of neuro-vascular complications, or in functional outcome was demonstrated. Conclusion. High pedicle screw misplacement rates have been reported with the conventional technique based on anatomical landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy. The concept of ”safe zone” is hypothetical, and underestimates the true risks of misplaced pedicle screws. Computer assistance significantly improves the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion. It will, however, be difficult to correlate this increased accuracy to improved patient outcomes