Aims

Orthopaedic surgery requires grafts with sufficient mechanical strength. For this purpose, decellularized tissue is an available option that lacks the complications of autologous tissue. However, it is not widely used in orthopaedic surgeries. This study investigated clinical trials of the use of decellularized tissue grafts in orthopaedic surgery.

High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating surgical therapies are fundamental to the delivery of evidence-based orthopaedics. Orthopaedic clinical trials have unique challenges; however, when these challenges are overcome, evidence from trials can be definitive in its impact on surgical practice. In this review, we highlight several issues that pose potential challenges to orthopaedic investigators aiming to perform surgical randomised controlled trials. We begin with a discussion on trial design issues, including the ethics of sham surgery, the importance of sample size, the need for patient-important outcomes, and overcoming expertise bias. We then explore features surrounding the execution of surgical randomised trials, including ethics review boards, the importance of organisational frameworks, and obtaining adequate funding. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:161–8

Background. Delayed bone healing and nonunion are complications of long bone fractures, with prolonged pain and disability. Regenerative therapies employing mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) and/or bone substitutes are increasingly applied to enhance bone consolidation. Within the REBORNE project, a multi-center orthopaedic clinical trial was focused on the evaluation of efficacy of expanded autologous bone marrow (BM) derived MSC combined with a CaP-biomaterial to enhance bone healing in patients with nonunion of diaphyseal fractures. To complement the clinical and radiological examination of patients, bone turnover markers (BTM) were assayed as potential predictors of bone healing or non-union. Methods. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), C-terminal-propeptide type I-procollagen (PICP), osteocalcin (OC), β-Cross-Laps Collagen (CTX), soluble receptor activator of NFkB (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG) were measured by ELISA assays in blood samples of 22 patients at BM collection and at follow-ups (6, 12 and 24 weeks post-surgery). Results. A significant relationship with age was found only at Visit 6, with an inverse correlation for CTX, RANKL and OC, and positive for OPG. BTM levels were not related to gender. As an effect of local regenerative process, some BTM showed significant changes in comparison to the starting value. In particular, the time course of BAP, PICP and RANKL was different in patients with a successful healing in comparison to patients with negative outcome. The BTM profile indicated remarkable bone formation activity after 12 weeks after surgery. However, the paucity of failed patients in our case series did not allow to prove statistically the role of BTM as predictors of the final outcome. Conclusion. BTM related to bone cell function are useful to measure the efficacy of a regenerative approach based on expanded MSC. Level of evidence. Diagnostic Level IV. Work supported by the EC, Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), through the REBORNE Project, grant agreement no. 241879

Delayed bone healing and nonunion are complications of long bone fractures, with prolonged pain and disability. Regenerative therapies employing mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) and/or bone substitutes are increasingly applied to enhance bone consolidation. The REBORNE project entailed a multi-center orthopaedic clinical trial focused on the evaluation of efficacy of expanded autologous bone marrow (BM) derived MSC combined with a CaP-biomaterial, to enhance bone healing in patients with nonunion of diaphyseal fractures. To complement the clinical and radiological examination of patients, bone turnover markers (BTM) were assayed as potential predictors of bone healing or non-union. Peripheral blood was collected from patients at fixed time-endpoints, that is at 6,12 and 24 weeks post-surgery for implantation of expanded autologus MSC and bone-like particles. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), C-terminal-propeptide type I-procollagen (PICP), osteocalcin (OC), β-Cross-Laps Collagen (CTX), soluble receptor activator of NFkB (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG) were measured by ELISA assays in blood samples of 22 patients at BM collection and at follow-up visits. A significant relationship with age was found only at 6 months, with an inverse correlation for CTX, RANKL and OC, and positive for OPG. BTM levels were not related to gender. As an effect of local regenerative process, some BTM showed significant changes in comparison to the baseline value. In particular, the time course of BAP, PICP and RANKL was different in patients with a successful healing in comparison to patients with a negative outcome. The BTM profile apparently indicated a remarkable bone formation activity 12 weeks after surgery. However, the paucity of failed patients in our case series did not allow to prove statistically the role of BTM as predictors of the final outcome. Blood markers related to bone cell function are useful to measure the efficacy of a expanded MSC-regenerative approach applied to long bone non-unions. Changes of the markers may provide a support to radiological assessment of bone healing

Purpose: Unbiased outcome assessment in orthopedic clinical trials has the potential to improve trial validity. The approaches used to limit bias in outcome assessment in orthopaedic trials remain unclear. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the reporting and process of outcomes assessment practices in the current orthopaedic trauma literature. Method: We searched eight high-impact-factor medical and orthopaedic journals manually and using the MED-LINE electronic database for reports of randomized controlled trials published from 2005 to 2008 pertaining to the surgical treatment of trauma-related injuries. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility and extracted relevant data from included trials. Results: Of the 7910 citations identified during our search, 47 randomized controlled trials, which included a total of 4706 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Of 47 studies, 39 (83%) provided a statement to describe some process of outcome assessment and 29 (74%) reported using an unblinded individual as the outcome adjudicator. Four studies (10%) reported using a second assessor to verify outcome measurements, and three studies (8%) reported the use of an adjudication committee to reach endpoint decisions via consensus. No included study provided a rationale for the use of their chosen approach to adjudication. The most commonly adjudicated outcomes included fracture healing (15 studies), reoperation rate (6 studies), and general clinical assessment of post-operative complications and limb function (30 studies), mainly by orthopaedic surgeons. Blinding of outcome assessors was not performed or unclear in 38 studies (81%). Conclusion: Despite the importance of the outcome assessment process in orthopedic trauma trials, key aspects of outcome assessment are insufficiently reported. This limits the ability of readers to assess the validity of published trials