Aims. Fungal periprosthetic joint infections (fPJIs) are rare complications, constituting only 1% of all PJIs. Neither a uniform definition for fPJI has been established, nor a standardized treatment regimen. Compared to bacterial PJI, there is little evidence for fPJI in the literature with divergent results. Hence, we implemented a novel treatment algorithm based on three-stage revision arthroplasty, with local and systemic antifungal therapy to optimize treatment for fPJI. Methods. From 2015 to 2018, a total of 18 patients with fPJI were included in a prospective, single-centre study (DKRS-ID 00020409). The diagnosis of PJI is based on the European Bone and Joint Infection Society definition of periprosthetic joint infections. The baseline parameters (age, sex, and BMI) and additional data (previous surgeries, pathogen spectrum, and Charlson Comorbidity Index) were recorded. A therapy protocol with three-stage revision, including a scheduled spacer exchange, was implemented. Systemic antifungal medication was administered throughout the entire treatment period and continued for six months after reimplantation. A minimum follow-up of 24 months was defined. Results. Eradication of infection was achieved in 16 out of 18 patients (88.8%), with a mean follow-up of 35 months (25 to 54). Mixed bacterial and fungal infections were present in seven cases (39%). The interval period, defined as the period of time from explantation to reimplantation, was 119 days (55 to 202). In five patients, a salvage procedure was performed (three cementless modular knee arthrodesis, and two Girdlestone procedures). Conclusion. Therapy for fPJI is complex, with low cure rates according to the literature. No uniform treatment recommendations presently exist for fPJI. Three-stage revision arthroplasty with prolonged systemic antifungal therapy showed promising results. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):671–678

Osteomyelitis is an inflammatory condition accompanied by the destruction of bone and caused by an infecting microorganism. Open contaminated fractures can lead to the development of osteomyelitis of the fractured bone in 3-25% of cases, depending on fracture type, degree of soft-tissue injury, degree of microbial contamination, and whether systemic and/or local antimicrobial therapies have been administered. Untreated, infection will ultimately lead to non-union, chronic osteomyelitis, or amputation. We report a case series of 10 patients that presented with post-operative infected non-union of the distal femur with or without prior surgery. The cases were performed at Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India. All the patients’ consents were taken for the study which was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The methodology involved patients undergoing a two-stage procedure in case of no prior implant or a three-stage procedure in case of a previous implant. Firstly, debridement and implant removal were done. The second was a definitive procedure in form of knee arthrodesis with ring fixator and finally followed by limb lengthening surgery. Arthrodesis was planned in view of infection, non-union, severe arthritic, subluxated knee, stiff knee, non-salvage knee joint, and financial constraints. After all the patients demonstrated wound healing in 3 months along with good radiographic osteogenesis at the knee arthrodesis site, limb lengthening surgeries by tibial osteotomy were done to overcome the limb length discrepancy. Distraction was started and followed up for 5 months. All 10 patients showed results with sound knee arthrodesis and good osteogenesis at the osteotomy site followed by achieving the limb length just 1-inch short from the normal side to achieve ground clearance while walking. Our case series is unique and distinctive as it shows that when patients with infected nonunion of distal femur come with the stiff and non-salvage knee with severe arthritic changes and financial constraints, we should consider knee arthrodesis with Ilizarov ring fixator followed by limb lengthening surgery

Introduction. Knee arthrodesis is a useful limb salvage technique to maintain function in patients with complex and infected total knee arthroplasties (TKA). There are a number of commonly used external fixators, but no consensus on which of these are optimal. The aim of this study was to synthesise the current literature to guide clinical decision making and improve patient outcomes. We systematically review the literature to compare outcomes of external fixators in arthrodesis following infected TKA. Materials & Methods. A systematic review of the literature of primary research articles investigating the use of external fixators for knee arthrodesis after an infected TKA was conducted. Relevant articles were identified with a search strategy on online databases (EMBASE and Medline) and reviewed by two independent reviewers. Clinical outcome measures were independently extracted by two reviewers which included union rate, infection eradication rate, complication rate, time to fusion, and time in frame. Results. Circular frames were more likely to result in union compared to biplanar (OR 1.40 p=0.456) and monoplanar frames (OR 2.28 p=0.018). Infection recurrence was least likely in those treated by circular frames when compared to monoplanar (OR 0.12 p=0.005) and biplanar external fixators (0.41 P=0.331). Complication rates were highest in the circular fixator group, followed by the monoplanar fixator group and biplanar fixator group at 34%, 31% and 11% respectively. Conclusions. Analysis of the available literature suggests higher union and infection eradication rates with circular frames over the other two fixation methods despite a higher complication rate. There is a paucity in the literature and therefore, no firm conclusions can be drawn. Further research investigating the variations and biomechanical properties between different external fixation methods for knee arthrodesis is necessary. Further clarity in reporting and pooled data would be useful for future analysis

Abstract. Introduction. Knee arthrodesis is one of the treatment options for limb salvage of a failed total knee replacement (TKR) when further revisions were contraindicated. The aim of this study is to determine patient outcomes after knee arthrodesis (KA) following a failed TKR. Methodology. A literature search was conducted for studies published from January 2000 through January 2022 via Medline, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases. Only primary research studies were included with independent extraction of articles by two reviewers. Results were synthesised by narrative review according to PRISMA guidelines, with full tabulation of all included study results. Results. A total of 34 studies with 1,034 patients were included in the review; all were longitudinal observational studies, and none were conducted as randomised controlled trials. Reporting methods were very inconsistent in the included studies, and this heterogeneity led to pooled data totals that varied widely in different categories. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Overall, 72.0% (167 of 232) of patients used a walking stick and 12.5% (36 of 287) remained non-ambulatory after KA. Only 7.7% (58 of 752) of patients subsequently underwent above-knee amputation. Conclusion. KA is a potential limb salvage procedure after revision arthroplasties have been attempted in cases of failed TKR. Most patients were able to ambulate both at home and in the community, although with an increased rate of using a walking stick after the operation. However, in the absence of randomised controlled trials, these data may allow for a more accurate counselling and decision making

Introduction. While knee arthrodesis is a salvage option for recalcitrant total knee arthroplasty (TKA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) it is used relatively uncommonly and contemporary data are limited. We sought to determine the reliability, durability and safety of knee arthrodesis as the definitive treatment for complex, persistently infected TKA in a modern series of patients. Methods. We retrospectively identified 41 knees treated from 2002–2016 with a deliberate, two-stage knee arthrodesis protocol (TKA resection, high-dose antibiotic spacer, targeted IV antibiotics and followed by subsequent knee arthrodesis) in patients with complex TKA PJI. Mean age was 64 years & mean BMI was 39 kg/m. 2. Mean follow-up was 4 years. The extensor mechanism was deficient in 66% of knees, and flap coverage was required in 34% of knees. The majority of patients were host grade B (56%) or C (29%), and extremity grade of 3 (71%). Twenty-nine percent had poly-microbial infections, and 49% had multi-drug resistant organisms. Fixation included intramedullary nail (61%), external fixator (24%), and dual plating (15%). Results. Two patients (5%) required amputation for persistently infected non-unions; therefore, limb salvage was accomplished in 95% of patients. After initial treatment, there were non-unions in 24% and persistent infection in 17%. Non-union was significantly correlated with persistent infection, with 50% of non-unions having persistent infection compared with just 6% of united knees (p=0.006). External fixation was a significant risk factor for non-union (70%) compared to intramedullary fixation (8%; p=0.005). Overall, twenty-seven complications occurred in 20 patients and 31% required reoperation other than external fixator removal. Intramedullary fixation led to a 90% rate of both infection control and radiographic union. Conclusion. Two-stage knee arthrodesis using a deliberate protocol (resection, high-dose abx spacer, targeted IV abx, and subsequent arthrodesis) ultimately achieved successful limb salvage in 95% of patients with complex infected TKA. One or more complications occurred in nearly half the patients and reoperation was required for 1-in-3. That substantial risk of complications is not surprising as this large contemporary series included complex, worst-case infected TKA in which: 2/3 had disrupted extensor mechanism, 1/3 required flap coverage, and the majority had poly-microbial or multi-drug resistant organisms. Summary. For contemporary patients with very complex, infected TKA a two-stage knee arthrodesis was reliable in achieving limb salvage (95%) at the cost of a high initial complication and reoperation rate. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aim. Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) after failed knee arthroplasty, especially in complicated courses with persisting or recurrent infections, may result in a considerable destruction of bone substance, the extensor apparatus and the surrounding soft tissue. In these cases reconstruction of a proper knee function may be impossible and the only solutions are: knee arthrodesis or above-the-knee amputation (AKA). However, both methods are associated with considerable functional deficits and high complication rates. The primary aim of the current study is to analyse the clinical course, outcome and complications in patients with knee arthrodesis and AKA after PJI and to compare these two methods in terms of the analysed parameters. Method. Patients treated with a knee arthrodesis or AKA after PJI in an 11-year time period were included in this study. Demographic data, comorbidities, infecting characteristics and operative procedures were recorded. Patients were seen in regular intervals and underwent physical and radiographic examination. Major complications such as: re-infection, implant-failure, revision surgeries or stump healing disorders were recorded. Functional outcome with use of the Lower-Extremity-Functional-Score was assessed and the patients reported general health status (SF-12-questionnaire) was recorded. Results. In total 87 patients with a knee arthrodesis and 32 patients with an AKA after PJI were included. Knee arthrodesis was performed in 81 patients with a modular system and in six cases with bone fusion. Re-arthrodesis had to be performed in 21 cases. Survival rate of knee arthrodesis was 86% after one year, 71% after five and 61% after ten years. Major complications such as recurrence of infection (n=16) implant loosening (n=12), implant failure (n=3) or per-implant fracture (n=5) occurred in 30% of the patients. In seven patients an amputation after failed arthrodesis had to be performed. In patients with AKA after PJI a similar complication rate of 34% (p=0.64) was seen. Recurrence of infection was diagnosed in nine patients and a re-amputation had to be performed in four cases. The final functional examination was assessed after a mean interval of 48 month and revealed comparably in both cohorts a comparable limitation of functionality (p=0.181) and a slightly worse physical quality of life after knee arthrodesis compared to patients with AKA (p=0.08). Conclusions. Knee arthrodesis or above the knee amputation after PJIshow similar functional limitations and comparably high complication rates. The patients have to be supervised by an interdisciplinary team to avoid complications and regain quality of life

Aim. Antibiotics have limited activity in the treatment of multidrug-resistant or chronic biofilm-associated infections, in particular when implants cannot be removed. Lytic bacteriophages can rapidly and selectively kill bacteria, and can be combined with antibiotics. However, clinical experience in patients with surgical infections is limited. We investigated the outcome and safety of local application of bacteriophages in addition to antimicrobial therapy. Method. 8 patients (2 female and 6 male) with complex orthopedic and cardiovascular infections were included, in whom standard treatment was not feasible or impossible. The treatment was performed in agreement with the Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki. Commercial or individually prepared bacteriophages were provided by ELIAVA Institute in Tbilisi, Georgia. Bacteriophages were applied during surgery and continued through drains placed during surgery three times per day for the following 5–14 days. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 28 months. Results. Median age was 57 years, range 33–75 years. Two patients were diagnosed with a persistent knee arthrodesis infection, one chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), one cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection and four patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) infection. The isolated pathogens were multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=3), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n=4), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (n=1) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) (n=1). 4 infections were polymicrobial. 5 patients underwent surgical debridement with retention of the implant, 1 patient with PJI underwent the exchange of the prosthesis and one patient with LVAD infection was treated conservatively. All patients received intravenous and oral antibiotic therapy and local application of bacteriophages. At follow-up of 12 month, 5 patients were without signs or symptoms of infection, whereas in one patient with LVAD infection, a relapse was observed with emergence of phage-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this patient, no surgical revision was performed. Conclusions. Bacteriophage therapy may represent a valid additional approach, when standard antimicrobial and surgical treatment is not possible or feasible, including in difficult-to-treat infections. In our case series, 5 of 6 patients were infection free after 1 year. Further studies need to address the optimal bacteriophage administration route, concentration, duration of treatment and combination with antimicrobials

Periprosthetic infection is a challenging complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) which reported incidence varies from 1 to 2% in primary TKA and 3–5% in revision TKA. Persistent infection of TKA may benefit from knee arthrodesis when all reconstruction options have failed. Knee arthrodesis also demonstrated better functional results and pain relief than other salvage procedures such as above-knee amputation. The purpose of this study was to analyze treatment results in patients who underwent knee arthrodesis following infected TKA. Retrospective study with review of the data of all patients treated in our department with knee arthrodesis for chronic infection of knee arthroplasty between 2009 and 2014. Clinical and radiographic data were evaluated as well as several variables: technique used, fusion rate, time to fusion, need for further arthrodesis and complications. Patients with less than 8 months of follow-up were excluded from this study. 46 patients were treated with knee arthrodesis in our department from 2009 to 2014 for chronic infection of total knee arthroplasty. The sample included 26 (57%) women and 20 (43%) men, median age of 70 years. In 45 patients, the technique used was compressive external fixation, while an intramedullary modular nail was used in 1 patient. Mean follow-up of these patients was 35 months (8–57). Primary knee fusion was obtained in 32 (70%) patients with a mean time to fusion of 5,8 months (4–9). 9 (20%) patients needed rearthrodesis and 7 (15%) ultimately achieved fusion. 33 (72%) patients underwent knee arthrodesis in a single surgical procedure, while 13 (28%) firstly removed knee arthroplasty and used a spacer before arthrodesis. Overall complication rate was 35%; 7 (15%) patients experienced persistent infection and 4 (9%) of these undergone above knee amputation. Treatment of septic total knee replacement is a surgical challenge. Compressive external fixation was the method of choice to perform knee arthrodesis following chronic infected TKA. Although complication rate was worrisome, overall fusion rate was satisfactory and this arthrodesis method can be safely performed in one stage

Knee arthrodesis is a potencial salvage procedure for limb preservation in patients with multiple failures of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with massive bone loss and extensor mechanism deficiency. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the outcome of bridging knee arthrodesis using a modular and non cemented intramedullary nail in patients with septic failure Total Knee Arthroplasty. Between 2005 and 2013 (9 years), 15 patients (13 female and 2 male) with mean age 71.1 years (range 41 to 85) were treated at our Institution with septic two- stage knee arthrodesis using a modular and non- cemented intramedullary nail after multiple failures of septic Total Knee Arthroplasty. Mean follow- up was 70.1 months (24 to 108 months) with a minimum follow- up of 24 months. We evaluated the erradication of infection clinically and with normalization of laboratory parameters (ESR and CRP), limb length discrepancies and complications (periimplant fractures, amputation rates, wound healing disturbances) and the subjective evaluation of the patients after knee arthrodesis. We reported 11 cases of resolution of the infection (73.3 %), with good tolerance of the implant and a mean limb length discrepancies of 15 mm. Of these, 8 patients had been monitored over 5 years without recurrence of the infection. The mean number of previous operations was 4.9 (range 2 to 9). Two patients (13.3 %) required multiples surgical debridements for uncontrolled sepsis and finally underwent knee amputation. Coagulase- negative Staphylococci (SCN) were the most commom pathogen (53.3 %) followed by polimicrobian infections (26.7 %). One patient continues suppressive antibiotic treatment and 1 patient was treated with a one- stage custom- made arthrodesis nail exchange. Bridging knee arthrodesis using a modular and non- cemented intramedullary nail is a salvage procedure with acceptable results in terms of erradication of infection after septic faliure Total Knee Arthroplasty with restoration of limb length discrepancy. Despite these satisfactory results it is not without serious complications such as knee amputation

Aim. Reconstruction of composite soft-tissue defects with extensor apparatus deficiency in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee is challenging. We present a single-centre multidisciplinary orthoplastic treatment concept based on a retrospective outcome analysis over 20 years. Method. One-hundred sixty-seven patients had PJI after total knee arthroplasty. Plastic surgical reconstruction of a concomitant perigenicular soft-tissue defect was indicated in 49 patients. Of these, seven presented with extensor apparatus deficiency. Results. One patient underwent primary arthrodesis and six patients underwent autologous reconstruction of the extensor apparatus. The principle to reconstruct missing tissue ‘like with like’ was thereby favoured: Two patients with a wide soft-tissue defect received a free anterolateral thigh flap with fascia lata; one patient with a smaller soft-tissue defect received a free sensate, extended lateral arm flap with triceps tendon; and three patients received a pedicled medial sural artery perforator gastrocnemius flap, of which one with Achilles tendon. Despite good functional results 1 year later, long-term follow-up revealed that two patients had to undergo knee arthrodesis because of recurrent infection and one patient was lost to follow-up. In parts, results have been published under doi: 10.7150/jbji.47018. Conclusions. A treatment concept and its rationale, based on a single-centre experience, is presented. It differentiates between various types of soft-tissue defects and shows reconstructive options following the concept to reconstruct ‘like with like’. Despite good results 1 year postoperatively, PJI of the knee with extensor apparatus deficiency remains a dreaded combination with a poor long-term outcome

Purpose: To review long-term outcome following knee arthrodesis, and compare this with patient outcome following revision knee arthroplasty. Methods: Case notes and radiographs of patients who underwent arthrodesis using the Mayday nail were reviewed retrospectively for evidence of clinical and radiological union. Patients also completed an SF12 health survey and Oxford knee score in the form of postal questionnaires. Each patient was matched with patients who had undergone revision knee arthoplasty and the outcomes were compared. Results: 19 patients were reviewed who underwent knee arthrodesis using a Mayday nail in two centres between 1993 and 2004. 18 cases had united clinically and radiologically with one case lost to follow-up. Mean SF12 scores of patients following knee arthrodesis indicated severe physical (28.8) but only mild mental (43.3) disabilities. The mean Oxford knee score in this group was 41.0. These results were comparable with matched patients following revision knee arthroplasty who scores 27.2 (physical) and 41.1 (mental) on the SF12, and a mean of 38.8 on the Oxford knee score. Conclusion: Outcome scores following knee arthrodesis were similar to those following revision knee arthroplasty making it an option worth considering in selected patients requiring revision surgery. Discussion: The Mayday nail provides a method of knee arthrodesis with a high union rate and an acceptable complication rate. Outcome scores following arthrod-esis were not dissimilar to those following revision total knee replacement. These results suggest that knee arthrodesis may be considered as an acceptable alternative to complex knee revision surgery

Aim. External fixator knee arthrodesis is a salvage procedure mainly used in cases of end-stage infected total knee replacement (iTKR). A stable fixation combined with bone-ends compression is basic to achieve knee fusion in such a scenario but providing enough stability can be challenging in the presence of severe bone loss after multiple previous procedures. Compared with monoplanar configuration, a biplanar frame achieves improved coronal stiffness, while providing the advantages of good access to the wound and allowance of early ambulation. Our primary hypothesis stated that a biplanar frame would achieve higher and quicker fusion rate than a monolateral configuration. Method. We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining patients managed with biplanar external fixator knee fusion due to non-revisable iTKR between 2014 and 2018. We compared this group of patients with a historical cohort-control patient who had been previously published by our unit in 2013, since we switched from a monoplanar to a biplanar configuration for the management of this kind of complex end-stage iTKR. Primary end-points were fusion rate, time to achieve bone fusion and infection eradication rate. Limb-length discrepancy, pain level, patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life were also evaluated. Results. A total of 29 cases were finally included; 8 patients were managed with a bilateral external fixator and 21 patients were managed with a monoplanar external fixator. In the biplanar configuration group, infection was eradicated in 100% of the patients, and fusion was achieved in all cases after 5.24 months on average. In comparison, in the monolateral configuration group, infection was eradicated in 18 (86%) out of 21, whereas fusion was achieved in 17 (81%) of the patients after a mean of 10.3 months (range, 4–16). Such difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). In both groups, postoperative pain was mild (VAS score 2,25 and 3,4, respectively) and patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction once fusion was achieved. Conclusions. External fixation knee fusion is a useful limb-salvage procedure in end-stage cases of knee PJI. According to our data, the use of a biplanar configuration allows us to reduce in half (10.3 vs 5.2 months, p<0.05) the time needed to achieve the solid bone fusion in such a complex scenario. In this cohort of previously multi-operated patients, the satisfaction is high, and the level of pain is low if a solid bone fusion free of infection is achieved

The implementation of knee arthrodesis has become synonymous with limb salvage in the presence of chronic sepsis and bone loss around the knee. This can be seen in failed trauma surgery or knee arthroplasty as an alternative to trans-femoral amputation. There is no prior literature assessing which factors affect knee arthrodesis using external fixation devices. Sixteen consecutive patients (four women and twelve men) made up of eleven infected knee implants, three internal fixations of the tibial following fractured tibial plateau as well as 2 infected native joints were identified. The mean age at initial surgery was 56 years (range 25 to 82 years). All procedures were performed under the direct supervision of the limb reconstruction teams using a standard protocol with either a Taylor spatial frame or Ilizarov frame. The patient records, microbiology results and radiographs of all patients who underwent knee arthrodesis at this institution between 1999 and 2010 were reviewed. Of the 16 patients in this study knee fusion occurred in eleven patients (69%). The five patients where arthrodesis failed all had significant bone loss on the pre-operative radiographs and confirmed at surgery. We found a relationship between a significant infection of the knee with MRSA and failure to fuse. Three of the five patients had MRSA isolated from inside the knee at some stage during their treatment. The five patients where fusion failed were on average older (mean age 63 years against 51 years) and had more extensive bone loss. Those who failed to fuse had more co-morbidities. We would conclude that where there is little or no bone loss, arthrodesis of the knee can be reliably achieved with the use of circular frame fixation. A greater number of negative factors also prolongs the amount of time spent in the external fixator. The presence of significant bone loss, infection, increased age and multiple co-morbidities requires careful evaluation and consideration of trans-femoral amputation as an alternative

The purpose of the following study was to present the general strategy for preserving the lower extremity by knee arthrodesis and to analyze the outcome of knee arthrodeses performed by a special modular system. Between 2009 and 2014 35 knee arthrodeses were performed. 23 patients were male, 12 female. The average age was 66 years (42 to 83 years). The patients underwent an average of 6 operations because of infected knee arthroplasties previous to the knee arthrodesis. The main pathogen was S. epidermidis followed by MRSA. The arthrodeses system included a non cemented femoral and tibial stem (press fit application plus two static locking screws). These were connected by a special stem to stem clamp. Immediate postoperative full weight-bearing was possible in 32 of 35 patients. We saw 4 recurrent infections (all connected to the patients, who did not show a full weight bearing after knee arthrodesis). In two cases re-revision surgery was successful and lead to a sufficient re-arthrodesis. In two cases above-knee-amputation was necessary. Peri-implant fractures were detected in 3 cases. All of them could be cured by changing the arthrodesis stem and to a longer one bridging the fracture. In one case a stem loosening was seen. This was as well addressed by the use of a longer stem. Knee arthrodesis by a modular non cemented system is a god alternative in order to preserve the weight-bearing lower extremity. The complication rate is rather high due to the fact, that this procedure presents the final alternative to do so in patients, who are in extremis in terms of a long lasting aggressive peri-arthroplasty infection the lead to massive destruction of the soft tissue around the knee and a significant loss of function

Sepsis following total knee replacement (TKR) is a disastrous complication. The knee arthrodesis comes as the final solution to solve the chronic infection after multiple failed surgeries. Our objective was to review these procedures performed in our institution for the past 20 years. We present a retrospective study with 5 cases of severe unsolved knee infection after TKR, who have been finally submitted to knee arthrodesis performed between 1993 and 2008. The patients are 4 males and 1 female, with a mean age of 62 years (ranging from 55 to 74 years) at the time of surgery. They presented MRSA infection (3 cases), P aeruginosa infection (1 case) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (1 case). The average follow up was 25 months (between 12–48 months). The Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) value was registered. The mean number of surgeries before the arthrodesis was 3,6. In 4 of the 5 cases the surgeon used an external fixator to achieve the fusion. In the other patient, an intramedullary nail was used. The arthrodesis was performed in a single-time surgery in every patient. All cases achieved knee fusion and the mean time of consolidation was 5,1 months, with the longest being 8 months until fusion. No bone graft was used in any of these cases, and the mean size of leg length discrepancy was 2,8 cm. The average VAS was 3,6. In one patient with an external fixator there was a relapse of the infection (MRSA infection), but with adequate antibiotic therapy (vancomycin) ended up to resolve. There are no records of any other complication. The knee arthrodesis appears as last but useful resort in extreme cases of relapse infection after a TKR and multiple unsuccessful surgeries. Although it comprises an elevated level of morbidity, it also seems to allow to heal difficult and multi resistant infections and with few complications

Introduction: Historically, arthrodesis of the knee was accepted as a primary procedure in patients with extensive joint destruction, usually in the elderly arthritic population. Since the significant advances in arthroplasty, knee arthrodesis has mainly become an uncommon salvage procedure for failed and infected arthroplasty. However, when all other surgical options in reconstruction post-trauma have failed, arthrodesis remains an alternative to amputation. Patients and Methods: Six patients who had unilateral knee arthrodesis with the Ilizarov frame for traumatic destruction of their knee were assessed by physical examination, radiology review and clinical questionnaires. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the AMA Criteria for Impairment Associated with Station and Gait Disorders were used to evaluate their functional levels of impairment. The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey was also used as a general survey of their health. Results: The patient group ranged from 24 – 47 years of age (mean 32.5 years), and are between 1 – 10 years after unilateral knee arthrodesis. All were satisfied with the outcome of their procedure, and half are able to work full time. 80% of those who drive report actually driving while being treated with the Ilizarov frame. Those who score lowest on the SF-36 also had significant other post-trauma injuries (e.g. upper limb amputation). Significantly, while the average level of whole person impairment was 10–19%, patients perceived their ability to walk on the flat as normal, and only have mild difficulty in rising to stand. Conclusion: Knee arthrodesis is a realistic and acceptable alternative to amputation, and is therefore an option which should be offered to patients in the non-acute setting. It has successfully enabled salvage of otherwise “unsalvageable” limbs in our young patient group

Introduction: Fusion of the knee joint should be the last option for salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although knee arthrodesis implies lost of function, it is a successful treatment in eradicating the infection and in decreasing pain. External fixation compression devices have been an excellent method for gaining fusion but, there is no documentation about its ability for obtaining adequate limb alignment with a stable fusion of the knee joint. Material and Methods: We have retrospectively reviewed the results of knee arthrodesis after infection of TKA using an anteriorly placed unilateral external fixator. In addition, we have assessed patient self-satisfaction. Postoperative radiographs have been evaluated to digitally measure loss of femoral and tibial bone stock using Engh radiological classification. Moreover, we have quantified tibiofemoral alignment and the section of bony fusion. Fusion of the knee joint was assessed with CT. Patients were interviewed and pain was graded using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and self-satisfaction as well as current health status using the 12-item social function survey form (SF12). Results: From 1992 to 2003, 52 arthrodeses were done for treatment of infected TKA. The average age was 71 years (range, 37–83 years). Type III bone defect according with Engh classification, in femur and/or in tibia, was present in 50% of the patients. The average postoperative tibiofemoral alignment was 1.2° (SD 3.79). The mean time to fusion was 11.26 months (range, 3–30 months). Time to fusion was statistical related with severe bone loss and with the tibiofemoral contact section. The average score according VAS was 1.6 (SD 2.60). Conclusions: Knee arthrodesis using a monolateral external fixator for infected TKA is an effective method to control infection as well as to obtain knee fusion and pain relief. Severe bone loss, frequently present in infected TKA, was found to be the most relevant factor in achieving tibiofemoral union. The individual clinical result according to SF12 shows a lower quality of life both for physical and mental components compare with general population

Aims. To evaluate the place of the massive prostheses in the most complex periprosthetic infections cases (PJis). Method. Between 2011 and 2017, 516 hip and knee revisions for periprosthetic infections had been performed in our hospital by the same senior surgeon. We report a prospective series of 58 patients treated between 2011 and the end of 2017. 26 males and 32 females with on average 69,4 years old (38–86). Infection involved TKA in 39 cases (26 TKA revisions, 11 primary TKA), THA in 18 cases (10 revisions, 7 primary THA), a femoral pseudoarthrosis with posttraumatic gonarthrosis in one case and a septic humeral pseudoarthrosis in one case. We used one stage procedures in 38 cases (14 hips, 23 knees, 1 shoulder) and 20 two stages surgeries (16 knees and 4 hips). Additional technics used with massive prostheses, all for TKA PJis: 4 massive extensor systemallografts performed two times in a one stage procedure, two local flaps (medial gastronecmienmuscle). Two perioperative hyperbaric procedures used to limit the risks of wound complications. Results. The average follow-up is 38 months (12–62 months). The rate of sucess to treat the infection at this follow-up is 89,7 %. We report our feedback of the different massive components uses and the qualities/defaults we noted. The most frequent complication was skin events like wound swelling and delayed cicatrisations in 13 cases. 3 cases of one stages needed a complementary debridement in the three weeks after the surgery with always a good local and infectious evolution. This series report 5 failures of two stages TKA revisions. In 4 cases, the initial local soft tissues conditions were compromised. Conclusions. The use of massive prostheses to treat PJIs is a good option for the complex cases. It can be a good alternative of knee arthrodesis. These components must be used, preferentially for oldest patients, in cases of extreme bone loss or extensed osteitis to secure the bone debridement and the quality of the reconstruction. In our series, the one stage procedure is a validated option even by using complementary technics as bone allografts, extensor system allografts or flaps. The two stages procedure is a secondary option, particularly when softtissues status is compromised before or after the debridement, and mostly for the knees

Arthrodesis. Today, knee arthrodesis is most commonly performed for cases of chronic sepsis after total knee arthroplasty in patients who are not candidates for reimplantation. This is typically a host in whom the risk of recurrent infection is high, especially when extensor mechanism problems such as patellar tendon rupture is present. Local and systemic host factors place the patient at this high risk for failure of reimplantation. Local factors include chronic lymphedema, major vessel disease, venous stasis, extensive scarring and radiation fibrosis. Systemic problems include malnutrition, malignancy, extremes of age, hepatic or renal failure, diabetes mellitus and alcohol abuse. Also, at least in one study, patients who fail one two-stage reimplantation have at least a 50% change for recurrence the second time. Methods of knee arthrodesis include external fixation, single or double plate fixation and intramedullary nailing either monolithic or modular. External fixation can be performed as a single procedure. With external ring fixators leg lengthening has been described. Plate and nailing procedures are commonly performed after the infection is eradicated. If infection recurs but fusion has occurred, removal of a modular nail may be difficult although techniques have been described. Fusion rates of 85% to 100% have been reported with the newer techniques and fusion rates are usually correlated with the amount of bone loss after removal of the prosthesis. Optimal position of fusion is slight anatomic valgus and slight flexion. Placing a bowed intramedullary nail with the bow anteromedially can facilitate this alignment. One study comparing arthrodesis after failed knee arthroplasty with primary total knee replacement found nearly identical Short-Form 36 scores. Physical mobility was better with knee arthroplasty but pain control was better with arthrodesis. Resection Arthroplasty. Indication: Low demand patient with comorbidities. Results: Falahee et al.; 28 knees;15 patients walked independently; Most severely disabled more satisfied. Less disabled least satisfied. Amputation - Above the Knee Amputations after TKA (Sierra et al). Prevalence: 0.36% (all causes – most common was peripheral vascular disease), 0.14% (for causes related to TKA: infection, periprosthetic fracture, pain, bone loss, vascular complication). Results: 25 amputations for causes related to TKA; Avg 8.6 years after TKA. Complications: deep infection 5, superficial infection 1, skin necrosis 1, perioperative death 1. 9 of 25 fitted with above knee prosthesis; Only 5 were walking even to limited degree with prosthesis

Introduction: Knee arthrodesis is a well-recognized salvage procedure in patients with septic destruction of the knee joint. If fusion can be achieved, it offers the opportunity for a stable lower limb and eradication of infection, but at the expense of knee motion. However, knee arthrodesis in this setting may be difficult to achieve because of poor bone stock, persistent infection and soft tissue compromise. In this study we present clinical and radiological results after knee fusion as well as an algorithm according to different surgical techniques (hybrid external fixator (HEF), antegrad compression nail (ACN) and modular cement less titanium rod (MCR)) and types of soft tissue damages and bone loss caused by infection. Patients and Methods: Between 10/2000 and 10/2002 in 37 patients knee arthrodesis was indicated after septic joint destruction. In 23 Pat. (67.0 y, 19.4–88,8 y) septic failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA)caused severe bone loss and soft tissue damage. Because solid bony fusion was not to be expected weight bearing capability was restored by the use of MCR in a second stage procedure, using a PMMA Gentamycin spacer for eradication. In 14 Pat. (54.3 y, 23.l–87.7 y) remaining bone stock indicated direct fusion. In 10 of these cases HEF was used (6x primary joint infection, 3x septic failure of TKA, lx infected osteosynthesis). 2 pat. denied written consent for HEF, another 2 pat. had infected ipsilaterale midshaft femor-and/or tibia non unions. Because of these we used the ACN. Results: In 5 pat. (21.7%) treated with MCR 1,4 revision procedures were indicated to eradicate infection before the implantation of MCR. Recurrence of infection after implantation occurred in 13% (n=3): 2 pat. were treated non surgically, lx amputation had to be done. No radiological signs for implant loosening were seen. HEF was removed after 15 weeks (12–18w) on average. 5 revision procedures were necessary in HEF cases (lx Pin-, lx ring exchange, lx sequestrectomy after pintractinfection,)- hi 2 cases the procedure was changed to MCR because of a non-union. Using the ACN we saw a 100% fusion rate, in one case the sinus tract persisted. The check up examinations were done 8,7 month (2,4–22,4mo) after arthrodesis procedure. 82,6% of pat. after MCR, 100% after HEF- and ACN-had full weight bearing capability. Eradication of infection was achieved in 86,9% (n=20) after MCR, in 70% (n=7) after HEF and in 75% (n=3) after ACN. In all 3 groups soft tissue reconstruction by flap surgery was indicated in 20%. Conclusion: HEF is indicated when bone loss allows bony fusion. Failure occurred when bone defects were underestimated ort he fixator was removed before the 14th week. MCR can be used when eradication of infection is success and because of bone defects direct fusion is not possible. When eradication is not possible and bone stock makes the fusion reliable the ACN can be used under ongoing infection. ACN is also used when HEF is not recommended by the patient or because of mechanical reasons (floating knee)