Aim: Supine lateral bending radiographs are the standard methods of evaluating curve flexibility before surgery in idiopathic scoliosis. Supine traction radiographs have also been used at the authors’ institution in addition to the supine lateral bending radiographs before surgery, believing that it is usually more helpful to analyze the response of the main and compensatory curves to corrective forces. The purpose of this prospective study was to use and evaluate the results of traction radiographs taken before general anesthesia (BGA) and under general anesthesia (UGA). Material and Method: 25 patients required surgical treatment with idiopathic scoliosis were evaluated prospectively. Thirteen were female. The average age was 12.87 years. We designed a new electronic traction table in order to take the longitudinal traction and three-points lateral pressure radiographs. We situated the patient on the table and measured the patient’s weight. Then we made a longitudinal and lateral traction while asking the possible neurologic symptoms. If there was not any symptom we stopped at the seventy percent of the patient’s weight for the longitudinal and at the fifty percent for the lateral pressure. These radiographs had been taken before and under general anesthesia (UGA). The influence of the traction radiographies on the decision for surgery and its correlation with postoperative result was examined. Results: Longitudinal traction radiographs taken consciously provided the best amount of flexibility, with no significant difference from traction with the patient UGA (p = 0.17) but with significant difference from bending radiographs (p < 0.002). No significant difference was demonstrated between the traction radiographies taken before and under general anesthesia and postoperative correction (P = 0.14). Conclusion: The curve flexibility in supine traction films taken with the patient BGA was nearly equal to the curve flexibility in supine traction films taken with the patient UGA in all patients and all types of curves. Thus, there is no need to obtain a normal supine traction film for flexibility analysis under general anesthesia. By this way; the surgeons will be able to give the patient a definitive plan before surgery because the decision can be finalized after seeing the traction radiographs with the patient before the general anesthesia and operation time will be shorter

There has been a significant increase in the demand for arthroplasty as a result of the Covid 19 pandemic and lack of beds on the green pathway. The average length of in-hospital stay following knee replacements has been successfully reduced over the years following introduction and adoption of enhanced recovery protocols. Day case arthroplasty has the potential to be efficient as well as cost-effective. We present our day case pathway for elective knee arthroplasty and early results of its adoption at a district general hospital. Our pathway was developed through a multidisciplinary input from surgeons, anaesthetists, physiotherapists, nursing staff, administrative staff, surgical care practitioners and pharmacists. Inclusion criteria were defined to identify patients suitable for cay case arthroplasty. Results of 32 patients who underwent day case partial and total knee replacement at our institution between 2018 to 2022 are presented. 31 out of 32 (97%) were discharged safely on the day of surgery. Patients were discharged at a mean of 7 hours following surgery. There were no re-admissions following discharge. There were no surgical complications at a mean follow-up of 2 years. Patient feedback revealed high levels of satisfaction and that they would recommend the pathway to others. Cost analysis revealed savings towards bed costs. Our early results demonstrate day case knee arthroplasty to be safe and cost effective. With limited resources to tackle the enormous backlog of arthroplasty, it offers the potential to make theatre utilization efficient

Aims. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition which requires urgent treatment to reduce the risk of long term neurological morbidity. Most authors recommend surgical decompression within 24–48 hours of the onset of symptoms, which may not be possible if there are delays in referral to hospital, performance of diagnostic imaging or poor access to a spine surgeon. We present a snap shot of referrals of patients with suspected cauda equina syndrome to the Orthopaedic department in a district general hospital including the diagnoses, management and outcome. Methods. A retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients (mean age 49, 11 males, 9 females) referred via Primary Care to the orthopaedic on call team between April and December 2010 was carried out. Data were recorded including the clinical symptoms and signs on admission, time taken to undergo MRI, diagnosis and treatment. Results. 18/20 patients had red flag symptoms. Two patients with convincing neurological evidence of CES were transferred to the local neurosurgical unit for urgent assessment and surgical intervention. 12 patients required urgent inpatient MRI scans; mean time to MRI for these patients was 22 hours from the initial Orthopaedic assessment. Of these, none showed cauda equina and 3 were offered elective surgery for spinal nerve root compression. 14 out of 20 patients presented outside normal working hours when immediate access to MRI was unavailable. Conclusions. The majority of patients in this study had red flag symptoms, although few actually had CES. Usually patients present in the evening when access to MRI is unavailable, potentially delaying the diagnosis. Such information may be useful to radiology departments to help plan out of hours services or help district hospital Orthopaedic departments develop protocols with nearby neurosurgical units for rapid patient transfer when CES is suspected

The significance of ring-fencing orthopaedic beds and protected elective sites have recently been highlighted by the British Orthopaedic Association & Royal College of Surgeons. During the pandemic many such elective setups were established with various degrees of success. This study aimed to compare the functioning and efficiency of a Orthopaedic Protected Elective Surgical Unit (PESU) instituted during the pandemic with the pre-pandemic elective service at our hospital (Pre-Pandemic ward or PPW). We retrospectively collected data of all patients who underwent elective Orthopaedic procedures in a protected elective unit during the pandemic (March 2020 – July 2020) and a similar cohort of patients operated via the routine elective service immediately prior to the pandemic (October 2019 – February 2020). Various parameters were compared and analysed. To minimise the effect of confounding factors a secondary analysis was undertaken comparing total hip replacements (THR) by a single surgeon via PESU (PESU-THR) and PPW (PPW-THR) over 5 months each from March-July 2021 and March-July 2019 respectively. A total of 192 cases were listed on PESU during the studied period whereas this number was 339 for PPW. However more than half (52%) of those listed for a surgery on PPW were cancelled and only 162 cases (48%) were actually performed. PESU had a significantly better conversion rate with only 12.5% being cancelled and 168 (87.5%) cases performed. 49% (87 out of 177) of the cases cancelled on PPW were due to a ‘bed unavailability’. A further 17% (30/177) and 16% (28/177) were cancelled due to ‘emergency case prioritisation’ and ‘patient deemed unfit’ respectively. In contrast only 3 out of the 24 patients cancelled on PESU were due to bed unavailability and the main reason for cancellation here was ‘patient deemed unfit’ (9/24). Single surgeon THR, showed similar demographic features for the 25 patients on PESU and 37 patients on PPW. The average age for these patients was 63 on PESU and 69 on PPW whereas the BMI was 33 and 30 respectively. The patients on PESU also demonstrated a decrease in length of hospital stay with an average of 3 days in comparison to 4.8 days for those admitted to PPW. PROMS scores were comparable at 6 weeks with an average improvement of 16.4/48 in the PESU-THR cohort and of 18.8/48 in the PPW-THR cohort. There were no readmissions or revisions recorded in the PESU-THR cohort while the PPW-THR cohort had 1 readmission and revision. Our study shows how a small ring fenced Orthopaedic elective unit in a district general hospital, even during a global pandemic, can function more efficiently than a routine elective facility with many shared services

Background. An understanding of the patterns of healthcare services used after MRI of the spine in general practice would provide information about how MRI scans are used in primary care. Aim. To describe the healthcare use of patients referred for lumbar MRI in general practice, and to investigate the association between specific patient characteristics, back pain characteristics and MRI abnormalities with subsequent specialist consultation. Methods. Patients already referred by their general practitioner for MRI of the lumbar spine were recruited. The MRI radiology reports were scored on abnormalities. The questionnaires filled in at baseline, and at 3 and 12-month follow-up, included potential clinical predictors from history taking and use of healthcare services (consultation, surgery). Results. Of the 683 included patients being referred for MRI by their general practitioner, 55% were being referred for consultation with a specialist during the first 3 months of follow-up. Patients with no history of back complaints, severe leg pain, more disability, and/or a history of back surgery had a greater chance of being referred to a specialist. Addition of the reported MRI findings did not add to the predictive value of being referred based on only clinical factors. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the general practitioners decision whether or not to refer a patient to a specialist was not dependent on the MRI report, but was mostly based on history taking. From a clinical perspective, these results raise questions about the usefulness of the lumbar MRI in general practice patients with low back pain. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding for the research: This study is partly funded by a program grant of the Dutch Arthritis Foundation. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript

Aims. The aim of this paper is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on spine surgery services in a district general hospital in England in order to understand the spinal service provisions that may be required during a pandemic. Methods. A prospective cohort study was undertaken between 17 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and compared with retrospective data from same time period in 2019. We compared the number of patients requiring acute hospital admission or orthopaedic referrals and indications of referrals from our admission sheets and obtained operative data from our theatre software. Results. Between 17 March to 30 April 2020, there were 48 acute spine referrals as compared to 68 acute referrals during the same time period last year. In the 2019 period, 69% (47/68) of cases referred to the on-call team presented with back pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy compared to 43% (21/48) in the 2020 period. Almost 20% (14/68) of spine referrals consisted of spine trauma as compared to 35% (17/48) this year. There were no confirmed cases of cauda equine last year during this time. Overall, 150 spine cases were carried out during this time period last year, and 261 spine elective cases were cancelled since 17 March 2020. Recommendations. We recommend following steps can be helpful to deal with similar situations or new pandemics in future:. 24 hours on-call spine service during the pandemic. Clinical criteria in place to prioritize urgent spinal cases. Pre-screening spine patients before elective operating. Start of separate specialist trauma list for patients needing urgent surgeries. Conclusion. This paper highlights the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a district general hospital of England. We demonstrate a decrease in hospital attendances of spine pathologies, despite an increase in emergency spine operations. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:281–286

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has high rates of patient satisfaction; however patient expectations for recreational and sporting activities are not always met. Our study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict whether patient expectations for sporting or recreational activity are met 12 months following THA. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively from 2015-2018 at one private hospital in Sydney. Age, gender, postcode, weight, and height were recorded preoperatively. Included participants underwent primary THA by one of the investigating surgeons. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed with an expectation fulfilment score used as the primary outcome variable. Preoperative predictor variables included: age, gender, BMI, Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Oxford Hip Score, Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D-5L and EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). 1019 participants were eligible and included. 13% reported that preoperative expectations of sport or recreation were not met at 12 months. Younger age, lower preoperative EQ VAS, and higher BMI were associated with failed expectations on multivariable analysis. Odds of failed expectations increased by 2% for every one year younger in age (OR= 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.00, p=.048), by 2% for every one point lower on EQ VAS (OR=0.98, 95% CI = 0.98 to 0.99, p=.002), and by 4% for every one-point increase in BMI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.09, p=.042). Failure to have expectations met for sporting or recreational activity was associated with younger age, poorer general health, and high BMI. With a rise in younger patients who likely have higher physical demands, a tailored preoperative education is preferable to generic models to better manage patient expectations. Younger age, higher BMI, and poorer health may predict unmet expectations for sport and recreation after THA. Tailored education in these groups should be considered

Background: Screening modalities in early detection of DDH remain controversial worldwide despite of universal accessibility to ultrasound and despite of encouraging preliminary results reported about the Austrian and German general ultrasound screening programs. The goal of our investigations was to provide a long time survey on effects following the introduction of the ultrasound exam in prevention of DDH and to proof its beneficial medical and economic effects as well as to analyze possible adverse effects, when utilized by a general screening. Method: Nationwide data about ultrasound screening exams, sonographic follow up exams, frequencies of functional abductive treatment measures as well as hospitalizations due to DDH were requested by different Austrian health care providers. Through a representative recall over a time frame ranging partially back to 1980 a surveillance analysis is provided. The medical effectiveness of the screening was mainly assessed by the annual appearance of early late cases, representing open reductions (O.R.) upon the first two years of life. Other variables as the disease related incidence of age matched annual hospitalizations and the disease prevalence measured by non age matched hospitalizations in relation to the year specific population were analyzed. A cost benefit analysis was performed by comparing the treatment and diagnostic costs in the year before program start (1991) to the last year of surveillance (2004). Results: Since 1980 the functional treatment rate has continuously been reduced from approximately 12 percent to 3.23 percent in 2004. Early late cases (O.R.) due to DDH have been also diminished to an international competitive rate of 0.13 per 1000 newborns, while other age specific early surgical interventions could be almost eradicated. Current additional investments of the program figure only 16.94 € per newborn and embody approximately 1370 € per detection of one affected newborn. Control exams are contributing to roughly 25% of the calculated costs. Interpretation: By founding a nationwide program Austria has introduced a medically efficient screening modality to reduce early late cases and to limit treatment of DDH exposed children to less invasive measures by early diagnosis. In contrary to suspicions of possible adverse effects of such screening, overtreatment has been abandoned while the functional treatment rate has sunken to an acceptable level. Costs saving effects have been already realized on the treatment side. Further savings shall be realized by limiting an unacceptable rate of control exams

Abstract

There are numerous advantages of discharging patients early after any surgery. Day case arthroplasty in hip and knee is already brought into practice at many centres. We present our journey towards discharging elective shoulder arthroplasty patient on same after their surgery. An initial retrospective study of patients who underwent elective shoulder replacement between 2017 and 2020 were studied. It was identified that a selected group of patients could be discharged on the same of their surgery. The criteria to select a patient for this service was laid down that include ASA 1 or 2, good family support on discharge, personal wishes of patients and early identification of potential patients in the clinic and planning for day case shoulder arthroplasty56 consecutive patients underwent elective arthroplasty of shoulder. Among them 22 patients were discharges on the next day of surgery. The potential patients those could discharged on same were identified to be 11 out of 22 were under ASA 2 and had good family support at home on discharge. Average length of stay after surgery was 2.17 days. We have prospectively discharged 2 patients following the new criteria. This study demonstrates how outpatient elective shoulder could be implemented at other centres. Patient participation and selection with proper planning is key for success here.

To our knowledge, we are the only centre in the UK where Achilles tenotomies (TA) for CTEV Ponseti correction are performed in outpatient clinic under local anaesthetic by an Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner (APP) in orthopaedics. This study aims to present the outcomes and safety of this practice. Retrospective analysis of cases of idiopathic CTEV undergoing Ponseti correction January 2020 to October 2022. Demographic data: Pirani score and number of casts before boots and bar. Patients were divided into five groups: Group 1: TA performed by an Orthopaedic consultant under general anaesthetic (GA) in theatre. Group 2: TA performed by an Orthopaedic consultant under local anaesthetic (LA) in theatre. Group 3: TA performed by APP under GA in theatre. Group 4: TA performed by APP under LA in theatre. Group 5: TA performed by an APP under LA in outpatient clinic. Complications recorded: revision TA, infection, neurovascular injury or need for re-casting. Mean follow up 18 months. 45 feet included. Mean Pirani score 5.5, age started casting 33 days and total number of casts 6. No significant difference in demographic details between groups. 6, 4, 20, 5 and 10 tenotomies were performed in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively. Complications were 1 revision tenotomy from group 2, one from group 4 and 1 renewal of cast from 3. This study demonstrates that TAs performed in outpatient clinic under LA by an APP is safe and feasible. No increase in complications were observed compared to TAs performed by orthopaedic consultants

Introduction. With resumption of non-urgent surgery in May 2020, standard anesthesia for hip arthroscopy switched from general with endotracheal intubation (GA) to spinal (SA) in response to COVID-19 implications; reducing potential aerosolized exposure for patient and staff and reducing consumption of personal protective equipment (PPE). There are no studies that compare the attributes for these two anesthesia methods for hip arthroscopy; and thus, this was viewed as an opportunity to perform a comparative observational study on SA to a recent matched group of GA. Methods. Beginning in May 2020, SA became the standard for hip arthroscopy. GA was used if the patient refused SA or had a history of previous lumbar spinal surgery, or body mass index (BMI) greater than 35. SA patients were carefully matched for age, gender and procedure to a recent previous GA population and compared for recovery room (RR) length of stay, entry and discharge visual analog scores (VAS), morphine mg equivalent (MME) usage, and untoward events. Additionally, SA and GA cases performed since May 2020 were compared for the length of time from entry to the operating room (OR) until the surgeon was able to perform an examination under anesthesia (EUA). Results. Statistical analysis determined that these groups are too small (46 in each group) to establish significant differences, but the authors felt that an opportunity to explore this, based on a recent change out of necessity (COVID-!9), was worth presenting as a novel study to compare two accepted methods of anesthesia for hip arthroscopy. SA patients required fewer regional blocks (7 vs 1) and needed less narcotics (99 vs 153). As a potential advantage of SA, continued investigation to see if this reaches statistical significance is meaningful. SA patients did spend more time in the PACU (136 vs 133); and had more problems with urinary retention, requiring catheterization (5 vs 0); but most of these occurred early in the experience and was corrected by having the patient void immediately prior to transfer to the OR and avoiding anticholinergic medications. SA seemed to add only slightly to the length of time until the surgeon could perform an EUA and begin positioning for the procedure (9 vs 8). Conclusion. Hip arthroscopy can be effectively performed with either GA or SA. Of particular interest with further studies will be whether choice of anesthesia affects early postoperative rehabilitation

Limited strong data exists in current literature comparing the 90-day morbidity and mortality following general or spinal anesthetic in patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty, especially between matched cohorts. Because of this, there continues to be an ongoing debate regarding the risks and benefits of using general versus spinal anesthetic for patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage osteoarthritis. The Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI) database was searched to identify all patients who underwent either primary THA or TKA between April 2005 and December 2015. Those identified were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, type of joint replacement (THA or TKA), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and anesthetic type. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they received a general anesthesia (GA) or a spinal anesthesia (SA) at the time of their index surgery. Perioperative complications (medical events, mechanical events, deep infection, need for blood transfusion), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality were compared between cohorts. Included in this study are 5,580 patients who underwent THA and 7,712 patient who underwent TKA. All were successfully matched based on similar categorical criteria (THA, 2,790 matched-pairs, TKA, 3,856 matched-pairs). Following stratifications of cohorts, no statistical differences were appreciated between patient baseline demographics. Patients who underwent GA showed a trend towards higher 90-day mortality, however no statistical differences were found between anesthetic type on rates of 90-day mortality following either THA or TKA (THA, p = 0.290, TKA, p = 0.291). Considering this, patients who underwent THA with SA experienced fewer 90-day complications (medical events, p = 0.022, mechanical events, p = 0.017), needed fewer blood transfusions (p < 0 .001), and required shorter LOS (p = 0.038). Moreover, patient who underwent TKA with SA had fewer blood transfusion (p < 0 .001), 30-day readmission rates (p = 0.011), and fewer deep infections (p = 0.030) that required additional surgery compared to those in the GA cohort. Regardless of surgery performed, patients in the SA cohorts were more commonly discharged home without requiring additional support (i.e. home care). General anesthesia during THA and TKA appears to be associated with increased 90-day morbidity and more frequent need for allogenic blood transfusion. No statistical difference in 90-day mortality is reported between cohorts for either THA or TKA, yet a trend is appreciated favoring SA. Surgeons who commonly perform these surgeries should consider the added benefits of spinal anesthesia for those patients who are candidates

Background. Information about low back pain (LBP) and help to support patients' self-management are recommended in the majority of guidelines for LBP management. However, the delivery of patient information and advice can be time consuming, and with short available consultation times for general practitioners (GPs), new methods to support the delivery of sufficient patient information is called for. Purpose. To identify general practitioners' perspectives on recommending online information to patients with LBP. Methods. Danish GPs varying in age and professional interests were recruited to interviewing in their practices (their working environment). The interviews were based on a semi-structured interview guide, based on a value-led method, and inspired by think aloud methods,. Results. Eight 60-Minutes interviews were conducted. For GPs to recommend online LBP information, it is essential to target the information to their patients. GPs expressed the possible advantages by involving both healthcare professionals and patients in the development of the online information material by aligning the content with the face-to-face delivered information. Furthermore, the content should be guideline concordant. However, GPs expressed that some patients had problems with accessing and understanding health-related LBP information. Conclusion. When developing online information, the content should be supported by evidence and it is important to involve patients' and GPs' preferences in the design process. Consequently, including the elements in evidence-based medicine. However, GPs do not consider online information material to be suited to all. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Funded by ARs' Honour in Medical Research from Magda and Svend Aage Friederichs Memorial Fund and the Novo Nordic Foundation

Abstract

Introduction

Aims. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of the UK lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on the orthopaedic admissions, operations, training opportunities, and theatre efficiency in a large district general hospital. Methods. The number of patients referred to the orthopaedic team between 1 April 2020 and 30 April 2020 were collected. Other data collected included patient demographics, number of admissions, number and type of operations performed, and seniority of primary surgeon. Theatre time was collected consisting of anaesthetic time, surgical time, time to leave theatre, and turnaround time. Data were compared to the same period in 2019. Results. There was a significant increase in median age of admitted patients during lockdown (70.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 46.25 to 84) vs 57 (IQR 27 to 79.75); p = 0.017) with a 26% decrease in referrals from 303 to 224 patients and 37% decrease in admissions from 177 to 112 patients, with a significantly higher proportion of hip fracture admissions (33% (n = 37) vs 19% (n = 34); p = 0.011). Paediatric admissions decreased by 72% from 32 to nine patients making up 8% of admissions during lockdown compared to 18.1% the preceding year (p = 0.002) with 66.7% reduction in paediatric operations, from 18 to 6. There was a significant increase in median turnaround time (13 minutes (IQR 12 to 33) vs 60 minutes (IQR 41 to 71); p < 0.001) although there was no significant difference in the anaesthetic time or surgical time. There was a 38% (61 vs 38) decrease in trainee-led operations. Discussion. The lockdown resulted in large decreases in referrals and admissions. Despite this, hip fracture admissions were unaffected and should remain a priority for trauma service planning in future lockdowns. As plans to resume normal elective and trauma services begin, hospitals should focus on minimising theatre turnaround time to maximize theatre efficiency while prioritizing training opportunities. Clinical relevance. Lockdown has resulted in decreases in the trauma burden although hip fractures remain unaffected requiring priority. Theatre turnaround times and training opportunities are affected and should be optimised prior to the resumption of normal services. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:494–499

Objective. Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) bring relief of pain and functional disability to patients with end stage osteoarthritis, however the literature on their impact on patients’ level of physical activity (PA) is scarce. Methods. Cross-sectional study, performed in 2012, in 515 patients who underwent THA/TKA surgery in 2010–2011 and a random sample of persons aged >40 years from the Dutch general population participating in a national survey in the same period. PA in minutes per week (min/week) and adherence to the Dutch recommendation for health enhancing PA was measured by means of the Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health enhancing PA (SQUASH) Additional assessments included socio-demographic characteristics, the presence of comorbidities, BMI and Short Form-12. Multivariable linear (total min/week) and logistic regression analyses (meeting PA recommendation), adjusting for confounders, were performed for THA and TKA separately. Results. 258 THA patients (64% female, mean age 70.0 (SD9.2)), 221 TKA patients (67% female, mean age 70.2 (SD8.9)) and 4373 persons from the general population sample (52% female, age 59.0 (SD12.0)) were included. In both regression analyses, the presence of joint arthroplasty was statistically significantly associated with more total min/week spent on PA (THA 7.0% increase, 95%-CI (2.0%–12.6%); TKA 7.4% increase, 95%-CI (1.6%–13.4%)) and a higher chance of adherence with PA recommendations (THA OR 1.90, 95%-CI (1.12–3.03); TKA OR 1.94, 95%-CI (1.19–3.15)). Conclusion. 6-18 months after surgery, THA/TKA patients were more physically active than a random sample of persons >40 years from the Dutch general population

Aims: Musculo-skeletal complaints comprise a significant proportion of General Practitioner workload. The aim of this study was to assess whether the training of GP’s is satisfactory given their exposure to orthopaedics and trauma in practice. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to 200 local General Practitioners requesting information on their training in musculo-skeletal conditions. Results: The response rate was 58%. The reported estimated proportion of musculo-skeletal problems varied between 10% and 60 %. Only 33% of General Practitioners had any formal post graduate training in trauma and orthopaedics. Experience in the related specialities of rheumatology was 12% and A+E 69%. 35% of responding General Practitioners reported a specialist interest in musculo-skeletal conditions although less than 2% have any postgraduate qualifications in this area. Only 23% of GP’s thought that their training in orthopaedics and trauma was adequate .85% felt that they would benefit from further training. 80% of these felt that clinical teaching would be the best way to achieve this. Conclusions: Musculo-skeletal problems comprise a significant proportion of General Practice workload. Despite this fact formal training in trauma and orthopaedics received by GP’s is minimal. 77% of GP’s feel that their training in the treatment of musculo-skeletal conditions is inadequate and 85% would like further training

DAIR procedure is well established for Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) in acute setting after total hip and knee replacements. We present our experience of DAIR following hip and knee replacements in a District General Hospital (DGH), where we delivered comparable results to leading tertiary centres in short to mid-term followup. We undertook a retrospective study involving 14 patients, who underwent DAIR in our DGH between August 2012 and December 2015. Patient cohort included primary, complex primary and revision hip and knee replacements. Microbiological support was provided by a Microbiologist with interest in musculoskeletal infections. 14 patients [9 males, 5 females; age 62 to 78 years (Mean 70.7); BMI 22 to 44.2 (Mean 33.8)] with multiple comorbidities underwent DAIR procedure within 3 weeks of onset of symptoms. 12 out of 14 grew positive cultures with two growing Vancomycin resistant Enterococci. Intravenous antibiotics were started after multiple samples intraoperatively and continued in six patients after discharge, while 8 were discharged with oral antibiotics. One patient died of overwhelming intraoperative septic shock in postoperative period. Another patient died of myocardial infarction subsequently. 12 (85.7%) patients were doing well with regular followup (Mean 20 months). With good patient selection, DAIR is a far simpler solution and a safe and reproducible surgical option for early PJI following hip and knee replacements compared to one or two stage revisions. But published data in contemporary literature is predominantly from specialised centres. Our small series provides a perspective of comparable early to mid-term results of DAIR from DGH

Background: With the foreseeable increase in demand for revision hip surgery, it is likely that orthopaedic surgeons working in district general orthopaedic units will undertake an increasing number of secondary procedures. This article set out to determine whether a single orthopaedic surgeon, working in a district general hospital, could achieve results comparable to those obtained by surgeons working in specialised tertiary referral centres. Patients and methods: Complete records and serial radiographs of 72 patients (76 hips) having revision total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon and follow-up of at least 1 year, were reviewed by an independent observer. Results: The mean follow-up period was 4 years. Indications for revision were aseptic loosening (N=51), sepsis (N=16), fracture (N=3), dislocation (N=2), and other (N=4). Complete cement removal was achieved in 97% of acetabular components revised and 88% of femoral components revised. There were no documented complications in 68% of revised hip prostheses. The complications of the remaining cases comprised trochanteric bursitis (9%), dislocation (10%), thromboembolism (5%), periprosthetic fracture (1%) and infection of the revised prosthesis (1%). None of the cases studied died as a direct result of surgery. All radiographic parameters measured were improved by revision of the prostheses. Conclusions: Orthopaedic surgeons working in district general hospitals performing 5 to 10 revision hip arthroplasties per year can achieve results comparable to those of surgeons working in specialised units