Essex-Lopresti injuries are often unrecognized acutely with resulting debilitating adverse effects. Persistent axial forearm instability may affect load transmission at both the elbow and wrist, resulting in significant pain. In the setting of both acute and chronic injuries metallic radial head arthroplasty has been advocated, however there is little information regarding their outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a radial head arthroplasty to address both acute and chronic Essex-Lopresti type injuries. A retrospective review from 2006 to 2016 identified 11 Essex-Lopresti type injuries at a mean follow-up of 18 months. Five were diagnosed and treated acutely at a mean of 11 days (range, 8 to 19 days) from injury, while 6 were treated in a delayed fashion at a mean of 1.9 years (range, 2.7 months to 6.2 years) from injury with a mean 1.5 (range, 0 to 4) prior procedures. The cohort included 10 males with a mean age was 44.5 years (range, 28 to 71 years). A smooth stem, modular radial head arthroplasty was used in all cases. Outcomes included range of motion and radiographic findings such as ulnar variance, capitellar erosion, implant positioning and implant lucency using a modification of the method described by Gruen. Reoperations, including the need for ulnar shortening osteotomy, were also recorded. Three patients in each group (55%) reported persistent wrist pain. The mean ulnar variance improved from +5 mm (range, 1.8 to 7 mm) to +3.7 mm (range, 1 to 6.3 mm) at the time of final follow-up or prior to reoperation. Three (50%) patients in the chronic group underwent a staged ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) to correct residual ulnar positive variance and to manage residual wrist pain. There were no reoperations in the acute group. Following USO, the ulnar variance in those three cases improved further to +3.5, +2.1, and −1.1 mm. No radial head prostheses required removal. Capitellar erosion was noted in five (45%) elbows, and was rated severe in one, moderate in two, and mild in two. Lucency about the radial head prosthesis stem was noted in eight (73%) cases, and rated as severe in 2 (18%), based on Gruen zones. Treatment of acute and chronic Essex-Lopresti lesions with radial head arthroplasty often results in persistent wrist pain. In the chronic setting, a planned USO was often necessary to restore axial forearm stability after radial head arthroplasty. Essex-Lopresti lesions represent a rare clinical entity that are difficult treat, particularly in the chronic setting. Early recognition and management with a smooth stem modular radial head arthroplasty may provide improved outcomes compared to chronic reconstruction

Introduction and Aims: To evaluate the results of radial head replacement in the primary management of radial head fractures. The recommended indications for prosthetic radial head replacement include unreconstructable Mason 3 fractures associated with ligament disruption or axial forearm instability. Method: We retrospectively reviewed all radial head fractures that were treated with a radial head replacement, over a four-year period, in two district general hospitals. All seven patients were finally assessed specifically for this study, either in person or by telephone/ postal questionnaire, with final radiographs obtained for this study. Results: Routine clinical follow-up was three months, following which the patient was discharged. No patient achieved full functional range of motion. The average range of flexion was 110 degrees (range 80 to 120 degrees), average extension deficit of 35 degrees (range 30 to 45 degrees), average pronation was 35 degrees (range 0 to 65 degrees), and average supination was 50 degrees (range 30 to 85 degrees). Three patients required implant removal due to loosening (1/3), elbow stiffness (2/3), and instability (1/3), the latter case requiring a revision of the radial head prosthesis. Persistent discomfort was noticed in all cases. Four patients were tolerant of the final functional outcome, although the average Mayo elbow score was 78/100 (range 55 to 80). Conclusion: Radial head replacement in general orthopaedic, low volume, practice failed to achieve satisfactory results. Contrary to popular belief, it is a technically demanding operation, for which surveillance should be continued for a minimum of one year. Strict indications for prosthetic replacement should be followed and implant selection has yet to be proven to make a significant positive contribution

The influence of the supinator and pronator quadratus (PQ) muscles on distal radioulnar joint stability were evaluated using a joint simulator capable of producing forearm rotation, before and after ulnar head excision. Multiple pronation trials were conducted with incremental loading of the PQ relative to the pronator teres; supination trials were similarly conducted with the supinator and biceps. Incremental supinator muscle loading did not alter forearm kinematics. Increased PQ loading did not affect intact kinematics, but did alter joint motion following ulnar head excision. PQ activation will likely aggravate forearm instability following ulnar head excision; suggesting rehabilitation should incorporate immobilization in supination. The purpose of this study was to study the effect of pronator quadratus (PQ) and supinator loads on forearm kinematics in both an intact distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and following ulnar head excision. The PQ muscle appears to aggravate instability of the DRUJ following ulnar head excision, while incremental loading of the supinator muscle had no effect. Patients with DRUJ instability and/or who have undergone surgical removal of the ulnar head should be rehabilitated in supination to limit the influence of the PQ muscle. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were tested in a custom joint simulator employing motion and load-controlled tendon loading to produce forearm rotation. Pronation was achieved via loading of the pronator teres and PQ muscles. Repeated trials were conducted in which the ratio of the PQ load was increased incrementally relative to the pronator teres load. Supination trials were similarly conducted using the biceps and supinator muscles. Testing was conducted in the intact forearm and following ulnar head excision. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to record motion of the radius and ulna. Kinematic data was analyzed with a planar analysis that measured dorsal palmar displacements and diastasis of the DRUJ. Greater diastasis and dorsal translation of the radius relative to the ulna were noted under increased PQ loading following ulnar head excision (p< 0.05). Increased supinator load had no effect on kinematics before or after ulnar head excision. This effect is likely due to the location of the two muscles. The effect of PQ muscle loading was only noted in neutral to full pronation. These results suggest that rehabilitation of the forearm following ulnar head excision should be conducted with the forearm in supination to minimize joint instability. Funding: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, The Arthritis Society (Canada)

The June 2014 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: aart throwing not quite as we thought; two-gear, four-bar linkage in the wrist?; assessing outcomes in distal radial fractures; gold standard Swanson’s?; multistrand repairs of unclear benefit in flexor tendon release; for goodness’ sake, leave the thumb alone in scaphoid fractures; horizons in carpal tunnel surgery; treading the Essex-Lopresti tightrope; wrist replacement in trauma? and radial shortening reliable in the long term for Kienbock’s disease