The aim of this study was to gain an agreement on the management of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) up to walking age in order to provide a benchmark for practitioners and guide consistent, high-quality care for children with CTEV. The consensus process followed an established Delphi approach with a predetermined degree of agreement. The process included the following steps: establishing a steering group; steering group meetings, generating statements, and checking them against the literature; a two-round Delphi survey; and final consensus meeting. The steering group members and Delphi survey participants were all British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) members. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of the Delphi survey results. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation checklist was followed for reporting of the results.Aims
Methods
Introduction: Idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot) is a common complex deformity that occurs in approximately one or two per 1000 newborns. For many years, most surgeons considered it as a “surgical disease”. The long term results of the surgical release are disappointing, with increased foot pain, joints stiffness and muscle weakness. It would appear that the most successful conservative treatment for clubfoot is the method developed in the late 1940s by Ponseti. We recently reviewed the outcomes of treatment in Afula with the Ponseti method in our first 28 patients with minimum of five years follow-up. Materials and Methods: In our study are included 28 patients (38 feet). 22 males and six females, 18 unilateral and ten bilateral cases, with idiopathic clubfoot. The average follow-up duration is of 6.5 years (range 5–8.5). The cases were evaluated using the 6-point clssfication system described by Pirani. Each foot was assigned a total score of 6 points or less, with higher scores indicating more severe deformity, 0 points indicate a normal foot. Results: The average Pirani score at initial presentation was 5.5 (range 3–6). Only two feet out of 38 (7%), required complete surgical release, using the Turco method. The average number of casts applied was 7.5 (range, 5–13), and 35 of 38 (92%) feet required percutaneous Achilles tenotomy. We used the Garceau classification to assess residual deformity. The average scoring was 3.6 points (range 2–4). Twelve feet out of 36 (33%) (excluding the 2 feet who underwent PMR), ended up with some residual supination, according to the Garceau classification, 11 feet rated 3 points each, and only one foot 2 points. Only12 patients were defined as compliant with the use of the
Background and aims of the study: Identifying risk factors for poor outcome, is an important issue in the management of idiopathic congenital talipes equino varus foot deformity using Ponsetti Method. Material &
Methods: 198 feet of idiopathic congenital talipes equino varus foot deformity in 126 children, were treated using the Ponseti technique. They were followed up for a maximum of 36 months. Patient prenatal, natal and family history were documented. Pre and post intervention morphologic measures were recorded. All cases had thorough clinical examination to exclude cases other than idiopathic congenital talipes equino varus, identified syndromes were excluded. Serial weekly plaster casting to correct cavus adducts and varus, followed by heel cord tenotomy if needed. Then
To identify the minimum set of outcomes that should be collected in clinical practice and reported in research related to the care of children with idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV). A list of outcome measurement tools (OMTs) was obtained from the literature through a systematic review. Further outcomes were collected from patients and families through a questionnaire and interview process. The combined list, as well as the appropriate follow-up timepoint, was rated for importance in a two-round Delphi process that included an international group of orthopaedic surgeons, physiotherapists, nurse practitioners, patients, and families. Outcomes that reached no consensus during the Delphi process were further discussed and scored for inclusion/exclusion in a final consensus meeting involving international stakeholder representatives of practitioners, families, and patient charities.Aims
Methods