Introduction: Total femoral endoprosthetic replacement can be an alternative to amputation following extensive tumour excision or in cases of severe bone loss. In skeletally immature patients the problem of leg length inequality may be overcome by the use of extendable prostheses. The aim of this study is to assess the functional outcome of patients following total femoral endoprosthetic replacement. Methods: This is a retrospective, single centre study of 16 patients who underwent consecutive total femoral replacements between 1978 and 1999. Information was collected from the Bone Tumour database, medical records and clinical review. The prostheses were custom made by the Biomedical Engineering Department of University College London and Stanmore Implants Worldwide. The implants are composed of a Titanium alloy shaft with Cobalt-Chrome bearing surfaces, incorporating a SMILES (Stanmore Modular Individualised Lower Extremity System) knee joint. Outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MTS) rating score. Sample: Eight patients were male and eight female. Mean age was 35 years (range 5–75 years). Ten patients underwent total femoral replacement as a primary procedure; nine for malignant tumour and one for hydatid disease. Of the patients with malignancy five had metastases at the time of presentation. The other indications were failed distal femoral replacement in four cases and periprosthetic fractures in the remaining two. Four children received extendable prostheses. Results: Of the patients with malignant disease, all but one had complete tumour excision. Three patients developed local recurrence. Two patients died of metastases within one year of diagnosis and three more died within five years. Three required revision procedures. Two more dislocated at the hip joint. Other complications included infection and lymphoedema. In patients surviving longer than one year the average range of motion at the hip was 85 degrees and at the knee 80 degrees. Using the MTS rating score the mean functional outcome was 60% of normal (range 27–90%). Of the survivors one achieved an excellent result, five were good, four fair and one poor. Conclusion: Total femoral endoprosthetic replacement can be effective in limb salvage and provide an alternative to amputation. Good functional results can often be achieved. However, the complication rate is high and the outcome extremely varied

We report the use of contained impacted morsellized allograft to revise an aseptically loose, massive distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement in a 27-year old Caucasian lady. The prosthesis was inserted 4 years earlier, following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and resection of a distal femoral high grade osteosarcoma. Impaction grafting was used to restore bone stock and maintain femoral length. The patient remains disease-free, with excellent function, at two years after revision with no evidence of loosening and maintenance of bone stock. This is the first time this technique has been used in revision of a distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement

Introduction: Total femoral endoprosthetic replacement can be used as an alternative to hip disarticulation following extensive tumour excision or in cases of more severe bone loss. To date there have been no long term studies on the oncological and functional outcome of patients who have had this procedure for malignant bone disease. We report our experience of over 25 years employing this procedure using a custom-made and modular total femoral endoprosthetic replacement. Methods: This is a retrospective, single centre study of 27 patients who underwent consecutive total femoral replacement as a primary procedure between 1978 and 2005. Information was collected from the bone tumour database, medical records and clinic review. Outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) rating score, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Results: There were 15 males and 12 females, with a mean age of 30 years (5 to 65). The overall mean follow-up was 4.3 years (1 to 16.4) for all patients, 9.1 years (1 to 16.4) for the 7 patients who were alive at the time of this review, and 2.6 years (1 to 13) for the 20 patients who had died. 24 patients had primary malignant bone tumours of the femur and 3 had metastatic disease from a known primary elsewhere. 3 patients developed local recurrence, 1 patient developed new lung metastases. Mean MSTS score was 63% (19/30), mean HHS was 68/100 and mean OKS was 34/48. Discussion: Total femoral replacement can be an effective alternative to hip disarticulation in patients with malignant bone disease. Good functional outcomes can be achieved without compromising survival

Purpose; To show that Distal Femoral Endoprosthetic Replacement for metastatic disease can be performed with relatively few complications and allows good pain control and mobilisation for otherwise severely compromised patients. Method; This is a retrospective study, using the oncology database, patient records and local correspondence, looking at 23 patients with distal femoral metastases who had limb salvage with a Distal Femoral Endoprosthesis (DF EPR). Results; There were 10 males (43%) and 13 females (57%), mean age 65 (38–84). 13 (57%) had Renal, 6 (26%) Breast and 5 other primaries identified. Five had additional metastases. 8 (35%) had pathological fractures. The mean time for diagnosis of mets was 67 months ranging from 0 (i.e. at the time of primary tumour) to 30 years since the original diagnosis. 15 patients had surgery alone. 3 patients were lost to follow up. 15 patients have diseased at a mean of 26 months (4–58) post op. There was one intra-op and four post-op complications. The majority of the patients were satisfied post op with regards to pain and mobility. The generally unfavourable prognosis and perceived risks have led surgeons to palliate, stabilise in situ or amputate for distal femoral metastases despite recognised morbidity and life style restrictions. We conclude that DF EPR should be considered as a limb salvage option in patients with distal femoral mets

Introduction: Deep infection following distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement remains an uncommon, (< 7%), but serious complication; we present the results all three-phase revisions performed at our unit. Method: Using the endoprosthesis-survivorship database we identified and analysed 15 consecutive cases, (including MSTS functional assessment of all available patients), performed between 1993 and 2002. The primary replacement had been performed for trauma and fourteen for limb reconstruction following excision of tumour. All cases underwent a three-phase revision. The first stage involved debridement and exchange of prosthesis for a custom-made antibiotic-impregnated spacer. Following at least six weeks of intravenous antibiotics, a further endoprosthesis was inserted. Results: Eight patients had complete clinical, radiological & biochemical resolution of infection, (mean follow-up 60 months). Mean MSTS score for this group was 83% (range 60–97%). The remaining seven had recurrence of infection, all within 18 months. Of this group, two underwent a successful second revision procedure with conversion to a total femoral replacement. Two cases are satisfactorily managed with antibiotic suppression therapy and three have required amputation. Two of these cases underwent above-knee amputation following a failed second revision, whilst the third was given a femoral stump endoprosthesis to avoid disarticulation. Revision was generally more successful in younger patients. Neither the original pathology nor the timing of revision surgery appeared to affect outcome. Negative tissue cultures from the first stage were associated with a successful result. Very high levels of inflammatory markers were associated with failure of revision. Conclusion: We recommend two-stage revision of distal femoral replacement as an effective treatment for infection, allowing limb salvage with excellent functional outcome in the majority of patients. The antibiotic phase may need to exceed six weeks in certain cases, and levels of inflammatory markers appear to be critical. If this revision fails, conversion to a total femoral replacement should be considered

Purpose: Few functional outcomes of total femoral endoprosthetic replacement (TFEPR) using contemporary modular systems are available. We compared functional results between TFEPR patients receiving fixed- and rotating-hinge knee componentry following oncologic resections. Method: Eighteen TFEPR patients were identified from a prospectively gathered sarcoma database. Six were secondary procedures and 12 primary. Four patients had metastatic carcinoma, 8 osteosarcoma, 4 non-osteogenic spindle cell sarcomas of bone, 1 Ewing’s sarcoma, and 1 femur-invading soft-tissue sarcoma. All reconstructions used modular implants from a single company. Proximally, all were bipolar hip hemiarthoplasties, 12 including abductor reattachment. Distally, 8 had fixed- and 10 had rotating-hinge knee componentry. Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and both Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores (MSTS) were compared between fixed- and rotating-hinge groups using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Complications included 1 hip dislocation, 1 femoral malrotation, and wound problems requiring 3 debridements and 1 amputation. One metastatic carcinoma patient developed local relapse. Follow-up averaged 4 years (range 1 month to 14 years). At latest follow-up, 10 patients had died of disease. Eight remained alive, 6 disease-free, 2 with distant disease. Among patients surviving 6 months, 6 used no assistive devices, 5 used a single cane, and 4 were wheelchair bound, each at least partly due to distant disease progression. TESS averaged 74.5±17.4, MSTS1987 25.2±4.4; and MSTS1993 58.6±22.9 among the 12 patients for whom functional results were available from latest follow-up. No statistically significant differences or even trends were detected between fixed-hinge and rotating-hinge patients (lowest p = 0.755), but both instability problems were in the rotating-hinge group. Conclusion: While both rotating- and fixed-hinge TFEPR reconstructions may function well, consideration should be given to fixed-hinge knee reconstruction when massive myectomies or poorer conditioning make hip and knee stability a primary concern in the short-term

Introduction and Aims: Orthopaedic oncologists are often consulted regarding problems involving salvage of the distal femur due to bone loss, non-unions, infections. In young patients, extensive bony reconstruction is often necessary; in elderly, low demand patients, replacement with an endoprosthetic device results in decreased surgical time and more rapid mobilisation.

Method: Since 1991, 27 patients underwent reconstruction with a custom modular distal femoral replacement and rotating hinged knee joint (DFR). Twenty-two (81%) were revised to a DFR from an existing knee arthroplasty. Diagnoses included fracture, non-union, osteomyelitis, osteolysis or deformity. Average age was 66 (25–85); 83% were female. Most patients had undergone multiple prior surgeries. Patients with a history of infection had undergone aggressive resection and insertion of spacers with prolonged antibiotic administration, however they had no infection at the time of DFR reconstruction. All endoprostheses were cemented. Patients were allowed immediate weight-bearing and rehabilitation similar to patients undergoing TKA.

Results: One elderly patient died in the immediate peri-operative period of respiratory failure and one was lost to follow-up after placement in a nursing home. Average follow-up on 25 evaluable patients was 47 months (7–122). Reoperations were for recurrent infection (six) and tibial component loosening (three). Five of the six with infection were treated with synovectomy, antibiotic beads and suppressive oral antibiotics, and all five devices are still in place at an average of 54 months (range, 25–100). One severely diabetic patient had had multiple episodes of sepsis unrelated to the prosthesis which eventually seeded the distal femur and required a hip disarticulation. MSTS functional scores at last follow-up averaged 49% (13–80%) and HSS knee scores averaged 71% (37–90%).

Conclusion: DFR is a useful salvage procedure in low demand patients. Initially, six patients were scheduled for transfemoral amputation and three were confined to wheelchairs. Patients other than the hip disarticulation were at minimum household ambulators at last follow-up. In spite of problems with infection, most patients improved in overall function.

The objective of this study was to compare the results of two consecutive series of patients with either intra-medullary uncemented stems (UCS) distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement or the Compress. ®. (CMP) distal femoral implant. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received UCS prosthesis (Group-1: 54 patients) and those who received CMP prosthesis (Group-2: 42 patients).The most frequent diagnosis was osteosarcoma. Age and gender were similar both groups. In Group-1, at a mean follow-up of 144 months, 37 prostheses were still in place. The overall Kaplan-Meier prosthetic survival rates were 79% at five and 62 % at ten years. Most of failures were long term complications. Aseptic loosening was the primary cause of late prosthetic failure. On Cox regression analysis, prosthetic stem diameter under 13mm was a significant negative prognostic factor for prosthetic survival (p=0.016). In Group-2, at a mean follow-up of 84 months, 36 prostheses were still in place. The overall rate of CMP prosthesis survival was 86% at 5 years. All complications were during the first postoperative year, being femoral fracture the main revision cause. The patients who retained the prosthesis had mainly good or excellent MSTS functional results in both groups

Background: Chronic prosthetic joint infection is a cause of patient morbidity and can be challenging to treat. Surgeons performing revision arthroplasty of the hip and knee are confronted with a growing number of patients with extensive loss of bone stock. The use of a modular endoprosthesis is a possible method of treatment in such patients. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcomes and the success of a single and two stage revision procedure in eradicating chronic prosthetic joint infection using a femoral endoprosthesis. Methods: A prospective database was reviewed of 20 patients who underwent a proximal, total or distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement after chronic prosthetic infection. Radiographs performed at the time of latest follow up were evaluated for signs of loosening, osteomyelitis and implant failure. The functional status was assessed using the Short Form (SF)-36 health survey score, Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) and the Enneking score. Results: Thirteen patients underwent a single stage revision procedure and seven had been treated with a staged revision. At the latest follow up none of the 13 patients treated with a single stage procedure had evidence of ongoing infection. Of the seven patients who had a staged revision, 3 patients had evidence of ongoing infection. The mean pre operative Enneking score for the entire group was 17.1 points and this improved to 47.5 points post operatively (p< 0.0002). The mean pre operative TESS score for the entire group was 42% and this improved to 59% post operatively (p< 0.005). There was also a statistically significant improvement in all of the components of the SF-36 score. Conclusion: We believe that the use of a modular endo-prosthesis in the treatment of chronic prosthetic joint infection is a successful and viable option in eradicating infection, preserving the limb and providing a good functional result