Aims. There are concerns regarding complications and longevity of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in young patients, and the few previous publications are mainly limited to reports on linked elbow devices. We investigated the clinical outcome of unlinked TEA for patients aged less than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 elbows of 21 patients with RA who were aged less than 50 years who underwent primary TEA with an unlinked elbow prosthesis. The mean patient age was 46 years (35 to 49), and the mean follow-up period was 13.6 years (6 to 27). Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiological evaluation for radiolucent line and loosening, complications, and revision surgery with or without implant removal. Results. The mean MEPS significantly improved from 47 (15 to 70) points preoperatively to 95 (70 to 100) points at final follow-up (p < 0.001). Complications were noted in six elbows (23%) in six patients, and of these, four with an ulnar neuropathy and one elbow with postoperative traumatic fracture required additional surgeries. There was no revision with implant removal, and there was no radiological evidence of loosening around the components. With any revision surgery as the endpoint, the survival rates up to 25 years were 78.1% (95% confidence interval 52.8 to 90.6) as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusion. The clinical outcome of primary unlinked TEA for young patients with RA was satisfactory and comparable with that for elderly patients. A favourable survival rate without implant removal might support the use of unlinked devices for young patients with this disease entity, with a caution of a relatively high complication rate regarding ulnar neuropathy. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(1):19–26

Introduction. Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) is recognized as an effective treatment solution for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or for traumatic conditions. Current total elbow devices can be divided into linked or unlinked design. The first design usually presents a linking element (i.e. an axle) to link together the ulnar and humeral components to stabilize the joint; the second one does not present any linkage and the stability is provided by both intrinsic design constraints and the soft tissues. Convertible modular solutions allow for an intraoperative decision to link or unlink the prosthesis; the modular connections introduce however additional risks in terms of both mechanical strength and potential fatigue and fretting phenomena that may arise not only due to low demand activities loads, but also high demand (HD) ones that could be even more detrimental. The aim of this study was to assess the strength of the modular connection between the axle and the ulnar component in a novel convertible elbow prosthesis design under simulated HD and activities of daily living (ADLs) loading. Methods. A novel convertible total elbow prosthesis (LimaCorporate, IT) comprising both ulnar and humeral components that can be linked together by means of an axle, was used. Both typical ADLs and HD torques to be applied to the axle were determined based on finite element analysis (FEA); the boundary load conditions for the FEA were determined based on kinematics analysis on real patients in previous studies. The FEA resultant moment acting on the axle junction during typical ADLs (i.e. feeding with 7.2lbs weight in hand) was 3.2Nm while for HD loads (i.e. sit to stand) was 5.7 Nm. In the experimental setup, 5 axle specimens coupled with 5 ulnar bodies through a tapered connection (5 Nm assembly torque) were fixed to a torque actuator (MTS Bionix) and submerged in a saline solution (9g/l). A moment of 3.2 Nm was applied to the axle for 5M cycles through a fixture to test it under ADLs loading. After 5M cycles, the axles were analyzed with regards to fretting behavior and then re-assembled to test them against HD loading by applying 5.7 Nm for 200K cycles (corresponding to 20 years function). Results. All 5 samples withstood all 5.2M loading cycles without any mechanical failure. At the end of 5M cycles, each axle was still stable as the measured disassembly torque was 3.96 +/−0.18 Nm. Slight signs of fretting were detected on the tapered connection after 5M cycles, however they did not compromise the mechanical connection nor the stability. Discussion and Conclusions. Currently there are no reference standards that properly define protocols for biomechanical testing of elbow prostheses. In the present study, a test to mechanically assess the strength of an axle connection under both typical ADLs and HD loads was set. The connection was able to withstand the imposed conditions. In general, testing of TEA devices should include not only standard ADLs loads but also HD loads, which could be more detrimental for the long-term survivorship. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction: The Kudo total elbow prosthesis (TEP) is a well established implant, with good mid-term results. In the last decades this implant underwent several modifications. The last modification (type 5) has overcome the problems of stem breakage of the humeral component by modifications of the stem. The ulnar component can be placed with or without cement; the humeral component is always placed without cement. Aims of this study: To examine the mid-term results of the Kudo type 5 TEP and to compare the results of the uncemented Kudo total elbow prosthesis (TEP), with the hybrid Kudo TEP (uncemented humeral component and cemented ulnar component). Material and methods: Between 1994 and 2004 89 Kudo type 5 TEPs were placed for joint destruction due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The mean age of the patients was 55 years (range 21–84 years). Twenty-two prostheses were placed in males, 66 in females. Forty-nine TEPs (group 1) were fully uncemented and 40 TEPs (group 2) were hybrid (humeral component uncemented, ulnar component cemented). The groups were comparable as related to age, sex and indication for surgery. After implantation of the prosthesis a radiograph was made every two years or sooner when indicated. Evaluation took place after an average of 5.3 years of follow up (range 1.7–10.6 years) and consisted of a questionnaire, elbow function assessment and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in a standard way. Pre- and postoperative range of motion was analysed with the paired T-test. Pain scores and EFAS scores postoperatively were analysed using the independent sample T-test. The survival of the prosthesis was calculated from the time of implant to the time of revision or occurrence of radiolucencies. Results: In group 1, seven ulnar components had to be revised due to aseptic loosening after a mean follow-up of 4 years (range 1.5–6.3 years). Three of these ulnar components were short-stemmed, four were long stemmed uncemented. In group 2 five patients died of an unrelated course and no revisions have taken place, one TEP is loose on X-ray (after two years) with a suspicion of septic loosening The EFAS scores (87 in group 1 and 91 in group 2) and range of motion (84 degrees in group 1 and 90 degrees in group 2) were the same in both groups. Conclusion: In this group of patients with RA the survival of the Kudo type 5 TEP with cemented ulnar component is better as compared to the uncemented ulnar component

Introduction and Objectives: The goal of this study is to present results from a series of arthroplasties performed in our hospital in the past 3 years in terms of pain and mobility.

Materials and Methods: In this study, a total of 14 arthroplasties were performed on 12 patients (including 2 revisions). Follow-up was lost on 3 patients. Of the 9 remaining patients, 5 were females and 4 were male. Average age was 59 years (42–75) at time of surgery. Two prosthetic models were used: Coonrad-Morrey in 5 cases (including one revision) and GSB-III in 6 cases (including one revision). The following conditions were treated: 5 cases of post-traumatic arthrosis of the elbow, one haemophilic arthropathy of the elbow with the elbow as the target joint, one case of rheumatoid arthritis, one supracondylar fracture with nonunion in an elderly patient, and one humeral fracture with post-traumatic arthrosis of the elbow.

Results: At the functional level, a postoperative articular balance of 118° flexion and −20° extension and free pronosupination was obtained, with the exception of 2 cases. There was complete elimination or a significant decrease in pain except in 2 cases where a certain level of pain persisted. Radiographically, poor positioning was not seen, but there was one case of septic loosening (resulting in resective arthroplasty) and one peri-prosthetic fracture requiring revision, since it led to instability and repeated dislocation. Other complications included neurologic problems (2), extension deficit > 30° (2), and residual pain (2).

Discussion and Conclusions: Although this study is still in the early stages and follow-up time is short (the study was initiated in 2000), we are seeing promising results in terms of mobility and cessation of pain, similar to various other studies. In terms of the percentage of revisions, complications, and patient satisfaction, results are also comparable to other studies, even though our study thus far has the disadvantage of being shorter. Nonetheless, we wish to present this study to demonstrate that even though elbow arthroplasties are in their infancy, results are promising, and there is hope that they will improve further in future with improved selection criteria, as happened in the past with knee and hip arthroplasties.

Introduction – Electronic storage of X-rays is becoming standard. It would therefore, be highly desirable to use a computer as a tool for obtaining useful measurements from radiographs. The current study investigates the reliability of computerised measurements of radiographs of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow.

Materials and Methods – 56 AP radiographs of Souter-Strathclyde Elbows were assessed for the parameters described by Trail et al (1999). The respective x-rays were digitised using a transparency flatbed scanner with a resolution of 80 ï m/pixel. The radiographs were then measured for the migration and movement of the prosthesis using the following lines: Hapd1, Hapd2, Hapd3 Hapd4. All the radiographs were measured twice manually with at least one week interval, the observer being blind to the initial results at the time of the second measurement. The x-rays were again measured twice using the computer and a measuring software developed in our own department. The results were analysed for intra observer variability, using paired t-test and Pearson correlations.

Results – Table 1 shows the results of the paired measurements, with the confidence intervals for the mean error, the p for the paired t-test and the correlations between the paired readings. M1 and M2 represent the manual readings, while C1 and C2 the computerised readings.

Conclusions – The mean error of all paired readings was below 1 mm. The correlation between all paired readings was highly significant, with all the paired readings with the computer as a tool being .99. The only difference that was statistically significant was Hapd3M1-M2, between two manual measurements, although the mean error is not clinically relevant, still being less than 1mm. We conclude that computerised measurements of radiographs are at least as reliable as those conducted directly on film.

Introduction: Electronic storage of X-rays is becoming standard. It would therefore, be highly desirable to use a computer as a tool for obtaining useful measurements from radiographs. The current study investigates the reliability of computerised measurements of radiographs of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow.

Materials and Methods: 56 AP radiographs of Souter-Strathclyde Elbows were assessed for the parameters described by Trail et al (1999). The respective x-rays were digitised using a transparency flatbed scanner with a resolution of 80 _m/pixel. The radiographs were then measured for the migration and movement of the prosthesis using the following lines: Hapd1, Hapd2, Hapd3 Hapd4. All the radiographs were measured twice manually with at least one week interval, the observer being blind to the initial results at the time of the second measurement. The x-rays were again measured twice using the computer and a measuring software developed in our own department. The results were analysed for intra observer variability, using paired t-test and Pearson correlations.

Results: Table 1 shows the results of the paired measurements, with the confidence intervals for the mean error, the p for the paired t-test and the correlations between the paired readings. M1 and M2 represent the manual readings, while C1 and C2 the computerised readings.

Conclusions: The mean error of all paired readings was below 1 mm. The correlation between all paired readings was highly significant, with all the paired readings with the computer as a tool being .99. The only difference that was statistically significant was Hapd3M1-M2, between two manual measurements, although the mean error is not clinically relevant, still being less than 1mm. We conclude that computerised measurements of radiographs are at least as reliable as those conducted directly on film.

Purpose: We report our experience with 23 Coonrad-Morrey total elbow prostheses.

Material and methods: Between July 1997 and February 2001, we implanted 34 Coonrad-Morrey total elbow pros-theses in 33 patients. Twenty-three patients (23 implants) were reviewed at a mean 24 months follow-up, maximum 40 months. There were three men and 20 women, mean age 62 years (42–69). Twelve patients had rheumatoid polyarthritis, the principal indication. There were also four recent fractures of the distal humerus, two nonunions, and one patient with post-traumatic osteoarthritis. One patient had sequelar osteoarthritis since childhood. Finally three revisions were performed for loosening of a GUEPAR prosthesis in two cases and a GSBIII prosthesis in one. Results were assessed with the Mayo Clinic score. We searched for lucent lines around the implants, polyethylene wear, and incorporation of the bone graft behind the anterior wing of the implant on plain radiographs.

Results: At last follow-up, the mean Mayo Clinic score had improved from 25 to 89 points (70–100). Before surgery, 17 patients had severe pain. At last follow-up, eight patients had occasional pain. Extension was improved by 10°, flexion by 27° giving a postoperative amplitude of 29° to 132°. Prona-tion supination progressed by 37° giving a rotation amplitude of 127°. The function score improved from 4 to 21 points. Sixteen of the 23 patients had normal elbow function. Outcome was excellent in 13 patients, good in eight, and fair in two. There were no lucent lines visible on the radiographs. There was no sign of polyethylene wear. The bon graft was incorporated behind the implant in 20 cases and was not visible in three. Complications included one peroperative fracture, one cutaneous dehiscence, one post-operative fracture of the olecranon due to a fall, and persistent ulnar paresthesia in four patients requiring secondary neurolysis in one.

Discussion, conclusion: The Coonrad-Morrey semi-constrained prosthesis provides a response to a large range of situations. The dominant indication is rheumatoid polyarthritis, but trauma patients can benefit from this reliable therapeutic solution giving a satisfactory rate of success. A satisfactory functional amplitude is generally achieved with this implant and the elbow is generally pain free.

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), non constrained or semi-constrained prostheses can be used. The authors used the Kudo III, IV or V or iBP prostheses 54 times from 1994 to 2003. After initial satisfactory results, they had to change one or both implants for several reasons: humeral stem fracture (5 cases), unipolar humeral loosening (1 case), ulnar loosening without laxity (8 cases), polyethylene wear (11 cases), due to progressive ulnar collateral ligament lengthening and progressive valgus deformity, without or with metallosis, due to contact between Cr-Co humeral component and titanium alloy ulnar component, chronic infection (1 case). When the local conditions were satisfactory (bone stock, ligament balance), the fractured or loosened component was changed. When the conditions were bad (poor bone stock, ligament misbalance, metallosis), both implants were removed; posterior humeral and/or medial or lateral ulnar window were used to removed the uncemented stems still osteointegrated. All the bipolar operations used the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis, but the last case a Discovery prosthesis. The operative tricks are described, the management of the extensor apparatus is discussed, the clinical outcomes (especially the extensor apparatus function, most often weak) and the radiographic outcomes are presented.

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term results of the Kudo type-5 total elbow prosthesis and compare the results of two types of cemented ulnar components. The Kudo type-5 unlinked total elbow prosthesis (Biomet UK Ltd, Bridgend Wales) was developed in 1993. The stem of humeral component is porous-coated with a plasma spray of titanium alloy for cementless use. The ulnar component may be metal-backed with a porous-coated stem or polyethylene alone; the latter designed mainly for cement use. A metal-backed type without a porous-coated stem designed for cement use also came into being after 2003. Between 1993 and 2010, the Kudo type-5 total elbow arthroplasty was performed on 364 elbows in 274 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was 60.7 (27–86) years. Twenty elbows had Larsen grade III, 224 had grade IV, and 120 had grade V changes pre-operatively. Before the operation, 346 elbows had severe or moderate pain, 95 had gross valgus-varus instability. Clinical symptoms and revision rates were assessed 4 to 20 years (mean, 9 years) postoperatively. The mean Mayo elbow performance scores were all poor except for three initially (mean overall score, 39.5 points). The overall score had improved substantially both at the early follow-up (1 to 3 years after the operation) and the latest follow-up (4 to 20 years after the operation), with 89.5 and 84.7 points, respectively. At the latest follow-up the overall result was excellent for 185 elbows, good for 103, fair for 11 and poor for 30, with almost complete relief from pain for 298. The arc of movement had increased from a mean of 85.7 °pre-operatively to 95.1 ° post-operatively, and to 98.1 °at the latest follow-up. Spot welds around the humeral stem suggesting solid osseous integration were often seen in the elbows with cementless fixation of the porous humeral stem. At the latest follow-up, implants were removed due to infection in 3 elbows. Twenty-five elbows required ulnar component revision due to loosening of the all-polyethylene component. Two elbows required ulnar component revision due to loosening of the metal-backed component. Seven elbows required humeral component revision due to loosening of the humeral components. One elbow required revision due to dislocation. A survival analysis with revision or removal of one or both components as the end point was performed according to the Kaplan and Meier method. The overall survival rate of the prosthesis was 75.2% at 19 years. The survival of 87.0% in the metal-backed group was higher than the 74.3% in the all-polyethylene group. Loosening of the all-polyethylene ulnar component was the main reason for deterioration in the long-term outcome. We conclude that the long-term results of the Kudo type-5 total elbow arthroplasty is acceptable and cemented fixation of metal-backed ulnar component had better long-term survival than the all-polyethylene component

Summary Statement. Discovery system produced effective functional improvement in both primary and revision total elbow replacement. The incidence of major complications was in an acceptable range. Introduction. The search for the ideal elbow prosthesis continues as instability and loosening remain the prime reasons for total elbow replacement (TER) failure. The Discovery Elbow System (Biomet) is one of the latest generations of linked prosthesis and has been used in UK since 2003. We report outcome of TER using this system. Methods. A total of 100 TERs (75 primary, 25 revisions) were performed between 2003 and 2010. The main primary underlying pathologies for TER were advanced rheumatoid arthritis (N=58), osteoarthritis (N=35), acute fractures (N=7). There were 60 female and 40 male patients with an average age of 62 years. The outcome assessment included pain, patient satisfaction, Liverpool Elbow Score (LES), range of movement, and imaging during a mean follow-up period of 48.5 months. Major complications are also reported. Results. For the whole patient group (primary + revision), the LES was significantly (p<0.001) improved from 3.79+/−1.71 to 6.36+/−1.85There were significant improvements in elbow flexion from 100°+/−24 to 118°+17, supination from 38°+/−26 to 50°+/−25 and pronation from 48°+/−22 to 61°+/−21. Mean improvement in flexion-extension and pronation-supination arc was 20° and 25°, respectively. 64% of cases were completely pain-free and at the final follow-up (compared to 7% preoperatively). Only 6% of patients scored “Not Satisfied” at the final follow-up. LES improvement was significantly higher in the primary TER compared to revision TER (p<0.05). Imaging reviewed for 60 cases showed loosening in 4% of patients. Other main complications included deep infection (N=2), ulnar neuropathy (N=3), pre-prosthetic fracture (N=2), and prosthetic failure (N=1). Discussion. TER using the Discovery Elbow System is an effective arthroplasty in terms of functional improvement, pain relief and range of motion in both primary and revision patients. TER resulted in no/mild pain in 78% of cases. Patients undergoing Acclaim, Souter-Strathclyde, GSB III, and Coonrad-Morrey TER have been reported to have no/mild pain in 64%, 67%, 50–92% and 60–100% of cases, respectively. A 20° improvement in flexion-extension arc is comparable to that of Acclaim (23°), Souter-Strathclyde (15°), GSBIII (19–33°), and Coonrad-Morrey (17–26°) TER. An improvement of 25° in pronation-supination arc in our series is also comparable to that of 21–28° reported the Coonrad-Morrey and 27–33° for Discovery prostheses. An infection rate of 2% is lower than several other reports for GSB III TER (7–11%) and Coonrad-Morrey (6–8%). The incidence of persistent ulnar neuropathy (3%) was lower compared to GSBIII TER (11–14%), Coonrad-Morrey (12–26%), and Acclaim (8%)

Aim: To describe and evaluate the use of the limited contact plate in complex humeral shaft fractures. Certain sub-groups of humeral shaft fractures can be very difficult to treat. These ‘complex fractures’ include fractures in very osteoporotic bone, those associated with shoulder or elbow prosthesis, non-unions and those associated with intra articular extensions and dislocations. The AO limited contact plate (LCP) is a new form of fixation whether the screw heads lock into the holes in the plate. The plate is not designed to cause compression and does not need to lie perfectly adjacent to the bone. Methods: A prospective study of six consecutive complex humeral shaft fractures treated with LCP plate. Rate of union, complications, and subjective and objective outcome (DASH scores) are analyzed. Results: Union occurred in 9/10 patients. The final patient is progressing to union. There were no serious complications. Good subjective and objective outcome in all patients. Conclusion: This heterogeneous series of complex and complicated humeral shaft fractures all pose significant management problems. Treatment with the LCP plate demonstrated good results with no significant complications. This completely new rational for treatment seems particularly suitable for the treatment of complex or complicated humeral shaft fractures

Background and purpose: The Souter-Strathclyde total elbow prosthesis is a well-studied replacement therapy for the destructed rheumatoid elbow joint. In the short-term results of a RSA-study we concluded that 8 out of 18 humeral components were at risk for loosening at two years of follow-up. Now we present the long-term results of this study to evaluate these predictions. Patients and Methods: Twenty-one elbows (18 patients) were included in the RSA-study. At risk for loosening was defined as increase of translation of more than 0.4 mm or increase of rotation of more than one degree during the second postoperative year. The average follow-up was 98 months (range: 12–134 months). RSA-measurements were performed post-operatively, at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and at yearly intervals thereafter. Prosthetic position and radiolucent lines (RLLs) were examined on conventional radiographs. Results: Almost all humeral components, including the ones that were defined to be ‘at risk’ for loosening in our short-term study, showed increased and irregular migration in this long-term follow-up study. In contrast to this, the ulnar components were stable. Translations were most prominent in the posterior-anterior direction, the most prominent rotations took place about the transverse axis. No obvious influences of prosthetic alignment on micromotions were found. Four humeral components were clinically loose – three of them could be revised -, but only one of them was defined to be at risk for loosening in the short term study. Radiological assessment based on conventional radiographs showed that a prediction of humeral loosening can be made within four years after surgery. Interpretation: The RSA results clearly show that almost all humeral components migrate up to several millimeters and several degrees in an irregular manner, but often without clinical consequences

Aims: To review the results from a series of GSB III total elbow arthroplasties performed at an independent centre. Between 1996 and 2004 the senior author performed 58 total elbow arthroplasties in 44 patients (10 males, 34 females) using the GSB III implant. These were reviewed and the outcome assessed through the use of a patient-answered questionnaire and clinical and radiological review. Mean age was 65 (49 to 84 years). Indications for surgery included rheumatoid arthritis (46 elbows) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (11 elbows). Mean F/up was 4.1 years (0.8 to 8.5 years). 4 patients had died (6 elbows) and 4 patients (4 elbows) were unavailable for review. 2 of the implants had been revised (1x aseptic loosening, 1x deep infection), leaving a total of 46 elbows available for review. The survival rate at a mean of 4 years was 98% with aseptic loosening as the endpoint. Complications included 1 case of intraoperative fracture and 1 persistent ulnar neuritis. Overall patient satisfaction was high. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 83 out of 100 (range, 34 to 100) and mean Liverpool Elbow Score was 8 out of 10 (range, 1 to 10). Conclusion: Previous studies of outcome following total elbow arthroplasty using the GSB III elbow prosthesis at independent centres have shown satisfactory results, but have looked at small groups of patients. Our results offer more robust data to show that the medium term outcome following total elbow arthroplasty using the GSB III prosthesis is satisfactory

Aims: To review the results from a series of GSB III total elbow arthroplasties performed at an independent centre. Between 1996 and 2004, the senior author performed 58 total elbow arthroplasties in 44 patients (10 males, 34 females) using the GSB III implant. These were reviewed and the outcome assessed through the use of a patient-answered questionnaire and clinical and radiological review. Mean age was 65 (49 to 84 years). Indications for surgery included rheumatoid arthritis (46 elbows) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (11 elbows). Mean F/up was 4.1 years (0.8 to 8.5 years). Four patients had died (six elbows) and four patients (four elbows) were unavailable for review. Two of the implants had been revised (1x aseptic loosening, 1x deep infection), leaving a total of 46 elbows available for review. The survival rate at a mean of four years was 98% with aseptic loosening as the endpoint. Complications included one case of intraoperative fracture and one persistent ulnar neuritis. Overall patient satisfaction was high. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 83 out of 100 (range, 34 to 100) and mean Liverpool Elbow Score was 8 out of 10 (range, 1 to 10). Conclusion: Previous studies of outcome following total elbow arthroplasty using the GSB III elbow prosthesis at independent centres have shown satisfactory results, but have looked at small groups of patients. Our results offer more robust data to show that the medium term outcome following total elbow arthroplasty using the GSB III prosthesis is satisfactory

Background: Total elbow prostheses are broadly classified into linked and the unlinked categories. We have looked at long-term results of unlinked Kudo 5 total elbow replacement used in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 2 hospitals. Methods: 87 Kudo 5 Total elbow replacements in 70 patients with adult rheumatoid arthritis were performed at Wexham Park Hospital, Slough and City Hospital, Nottingham by 2 specialist elbow surgeons, the senior authors. 16 patients had died and 8 patients were lost to follow up. 62 elbow replacements in 46 patients were evaluated at a mean follow up of 79 months [29–137 months] using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral films. Results: Preoperatively 6 had moderate pain and 56 had severe pain. Postoperatively the pain was rated as none or mild by 58 and moderate by 4. The average Mayo Elbow Score improved from 37 preoperatively to 86 postoperatively. The mean arc of flexion/extension improved from 60 to 99 degrees. There were 14 complications including ulnar neuropraxia, fracture, dislocation, triceps rupture and loosening. 4 cases were revised, 2 for aseptic and 2 for septic loosening. Postoperative radiographs showed 5 cases with loosening around the ulna component. Conclusions: The long-term results using the Kudo 5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are acceptable and comparable to other series reported of this implant. To date this is the largest series reported with the longest follow up using this implant

Background: Total elbow prostheses are broadly classified into linked and the unlinked categories. We have looked at long-term results of unlinked Kudo 5 total elbow replacement used in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 2 hospitals. Methods: 87 Kudo 5 Total elbow replacements in 70 patients with adult rheumatoid arthritis were performed at Wexham Park Hospital, Slough and City Hospital, Nottingham by 2 specialist elbow surgeons, the senior authors. 16 patients had died and 8 patients were lost to follow up. 62 elbow replacements in 46 patients were evaluated at a mean follow up of 79 months [29–137 months] using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral films. Results: Preoperatively 6 had moderate pain and 56 had severe pain. Postoperatively the pain was rated as none or mild by 58 and moderate by 4. The average Mayo Elbow Score improved from 37 preoperatively to 86 postoperatively. The mean arc of flexion/extension improved from 60 to 99 degrees. There were 14 complications including ulnar neuropraxia, fracture, dislocation, triceps rupture and loosening. 4 cases were revised, 2 for aseptic and 2 for septic loosening. Postoperative radiographs showed 5 cases with loosening around the ulna component. Conclusions: The long-term results using the Kudo 5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are acceptable and comparable to other series reported of this implant. To date this is the largest series reported with the longest follow up using this implant

Purpose: To measure any observed migration and rotation of humeral and ulnar components using radiostereometric analysis. Methods: From 2002–2004 in a prospective study, twelve elbows in patients treated with either a linked(3) or unlinked(9) Acclaim total elbow prosthesis were included in a radiostereometry study. Six tantalum markers were introduced into the humerus another 3 markers were located on a humeral component. Four markers were placed in to ulna and three markers located on the ulnar component. RSA radiographs were taken postoperatively, six, twelve and twenty-four months. The radiographs were digitised and analysed using UmRSA software. The relative movement of the humeral and ulnar implants with respect to the bone was measured. Results: At twelve months, the largest rotation of the humeral component was anteversion/retroversion with a mean of 20, anterior tilt had a mean of 1.10 and varus/valgus tilt was minimal mean 0.60. Mean difference between twelve and 24 months segment rotation was no more than 0.50. Rotation in unlinked humeral implants reached a plateau at 12 months this did not occur in linked implants. Paired t-tests between twelve and 24 months segment translation data showed the mean differences to be no more than 0.04mm. In contrast, humeral tip motion produced a mean of 1.3mm at 12 months dominated by movement in the horizontal plane with a mean difference at 24 months of 0.2mm. Mean micro-motion of the ulna implant tip was 0.32mm at 12 months with a mean difference at 24 months of 0.1mm. Conclusions: Early micromotion of the Acclaim humeral implant occurs mostly by rotation about the vertical axis accompanied by anterior tilt. In unlinked implants this motion reaches a plateau at 12 months after operation but does occur in linked implants

To measure any observed migration and rotation of humeral and ulnar components using radiostereometric analysis. From 2002–2004 in a prospective ongoing study, twelve elbows in patients treated with either a linked or unlinked Acclaim total elbow prosthesis were included in a radiostereometry study. Six tantalum markers were introduced into the humerus another three markers were located on a humeral component. Four markers were placed in to ulna and three markers located on the ulnar component. RSA radiographs were taken postoperatively, six, twelve and twenty-four months. The radiographs were digitised and analysed using UmRSA software. The relative movement of the humeral and ulnar implants with respect to the bone was measured. At twelve months, the largest segment translation of the humeral component was in the anterior/posterior direction with a mean of 0.44mm followed by medial/lateral translation of 0.39 mm; there was minimal proximal/ distal translation or with a mean of 0.16mm. Paired t-tests between twelve and 24 months segment translation data showed the mean differences to be no more than 0.056mm. The largest rotation at twelve months was anteversion/retroversion with a mean of 2.40deg, anterior tilt had a mean of 1.20deg and varus/valgus tilt was minimal mean 0.60deg. Mean difference between twelve and 24 months segment rotation was no more than 0.30deg. In contrast, humeral tip motion produced a mean of 1.1mm at 12 months dominated by movement in the plane horizontal plane with a mean difference at 24 months of 0.06mm. No patients could be measured for segment micromotion of the ulnar component due to technical difficulty in visualising tantalum markers in the ulna. Early micromotion of the Acclaim humeral implant occurs mostly by rotation about the vertical axis accompanied by anterior tilt. This motion reaches a plateau at 12 months after operation

Background. The quest for the perfectly designed elbow prosthesis continues as instability and loosening remain the foremost reasons for the failure of total elbow replacement (TER). The Discovery® Elbow System (Biomet, UK) (Figure 1), which has been used in UK since 2003, is one of the latest generations of linked prosthesis. This system was designed to decrease polyethylene-bushing wear, improve anatomic stem design, restore elbow joint biomechanics, and produce a hinge that could be easily revised. This report describes the short term outcome of TER using the Discovery® Elbow System. Patients and Methods. A total of 60 TERs including 48 primary and 12 revisions were performed between 2003 and 2008. Patients included 21 males (37%) and 36 females (63%) with a mean age of 63 years. The indications for primary TER were advanced rheumatoid arthritis (n=19), osteoarthritis (n=16), post traumatic osteoarthritis (n=9), acute fractures (n=3), and haemophilic arthropathy (n=1). The outcome was assessed using pain score, Liverpool Elbow Score (LES), and range of movement during a mean follow-up of 26 months. Associated complications were documented. Radiological assessment included evaluation for loosening, instability and periprosthetic fractures. Results. The mean LES was significantly (p<0.001) improved from 3.8 (±1) pre-operatively to 6.9 (±2) at the final follow- up. Significant improvements were noted in elbow flexion from 100° (±22) to 120° (±15), supination from 41° (±28) to 65° (±20) and pronation from 52° (±22) to 72° (±18). There was no significant change in elbow extension. Mean improvement in flexion-extension and pronation-supination arc was 22° and 44°, respectively. 46 cases (77%) were completely pain-free at the final follow-up. The main complications included deep infection (4 cases – treated with staged revision TER), postoperative ulnar neuropathy (3 cases–treated with decompression), intra-operative fractures of medial condyle (3 cases – treated non-operatively with brace), and elbow haemarthrosis (1 case). Discussion. TER with Discovery® Elbow System resulted in either no pain or mild pain in 87% of cases. Patients undergoing Acclaim, Souter-Strathclyde, GSB III, and Coonrad-Morrey TER have been reported to have no/mild pain in 64%, 67%, 50–92% and 60–100% of cases, respectively. A 22° improvement in flexion-extension arc is comparable to that of Acclaim (23°), Souter-Strathclyde (15°), GSB III (19–33°), and Coonrad-Morrey (17–26°) TER. An improvement of 44° in pronation-supination arc in our series is also comparable to that of 31–67° reported for GSB III and higher than the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis (21–28°). In terms of complications, an infection rate of 6.7% is consistent with those reported for GSB III TER (7–11%) and Coonrad-Morrey (6–8%). The incidence of persistent ulnar neuropathy was lower compared to GSB III TER (11–14%), Coonrad-Morrey (12–26%), and Acclaim (8%). While the survival of Discovery TER was 93%, the survival of GSB III (5–6 years) and Coonrad-Morrey (5 years) has been reported as 71–85% and 72–90%. The results indicate that Discovery® Elbow System is an effective device for total elbow arthroplasty in terms of functional improvement, pain relief and range of motion at short-term follow-up

Purpose: We reviewed retrospectively 22 patients with recent and old fractures of the radial head treated with the GUEPAR radial head prosthesis which has a mobile metal cup derived from the GUEPAR gliding total elbow prosthesis. Material and methods: Among the 22 patients, 13 underwent surgery in an emergency setting and four underwent a secondary procedure. Mean age was 41 years and follow-up was 18 months. The Mayo Clinic score was noted. Fractures were total or disengaged cervical fractures and in 72% of the elbows dislocation was associated. The coronoid process was fixed in one elbow, the olecranon in one and the medial ligaments were repaired in five. The status of the humeral condyle was examined in detail before insertion of the prosthesis. We also were particularly attentive concerning the height position of the prosthesis. Results: There were no complications. Outcome was good among the patients undergoing an emergency procedure with a mean Mayo Clinic score of 83/100, mean force 75%, good motion, particularly 77° pronation, and 79° supination, with good stability and absence of wrist problems. The patients who underwent a secondary procedure had less satisfactory results, particularly for motion (44° pronation and 54° supination). The distal radioulnar index was not perfectly restored. Finally four patients had arthrolysis for limited flexion/extension, three of them in the secondary group. Discussion: Resection of the radial head is an alternative for complex fractures that has its inconveniences. The first is that it destabilises the elbow in valgus position in the event of injury to the medial ligaments and the second is the ascension of the radius in the event of injury to the interosseous membrane. Fixation is another alternative, but it is difficult and has not provided good results in our hands or in the literature (we have compared this series with a series of 20 fixations for equivalent fractures). The prosthesis appears to be a good solution: it stabilises the elbow, prevents ascension of the radius, allows early rehabilitation, and provides good subjective outcome, particularly in emergency cases