Aims. The conventionally described mechanism of distal biceps tendon rupture (DBTR) is of a ‘considerable extension force suddenly applied to a resisting, actively flexed forearm’. This has been commonly paraphrased as an ‘eccentric contracture to a flexed elbow’. Both definitions have been frequently used in the literature with little objective analysis or citation. The aim of the present study was to use video footage of real time distal biceps ruptures to revisit and objectively define the mechanism of injury. Methods. An online search identified 61 videos reporting a DBTR. Videos were independently reviewed by three surgeons to assess forearm rotation, elbow flexion, shoulder position, and type of muscle contraction being exerted at the time of rupture. Prospective data on mechanism of injury and arm position was also collected concurrently for 22 consecutive patients diagnosed with an acute DBTR in order to corroborate the video analysis. Results. Four videos were excluded, leaving 57 for final analysis. Mechanisms of injury included deadlift, bicep curls, calisthenics, arm wrestling, heavy lifting, and boxing. In all, 98% of ruptures occurred with the arm in supination and 89% occurred at 0° to 10° of elbow flexion. Regarding muscle activity, 88% occurred during isometric contraction, 7% during eccentric contraction, and 5% during concentric contraction. Interobserver correlation scores were calculated as 0.66 to 0.89 using the free-marginal Fleiss Kappa tool. The prospectively collected patient data was consistent with the video analysis, with 82% of injuries occurring in supination and 95% in relative elbow extension. Conclusion. Contrary to the classically described injury mechanism, in this study the usual arm position during DBTR was forearm supination and elbow extension, and the muscle contraction was typically isometric. This was demonstrated for both video analysis and ‘real’ patients across a range of activities leading to rupture. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):826–831

Introduction and Objective. There remains much debate regarding the optimal method for surgical management of patients with long head of biceps pathology. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of tenotomy versus tenodesis. Materials and Methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42020198658). Electronic databases searched included EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tenotomy versus tenodesis were included. Risk of bias within studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias v2.0 tool and the Jadad score. The primary outcome included patient reported functional outcome measures pooled using standardized mean difference (SMD) and a random effects model. Secondary outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS), rate of cosmetic deformity (Popeye sign), range of motion, operative time, and elbow flexion strength. Results. 751 patients from 10 RCTs demonstrated (369 tenotomy vs 382 tenodesis) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of all PROMs data demonstrated comparable outcomes between tenotomy vs tenodesis (SMD 0.17 95% CI −0.02 to 0.36, p=0.09). Sensitivity analysis comparing RCTs involving patients with and without an intact rotator cuff did not change the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes including VAS, shoulder external rotation, and elbow flexion strength did not reveal any significant difference. Tenodesis resulted in a lower rate of Popeye deformity (OR 0.27 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45, p<0.00001). Conclusions. Aside from a lower rate of cosmetic deformity, tenodesis yielded no measurable significant benefit to tenotomy for addressing pathology in the long head of biceps. This finding was irrespective of the whether the rotator cuff was intact

Insufficiency of the lateral collateral ligamentous complex causes posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). During reconstruction surgery the joint capsule is repaired, but its biomechanical influence on elbow stability has not been described. We hypothesized that capsular repair reduces ROM and varus angle after reconstruction of the lateral collateral complex. Six fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were used. Varus laxity in supination, pronation and neutral forearm rotation with 1 Nm load and forearm rotaitonal range of motion (ROM) with 0.3 Nm torque were measured using a Microscribe 3DLX digitizing system (Revware Inc, Raleigh, NC). Each specimen was tested under four different conditions: Intact, Complete Tear with LUCL, RCL and capsule tear, LUCL/RCL reconstruction + capsule repair and LUCL/RCL reconstruction only. Reconstruction was performed according to the docking technique (Jones, JSES, 2013) and the capsule was repaired with mattress sutures. Each condition was tested in 30°, 60° and 90° elbow flexion. A two-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test was used to detect statistical differences between the conditions. Total ROM of the forearm significantly increased in all flexion angles from intact to Complete tear (p<0.001). ROM was restored to normal in 30° and 60° elbow flexion in both reconstruction conditions (p>0.05). LUCL/RCL Reconstruction + capsule repair in 90° elbow flexion was associated with a significantly lower ROM compared to intact (p=0.0003) and reconstruction without capsule repair (p=0.015). Varus angle increased significantly from intact to complete tear (p<0.0001) and restored to normal in both reconstruction conditions (p>0.05) in 30° and 60° elbow flexion. In contrast varus angle was significantly lower in 90° elbow flexion in both reconstruction conditions compared to intact (both p<0.0001). Reconstruction of the lateral collateral complex restores elbow stability, ROM and varus laxity independent of capsular repair. Over tightening of the elbow joint occurred in 90° elbow flexion, which was aggravated by capsular repair. Over all capsular repair can be performed without negatively affecting elbow joint mobility

Over 500 supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) are treated at our institution each year. Our standard post-operative pathway includes a 3-week visit for splint removal, wire removal, and radiographs. Subsequent follow-up occurs at 12 weeks for a clinical examination. In an effort to minimize unnecessary follow-up visits, we investigated whether photographs and/or patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores could identify patients who do not need routine 3-month in-person follow-up. At the 3-month visit, 248 SCHF patients (mean 6.2 yrs; 0.75-11yrs) had bilateral elbow motion (ROM) and carrying angles measured; and photographs documenting frontal and sagittal alignment of both injured and uninjured upper extremities, in both maximum elbow flexion and extension. Two independent assessors made the same measurements off the clinical photographs to compare these with the clinical measurements. Two PROMs: Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ: 0 best to 14 worst) and QuickDASH (0 best to 100 worst) were completed at the 3-month visit. Inter-rater reliability of the photograph measurements was excellent (Kappa: 0.88-0.93), but weakly concordant with clinical measurements (carrying angle Kappa=0.51;max flexion Kappa=0.68;max extension Kappa=0.64). SAQ moderately correlated with QuickDASH (Kappa=0.59) and performed better at identifying patients with abnormalities. SAQ score ≥ 4 identified patients meeting 3-month follow-up criteria, with sensitivity: 36.1%; specificity: 96.8% and negative-predictive-value (NPV): 87%. We did not find that photographs were reliable. Although SAQ-score has high NPV, a more sensitive fracture-specific PROM is needed to identify patients who do not need a 3-month follow-up visit

The Pronator Quadratus (PQ) is commonly damaged in the surgical approach to the distal radius during volar plating. This study explored the functional strength of the PQ muscle, 12 months after volar plating of a distal radial fracture. Testing of treated and contralateral forearms was carried out using a custom-made Torque Measuring Device (TMD) and surface Electromyography (sEMG). To assess both the direct and indirect function of PQ in participants treated with volar plating and compared to the contralateral non-injured forearms. The angle of elbow flexion was varied from 45o, 90o and 135o when measuring forearm pronation. Mean peak torque of the major pronating muscles, PQ and Pronator Teres (PT) was directly measured with the TMD and the indirect activation of the PQ and PT was measured with sEMG. In total 27 participants were studied. A statistically significant reduction in mean peak pronation torque was observed in the volar plated forearms (P<0.05 SE 0.015, CI 95%). This is unlikely to be of clinical significance as the mean reduction was small (13.43Nm treated v 13.48Nm none treated). Pairwise comparison found no statistically significant reduction in peak torque between 45o, 90o and 135o of elbow flexion. There was an increase in PQ muscle activation at 135o compared to 45o elbow flexion. The converse was identified in PT. The small but statistically significant difference in mean peak torque in treated and uninjured forearms is unlikely to be of clinical significance and results suggest adequate functional recovery of the PQ after volar plating

Purpose: Techniques to quantify soft-tissue forces in the upper extremity are not well described. Consequently, ligament forces of the elbow joint have not been reported. Knowledge of the magnitudes of tension of the primary valgus stabilizer, the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (AMCL), would allow for an improved understanding of the load bourne by the ligament. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify the magnitude of tension in the native AMCL throughout flexion with the arm in the valgus orientation. We hypothesized that tension in the AMCL would increase with flexion. Method: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean age 72 ± 10 years) were tested. To produce active muscle loading in a motion simulator, cables were affixed to the distal tendons of the brachialis, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and brachioradialis and attached to actuators. The wrist was fixed in neutral flexion/extension and the forearm in neutral rotation. The arm was orientated in the valgus gravity-loaded position. A custom designed ligament load transducer was inserted into the AMCL. Active simulated flexion was achieved via computer-controlled actuation while passive elbow flexion was achieved by an investigator manually guiding the arm through flexion. Motion of the ulna relative to the humerus was measured using a tracking device. Results: Both the active and passive motion pathways showed an increase in AMCL tension with increasing angles of elbow flexion (p < 0.05). There was no difference in AMCL tension levels between active and passive elbow flexion (p = 0.20). The mean maximum tension achieved was 97±33N and 94±40 N for active and passive testing respectively. Conclusion: AMCL tension levels were observed to increase with elbow flexion, indicating that other structures (such as the joint capsule and the shape of the articulation) are likely more responsible for joint stability near full extension, and that the AMCL is recruited at increased angles of elbow flexion. With respect to load magnitudes, Regan et al. found the maximum load to failure of the AMCL was 261 N, while Armstrong et al. reported a failure load of 143 N in cyclic testing. The maximum AMCL tension level observed in this study was 160 N. Failure of the AMCL was not observed, which may be due to differences in specimen size, age, or the method of load application. In summary, this in vitro cadaveric study has provided a new understanding of the magnitudes of AMCL tension through the arc of elbow flexion, and this has important implications with respect to the desired target strength of repair and reconstruction techniques. These findings will also assist in the development and validation of computational models of the elbow

Objectives. Traumatic brachial plexus injury causes severe functional impairment of the arm. Elbow flexion is often affected. Nerve surgery or tendon transfers provide the only means to obtain improved elbow flexion. Unfortunately, the functionality of the arm often remains insufficient. Stem cell therapy could potentially improve muscle strength and avoid muscle-tendon transfer. This pilot study assesses the safety and regenerative potential of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell injection in partially denervated biceps. Methods. Nine brachial plexus patients with insufficient elbow flexion (i.e., partial denervation) received intramuscular escalating doses of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells, combined with tendon transfers. Effect parameters included biceps biopsies, motor unit analysis on needle electromyography and computerised muscle tomography, before and after cell therapy. Results. No adverse effects in vital signs, bone marrow aspiration sites, injection sites, or surgical wound were seen. After cell therapy there was a 52% decrease in muscle fibrosis (p = 0.01), an 80% increase in myofibre diameter (p = 0.007), a 50% increase in satellite cells (p = 0.045) and an 83% increase in capillary-to-myofibre ratio (p < 0.001) was shown. CT analysis demonstrated a 48% decrease in mean muscle density (p = 0.009). Motor unit analysis showed a mean increase of 36% in motor unit amplitude (p = 0.045), 22% increase in duration (p = 0.005) and 29% increase in number of phases (p = 0.002). Conclusions. Mononuclear cell injection in partly denervated muscle of brachial plexus patients is safe. The results suggest enhanced muscle reinnervation and regeneration. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:38–47

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results 9 to 12 years after the transfer of 3 distal parts of pectoralis major muscle to restore active elbow flexion in patient with arthrogryposis. Material and methods: From 1996 to 1999, elbow flexion was reconstructed in 9 upper extremities by 5 patient aged 4.3–9 years. The patients were clinically evaluated according to the subjective and objective assessment and examined electromyographically before the surgery and during the follow up. Last clinical examination was provided 8 to12 years after the surgery in patients aged 15 to 18 years. Results: 3–4 years after pectoralis major transfer, 6 very good and good results were achieved, the average active ROM of elbow ranged 15 to 95 degrees. The power of elbow flexion was graded as 4 and 4+. This method was unsuccessful in the remaining 3 cases, the patients were not able to reach the mouth with the hands because of limited elbow flexion. 9 to12 years after the surgery, the results were similar. 5 extremities remain very good and good. One deterioration was obvious. The ROM of elbow changed, namely the extension was mostly reduced even in very good and good evaluations (the average decrease was 13.8 degrees, the range −20 to +10 deg.). The active flexion was not changed in 5 elbows, or it was increased (the average increase 4,4 deg., the range 0–15 deg.). The final limitation of extension (30 – 50 degrees) does not restrict using the hands for perineal hygiene and the final active flexion (85–100 degrees) allows elevating the hands to the head for feeding and toilet. Discussion and Conclusions: From the analysis of unsuccessful results 3–4 years after the surgery it was obvious that all cases were related to very limited preoperative passive flexion of the elbow; restricted movement of the shoulder and failed distal fixation of the transferred muscle. After 9–12 years, the active elbow flexion and extension for raising the hands to the mouth and for toilet needs, respectively, remain in majority previously successful cases. Because most children reached the skeletal maturity, no further shortening of the transferred muscle and limitation of extension is expected. These findings do not concur with the literature reports. According to our results, the transfer of the pectoralis major represents the efficient method for permanent restoring of bilateral active elbow flexion with the remaining functional extension. The ROM does not change significantly after having reached the plateau 2 years postoperatively. The prerequisites for successful results are a minimum of 90 degrees of passive flexion of the elbow before the surgery, the active shoulder abduction of 80–90 degrees, long-term rehabilitation and successful fixation of the transferred muscle to the forearm

Abstract. Objectives. Falling studies have been conducted in controlled environments but not in field studies for ethical reasons; this limits the validity and applicability of previous studies. We performed field studies on existing YouTube © videos of skateboarders falling. The aims were to measure the wrist angle at impact on videos of real unprotected falls and to study the dynamics of the upper limbs when falling. Methods. Youtube © videos of skateboarders falling were studied assessing the direction of the fall, the positions of both upper limbs and especially the wrists on impact. This study would not be ethical by other means. Results. In study one (the more quantitative study) there were 48 men and 50 falls. The mean elbow flexion was 300 (range 00 to 800) and the mean maximal wrist extension was 800 (range 500 to 1100). The secondary wrist extended less or the same in > 90%. The second wrist only one (of 31) extended > 900 which should minimise the risk of toppling. Falls onto only one wrist gave significantly greater maximal wrist extension. In the second more qualitative study we observed the “upper limb falling reflex” where the response to falling is for the upper limb(s) to align with the direction of falling of the body with the elbow mostly but not fully extended. Initially the wrists extend c. 400–500 with the fingers held mildly flexed. Immediately before impact the fingers hyper-extend with some compensatory wrist flexion to c. 300. The fingertips impact the ground first followed by the hand. Conclusion. These studies confirm wrist extension at impact around 800 but the wrist(s) may hyper-extend risking toppling. Falls on both wrists minimise the risk of toppling. The “upper limb falling reflex” is defined; it is a rapid dynamic response leading to the fingers impacting the ground first on falling. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

In late cases of brachial plexus palsy or when nerve reconstruction was not that beneficial, pedicled or free neurotized muscles i.e. latissimus dorsi are used to restore or enhance important functions i.e. elbow flexion or extention. During the last three years, 43 patients with brachial plexus injuries were operated in our Clinic to reconstract the paralysed extremity. In nine of them, the ipsilateral latissimus dorsi was transferred as pedicled neurotized muscle to restore elbow flexion (seven patients) and elbow extension (two patients). Two patients had free latissimus dorsi transfer, which was neurotized directly via three intercostals. The neurovascular pedicle was dissected proximally up to the subclavian vessels and posterior cord, and the muscle was raised from its origin to its insertion and tailored to simulate the shape of biceps or triceps. Then it was passed via a subcutaneous tunnel on the anterior or posterior arm. The reattachment was done with Mitek anchors on the clavicle and the radial tuberosity (elbow flexion) or on the posterior edge of the acromion and the olecranon (elbow extension). The arm was immobilized in a prefabricated splint, which was removed after six to eight weeks. After the first three months all patients had a powerful elbow flexion or extension. One of the free muscle transfers started to have elbow flexion after eight months and he is still progressing. In one patient skin necrosis and infection occurred near the elbow. The patient after IV antibiotics needed another operation to restore the distal insertion, using fascia lata. Ipsilateral latissimus dorsi, if strong enough (at least M4), is an excellent transfer for elbow flexion or extension restoration or enhancement, in late cases of brachial plexus paralysis. Contralateral latissimus is an option when the ipsilateral is weak but it takes more time to function since there is a waiting period for reinnervation

Purpose. The measurement of radial head translation about the capitellum (in percent): the radio-capitellum ratio (RCR) has proven to have excellent inter- and intra-observer reliabilities when measuring the RCR on a lateral radiological view of elbows at 90° of flexion and in the neutral position of the forearm. However, in the clinical setting, radiographs may be taken with the elbow in different positions. However, the purpose was to validate the RCR measurement method on elbows in different positions in flexion-extension and in different positions of the forearm in pronation-supination. Method. Fifty-one healthy volunteers were recruited to evaluate the RCR in different elbow positions. Lateral elbow radiographs were taken with the elbow in different magnitude of ROM: maximal extension, maximal flexion, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation. The measurements of the RCR were done using the software SliceOmatic. ANOVA and paired T-test were used to assess the difference of the RCR depending on the position of the elbow and of the forearm. Pearson coefficients were calculated to obtain the correlation between the RCR in each different position. Results. The mean RCR for each position were the following: elbow in maximal extension: −2%±7%, elbow in maximal flexion: −5%±9%, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral: −2%±5%, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination: 1%±6% and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation: 1%±5%. According to the Anova results, a significant difference exists between the RCR in different elbow positions (p=0.01) and in the different forearm positions (p<0.001). Paired T-test confirmed a significant difference between maximal elbow flexion and elbow flexion at 90° (p=0.003), as well as for maximal elbow extension and maximal elbow flexion (p=0.034). According to the Pearson coefficient, significant correlations exist between: elbow flexion at 90° and in maximal flexion (r=0.19, p=0.050); the forearm in neutral and in supination (r=0.34, p<0.001); the forearm in neutral and in pronation (r=0.42, p<0.001). Conclusion. The RCR method is dependent on elbow (flexion-extension) and forearm (pronation-supination) positions. At both maximal elbow positions in flexion and extension, the measurements of the RCR have a higher standard deviation. In order to decrease its variability, we recommend as a convention measuring the RCR on lateral radiographs with the elbow at 90° and the forearm in neutral position. However, 95% of the values of RCR (except in maximal flexion which is unusual in trauma) are included in the normal range of RCR from −5% to 13%. Thus a value outside this range in any elbow positions (except maximal flexion) or any forearm positions must raise doubt on elbow alignment. Then, with a capitellum of 25 mm of diameter, the translation of the radial head must be less than 1 mm posterior and less than 3 mm anterior from the center of the capitellum

Introduction and Aims: Chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures have traditionally been treated with a biceps to brachialis tenodesis. The use of a semitendinosus autograft to reconstruct the distal biceps tendon for chronic rupture has been described. This study evaluates the functional outcome of a group of patients treated with autograft reconstruction. Method: This retrospective study identified six patients who underwent a late reconstruction of a biceps tendon rupture using a semitendinosis autograft. Functional outcome was evaluated objectively and subjectively. Clinical subjective evaluation included the MAYO elbow score and the outcome questionnaire from the Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (SSES). Objective outcomes were assessed by measurement of peak torque for both elbow flexion and supination using a Cybex II Isokinetic machine. Comparisons were made with the opposite limb. Results: Six right-handed male patients aged 42±7 yrs (range 34–48 yrs) were evaluated in this study, five of which achieved a good to excellent MAYO performance score (average 87 ±12), and SSES score (average 86±21). Peak torque obtained during maximal elbow flexion was 44±17 Nm (vs. 55 ±16 Nm opposite elbow) during supination was 8±4Nm (vs. 10±2Nm opposite elbow). Conclusion: This study represents a series of patients with autograft reconstruction of the chronic distal biceps rupture. It is the first study to quantitatively measure the recovery of strength of elbow flexion and supination. The semitendinosus autograft provides a strong and reliable reconstructive option in the majority of patients with chronic biceps tendon ruptures. Recovery of elbow flexion and supination power is nearly normal

We report the case of a 12-year-old boy with flexion loss in the left elbow caused by deficient of the concavity corresponding to the coronoid fossa in the distal humerus. The range of motion (ROM) was 15°/100°, and pain was induced by passive terminal flexion. Plain radiographs revealed complete epiphyseal closure, and computed tomography (CT) revealed a flat anterior surface of the distal humerus; the coronoid fossa was absent. Then, the bony morphometric contour was surgically recreated using a navigation system and a three-dimensional elbow joint model. A three-dimensional model of the elbow joint was made preoperatively and the model comprising the distal humerus was milled so that elbow flexion flexion of more than 140° could be achieved against the proximal ulna and radius. Navigation-assisted surgery (contouring arthroplasty) was performed using CT data from this milled three-dimensional model. Subsequently, an intraoperative passive elbow flexion of 135° was obtained. However, active elbow flexion was still inadequate one year after operation, and a triceps lengthening procedure was performed. At the final follow-up one year after triceps lengthening, a considerable improvement in flexion was observed with a ROM of −12°/125°. Plain radiographs revealed no signs of degenerative change, and CT revealed the formation of the radial and coronoid fossae on the anterior surface of the distal humerus. Navigation-assisted surgery for deformity of the distal humerus based on a contoured three-dimensional model is extremely effective as it facilitates evaluation of the bony morphometry of the distal humerus. It is particularly useful as an indicator for milling the actual bone when a model of the mirror image of the unaffected side cannot be applied to the affected side as observed in our case

Aim: To develop a database of the force generated by brachioradialis muscle (BR) using IEMG. Methods: The 32 BR muscles of 12 young male and four young female adults were studied using the MedTronic functional diagnostics key point EMG machine. Two self adhesive surface electrodes were placed 3mm apart over the BR belly and a third earth electrode over the radial styloid process. The subject’s arm was at the side of the trunk, the elbow flexed to 90 degrees and the forearm strapped in neutral rotation. Recordings were taken over a five-second voluntary maximum isometric elbow flexion and the force of the contraction measured from the rectified and integrated tracing (mv.ms). Four recordings were taken for each arm; wrist in neutral and at maximum passive flexion, with a two-minute rest between recordings. Recordings were repeated after minimum of 24 hours later. Results: There was large inter-subject variability with a range of values recorded between 14 685 and 278 533 mv.ms with an average of 99 472 for the wrist in neutral and 93 038 with the wrist flexed in males and 53 292 and 57 224 respectively for females. However, intra-subject variability was low (co-efficient of variation, CV 8 to 11%) and good repeatability (CV 6 to13%). There was no significant statistical difference with the wrist either in neutral or fully flexed. Conclusions: BR is the key muscle for hand reconstruction in tetraplegia but it has not been possible until now to test its force objectively in isolation from other elbow flexors. Although the results from the study demonstrated a wide range of values for the BR muscle the consistent repeatability probably reflected different involvement of the BR muscle in elbow flexion. If verified, it would indicate that tetraplegics who have low IEMG values should benefit from specific strengthening exercises prior to transfer surgery

Acute distal biceps tendon repair reduces fatigue-related pain and minimises loss of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength. We report the short- and long-term outcome following repair using an EndoButton technique. Between 2010 – 2018, 102 patients (101 males; mean age 43 years) underwent acute (□6 weeks) distal biceps tendon repair using an EndoButton technique. The primary short-term outcome was complications. The primary long-term outcome was the Quick-DASH (Q-DASH). Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D), return to function and satisfaction. At mean short-term follow-up of 4 months (2.0 – 55.5) eight patients (7.8%) experienced a major complication and 34 patients (33.3%) experienced a minor complication. Major complications included re-rupture (n=3, 2.9%), unrecovered nerve injury (n=4, 3.9%) and surgery for heterotopic ossification excision (n=1, 1.0%). Three patients (2.9%) required surgery for a complication. Minor complications included neuropraxia (n=27, 26.5%) and superficial infection (n=7, 6.9%). At mean follow-up of 5 years (1 – 9.8) outcomes were collected from 86 patients (84.3%). The median Q-DASH, OES, EQ-5D and satisfaction scores were 1.2 (IQR 0 – 5.1), 48 (IQR, 46 – 48), 0.80 (IQR, 0.72 – 1.0) and 100/100 (IQR, 90 – 100) respectively. Most patients returned to sport (82.3%) and employment (97.6%) following surgery. Unrecovered nerve injury was associated with a poor outcome according to the Q-DASH (p< 0.001), although re-rupture and further surgery were not (p > 0.05). Acute distal biceps tendon repair using an EndoButton technique results in excellent patient reported outcomes and health-related quality of life. Although rare, unrecovered nerve injury adversely affects outcome

Purpose: Until recently, evaluation of surgical treatment for brachial plexus palsy has been purely analytic, not taking into account the patient’s overall functional capacity nor his/her quality of life. The unilateral nature of these palsies and the fact that the limb remains healthy requires a global assessment of outcome. We propose here to associate the classical analytical evaluation with a global quality of life evaluation to determine the beneficial effect of surgical treatment for partial or total brachial plexus palsy. Material and methods: Forty-four patients, mean age 30 years (17–60) were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 34 months. These patients were divided into two groups: C5–C6 ± C7 palsy (n=18), C5-T1 palsy (n=26). In each group, we recorded a complete muscle analysis, a visual analogue scale test of pain, and results of three quality of life questionnaires (DASH, Abilhand, MOS SF-36). We studied for each group the influence of recovered elbow flexion (biceps ≥ M3+), recovered shoulder function (abduction ≥ M3+), and residual pain on quality of life. Results: The overall analysis did not demonstrate any difference in quality of life between partial and complete palsy. The three questionnaires were correlated with each other (p< 0.03). Residual pain (visual analogue scale ≥ 4 in 59% of the patients) was correlated with quality of life (p< 0.05) while involvement of the dominant side did not have any influence. In the partial palsy group, recovery of shoulder function (61%, n=11) improved significantly all the quality of life scores (p< 0.01). Conversely, recovery of elbow flexion (72%, n=13) did not improve quality of life in patients with a functional shoulder (p< 0.02). In the group with total palsy, recovery of shoulder function (77%, n=20) appeared to be as least as important as elbow flexion on quality of life (p ≤ 0.05). Discussion: Unlike generally accepted notions, postoperative assessment of quality of life in these brachial plexus palsy patients demonstrates the importance of shoulder function which appears to be as least as important as recovery of elbow flexion. Furthermore, persistent pain appeared as one of the main negative factors affecting quality of life. Appropriate management is necessary

Introduction: Scapular manipulation is one of the most successful techniques for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations. However, as there is evidence in the literature that elbow flexion can avoid tendon interposition and muscular compression forces on the glenohumeral joint are at a minimum in the overhead position, we created a modification of the original technique with the principle of scapular manipulation in overhead position and traction on the upper arm with the elbow flexed. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of this new method. Methods: 62 patients with acute anterior shoulder dislocation who were treated with this new method were evaluated prospectively with regard to primary success rate and reduction time as main outcome parameters. Results were compared to the published data on the original method. Statistics was conducted using the chi-square test and the ANOVA post hoc test with Bonferroni-Dunn-transformation. Results: 59 of the 62 dislocations (61% first time dislocations, 21% with associated fractures) were reduced successfully by use of the new method by 21 different physicians indicating a primary success rate of 95.2%. The mean reduction time was 3.13 minutes. Primary success rates of the original method reported in 5 studies range from 78.4 to 96.0% (mean 87.1%). In 2 out of 5 single test and global level comparisons our new modification revealed a statistically significant better primary success rate compared to the original method (p< 0.05). There were no iatrogenic complications in our study, and the method was easy to perform even without any experience in reducing shoulder dislocations. Conclusion: Modification by overhead position and elbow flexion can even improve the high primary success rate of the original scapular manipulation technique. Therefore, the method is strongly recommended as a first choice technique for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations

Radial head fractures are relatively common, representing approximately one-third of all elbow fractures. Outcomes are generally inversely proportional to the amount of force involved in the mechanism of injury, with simple fractures doing better than more comminuted ones. However, the prognosis for these fractures may also be influenced by associated injuries and patient-related factors (age, body index mass, gender, tobacco habit, etc.) The purpose of this study is to evaluate which factors will affect range of motion and function in partial radial head fractures. The hypothesis is that conservative treatment yields better outcomes. This retrospective comparative cohort study included 43 adult volunteers with partial radial head fracture, a minimum one-year follow up, separated into a surgical and non-surgical group. Risk factors were: associated injury, heterotopic ossification, worker's compensation, and proximal radio-ulnar joint implication. Outcomes included radiographic range of motion measurement, demographic data, and quality of life questionnaires (PREE, Q-DASH, MEPS). Mean follow up was 3.5 years (1–7 years). Thirty patients (70%) had associated injuries with decreased elbow extension (−11°, p=0.004) and total range of motion (−14°, p=0.002) compared to the other group. Heterotopic ossification was associated with decreased elbow flexion (−9°, p=0.001) and fractures involved the proximal radio-ulnar joint in 88% of patients. Only worker's compensation was associated with worse scores. There was no difference in terms of function and outcome between patients treated nonsurgically or surgically. We found that associated injuries, worker's compensation and the presence of heterotopic ossification were the only factors correlated with a worse prognosis in this cohort of patients. Given these results, the authors reiterate the importance of being vigilant to associated injuries

Management of the pathologic long-head biceps tendon remains controversial. Biceps tenotomy is a simple intervention but may result in visible deformity and subjective cramping. Comparatively, biceps tenodesis is technically challenging, and has increased operative times, and a more prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of popeye deformity following biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis, identify predictors for developing a deformity, and compare subjective and objective outcomes between those that have one and those that do not. Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial comparing tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. Patients 18 years of age or older with an arthroscopy confirmed biceps lesion were randomized to one of these two techniques. The primary outcome measure for this sub-study was the rate of a popeye deformity at 24-months post-operative as determined by an evaluator blinded to group allocation. Secondary outcomes were patient reported presence/absence of a popeye deformity, satisfaction with the appearance of their arm, as well as pain and cramping on a VAS. Isometric elbow flexion and supination strength were also measured. Interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa) was calculated between patient and evaluator on the presence of a deformity, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of its occurrence. Linear regression was performed to identify if age, gender, or BMI were predictive of satisfaction in appearance if a deformity was present. Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to each group of which 42 in the tenodesis group and 45 in the tenotomy group completed a 24-month follow-up. The incidence of popeye deformity was 9.5% (4/42) in the tenodesis group and 33% (15/45) in the tenotomy group (18 male, 1 female) with a relative risk of 3.5 (p=0.016). There was strong interrater agreement between evaluator and patient perceived deformity (kappa=0.636; p<0.001). Gender tended towards being a significant predictor of having a popeye with males having 6.6 greater odds (p=0.090). BMI also tended towards significance with lower BMI predictive of popeye deformity (OR 1.21; p=0.051). Age was not predictive (p=0.191). Mean (SD) satisfaction score regarding the appearance of their popeye deformity was 7.3 (2.6). Age was a significant predictor, with lower age associated with decreased satisfaction (F=14.951, adjusted r2=0.582, p=0.004), but there was no association with gender (p=0.083) or BMI (p=0.949). There were no differences in pain, cramping, or strength between those who had a popeye deformity and those who did not. The risk of developing a popeye deformity was 3.5 times higher after tenotomy compared to tenodesis. Male gender and lower BMI tended towards being predictive of having a deformity; however, those with a high BMI may have had popeye deformities that were not as visually apparent to an examiner as those with a lower BMI. Younger patients were significantly less satisfied with a deformity despite no difference in functional outcomes at 24 months. Thus, biceps tenodesis may be favored in younger patients with low BMI to mitigate the risk of an unsatisfactory popeye deformity

Background: Traumatic brachial plexus (BP) injuries may cause loss of elbow flexion. After nerve surgery active elbow flexion often remains insufficient. Muscle strength improvement via cell therapy would be a potential option and could avoid muscle transfer surgery. The primary objective of this pilot study was to assess the safety and feasibility of autologous bone marrow (BM)-derived mononuclear cell (MNC) injection in partly denervated m. biceps brachii of BP patients. Secondary, this study has focused on the myogenic potential of BM-derived MNC by assessing the morphological and functional improvement of the biceps. Methods: Nine adult BP patients with insufficient force recovery of elbow flexion were included. Three escalating doses (0.9, 4 and 8 * 108) of MNCs were injected in the m. biceps brachii (group A, B and C). In group A, BM was aspirated under local anesthesia (60 ml). In group B and C, BM was aspirated in combination with a muscle tendon transfer (Steindler flexorplasty) under general anesthesia (350 and 650 ml respectively). A muscle biopsy was performed before and 3 months after transplantation. Furthermore, quantitative needle EMG, CT-scan and clinical function was obtained at pre-transplantation and at 3 and 6 months follow-up. The EMG and CT-scan data were blinded during analysis. Results: No negative side effects were observed. Biopsies showed an increase of 80% in myofiber diameter (P = 0.007), 51% in satellite cells (P = 0.045), 83% in capillary to myofiber ratio (P < 0.001) and a decrease of 51% in fibrosis (P = 0.012). Histological changes were most apparent in group B with an increase of 126% in myofiber diameter (P = 0.019), 100% in capillary to myofiber ratio (P = 0.027), and a decrease of 70% in fibrosis (P = 0.023). EMG demonstrated an increase of 36% in amplitude (P = 0.045), 29% in duration (P = 0.005) and 29% in number of phases of the motor unit potentials (P = 0.002). CT-scan analysis showed a decrease of 48% in mean muscle density (P = 0.009). Discussion: This study shows that BM-derived MNC transplantation in a partly denervated muscle of traumatic PB patients is safe and feasible. Muscle improvement was observed in muscle biopsies. Furthermore, changes in EMGs and CT-scans were also suggestive for muscle regeneration. The BM dose applied in group B could represent the optimal dose to enhance partly denervated muscles. The results of the present study require confirmation in a placebo-controlled study