Aims

A novel enhanced cement fixation (EF) tibial implant with deeper cement pockets and a more roughened bonding surface was released to market for an existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system.This randomized controlled trial assessed fixation of the both the EF (ATTUNE S+) and standard (Std; ATTUNE S) using radiostereometric analysis.

Aims. Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and has been linked to poor cementation technique. We aimed to develop a consensus on the optimal technique for component cementation in TKA. Methods. A UK-based, three-round, online modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study was completed focusing on cementation technique in TKA. Experts were identified as having a minimum of five years’ consultant experience in the NHS and fulfilling any one of the following criteria: a ‘high volume’ knee arthroplasty practice (> 150 TKAs per annum) as identified from the National joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man; a senior author of at least five peer reviewed articles related to TKA in the previous five years; a surgeon who is named trainer for a post-certificate of comletion of training fellowship in TKA. Results. In total, 81 experts (round 1) and 80 experts (round 2 and 3) completed the Delphi Study. Four domains with a total of 24 statements were identified. 100% consensus was reached within the cement preparation, pressurization, and cement curing domains. 90% consensus was reached within the cement application domain. Consensus was not reached with only one statement regarding the handling of cement during initial application to the tibial and/or femoral bone surfaces. Conclusion. The Cementing Techniques In Knee Surgery (CeTIKS) Delphi consensus study presents comprehensive recommendations on the optimal technique for component cementing in TKA. Expert opinion has a place in the hierarchy of evidence and, until better evidence is available these recommendations should be considered when cementing a TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):682–688

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of cement in total knee arthroplasty on markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, as surrogate markers for enhanced risk of vascular disease or precipitation of acute vascular events post-operatively. A total of 36 patients were recruited, with 18 in each of the cemented and uncemented groups. Both groups were matched for age, sex and body mass index. Venous blood samples were taken pre-operatively, day 1 and day 7 post-operatively. Serum levels of interleukin 6 (IL6), tumour necrosis factor (TNF□?, e-selectin, Von willebrand factor (vWF), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and soluble CD40 ligand were analysed. Also, real time analysis of the expression of CD40 and CD14/CD42a aggregates on monocytes was carried out using flow cytometry. Patients were excluded from the study if there were signs of either superficial or deep infection. The only variable to demonstrate a significant difference between the two groups was the CD1442a count. There was a significant difference in the first 24 hours (p=0.00) and from day 1 to day 7 (p=0.02). Our study suggests that the use of bone cement causes a significant rise in CD1442a count which has been linked to atherothrombosis and acute coronary syndromes. These changes may explain the increased incidence of venous thrombosis and thromboembolism post-operatively. However more research required in this field to delineate the exact pathways involved

During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a tourniquet is often used intraoperatively. There are proposed benefits of tourniquet use including shorter duration of surgery, improved surgical field visualization and increased cement penetration which may improve implant longevity. However, there are also cited side effects that include increased post-operative pain, slowed recovery, skin bruising, neurovascular injury and quadriceps weakness. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated no differences in implant longevity, however they are limited by short follow-up and small sample sizes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the rates of revision surgery among patients undergoing cemented TKA with or without an intraoperative tourniquet and to understand the causes and risk factors for failure. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all patients who received a primary, cemented TKA at a high-volume arthroplasty centre from January 1999 to December 2010. Patients who underwent surgery without the use of a tourniquet and those who had a tourniquet inflated for the entirety of the case were included. The causes and timing of revision surgery were recorded and cross referenced with the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database to reduce the loss to follow-up. Survivorship analysis was performed with the use of Kaplan-Meier curves to determine overall survival rates at final follow-up. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to evaluate independent predictors of revision surgery. Data from 3939 cases of primary cemented TKA were available for analysis. There were 2276 (58%) cases in which a tourniquet was used for the duration of the surgery and 1663 (42%) cases in which a tourniquet was not utilized. Mean time from the primary TKA was 14.7 years (range 0 days - 22.8 years) when censored by death or revision surgery. There were 150 recorded revisions in the entire cohort, with periprosthetic joint infection (n=50) and aseptic loosening (n=41) being the most common causes for revision. The cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquetless group was 93.8% at final follow-up while the cumulative survival at final follow-up for the tourniquet group was 96.9% at final follow-up. Tourniquetless surgery was an independent predictor for all-cause revision with an HR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.1, 2.1, p=0.011). Younger age and male sex were also independent factors for all cause revision. The results of the current study demonstrate higher all-cause revision rates with tourniquetless surgery in a large cohort of patients undergoing primary cemented TKA. The available literature consists of short-term trials and registry data, which have inherent limitations. Potential causes for increased revision rates in the tourniquetless group include reduced cement penetration, increased intraoperative blood loss and longer surgical. The results of the current study should be taken into consideration, alongside the known risks and benefits of tourniquet use, when considering intraoperative tourniquet use in cemented TKA

Abstract. Introduction. Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and this has been linked to poor cementation technique. We aimed to develop a consensus on the optimal technique for component cementation in TKA. Methodology. A UK based, three round, online modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study was completed focussing on cementation technique in TKA. Experts were identified as having a minimum of 5 years Consultant experience in the NHS and fulfilling any one of the following three criteria:. · A ‘high volume’ knee arthroplasty practice (>150 TKA per annum) as identified from the National joint registry (NJR). · A senior author of at least 5 peer reviewed articles related to TKA in the previous 5 years. · A named trainer for a post CCT fellowship in TKA. Results. Eighty-one experts (Round 1) and eighty experts (Round 2 and 3) completed the Delphi Study. Four domains with a total of twenty-four statements were identified. 100% consensus was reached within the cement preparation, pressurisation, and cement curing domains. 90% consensus was reached within the cement application domain. Consensus was not reached with only one statement regarding the handling of cement during initial application to the tibial and/or femoral bone surfaces. Conclusion. The CeTIKS expert consensus study presents comprehensive recommendations on the optimal technique for component cementation in TKA. Expert opinion has a place in the hierarchy of evidence and until better evidence is available these recommendations should be considered when cementing a TKA

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a subject of considerable debate. A recent study questioned the need for tourniquets based on associated risks. However, the study omitted analysis of crucial tourniquet-related parameters which have been demonstrated in numerous studies to be associated with safe tourniquet use and reduction of adverse events. The current utilization and preferences of tourniquet use in Canada remain unknown. Our primary aim was to determine the current practices, patterns of use, and opinions of tourniquet use in TKA among members of the Canadian Arthroplasty Society (CAS). Additionally, we sought to determine the need for updated best practice guidelines to inform optimal tourniquet use and to identify areas requiring further research. A self-administered survey was emailed to members of the CAS in October 2021(six-week period). The response rate was 57% (91/161). Skip logic branching was used to administer a maximum of 59 questions related to tourniquet use, beliefs, and practices. All respondents were staff surgeons and 88% were arthroplasty fellowship trained. Sixty-five percent have been in practice for ≥11 years and only 16% for 50 TKA/year, 59% have an academic practice, and >67% prefer cemented TKA. Sixty-six percent currently use tourniquets, 25% no longer do but previously did, and 9% never used tourniquets. For those not using tourniquets, the most common reasons are potential harm/risks and publications/conferences. Among current users, 48% use in all cases and an additional 37% use in 76-99% of cases. The top reason for use was improved visualization/bloodless field (88%), followed by performing a cemented TKA, used in training, and faster operative times. The main patient factor influencing selective tourniquet use was peripheral vascular disease and main surgical factors were operative duration and cementless TKA. The most frequent adverse events reported were bruising/pinching under the tourniquet and short-term pain, which majority believed were related to improper tourniquet use (prolonged time, high-pressures, poor cuff fit), yet only 8% use contoured tourniquets and 32% don't use limb protection. Despite substantial evidence in literature that tourniquet safety and probability of harm are affected by tourniquet time and pressure, only 83% and 72% of respondents believe reducing tourniquet time and pressure respectively reduce the probability of harm. In addition, no surgeon utilizes personalized limb occlusion pressure which has been demonstrated to substantially reduce tourniquet pressure while being safe and effective. Furthermore, 62% always use fixed pressure and 37% will modify the pressure based on patient parameters, most often systolic blood pressure and limb size. Almost all (88%) were interested in new evidence-based guidelines regarding these parameters. Tourniquet use in TKA remains prevalent among arthroplasty surgeons in the CAS; however tremendous practice variability regarding several key parameters required for optimal use exists. Current best practices of tourniquet use regarding personalized pressures, time, and type are not being utilized across Canada. There is considerable interest and need for further research and updated guidelines regarding key parameters of safe tourniquet usage to optimize tourniquet use in TKA

Aims. Micromotion of the polyethylene (PE) inlay may contribute to backside PE wear in addition to articulate wear of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) with tantalum beads in the PE inlay, we evaluated PE micromotion and its relationship to PE wear. Methods. A total of 23 patients with a mean age of 83 years (77 to 91), were available from a RSA study on cemented TKA with Maxim tibial components (Zimmer Biomet). PE inlay migration, PE wear, tibial component migration, and the anatomical knee axis were evaluated on weightbearing stereoradiographs. PE inlay wear was measured as the deepest penetration of the femoral component into the PE inlay. Results. At mean six years’ follow-up, the PE wear rate was 0.08 mm/year (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.09 mm/year). PE inlay external rotation was below the precision limit and did not influence PE wear. Varus knee alignment did not influence PE wear (p = 0.874), but increased tibial component total translation (p = 0.041). Conclusion. The PE inlay was well fixed and there was no relationship between PE stability and PE wear. The PE wear rate was low and similar in the medial and lateral compartments. Varus knee alignment did not influence PE wear. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(5):226–236

Aim. One of the most severe complications of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Nowadays, the use of antibiotic-loaded cement for prevention of infection is still controversial. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement to reduce the infection rate in primary total knee arthroplasty. Method. Prospective randomized study, with 2893 cemented total knee arthroplasties performed between 2005 and 2010 in our institution. Two different groups were formed depending on which bone cement was used, without antibiotic (the control group) or loaded with erythromycin and colistin (the study group). All patients received the same systemic prophylactic antibiotics. The patients were followed for a minimum of twelve months. The rate of infection was analyzed according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Results. In 1452 patients the prosthetic components were fixed using bone cement without antibiotic and in 1441 patients bone cement loaded with erythromycin and colistin was used. There were no differences between both groups in terms of demographic data (age, sex and BMI), either in operating time (p>0,05). The rate of infection was similar in both groups, being 2,0% (n=29) in the control group and 1,7% in the study group (p=0,58) at 8,7 years (SD 5,1) of follow up. In terms of prosthetic revision due to any cause (infected or aseptic), there wasn't differences between groups, performing a total of 61 revision arthroplasties in control group and 68 in study group (p>0,05). Moreover, we analyzed the erythromycin resistance rate, being no differences between both groups (p=0.6). Conclusions. The use of erythromycin and colistin-loaded bone cement in total knee arthroplasty did not lead to a decrease in the rate of infection when systemic prophylactic antibiotics were used, a finding that suggests that its use would not be indicated in the general population

This study aimed to analyze the effect of two different techniques of cement application: cement on bone surface (CoB) versus cement on bone surface and implant surface (CoBaI) on the short-term effect of radiolucent lines (RLL) in primary fully cemented total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with patella resurfacing. 379 fully cemented TKAs (318 patients) were included in this monocentric study. Preoperative and postoperative at week 4 and 12 month after surgery all patients had a clinical and radiological examination and were administered the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Cement was applied in two different ways among the two study groups: cement on bone surface (CoB group) or cement on bone surface and implant surface (CoBaI group). The evaluation of the presence of RLL or osteolysis was done as previously described using the updated Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System. The mean OKS and range of motion improved significantly in both groups at the 4-week and 12-month follow-up, with no significant difference between the groups (CoB vs. CoBaI). RLL were present in 4.7% in the whole study population and were significantly higher in the CoBaI group (10.5%) at the 4-week follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up RLL were seen in 29.8% of the TKAs in the CoBaI group, whereas the incidence was lower in the CoB group (24.0% (n.s.)). There were two revisions in each group. None of these due to aseptic loosening. Our study indicated that the application of bone cement on bone surface only might be more beneficial than onto the bone surface and onto the implant surface as well in respect to the short-term presence of RLL in fully cemented primary TKA. The long-term results will be of interest, especially in respect to aseptic loosening and might guide future directions of bone cement applications in TKA

Abstract. Objective. Up to 20% of patients can remain dissatisfied following TKR. A proportion of TKRs will need early revision with aseptic loosening the most common. The ATTUNE TKR was introduced in 2011 as successor to its predicate design The PFC Sigma (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, In). However, following reports of early failures of the tibial component there have been ongoing concerns of increased loosening rates with the ATTUNE TKR. In 2017 a redesigned tibial baseplate (S+) was introduced, which included cement pockets and an increased surface roughness to improve cement bonding. Given the concerns of early tibial loosening with the ATTUNE knee system, this study aimed to compare revision rates and those specific to aseptic loosening of the ATTUNE implant in comparison to an established predicate as well as other implant designs used in a high-volume arthroplasty centre. Methods. The Attune TKR was introduced to our unit in December 2011. Prior to this we routinely used a predicate design with an excellent long-term track record (PFC Sigma) which remains in use. In addition, other designs were available and used as per surgeon preference. Using a prospectively maintained database, we identified 10,202 patients who underwent primary cemented TKR at our institution between 01/04/2003–31/03/2022 with a minimum of 1 year follow-up (Mean 8.4years, range 1–20years): 1) 2406 with ATTUNE TKR (of which 557 were S+) 2) 4652 with PFC TKR 3) 3154 with other cemented designs. All implants were cemented using high viscosity cement. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, and revision for tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to compare the primary outcomes between groups. Matched cohorts were selected from the ATTUNE subsets (original and S+) and PFC groups using the nearest neighbor method for radiographic analysis. Radiographs were assessed to compare the presence of radiolucent lines in the Attune S+, standard Attune, and PFC implants. Results. At a mean of 8.4 years follow-up, 308 implants underwent revision equating to 3.58 revisions per 1000 implant-years. The lowest risk of revision was noted in the ATTUNE cohort with 2.98 per 1000-implant-years where the PFC and All Other Implant groups were 3.15 and 4.4 respectively. Aseptic loosing was the most common cause for revision across all cemented implants with 76% (65/88) of involving loosening of the tibia. Survival analysis comparing the ATTUNE cohort to the PFC and All Other Cemented Implant cohorts showed no significant differences for: all-cause revision, aseptic loosening, or tibial loosening (p=0.15,0.77,0.47). Radiolucent lines were detected in 4.6%, 5.8%, and 5.0% of the ATTUNE S+, standard ATTUNE, and PFC groups respectively. These differences were not significant. Conclusion. This study represents the largest non-registry review of the original and S+ ATTUNE TKR in comparison to its predicate design as well as other cemented implants. There appears to be no significant increased revision rate for all-cause revision or aseptic loosening. Radiographic analysis also showed no significant difference in peri-implant radiolucency. It appears that concerns of early loosening may be unfounded. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Introduction. Recent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs have featured more anatomic morphologies and shorter tibial keels. However, several reports have raised concerns regarding the impact of these modifications on implant longevity. This study's purpose is to report the early performance of a modern, cemented TKA design. Methods. All patients who received a primary, cemented TKA from 2012 to 2017 with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. This implant features an asymmetric tibial baseplate and a shortened keel. Patient demographics, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and component alignment were recorded, and Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed. Results. 720 of 754 primary TKAs (95.5%) were included for analysis (mean follow-up: 3.9 ± 1.3 years; 562 cruciate-retaining, 158 posterior-stabilized). Eleven (1.5%) were revised for periprosthetic infection and seven (1.0%) for aseptic tibial loosening (5 cruciate-retaining, 2 posterior-stabilized). Aseptic loosening occurred at a mean of 3.3 ± 2.0 years. There were no cases of aseptic loosening in 33 patients who received a 14 × 30mm tibial stem extension. All-cause survivorship was 96.6% at 3 years (95% CI: 95.3%–98.0%) and 96.2% at 5 years (95% CI: 94.8%–97.7%). Survivorship for aseptic loosening was 99.6% at 3 years (95% CI: 99.1%–100.0%) and 99.1% at 5 years (CI: 98.4%–99.9%). Tibial component alignment was more varus in aseptic loosening cases (86.6° ± 3.7° vs 88.7° ± 2.0°, p=0.02). There were no other differences in demographic, radiographic, or surgical characteristics between revised and non-revised TKAs for aseptic loosening (p=0.3–1.0). KSS improved from 57.3 pre-operatively to 92.6 post-operatively (p<0.001). Conclusion. This study comprises the largest series to date of this specific implant design. At short-term follow-up, the rate of aseptic tibial loosening is not overly concerning. But, further observation is warranted to determine if there is an abnormal rate of loosening at mid- to long-term follow-up

Introduction. Knee osteoarthritis often causes malalignment and altering bone load. This malalignment is corrected during total knee arthroplasty surgery, balancing the ligaments. Nonetheless, preoperative gait patterns may influence postoperative prosthesis load and bone support. Thus, the purpose is to investigate the impact of preoperative gait patterns on postoperative femoral and tibial component migration in total knee arthroplasty. Method. In a prospective cohort study, 66 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis undergoing cemented Persona total knee arthroplasty were assessed. Preoperative knee kinematics was analyzed through dynamic radiostereometry and motion capture, categorizing patients into four homogeneous gait patterns. The four subgroups were labeled as the flexion group (n=20), the abduction (valgus) group (n=17), the anterior drawer group (n=10), and the tibial external rotation group (n=19). The femoral and tibial component migration was measured using static radiostereometry taken supine on the postoperative day (baseline) and 3-, 12-, and 24- months after surgery. Migration was evaluated as maximum total point motion. Result. Of the preoperatively defined four subgroups, the abduction group with a valgus-characterized gait pattern exhibited the highest migration for both the femoral (1.64 mm (CI95% 1.25; 2.03)) and tibial (1.21 mm (CI95% 0.89; 1.53)) components at 24-month follow-up. For the femoral components, the abduction group migrated 0.6 mm (CI95% 0.08; 1.12) more than the external rotation group at 24 months. For the tibial components, the abduction group migrated 0.43 mm (CI95% 0.16; 0.70) more than the external rotation group at 3 months. Furthermore, at 12- and 24-months follow-up the abduction group migrated 0.39 mm (95%CI 0.04; 0.73) and 0.45 mm (95%CI 0.01; 0.89) more than the flexion group, respectively. Conclusion. A preoperative valgus-characterized gait pattern seems to increase femoral and tibial component migration until 2 years of follow-up. This suggests that the implant fixation depends on load distributions originating from specific preoperative gait patterns

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reliable, durable, and reproducible in relieving pain and improving function in patients with arthritis of the knee joint. Cemented fixation is the gold standard with low rates of loosening and excellent survivorship in several large clinical series and joint registries. While cementless knee designs have been available for the past 3 decades, changing patient demographics (i.e. younger patients), improved implant designs and materials, and a shift towards TKA procedures being performed in ambulatory surgery centers has rekindled the debate of the role of cementless knee implants in TKA. The drive towards achieving biologic implant fixation in TKA is also driven by the successful transition from cemented hip implants to uncemented THA. However, new technologies and new techniques must be adopted as a result of an unmet need, significant improvement, and/or clinical advantage. Thus, the questions remain: 1) Why switch; and 2) Is cementless TKA more reliable, durable, or reproducible compared to cemented TKA?. There are several advantages to using cement during TKA. First, the technique can be universally applied to all cases without exception and without concerns for bone health or structure. Second, cement can mask imprecisions in bone cuts and is a remarkably durable grout. Third, cement allows for antibiotic delivery at the time surrounding surgery which has been shown in some instances to reduce the risk of subsequent infection. Finally, cement fixation has provided successful and durable fixation across various types knee designs, surface finishes, and articulations. On the other hand, cementless knee implants have had an inconsistent track record throughout history. While some have fared very well, others have exhibited early failures and high revision rates. Behery et al. reported on a series of 70 consecutive cases of cementless TKA matched with 70 cemented TKA cases based on implant design and demographics and found that cementless TKA was associated with a greater risk of aseptic loosening and revision surgery at 5 years follow up. Finally, to date, there has not been a randomised controlled clinical trial demonstrating superiority of cementless fixation compared to cemented fixation in TKA. Improvements in materials and designs have definitely made cementless TKA designs viable. However, concerns with added cost, reproducibility, and durability remain. Cement fixation has withstood the test of time and is not the main cause of TKA failure. Therefore, until there is significant data showing that cementless TKA is more durable, reliable, and reproducible compared to cemented TKA, the widespread use of these implants cannot be recommended

Introduction. Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the gold standard with survivorship above 90% at greater than 10 years postoperatively. However, with younger, heavier, more active patients undergoing TKA at an increasing rate, cementless implants have the appeal of potential for improved implant fixation longevity and decreased rates of aseptic loosening. The cementless implants are more expensive than their cemented counterparts such that implant costs may create a barrier to utilization. However, such comparisons fail to consider the unavoidable additional costs of cementing, including the cost of operating room time, cement and cementing accessories. The purpose of this study is to compare the actual cost of cemented and cementless TKA. Methods. The TKA cost calculation included the cost of operative time, implants, cement and cementing accessories. The difference in operative time between cemented and cementless TKA was determined from a previously published study of 100 TKAs performed using a cemented (55) or press fit (45) implant of the same design performed at a single institution by four fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons. The decision to use cemented or cementless design in these patients was made based on patient bone quality intraoperatively. Operative time was compared between groups using a Student's two-tailed T-test. The cost of operating room time was based on estimates in the recent literature. The cost of cement and cementing accessories was estimated based on publically available market data. The cost of implants was estimated from institutional data for multiple companies. Results. The cost comparison between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty is summarized in Table 1. Mean operative time for cemented TKA was 14.3 minutes longer than for cementless TKA (94.7 + 15.2 vs. 80.4 + 15.7, p<0.01). The estimated cost of one minute of operating room time in the literature ranges from $30 to $60. For our analysis, we used an estimate of $36 per minute obtained from a recently published multi-center study. This resulted in an average operating room time cost $3406 for cemented and $2894 for cementless TKA. Antibiotic cement costs an average of $250 per bag and antibiotic-free cement costs an average of $75 per bag. Cement mixing techniques vary across surgeons. Approximately 95% use a vacuum system and 5% use a mixing bowl. The cost of vacuum systems ranges from $80 for an enclosed bowl to $125 for a vacuum system that can be directly connected to a cement gun. The cost of a plastic mixing bowl and spatula is $20. The cost of the disposables from a cement injection kit is $25. The average cost of a primary TKA implant, including femoral, tibial and polyethylene liner components, is $3530 for cemented and $4659 for cementless designs. Patellar resurfacing is not routinely used at our institution and therefore was not included in implant cost. Based on our calculations, the average cost of a cementless TKA is $7553. Using the cheapest cementing technique with 2 bags of plain cement and a manual mixing bowl with spatula, the cost of a cemented TKA $7114. Using the most expensive cementing technique with 2 bags of antibiotic cement and a cement gun compatible vacuum mixer, the cost of a cemented TKA is $7564. Conclusion. Cemented TKA remains the gold standard and still accounts for most procedures. Cementless TKA is increasing in utilization and may decrease the rate of aseptic loosening, especially in the rapidly growing young, active population undergoing TKA. Although cementless implants remain more expensive than cemented implants at most institutions, the actual overall cost of the two procedures is similar if operative time, cement and cementing accessories are considered. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction & Aims. In other medical fields, smart implantable devices are enabling decentralised monitoring of patients and early detection of disease. Despite research-focused smart orthopaedic implants dating back to the 1980s, such implants have not been adopted into regular clinical practice. The hardware footprint and commercial cost of components for sensing, powering, processing, and communicating are too large for mass-market use. However, a low-cost, minimal-modification solution that could detect loosening and infection would have considerable benefits for both patients and healthcare providers. This proof-of-concept study aimed to determine if loosening/infection data could be monitored with only two components inside an implant: a single-element sensor and simple communication element. Methods. The sensor and coil were embedded onto a representative cemented total knee replacement. The implant was then cemented onto synthetic bone using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Wireless measurements for loosening and infection were then made across different thicknesses of porcine tissue to characterise the sensor's accuracy for a range of implantation depths. Loosening was simulated by taking measurements before and after compromising the implant-cement interface, with fluid influx simulated with phosphate-buffered saline solution. Elevated temperature was used as a proxy for infection, with the sensor calibrated wirelessly through 5 mm of porcine tissue across a temperature range of 26–40°C. Results. Measurements for loosening and infection could be acquired simultaneously with a duration of 4 s per measurement. For loosening, the debonded implant-cement interface was detectable up to 10 mm with 95% confidence. For temperature, the sensor was calibrated with a root mean square error of 0.19°C at 5 mm implantation depth and prediction intervals of ±0.38°C for new measurements with 95% confidence. Conclusions. This study has demonstrated that with only two onboard electrical components, it is possible to wirelessly measure cement debonding and elevated temperature on a smart implant. With further development, this minimal hardware/cost approach could enable mass-market smart arthroplasty implants

Background. There are case series of debonding of the ATTUNE® tibial component introduced in 2013. We studied the early clinical results of this total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and compared it to other designs at one hospital. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 223 consecutive, non-randomized, cemented fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized ATTUNE® TKAs at one hospital by 5 surgeons from 2013 through 2017. We excluded 4 knees with early infection and 53 with follow-up less than 6 months. Of 166 TKAs reviewed, the mean patient age was 63.8 years, mean BMI 32, and mean follow-up 25 months. We compared this to a “control” cohort of 511 TKAs of other manufacturers performed at the same hospital. The endpoints were revision performed and revision pending. Results. Nineteen (11.5%) ATTUNE® knees have been revised and revision is pending in 12 (7%) knees, at a mean of 30 months. Tibial component loosening was seen in 17 (90%) revised knees. There was no difference between knees revised or revision pending and unrevised knees in patient demographics, cement used (p=0.84), or attending surgeon (p=0.55). In the “control” cohort, there were 13 (2.6%) knees revised (p<0.0001) and revision pending in 8 (1.5%) (p<0.0001), and only 2 had tibial loosening as the reason for revision. Conclusion. This cemented TKA design had an unexpected high early rate of revision. Debonding of the tibial component was the most common reason for failure. Additional longer-term follow-up studies of this component and techniques for implantation are warranted

Lavage and preparation of the cancellous bony surface can facilitate adequate fixation of components in cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Commonly used techniques for bone preparation such as pulse lavage, apart from adding to the cost, may cause local loss of loose cancellous bone and may even drive contaminants deeper into the tissue when used during TKA. We describe a simple, inexpensive and effective tool of using a sterilised toothbrush for preparing bone surface during cemented TKA. This must be followed by adequate pressurization of cement at the right time to achieve close interdigitation of cement with trabecular bone

Background. Secondary osteonecrosis of the knee (SOK) generally occurs in relatively young patients in their working years; at advanced stages of SOK, the only viable surgical option is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a retrospective study to investigate implant survivorship, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications of cemented TKA with/without patellar resurfacing for SOK. Methods. Thirty-eight cemented TKAs in 27 patients with non-traumatic SOK with a mean age 43 years (range 17–65) were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-one patients (78%) were female. Mean body mass index was 31 kg/m. 2. (range 20–48); 11 patients (41%) received bilateral TKAs. Twenty patients (74%) had a history of corticosteroid use and 18% had a history of alcohol abuse. Patellar osteonecrosis was coincidentally found in six knees (16%), all of which had no anterior knee pain and had no patellofemoral joint collapse. The mean follow-up was 7 years (range 2–12). Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at 6 weeks, 1 year, then every 2–3 years thereafter. Results. Ninety-two percent had implant survivorship free from revision with significant improvement in KSS. Causes of revision included aseptic tibial loosening (one), deep infection (one), and instability with patellofemoral issues (one). Four of six cases also with patellar osteonecrosis received resurfacing, including one with a periprosthetic patellar fracture after minor trauma, with satisfactory clinical results after conservative treatment. None of the unrevised knees had progressive radiolucent lines or evidence of loosening. Non-resurfacing of the patella, use of a stem extension or a varus-valgus constrained prosthesis constituted 18%, 8% and 3% of knees, respectively. Conclusion. Cemented TKAs with selective stem extension in patients with SOK had satisfactory implant survivorship and reliable outcomes at a mean of 7 years. Patellar resurfacing is unnecessary in younger patients with no symptoms of anterior knee pain and no patellar collapse radiographically. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Cementless TKA offers the potential for strong fixation through biologic fixation technology as compared to cemented TKA where fixation is achieved through mechanical integration of the cement. Few mid-term results are available for newer cementless TKA designs that have used additive manufacturing (3-D printing) for component design. The purpose of this study is to present minimum 5-year clinical outcomes and implant survivorship of a specific cementless TKA using a novel 3-D printed tibial baseplate. Methods. This is a single institution registry review of the prospectively obtained data on 296 cementless TKA using a novel 3-D printed tibial baseplate with minimum 5-year follow-up. Outcomes were determined by comparing pre- and post-operative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores and pre- and post-operative 12 item Veterans RAND/Short Form Health Survey (VR/SF-12). Aseptic loosening as well as revision for any reason were the endpoints used to determine survivorship at 5 years. Results. At minimum 5-year follow-up, the KOOS JR score improved from 34.88 pre-operatively to 84.29 post-operatively (p-values = 0.0001), the VR/SF-12 scores improved from PH − 31.98 pre-operatively to 42.80 post-operatively (p-values = 0.0001) and the MH − 37.24 pre-operatively to 55.16 post-operatively (p-value = 0.0001). Eleven revisions were performed for an overall revision rate of 2.94% - including 5 PJI (1.34%), 3 loosening (0.80%), 1 instability (0.27%), 2 pain (0.53%). The overall 5-year survivorship was 97.1% and survivorship for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 98.40%. The survivorship of the 3-D printed porous tibial component was 99.2%. Conclusion. This 3-D printed tibial baseplate and cementless total knee system shows excellent survivorship at 5-year follow-up. The design of this implant and the ability to obtain cementless fixation offers promise for excellent long-term durability

Introduction. The ideal type of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthesis remains a debatable topic with many different options available. Uncemented TKA has been a viable option due to its decreased operating room (OR) time but also because of its proposed improved long term fixation. Unfortunately, in the past uncemented TKA was associated with increased blood loss. Surgical technique and perioperative treatments have changed since these original studies and tranexamic acid (TXA) has become the gold standard for TKA blood loss management. The objective of this study was to evaluate if there was a difference in hemoglobin and hematocrit change, along with blood loss volume during surgery between cemented and cementless TKA when modern blood loss techniques are utilized. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed data from TKAs performed by three high volume surgeons between 2016 and 2019. We excluded bilateral TKA, revisions, hardware removal intraoperatively and other indications for TKA than primary OA. Power analysis determined 85 patients in both the cementless and cemented TKA groups. Patients were matched 1:1 for age, sex, BMI and surgeon. Use of TXA, intraoperative blood loss, differences in hemoglobin and hematocrit pre- and postoperatively days one, two, and three were recorded. Continuous variables were analyzed using T-tests and categorical variables were evaluated using Chi-squared tests. Results. No significant difference was observed between the cementless and cemented groups for hemoglobin (p=0.214), hematocrit (p=0.164), or intraoperative blood loss volume (p=0.343). A trend towards significantly shorter OR time was seen in the cementless group (p = 0.058). Conclusion. With modern TKA surgery, including the use of TXA, there is no difference in perioperative blood loss between cemented and cementless TKA. Unlike previous studies, the use of modern blood loss salvage techniques in conjunction with cementless TKA fixation, does not result in more blood loss during the perioperative period