There is a significant positive association between hours of brace wear and rate of success in the treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). The abandon rate reported in the literature averages 18%. In a recent randomized trial conducted at our center; the abandon rate was 4%. We aim to document the abandon rate towards brace treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on AIS progression. We reviewed a database of AIS patients recruited between March and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients with AIS under brace treatment according to SRS criteria. The patients were divided in 2 cohorts: those with a self-reported good adherence to treatment and those who voluntarily abandoned treatment during follow-up. Patients with irregular adherence were excluded. Data analysis included age, gender, Risser stage, type of brace, Cobb angles at first visit and last follow-up (mean 11 months) and % of progression. Unpaired student tests were used for comparison. 154 patients met inclusion criteria. 20 patients were excluded due to irregular adherence. 89 patients (age: 12.1 y.o. ±1.4) reported good adherence to treatment, while 45 patients (age: 12.6 y.o. ±1.5) abandoned treatment, an abandon rate of 29%. The cohort of compliant patients started treatment with a mean main thoracic (MT) curve of 26° and finished with 27°. The mean difference between measurements was +0.65°±7.5; mean progression rate was −4.6%. However, patients who abandoned treatment started with a mean MT curve of 28° and finished with 33°, with a mean increase of +5°±8 and a mean progression rate of −11%. The differences between the 2 cohorts were statistically significant (p=0.002). Five (5) patients from the abandon group were offered for surgery because of curve progression. The abandon rate of brace treatment in AIS significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who voluntarily discontinued treatment had significant increases in curve progression and surgical indication rates

The Pavlik harness (PH) is commonly used to treat infantile dislocated hips. Variability exists in the duration of brace treatment after successful reduction of the dislocated hip. In this study we evaluate the effect of prescribed time in brace on acetabular index (AI) at two years of age using a prospective, international, multicenter database. We retrospectively studied prospectively enrolled infants with at least one dislocated hip that were initially treated with a PH and had a recorded AI at two-year follow-up. Subjects were treated at one of two institutions. Institution 1 used the PH until they observed normal radiographic acetabular development. Institution 2 followed a structured 12-week brace treatment protocol. Hip dislocation was defined as less than 30% femoral head coverage at rest on the pre-treatment ultrasound or IHDI grade III or IV on the pre-treatment radiograph. Fifty-three hips met our inclusion criteria. Hips from Institution 1 were treated with a brace 3x longer than hips from institution 2 (adjusted mean 8.9±1.3 months vs 2.6±0.2 months)(p < 0 .001). Institution 1 had an 88% success rate and institution 2 had an 85% success rate at achieving hip reduction (p=0.735). At 2-year follow-up, we observed no significant difference in AI between Institution 1 (adjusted mean 25.6±0.9˚) compared to Institution 2 (adjusted mean 23.5±0.8˚) (p=0.1). However, 19% of patients from Institution 1 and 44% of patients from Institution 2 were at or below the 50th percentile of previously published age- and sex- matched AI normal data (p=0.049). Also, 27% (7/26) of hips from Institution 1 had significant acetabular dysplasia, compared to a 22% (6/27) from Institution 2 (p=0.691). We found no correlation between age at initiation of bracing and AI at 2-year follow-up (p=0.071). Our findings suggest that prolonged brace treatment does not result in improved acetabular index at age two years. Hips treated at Institution 1 had the same AI at age two years as hips treated at Institution 2, while spending about 1/3 the amount of time in a brace. We recommend close follow-up for all children treated for dislocated hips, as ~1/4 of infants had acetabular index measurements at or above the 90th percentile of normal. Continued follow-up of this prospective cohort will be critical to determine how many children require acetabular procedures during childhood. The PH brace can successfully treat dislocated infant hips, however, prolonged brace treatment was not found to result in improved acetabular development at two-year follow-up

Background. Improvement of Scheuermann's thoracic kyphosis in the growing spine with Milwaukee brace treatment has been reported. However, the role of brace treatment in Mb. Scheuermann is controversial. We report results of brace treatment by low profile scoliosis module with sternal shield. Indication. Thoracic kyphosis >55° or back pain and kyphosis >50°. Material. 21 consecutive patients (17 boys, 4 girls) referred to the Orton Orthopaedic Hospital between 2000-2007. One boy interrupted treatment and the follow-up of two boys was carried out at another hospital. The data of 18 patients are reported. Results. The mean age of patients at the beginning of treatment was 14 years (11-17) and the average thoracic kyphosis was 71° (50-94). On extension radiographs, the kyphosis decreased to 43°(16-66) with a mean correction of 38%. The average time of brace treatment was 2,5 (1-7) years. The final follow- up visit was at the age of 19 (15-21) years. At the final follow-up, the mean thoracic kyphosis was 59° (30-78). Permanent correction of thoracic kyphosis was achieved in 15 patients (83%) with a mean correction of 15 degrees. In two patients no correction was achieved and in one patient the kyphosis increased 9°. No patient required operative treatment. Discussion and conclusion. The efficiency of brace treatment is difficult to prove because natural history of Scheuermann's kyphosis is not fully known. Our material is too small for any final conclusions. However, treatment of the growing spine with modified low profile brace seem to decrease progression of kyphosis in most cases and operative treatment may be avoided

Aims. Radiological residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) has been reported in up to 30% of children who had successful brace treatment of infant developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Predicting those who will resolve and those who may need corrective surgery is important to optimize follow-up protocols. In this study we have aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of RAD at two years and five years post-bracing. Methods. This was a single-centre, prospective longitudinal cohort study of infants with DDH managed using a published, standardized Pavlik harness protocol between January 2012 and December 2016. RAD was measured at two years’ mean follow-up using acetabular index-lateral edge (AI-L) and acetabular index-sourcil (AI-S), and at five years using AI-L, AI-S, centre-edge angle (CEA), and acetabular depth ratio (ADR). Each hip was classified based on published normative values for normal, borderline (1 to 2 standard deviations (SDs)), or dysplastic (> 2 SDs) based on sex, age, and laterality. Results. Of 202 infants who completed the protocol, 181 (90%) had two and five years’ follow-up radiographs. At two years, in 304 initially pathological hips, the prevalence of RAD (dysplastic) was 10% and RAD (borderline) was 30%. At five years, RAD (dysplastic) decreased to 1% to 3% and RAD (borderline) decreased to < 1% to 2%. On logistic regression, no variables were predictive of RAD at two years. Only AI-L at two years was predictive of RAD at five years (p < 0.001). If both hips were normal at two years’ follow-up (n = 96), all remained normal at five years. In those with bilateral borderline hips at two years (n = 21), only two were borderline at five years, none were dysplastic. In those with either borderline-dysplastic or bilateral dysplasia at two years (n = 26), three (12%) were dysplastic at five years. Conclusion. The majority of patients with RAD at two years post-brace treatment, spontaneously resolved by five years. Therefore, children with normal radiographs at two years post-brace treatment can be discharged. Targeted follow-up for those with abnormal AI-L at two years will identify the few who may benefit from surgical correction at five years’ follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(7):744–750

Aims. This study aims to define a set of family-centred core outcomes for infants undergoing brace treatment to facilitate consistent reporting for future high-quality research. Methods. Family-centred outcomes will be identified through a literature review and a scoping survey involving key stakeholders, including parents, healthcare professionals, and researchers. These outcomes will then be rated for their perceived importance in a two-stage modified Delphi process with the same stakeholders. Finally, a consensus meeting will be held to establish the final core outcome set (COS). Conclusion. The impact of brace treatment on the family is profound, but seldom considered in randomized controlled trials. This COS can independently standardize reporting on the family’s experience, and potentially become part of a broader COS for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants undergoing brace treatment. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;6(1):21–25

Purpose. To evaluate outcome in patients with late onset juvenile scoliosis or adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 15 years or more after Boston brace treatment. Methods. 281 of 369 patients (22 men) with late onset juvenile (n=67) or adolescent (n=214) braced at mean 24.7 (range 16-32) years previously, responded to follow-up. Patients answered a standardized questionnaire including demographics, work status, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (100 - worst possible), EuroQol (EQ-5D) (1 – best possible), and Scoliosis Research Society - 22 (SRS - 22) (5 - best possible), and had radiological examination. Results. The mean age at follow-up was 40.4 (31-48) years. The prebrace major curve was in average 33.2 (20–57)°. At weaning and at the last follow-up the corresponding values were 28.3 (1 -58)° and 32.5 (7–80)°, respectively. Curve progression was similar in patients with early onset juvenile and adolescent start. Those who did not attend follow-up (n=88) had lower mean curve at weaning: 25.4 (6-53)°. Twenty-six patients had surgery. Sixty-eight percent had an increase < 6° from prebrace major curve. Work status was: full time 75%, part-time 10%, sick-leave 2%, disability pension 9%, student 4%. 87% had delivered a baby, 51% had pain in pregnancy. The mean (SD) ODI was 8.4 (11.0), EQ-5D 0.82 (0.2), SRS-22: pain 4.1 (0.8), mental health 4.1 (0.6), self-image 3.7 (0.7), function 4.0 (0.6), satisfaction with treatment 3.7 (1.0). Patients who had surgery reported significantly worse scores except for satisfaction. Conclusion. Long-term results were satisfactory in most braced patients

Purpose: Rigid full-time braces are the most common non-surgical treatment for adolescents with moderate severity of scoliosis and demonstrated growth remaining. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) has established guidelines on which patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) should be offered brace treatment. This study surveyed Canadian surgeons on the demographics of patients with scoliosis attending specialty clinics and for their protocols for prescribing braces. Method: An on-line survey of 41 questions was developed to document patient profiles and surgeon protocols for prescribing braces. Surgeons also selected whether they would recommend a brace in females with AIS based on a combination of three levels of maturity, with six levels of curve severity, and whether or not the curve was progressive. The survey was administered between July and November 2008 to the 30 paediatric spine surgeon members of the Canadian Paediatric Spinal Deformities Study Group. After one reminder, the response rate was 70% (21/30), representing 12 Canadian spine centres. Results: The average age of referral to the scoliosis clinic was 11–12 years (10 of 20 respondents) and 13–14 years (nine of 20 respondents). Most (81%) of the centers required radiographs prior to the first clinic visit. All surgeons recommended bracing, but there was broad variation on who they considered should be braced, with three to twenty six of the 36 potential scenarios defined by maturity, progression, and curve severity variables selected. This high variability was also observed among surgeons in the same spine centre. All considered parental or family issues and patient acceptance when recommending a brace. Age and curve severity were criteria for bracing; skeletal maturity was the primary criteria for discontinuing bracing. The majority (81%) of braces prescribed were rigid full-time braces followed by rigid night-time braces (14%). Weaning was common (76%), but protocols varied. Detection of curve progression increased the likelihood of bracing for curves 80% agreement on bracing. Braces were not recommended by > 50% of respondents for females with less than 1 year growth remaining regardless of progression or curve size. Conclusion: In spite of SRS guidelines and general agreement that braces are effective, there is little agreement among surgeons on which females with AIS should receive brace treatment. The likelihood that a female with AIS will be prescribed brace treatment primarily depends on surgeon brace prescription patterns, rather than actual curvature of the spine

INTRODUCTION: A consecutive series of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), treated between 1968 and 1977 before 21 years of age, with brace (BT, n=127; 122 females and 5 males) were followed at least twenty years after completion of the treatment. Methods: One hundred and nine patients were reexamined as part of an unbiased personal follow-up, including a clinical examination, radiographs, validated questionnaires in terms of general and disease-specific quality of life aspects as well as present back and pain symptoms. An age- and sex-matched control group (CTR) of 100 persons was randomly selected and subjected to the same examinations. Results: Curve size (major curve) was mean 38 degrees with a mean increase of 8 degrees from end of treatment to present follow-up. Significantly more patients complained of back pain (77%) in comparison to the control group (58%, p=0.0012), more often lumbar or thoracic pain. Significant but numerically small differences could be found for Oswestry Disability Index and other scores reflecting general back funtion and more patients had been on sick-leave due to the back (38% vs 19%). No differences were found in sociodemographic variables or in general quality of life (SF-36) between the groups. No correlation could be found between pain and its localization and curve size, increase since end of treatment or curve type. Conclusion: Patients with brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were found to have approximately the same back function as the general population. A few were physically severely disabled due to the back

Objective: The aim of the study is to get information about compliance as input of the patient and brace-correction as input of the technician for a successful treatment of Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with TLSO.

Study design: 234 patients with an idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle 20°–50°) were evaluated. Measurements were taken on standing radiographs (ap) before therapy, six months later and at least one year after weaning of the brace. Compliance was judged with compliance score into two groups with good and bad compliance. Also two groups with good (> 40% correction) and bad initial correction were formed.

Results: In patient with good compliance (n-188) and also good initial correction (n-136), a continuous correction of about 7°±4° Cobb angle was evident. Patient with good compliance but bad initial correction (n-45) can only expect a stop of progression. Patient with bad compliance (n-47) but good initial correction have shown progression of curvature with high variation (32°±6° to 37°±9°). Initial correction is low in cases with Cobb angle > 40° or > Risser II (n-21).

Conclusion: The result depends on the Cobb angle at the begin of therapy, brace correction and compliance. Initial correction gets worse in severe cases and cannot be compensated by compliance (Fulltime bracing).

The criteria of bracing have to be questioned: “In some cases we are to late”. In our recommendation we have to start earlier and a parttime-bracing has to be discussed in cases with Cobb angle < 30°

Introduction. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of the SpineCor bracing treatment in all forms of scoliosis, between 2000–2006.

Methods. Over the past 6 years 56 skeletally immature and 1 skeletally mature patients with progressive scoliosis have been treated with the Spine-Cor bracing system. They were divided into the following groups; infantile 3; juvenile 19; adolescent 29; adult 1; “other” 5.

Results. 20 were deemed to have achieved a correc-tion, 24 stabilised 3 worsened and the progression of 4 patients was not recorded. To date 11 patients have gone on to surgery.

Discussion. Various bracing systems utilised in the past have shown what appeared to be a lasting degree of protection for scoliosis but subsequent long term follow ups have demonstrated progression of curves. The newer SpineCor system may offer a good short term outcome.

Conclusion. Early diagnosis and rapid treatment at a young skeletal age may offer an alternative to surgery with this relatively new bracing system. A further prospective study continues at S.C.H. and will be ready to present in 2011. Far longer term follow up will be required to validate apparent successes in the short term.

Aims. Brace treatment is the cornerstone of managing developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), yet there is a lack of evidence-based treatment protocols, which results in wide variations in practice. To resolve this, we have developed a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol conforming to published consensus principles, with well-defined a priori criteria for inclusion and successful treatment. Methods. This was a single-centre, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of a consecutive series of infants with ultrasound-confirmed DDH who underwent a comprehensive nonoperative brace management protocol in a unified multidisciplinary clinic between January 2012 and December 2016 with five-year follow-up radiographs. The radiological outcomes were acetabular index-lateral edge (AI-L), acetabular index-sourcil (AI-S), centre-edge angle (CEA), acetabular depth ratio (ADR), International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade, and evidence of avascular necrosis (AVN). At five years, each hip was classified as normal (< 1 SD), borderline dysplastic (1 to 2 SDs), or dysplastic (> 2 SDs) based on validated radiological norm-referenced values. Results. Of 993 infants assessed clinically and sonographically, 21% (212 infants, 354 abnormal hips) had DDH and were included. Of these, 95% (202 infants, 335 hips) successfully completed bracing, and 5% (ten infants, 19 hips) failed bracing due to irreducible hip(s). The success rate of bracing for unilateral dislocations was 88% (45/51 infants) and for bilateral dislocations 83% (20/24 infants). The femoral nerve palsy rate was 1% (2/212 infants). At five-year follow-up (mean 63 months (SD 5.9; 49 to 83)) the prevalence of residual dysplasia after successful brace treatment was 1.6% (5/312 hips). All hips were IHDI grade I and none had AVN. Four children (4/186; 2%) subsequently underwent surgery for residual dysplasia. Conclusion. Our comprehensive protocol for nonoperative treatment of infant DDH has shown high rates of success and extremely low rates of residual dysplasia at a mean age of five years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(8):935–942

Success treating AIS with bracing is related to time worn and scoliosis severity. Temperature monitoring can help patients comply with their orthotic prescription. Routinely collected temperature data from the start of first brace treatment was reviewed for 14 patients. All were female with an average age of 12.4 years (range 10.3–14.6) and average 49o Cobb angle (30–64). Our current service recommendation is brace wear for 20 hours a day. Patients complied with this prescription 38.0% of the time, with four patients averaging this or more. Average brace wear was 16.3 hours per day (3.5–22.2). There were 13 patients who had completed brace treatment. The majority had surgery (7/13; 54%) or were considering surgery (1/13; 8%). There were 5 who did not wish surgery at discharge (5/13; 38%); 1 achieved a 40o Cobb angle, with 4 larger (53o;53o;54o;68o). The Bracing in AIS Trial (BrAIST) study measured “success” as less than a 50o Cobb angle, so using this metric our cohort has had a single “success”. Temperature monitors allowed an analysis of when patients were achieving their brace wear. When comparing daywear (8am-8pm) to nightwear (8pm-8am), patients wore their brace an average of 7.6 hours a day (2.5–11.2) and 8.7 hours a night (0.4–11.5). We conclude the minority of our patients comply with our current 20 hour orthotic prescription. The “success” of brace treatment is lower than comparison studies despite higher average compliance but starting with a larger scoliosis. Brace wear is achieved during both the day and night

Aims. To systematically evaluate whether bracing can effectively achieve curve regression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to identify any predictors of curve regression after bracing. Methods. Two independent reviewers performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to obtain all published information about the effectiveness of bracing in achieving curve regression in AIS patients. Search terms included “brace treatment” or “bracing,” “idiopathic scoliosis,” and “curve regression” or “curve reduction.” Inclusion criteria were studies recruiting patients with AIS undergoing brace treatment and one of the study outcomes must be curve regression or reduction, defined as > 5° reduction in coronal Cobb angle of a major curve upon bracing completion. Exclusion criteria were studies including non-AIS patients, studies not reporting p-value or confidence interval, animal studies, case reports, case series, and systematic reviews. The GRADE approach to assessing quality of evidence was used to evaluate each publication. Results. After abstract and full-text screening, 205 out of 216 articles were excluded. The 11 included studies all reported occurrence of curve regression among AIS patients who were braced. Regression rate ranged from 16.7% to 100%. We found evidence that bracing is effective in achieving curve regression among compliant AIS patients eligible for bracing, i.e. curves of 25° to 40°. A similar effect was also found in patients with major curve sizes ranging from 40° to 60° when combined with scoliosis-specific exercises. There was also evidence showing that a low apical vertebral body height ratio, in-brace correction, smaller pre-brace Cobb angle, and daily pattern of brace-wear compliance predict curve regression after bracing. Conclusion. Bracing provides a corrective effect on scoliotic curves of AIS patients to achieve curve regression, given there is high compliance rate and the incorporation of exercises. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(3):286–292

Primary care physicians rely on radiology reports to confirm a scoliosis diagnosis and inform the need for spine specialist referral. In turn, spine specialists use these reports for triage decisions and planning of care. To be a valid predictor of disease and management, radiographic evaluation should include frontal and lateral views of the spine and a complete view of the pelvis, leading to accurate Cobb angle measurements and Risser staging. The study objectives were to determine 1) the adequacy of index images to inform treatment decisions at initial consultation by generating a score and 2) the utility of index radiology reports for appropriate triage decisions, by comparing reports to corresponding images. We conducted a retrospective chart and radiographic review including all idiopathic scoliosis patients seen for initial consultation, aged three to 18 years, between January 1-April 30, 2021. A score was generated based on the adequacy of index images to provide accurate Cobb angle measurements and determine skeletal maturity (view of full spine, coronal=two, lateral=one, pelvis=one, ribcage=one). Index images were considered inadequate if repeat imaging was necessary. Comparisons were made between index radiology report, associated imaging, and new imaging if obtained at initial consultation. Major discrepancies were defined by inter-reader difference >15°, discordant Risser staging, or inaccuracies that led to inappropriate triage decisions. Location of index imaging, hospital versus community-based private clinic, was evaluated as a risk factor for inadequate or discrepant imaging. There were 94 patients reviewed with 79% (n=74) requiring repeat imaging at initial consultation, of which 74% (n=55) were due to insufficient quality and/or visualization of the sagittal profile, pelvis or ribcage. Of index images available for review at initial consult (n=80), 41.2% scored five out of five and 32.5% scored two or below. New imaging showed that 50.0% of those patients had not been triaged appropriately, compared to 18.2% of patients with a full score. Comparing index radiology reports to initial visit evaluation with <60 days between imaging (n=49), discrepancies in Cobb angle were found in 24.5% (95% CI 14.6, 38.1) of patients, with 18.4% (95% CI 10.0, 31.4) categorized as major discrepancies. Risser stage was reported in only 14% of index radiology reports. In 13.8% (n=13) of the total cohort, surgical or brace treatment was recommended when not predicted based on index radiology report. Repeat radiograph (p=0.001, OR=8.38) and discrepancies (p=0.02, OR=7.96) were increased when index imaging was obtained at community-based private clinic compared to at a hospital. Re-evaluation of available index imaging demonstrated that 24.6% (95% CI 15.2, 37.1) of Cobb angles were mis-reported by six to 21 degrees. Most pre-referral paediatric spine radiographs are inadequate for idiopathic scoliosis evaluation. Standardization of spine imaging and reporting should improve measurement accuracy, facilitate triage and decrease unnecessary radiation exposure

Objectives: To determine the correlation between brace treatment and the brace tightness and treatment compliance. Design: A monitoring device [. 1. ] was designed to measure and record the time and temporal profile of the loads on the pressure pad imposed on the trunk during daily activity. The device consists of a programmable digital data acquisition system and a force transducer. Three light emitted diodes (LEDs) were used to indicate the tightness level below 80%, between 80 to 120%, and above 120% of the load level prescribed. Each subject used the indicator on the device to adjust the tightness of the brace so as to achieve the prescribed pad load. The prescribed pad load had been set by his/her physician after the transducer was installed. Subjects: Eighteen brace candidates, 3 males and 15 females age 13.6 ± 1.8 years, who had worn their braces from 6 months up to 1 year were recruited. All subjects gave their informed consent to participate in this study. The selection criteria were 1) diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis, 2) ages between 9 – 15 years and 3) prescribed brace treatment. The exclusion criteria were anyone who 1) had other musculoskeletal or neurological disorders, 2) refused to wear the brace, 3) was being weaned from treatment, or 4) was a surgical candidate. Twelve of eighteen subjects have completed their brace treatment. Loads were measured one sample per minute. These twelve subjects used the systems from 3 to 14 days (9.4 ± 4.9 days). All subjects reported that the time they wore their braces was not influenced by wearing the monitor. Outcome measures: The quality of the brace wear was assessed by how often the brace was worn with zero force (i.e., not worn), below 80%, between 80 to 120%, and above 120% of the load level prescribed in the clinic. The quantity of brace wear was determined by how many hours per day they wore their braces. Three treatment outcomes were defined: improvement, no change, and deterioration. Improvement was defined as a reduction of the Cobb angle, compared to the pre-brace measurement, by more than 5 degrees after weaning; no change was defined as a Cobb angle change of ± 5 degrees after weaning, and deterioration was defined as a Cobb increase greater than 5 degrees after weaning. Results: One subject had curve improvement, 7 subjects had no change and 4 subjects had curve deterioration. The improvement subject was 84% compliant and wore her brace above or in the target load range 62% of prescribed time. No change subjects were 70 ± 12.5% compliant and wore their braces above or in the target load range 40 ± 24% of prescribed time. Deterioration subjects were 64 ± 10% compliant and wore their braces above or in the target load range only 26 ± 9% of prescribed time. Conclusions: It appears that tightening the straps to the prescribed level and wearing the brace as much as the prescribed time is important for successful brace treatment. Simply wearing a brace is not enough; it has to be worn tightly and often

Spine and torso models were generated concurrently with x-rays for twenty-three patients undergoing scoliosis brace treatment. Clinical indices of spinal deformity and torso surface asymmetry indices were computed from models obtained when patient was first recruited and at approximately one year’s follow-up. Significant correction changes of the torso shape were detected in indices including orientation of cross-sectional principal axes of inertia (p=0.048) and Back Surface Rotation (p=0.08) though spinal corrections were from not significant to subtle (0.20_p_0.88). Trunk asymmetry should be assessed for an objective evaluation and understanding of the effect produced by a specific treatment. To assess changes in torso geometry and spinal deformity during treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with rigid brace. Relationship between torso surface geometry and spinal deformity when a rigid brace is applied is essential for better understanding of brace treatment mechanism and optimal application of external forces. Three-dimensional torso surface models were generated concurrently with postero-anterior x-rays for twenty-three patients undergoing scoliosis brace treatment, when first recruited and at approximately one year’s follow-up. Torso asymmetry indices describing principal axis orientation, back surface rotation, and asymmetry of the centroid line, left and right half-areas and the spinous process line were computed. The statistical paired t-Test (95% CI) was performed to test the probability that no difference exist after one year of treatment in both spinal and torso asymmetry indices. After one year follow-up patients showed a mean increase of only 2° for the major Cobb angle. This was consistent with not significant to subtle corrections found in clinical (p=0.88) and computed (p=0.75) Cobb angle, lateral deviation (p=0.20), orientation of plane of maximum deformity (p= 0.58) and maximum vertebral axial rotation (p=0.83). Furthermore, significant correction changes of the torso shape were detected in the orientation of cross-sectional principal axes (PAX) of inertia (p=0.048) and Back Surface Rotation (p=0.08). Here we have shown that we can acquire 3D torso surface and reliably measured a set of indices of transverse torso asymmetry. Future work will look at indication of predictive potential of torso surface indices. Funding: AHFMR, CIHR, Fraternal Order of Eagles, NSERC, GEOIDE

The efficiency of brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is correlated to how the brace has been worn. A smart orthosis was developed to maintain the interface pressure between the brace and the body within the prescribed range during daily activity. Six patients with scoliosis, with Cobb angles of 31 +/− 5 degrees, who were new brace candidates were recruited. They used the system for four weeks: two weeks with monitoring only and two weeks with an automatic feedback activated. The time that the pressure level was in target level range during the study period was increased from 53 +/− 9% to 68 +/− 14% with the feedback activated. This work helps brace candidates wear their braces more effectively and receive the most benefit from the brace treatment. As a result, all subjects who participated in the study maintained their Cobb angles within + two degrees during the study period. Brace correction based upon mechanical action requires appropriate interface pressure between the body and the brace. A smart orthosis was developed to record how much time (quantity) a brace was worn, how well (quality) it was used and how well the interface pressure was maintained to the prescribed level. Six subjects were recruited and they all were fitted with Boston style braces. Each subject wore the brace for 2 weeks without the force maintenance system activated to serve as the control period, and the remaining 2 weeks with the force maintenance system activated. During the automatic feedback mode, the pressure maintenance system was activated only during the daytime hours (8:00–22:00hrs) to avoid disturbing the patients during sleep. The subject could either return the system to us after 1 month or continue to use the system until the next clinic. The time that the pressure level was in the target level range during the study period was increased from 53 +/− 9% to 68 +/− 14% with the feedback activated. The average brace wear time for the study period was 72 +/− 15% (12.6hr/day) of the prescribed time (17.5 +/− 3.8 hours). The curve severity of all subjects on the following clinical visit was the same (within measurement error) as the first visit (32 +/− 5 vs 31 +/− 5 degrees). Compliance was not affected when wearing the monitor. The smart orthosis was able to improve the efficiency of a conventional brace by maintaining the prescribed interface pressure automatically. This project helps brace candidates wear their braces more effectively and gets the most benefit from the brace treatment. As a result, all participating subjects maintained their Cobb angle within +/− 2 degrees during the study period

To determine the pattern of brace wear compliance over time in both day and night time wear by using objective force measurements within the brace. Twenty subjects who were diagnosed of AIS, age between nine and fifteen years, and new to brace treatment were recruited in this study. To use the data for analysis, only subjects who used the brace for five hours continuously either in daytime or nighttime were considered. For daytime wear, the selected five hour intervals had to begin with an initial spike in force after a period of non-activity as recorded by the transducer, which would indicate that they had just put on the brace. At night, the measurements began at one am and ended at six am. Among the twenty subjects, only nine subjects’ data were used for daytime and eleven subjects’ data were used in nighttime. The average wear period was 11.4 ± 4.3 days for the day group, 11.6 ± 3.9 days for the night group. There was a statistically significant decrease in force within the first five hours of consecutive brace wear during daytime hours. The decrease was from 1.4 ± 0.6 (140% of prescribed force) in the first hour to 1.0 ± 0.6 in the fifth hour, a difference of 0.4, which is a 29% drop from the initial force. Most of the drop in force happened between hour one and hour two, as the difference in those two hours is 0.2 ± 0.1 (p = 0.001); between hours two and five the difference did not reach statistical significance. The observed difference between hours one and five for the night group was 0.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.06, which did not reach significance as well. Daytime forces in a Boston Brace tend to decrease over a period of time, but the nighttime forces seem to be maintained at the same level. These results show that daily adjustment of the brace tightness may be required to maintain the tightness level and the efficiency of brace treatment

The most important determinant in the treatment of malleolar fractures is stability. Stable fractures have an intact deep deltoid ligament and do not displace with functional treatment. If the deep deltoid/medial malleolar complex is disrupted, the talus is at risk of displacement. Weber (2010) showed that weightbearing radiographs predicted stability in patients with undisplaced ankle fractures. We developed clinical criteria for potential instability and applied them to a prospective series of patients. Criteria included: medial clear space of < 4mm; medial tenderness, bruising or swelling; a fibular fracture above the syndesmosis; a bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture; an open fracture; a high-energy fracture mechanism. A consecutive, prospectively documented series of 37 patients chose functional brace treatment of potentially unstable fractures. Weightbearing radiographs were performed in the brace before treatment, and free of brace at clinical union (6–9 weeks in all patients). Patients were encouraged to bear full weight and actively exercise their ankles in the brace. All fractures healed without displacement. The risk of displacement was 0% (95% CI 0–11.2%). This preliminary series gives support for the use of weightbearing radiographs to guide treatment of undisplaced ankle fractures

Aims

Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).