Aims. The main advantage of 3D-printed, off-the-shelf acetabular implants is the potential to promote enhanced bony fixation due to their controllable porous structure. In this study we investigated the extent of osseointegration in retrieved 3D-printed acetabular implants. Methods. We compared two groups, one made via 3D-printing (n = 7) and the other using conventional techniques (n = 7). We collected implant details, type of surgery and removal technique, patient demographics, and clinical history. Bone integration was assessed by macroscopic visual analysis, followed by sectioning to allow undecalcified histology on eight sections (~200 µm) for each implant. The outcome measures considered were area of bone attachment (%), extent of bone ingrowth (%), bone-implant contact (%), and depth of ingrowth (%), and these were quantified using a line-intercept method. Results. The two groups were matched for patient sex, age (61 and 63 years), time to revision (30 and 41 months), implant size (54 mm and 52 mm), and porosity (72% and 60%) (p > 0.152). There was no difference in visual bony attachment (p = 0.209). Histological analysis showed greater bone ingrowth in 3D-printed implants (p < 0.001), with mean bone attachment of 63% (SD 28%) and 37% (SD 20%), respectively. This was observed for all the outcome measures. Conclusion. This was the first study to investigate osseointegration in retrieved 3D-printed acetabular implants. Greater bone ingrowth was found in 3D-printed implants, suggesting that better osseointegration can be achieved. However, the influence of specific surgeon, implant, and patient factors needs to be considered. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):388–400

Aims. Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but serious. Few studies carried out on small cohorts have reported them in the literature. The aim of this work is to describe the specific characteristics of post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures, and the outcome of their surgical treatment in terms of function and complications. Methods. Patients with this type of fracture were identified retrospectively over a period of six years (January 2016 to December 2021). The following data were collected: demographic characteristics, date of insertion of the prosthesis, details of the intervention, date of the trauma, characteristics of the fracture, and type of treatment. Functional results were assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Data concerning complications of treatment were collected. Results. Our series included 20 patients, with a mean age of 77 years (46 to 90). All the patients had at least one comorbid condition. Radiographs showed that 75% of the fractures were pure transverse fractures, and a transverse component was present in 90% of patients. All our patients underwent surgical treatment: open reduction and internal fixation, revision of the acetabular component, or both. Mean follow-up was 24 months, and HHS at last follow-up was 75.5 (42 to 95). The principal complications observed were dislocations of the prosthesis (30%) and infections (20%). A need for revision surgery was noted in 30% of patients. No dislocation occurred in patients undergoing osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction. We did not note either mechanical loosening of the acetabular component nor thromboembolic complications. In all, 30% of patients presented acute anemia requiring transfusion, and one death was reported. Conclusion. Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures frequently have a transverse component that can destabilize the acetabular implant. The frequency of complications, principally dislocations, led to a high rate of revision surgery. Improvements in preoperative planning should make it possible to codify management to reduce this high rate of complications. The best results were obtained when the surgical strategy combined osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(1):28–36

Introduction: Double mobility acetabular implant has a semicircular shape, it is covered with hydroxyapatite, the entire surface has a thickness of 3 mm and its centers of rotation are shifted. The polyethylene employed is a high density one and it has some chanfers to avoid the cam effect. Methods and materials: We present the results o an homogeneous series of 200 patients, operated between 2003 and 2007. Clinical and radiographic parameters were analyzed prospectively. The mean follow-up was done during 15 months. Clinical results were evaluated by the HHS at the out patients clinics: previous and post surgery. Results: From the 200 patients operated (130 women-70 men / Mean age: 81 years old): 57,63% had a primary hip osteoarthritis; 5,77 % femoral necrosis ; 1,13 % rheumatoid arthritis; 16,95 % revision surgeries; 13,45% femoral neck fractures; 3,2% acetabular fractures y 1,5 % hip tumours. HHS before surgery was 45, 83 points on average (from 12 to 79) y post surgery HHS was 80, 03 points (from 37 to 100), increasing the total score after the arthroplasty in a mean of 34, 17 points. Post surgery complications were as follow: 3 dislocations (1 after an enormous fall and 2 in patients with Alzheimer. In our series there are 50 patients diagnosed of dementia-Alzheimer); 1 per prosthetic fracture (revision surgery); 4 deep infections (2 acute: lavage+ antibiotherapy; 2 late ones: spacer + antibiotherapy +second time surgery); 2 Deep vein thromboses (Eco Doppler +) ; 10 urinary infections; 2 urinary retentions and 17 deaths. Discussion: Double Mobility acetabular implant has shown good results in all the following indications: Revision surgery, hip osteoarthritis, femoral necrosis, Rheumatoid arthritis, femoral neck and acetabular fractures, hip tumours and as an implant for Computer Assisted Hip Surgery. Conclusions: The complications founded while this acetabular implant is used appeared with the same percentage than others. The dislocation rate is lower than standard acetabular implants, especially in patients with neuromuscular or cognitive illnesses. Those clinical results are hopeful and they could increase the number of actual indications (hip osteoarthritis in people over 70 years old, multiple illnesses associated, iterative dislocations…) for the double mobility implant on the future

Aims. Pelvic discontinuity is a rare but increasingly common complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This single-centre study evaluated the performance of custom-made triflange acetabular components in acetabular reconstruction with pelvic discontinuity by determining: 1) revision and overall implant survival rates; 2) discontinuity healing rate; and 3) Harris Hip Score (HHS). Methods. Retrospectively collected data of 38 patients (39 hips) with pelvic discontinuity treated with revision THA using a custom-made triflange acetabular component were analyzed. Minimum follow-up was two years (mean 5.1 years (2 to 11)). Results. There were eight subsequent surgical interventions. Two failures (5%) of the triflange acetabular components were both revised because of deep infection. There were seven (18%) patients with dislocation, and five (13%) of these were treated with a constraint liner. One patient had a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure. In 34 (92%) hips the custom-made triflange component was considered stable, with a healed pelvic discontinuity with no aseptic loosening at midterm follow-up. Mean HHS was 80.5 (48 to 96). Conclusion. The performance of the custom triflange implant in this study is encouraging, with high rates of discontinuity healing and osteointegration of the acetabular implant with no aseptic loosening at midterm follow-up. However, complications are not uncommon, particularly instability which we successfully addressed with constrained liners. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):867–876

Introduction. Most of studies on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) are focused on acetabular cup orientation. Even though the literature suggests that femoral anteversion and combined anteversion have a clinical impact on THA stability, there are not many reports on these parameters. Combined anteversion can be considered morphologically as the addition of anatomical acetabular and femoral anteversions (Anatomical Combined Anatomical Anteversion ACA). It is also possible to evaluate the Combined Functional Anteversion (CFA) generated by the relative functional position of femoral and acetabular implants while standing. This preliminary study is focused on the comparison of the anatomical and functional data in asymptomatic THA patients. Material and methods. 50 asymptomatic unilateral THA patients (21 short stems and 29 standard stems) have been enrolled. All patients underwent an EOS low dose evaluation in standing position. SterEOS software was used for the 3D measurements of cup and femur orientation. Cup anatomical anteversion (CAA) was computed as the cup anteversion in axial plane perpendicular to the Anterior Pelvic Plane. Femoral anatomical anteversion (FAA) was computed as the angle between the femoral neck axis and the posterior femoral condyles in a plane perpendicular to femoral mechanical axis. Functional anteversions for the cup (CFA) and femur (FFA) were measured in the horizontal axial patient plane in standing position. Both anatomical and functional cumulative anteversions were calculated as a sum. All 3D measures were evaluated and compared for the repeatability and reproducibility. Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U-test considering the non-normal distribution of data and the short number of patients (<30 for each group). Results. Functional cumulative anteversion was significantly higher than anatomical cumulative anteversion for all groups (p<0.05). No significant difference could be noted between the cases according to the use of short or standard stems. Conclusion. This study shows the difference of functional implant orientation as compared to the anatomical measurements. This preliminary study has limitations. First the limited sample of patients. Then this series only includes asymptomatic subjects. Nevertheless, this work focused on the feasibility of the measurements shows the potential interest of a functional analysis of cumulated anteversion. Standing position influences the relative position of THA implants according to the frontal and sagittal orientation of the pelvis. The relevance of these functional measurements in instability cases must be demonstrated, especially in patients with anterior subluxation in standing position which is potentially associated with pelvic adaptative extension. Further studies are needed for the feasibility of measurements on EOS images in sitting position and their analysis in case of instability. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Aseptic acetabular component failure rates have been reported to be similar or even slightly higher than femoral component failure. Obtaining proper initial stability by press fitting the cementless acetabular cup into an undersized cavity is crucial to allow for secondary osseous integration. However, finding the insertion endpoint that corresponds to an optimal initial stability is challenging. This in vitro study presents an alternative method that allows tracking the insertion progress of acetabular implants in a non-destructive, real-time manner. Materials and Methods. A simplified acetabular bone model was used for a series of insertion experiments. The bone model consisted of polyurethane solid foam blocks (Sawbones #1522-04 and #1522-05) into which a hemispherical cavity and cylindrical wall, representing the acetabular rim, were machined using a computer numerically controlled (CNC) milling machine (Haas Automation Inc., Oxnard, CA, USA). Fig. 1 depicts the bone model and setup used. A total of 10 insertions were carried out, 5 on a low density block, 5 on a high density block. The acetabular cups were press fitted into the bone models by succeeding hammer hits. The acceleration of the implant-insertor combination was measured using 2 shock accelerometers mounted on the insertor during the insertion process (PCB 350C03, PCB Depew, NY, USA). The force applied to the implant-insertor combination was also measured. 15 hammer hits were applied per insertion experiment. Two features were extracted from the acceleration time signal; total signal energy (E) and signal length (LS). Two features and one correlation measure were extracted from the acceleration frequency spectra; the relative signal power in the low frequency band (PL, from 500–2500Hz) and the signal power in the high frequency band (P Hf, from 4000–4800 Hz). The changes in the low frequency spectra (P Lf, from 500–2500 Hz) between two steps were tracked by calculating the Frequency Response Assurance Criterion (FRAC). Force features similar to the ones proposed by Mathieu et al., 2013 were obtained from the force time data. The convergence behavior of the features was tracked as insertion progressed. Results. Differences were noted visually between the acceleration data recorded at the beginning of insertion and towards the end, both in the time domain (fig. 2A) as well as in the frequency domain (fig. 2B). These differences were also captured by the proposed features. Fig. 3 shows a typical representation of how the time (A), frequency (B) and force (C) features evolved during insertion. Based on a simple convergence criterion, the insertion endpoint could be determined. Conclusions. The convergence behavior, and the insertion endpoint thus identified, of the force-based and acceleration based features correlated well. The different features capture the changes in damping and stiffness of the implant-bone system that are occurring as the insertion progresses and combining them improves the robustness of the endpoint detection method. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Purpose:

Crosslinking of polyethylene has become synonymous with longevity in total hip replacement. In the USA 70–85% of all polyethylene cups underwent crosslinking since 2008. Three publications appeared in the autumn 2011 volume of the “SA Orthopaedic Journal,” on the 10–33 year follow-up of the original SA crosslinked implant. The purpose of this study is to illustrate and confirm statistically, the improvement of the bone cement interface, provided that wear of polyethylene can be reduced to an absolute minimum.

Introduction: Acetabular loosening can limit long-term success of total hip replacement. There are at least 62 different prosthesis designs available in the UK, many of which have no long term results. Revision surgery is expensive, challenging and potentially dangerous. There is still currently debate about the best method of acetabular fixation, in particular, regarding the use of press fit devices in elderly osteoporotic bone. Our study aims to test the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in outcome between cemented and non-cemented acetabular fixation in this group of patients.

Methods: Patients over 72 years of age were prospectively randomised to receive either a cemented Exeter cup or a HA coated press fit cementless cup. Both groups received a cemented Exeter stem. The patients were assessed pre-operatively and reviewed at 6 weeks, 6 months and yearly in a research clinic, by an independent observer. Outcome measures were the Merle D’Aubignon Postel, Oxford Hip and Visual analogue pain scores. The implants were also assessed radiographically and all complications were recorded.

Results: To date 151 patients have been recruited into the trial. 2 year data is available for 69 patients. There were no differences in satisfaction, pain or hip scores between the groups.

There have been no major surgical complications. In particular, there have been no failures of acetabular fixation, dislocations or deep infections.

Discussion: There have been no failures in either group. Although there is insufficient data at this stage to reject our null hypothesis, there is no early evidence for concern in using cementless cups in elderly patients.

Purpose of the study: When the acetabular component is revised alone, if the femoral stem has not been loosened, the question becomes what should be done about the osteolysis of the femur: Change the femoral piece systematically and graft the osteolysis? Curettage and grafting of the osteolysis? Curettage alone? This study reports the outcome of superior femoral osteolysis with a calcar granuloma and no other procedure (no curettage) after replacing the cup.

Material and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 54 acetabular revisions performed from 1988 to 1998. The cemented femoral piece was stable, with no lucent line and in position since the initial implantation. The reoperation consisted in cementing a new polyethylene cup (< 32 mm) with or without a graft. The femoral head was initially ceramic (alumina 29 and zircon 25) and was preserved in ten cases (alumina) and changed systematically for the zircon heads. New heads were implanted: 20 alumina (32mm) and 24 metal. Calcar osteolysis was measured in mm² on the x-rays before and after changing the acetabular piece and then regularly every year to last follow-up (10 to 20 years).

Results: Preoperatively, superior femoral osteolysis was 156 mm² (48–576m²) situated in Guren zone 1 and 7. At last follow-up, it was 135 mm² (38–616 mm²) with no femoral loosening, decreased in 34 cases, unchanged in 11 and increased in 9. Spontaneous decline in preoperative osteolysis was observed when the bearing was alumina-polyethylne and the preoperative osteolysis was less than 100 mm². Increased osteolysis (minor but undeniable) was observed with the couple was metal-polyethylene and when the preoperative osteolysis was > 300 mm².

Discussion: If the superior femoral osteolysis does not compromise the stability of the femoral implant when undertaking isolated revision of the acetabular component alone, it can be neglected. Changing the bearing stabilizes the progression of the osteolysis and does not appear to compromise the mid-term outcome (15 years) for the femoral piece. Spontaneous decline of the osteolysis can be observed if the initial osteolysis is less than 1 cm² and if the new bearing is alumina-polyethylene.

Background. Complications such as dislocations, impingement and early wear following total hip arthroplasty (THA) increase with acetabular cup implant malorientation. These errors are more common with low-volume centres or in novice hands. Currently, this skill is most commonly taught during real surgery with an expert trainer, but simulated training may offer a safer and more accessible solution. This study investigated if a novel MicronTracker® enhanced Microsoft HoloLens® augmented reality (EAR) headset was as effective as one-on-one expert surgeon (ES) training for teaching novice surgeons hip cup orientation skill. Methods. Twenty-four medical students were randomly assigned to EAR or ES training groups. Participants used a modified sawbone/foam pelvis model for hip cup orientation simulation. A validated EAR headset measured the orientation of acetabular cup implants and displayed this in the participant”s field of view. The system calculated the difference between planned and achieved orientation as a solid-angle error. Six different inclination and anteversion combinations, related to hypothetical patient-specific anatomy, were used as target orientations. Learning curves were measured over four sessions, each one week apart. Error in orientations of non-taught angles and during a concealed pelvic tilt were measured to assess translation of skills. A post-test questionnaire was used for qualitative analysis of procedure understanding and participant experience. Results. Novice surgeons of similar experience in both groups performed with a similar error prior to training (ES: 15.7°±6.9°, EAR: 14.2°±7.1°, p>0.05). During training, EAR participants were guided to significantly better orientation errors than ES (ES: 6.0°±3.4°, EAR: 1.1°±0.9°, p<0.001). After four training sessions, the orientation error in both groups significantly reduced (ES: 15.7°±6.9° to 8.2°±4.6°, p<0.001; EAR: 14.2°±7.0° to 9.6°±5.7°, p<0.001). Participants in both groups achieved the same levels of orientation accuracy in non-taught angles and when the pelvis was tilted (p>0.05). In post-training evaluation, participants expressed a preference towards ES rather than EAR for learning orientation skills and related visuospatial and procedure-specific skills. 79% of participants indicated EAR simulator training and ES in combination would be their preferred training method. Discussion. A novel head-mounted EAR platform delivered training to novice surgeons more accurately than an expert surgeon. Both EAR and ES enabled novices to acquire and retain skills on a learning curve to orientate the implant. These skills were translated to non-taught orientations and in the presence of a pelvic tilt. Conclusions. Augmented-reality simulators may be a feasible and valid method for teaching novice surgeon”s visuospatial skills for THA on a learning curve, to compliment traditional intraoperative training

Background

Trust in the validity of a measurement tool is critical to its function in both clinical and educational settings. Acetabular cup malposition within total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to increased dislocation rates, impingement and increased wear as a result of edge loading. We have developed a THA simulator incorporating a foam/Sawbone pelvis model with a modified Microsoft HoloLens® augmented reality (AR) headset. We aimed to measure the trueness, precision, reliability and reproducibility of this platform for translating spatial measurements of acetabular cup orientation to angular values before developing it as a training tool.

We investigated the revision rates of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joint Registry (NJR) by types of bearing surfaces used. We analysed THR procedures across all orthopaedic units in England and Wales. Our analyses estimated all-cause and cause-specific revision rates. We identified primary THRs with heads and monobloc cups or modular acetabular component THRs with head and shell/liner combinations. We used flexible parametric survival models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). A total of 1,026,481 primary THRs performed between 2003–2019 are included in the primary analysis (Monobloc: n=378,979 and Modular: n=647,502) with 20,869 (2%) of these primary THRs subsequently undergoing a revision episode (Monobloc: n=7,381 and Modular: n=13,488). Compared to implants with a cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HCLPE) cup, the all-cause risk of revision for monobloc acetabular implant was higher for patients with cobalt chrome or stainless steel head and non-HCLPE cup. The risk of revision was lower for patients with a delta ceramic head and HCLPE cup implant, at any post-operative period. Compared to patients with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner primary THR, the all-cause risk of revision for modular acetabular implant varied non-constantly. THRs with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and HCLPE liner had a lower risk of revision throughout the entire post-operative period. The all-cause and indication-specific risk of prosthesis revision, at different time points following the initial implantation, is lower for implants with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and a HCLPE liner/cup than commonly used alternatives such as cobalt chrome heads and HCLPE liner/cup

Hip bearing surfaces materials are typically broadly reported in national registry (metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic etc). We investigated the revision rates of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joint Registry (NJR) by detailed types of bearing surfaces used. We analysed THR procedures across all orthopaedic units in England and Wales. Our analyses estimated all-cause and cause-specific revision rates. We identified primary THRs with heads and monobloc cups or modular acetabular component THRs with detailed head and shell/liner bearing material combinations. We used flexible parametric survival models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). A total of 1,026,481 primary THRs performed between 2003–2019 were included in the primary analysis (Monobloc cups: n=378,979 and Modular cups: n=647,502) with 20,869 (2%) of these primary THRs subsequently undergoing a revision episode (Monobloc: n=7,381 and Modular: n=13,488). Compared to implants with a cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HCLPE) cup, the overall risk of revision for monobloc acetabular implant was higher for patients with cobalt chrome or stainless steel head and non-HCLPE cup. The risk of revision was lower for patients with a delta ceramic head and HCLPE cup implant, at any post-operative period. Compared to patients with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner primary THR, the overall risk of revision for modular acetabular implant varied non-constantly. THRs with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and HCLPE liner had a lower risk of revision throughout the entire post-operative period. The overall and indication-specific risk of prosthesis revision, at different time points following the initial implantation, is reduced for implants with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and a HCLPE liner/cup in reference to THRs with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner/cup

We present the indications and outcomes of a series of custom 3D printed titanium acetabular implants used over a 9 year period at our institution (Sydney, Australia), in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty. Individualised image-based case planning with additive manufacturing of pelvic components was combined with screw fixation and off-the-shelf femoral components to treat patients presenting with failed hip arthroplasty involving acetabular bone loss. Retrospective chart review was performed on the practices of three contributing surgeons, with an initial search by item number of the Medicare Benefits Scheme linked to a case list maintained by the manufacturer. An analysis of indications, patient demographics and clinical outcome was performed. The cohort comprised 65.2% female with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range 61–77) and a median follow up of 32.9 months (IQR 13.1 - 49.7). The indications for surgery were infection (12.5%); aseptic loosening (78.1%) and fracture (9.4%), with 65.7% of cases undergoing previous revision hip arthroplasty. A tumour prosthesis was implanted into the proximal femur in 21.9% of cases. Complications were observed in 31.3% of cases, with four cases requiring revision procedures and no deaths reported in this series. Kaplan-Meier analysis of all-cause revision revealed an overall procedure survival of 88.7% at two years (95%confidence interval 69 - 96.2) and 83.8% (95%CI 62 - 93.7) at five years, with pelvic implant-specific survival of 98% (95%CI 86.6 - 99.7) at two and five year follow up. We conclude that an individualised planning approach for custom 3D printed titanium acetabular implants can provide high overall and implant-specific survival at up to five years follow up in complex cases of failed hip arthroplasty and acetabular bone loss

Aims. Large acetabular bone defects encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are challenging to restore. Metal constructs for structural support are combined with bone graft materials for restoration. Autograft is restricted due to limited volume, and allogenic grafts have downsides including cost, availability, and operative processing. Bone graft substitutes (BGS) are an attractive alternative if they can demonstrate positive remodelling. One potential product is a biphasic injectable mixture (Cerament) that combines a fast-resorbing material (calcium sulphate) with the highly osteoconductive material hydroxyapatite. This study reviews the application of this biomaterial in large acetabular defects. Methods. We performed a retrospective review at a single institution of patients undergoing revision THA by a single surgeon. We identified 49 consecutive patients with large acetabular defects where the biphasic BGS was applied, with no other products added to the BGS. After placement of metallic acetabular implants, the BGS was injected into the remaining bone defects surrounding the new implants. Patients were followed and monitored for functional outcome scores, implant fixation, radiological graft site remodelling, and revision failures. Results. Mean follow-up was 39.5 months (36 to 71), with a significant improvement in post-revision function compared to preoperative function. Graft site remodelling was rated radiologically as moderate in 31 hips (63%) and strong in 12 hips (24%). There were no cases of complete graft site dissolution. No acetabular loosening was identified. None of the patients developed clinically significant heterotopic ossification. There were twelve reoperations: six patients developed post-revision infections, three experienced dislocations, two sustained periprosthetic femur fractures, and one subject had femoral component aseptic loosening. Conclusion. Our series reports bone defect restoration with the sole use of a biphasic injectable BGS in the periacetabular region. We did not observe significant graft dissolution. We emphasize that successful graft site remodelling requires meticulous recipient site preparation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(12):991–997

Introduction and Objective. The patients with a total hip arthroplasty is growing in world manly in Europe and USA, and this solution present a high success at 10years in several orthopaedic registers. The application of total press-fit hip fixation presents the most used solution, but presents some failures associated to the acetabular component fixation, associated to the load transfer and bone loss at long term. The aim of this work is to investigate the influence of different acetabular bone loss in the strain distribution in iliac bone. To evaluate implant fixation, an experimental study was performed using acetabular press-fit component simulating different acetabular bone loss and measuring the strain distribution. Materials and Methods. The experimental samples developed was based in an iliac bone model of Sawbones supplier and a acetabular component Titanium (Stryker) in a condition press-fit fixation and was implanted according surgical procedure with 45º inclination angle and 20º in the anteversion angle. Were developed five models with same initial bone, one with intact condition simulating the cartilage between bones and four with different bone loss around the acetabular component. These four models representing the evolution of bone support of acetabular components presented in the literature. The evolution of bone loss was imposed with a CAD CAM process in same iliac bone model. The models were instrumented with 5 rosettes in critical region at the cortical bone to measure the strain evolution along the process. Results. The results of strain gauges present the influence of acetabular component implantation, reducing the bone strains and presented the effect of the strain shielding. The acetabular component works as a shield in the load transfer. The critical region is the posterior region with highest principal strains and the strain effect was observed with different bone loss around acetabular component. The maximum value of principal strain was observed in the intact condition in the anterior region, with 950μ∊. In the posterior superior region, the effect of bone loss is more important presenting a reduction of 500% in the strains. The effect of bone loss is presented in the strains induced with acetabular implantation, in the first step of implantation the maximum strain was 950μ∊ and in the last model the value was 50μ∊, indicating lower press-fit fixation. Conclusions. The models developed allows study the effect of bone loss and acetabular implant fixation in the load transfer at the hip articulation. The results presented a critical region as the anterior-superior and the effect of strain shielding was observed in comparison with intact articulation. The results of press-fit fixation present a reduction of implant stability along bone loss. The process of bone fixation developed present some limitation associated to the bone adhesion in the interface, not considered. Acknowledgement. This work was supported by POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032486,– FCT, by the FEDER, with COMPETE2020 - (POCI), FCT/M

Literature data show varying rates of aseptic loosening of standard hemispherical cups after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). In order to improve the results regarding the frequency of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component, we decided to use custom-made acetabular implants (CMAI) in this category of patients. The aim of our study was to report outcomes after primary THA using CMAI in patients with Crowe IV DDH. We retrospectively analyzed the results of primary THA using the CMAI in 58 hips. The mean follow-up period was 5.2 years (range 4.2 – 6.3). Patients demonstrated improved functional outcomes according to the Oxford Hip Score: preoperatively 16.9 and postoperatively 38.5 (P < 0.05). Revisions were performed in 2 cases due to dislocations, in 1 case due to nonunion of the greater trochanter and in 1 case due to chronic pain syndrome caused by contact of the CMAI flange with the iliopsoas muscle. In a patient with chronic pain syndrome, during the revision, the pubic flange of the CMAI, which was in contact with the iliopsoas muscle, was removed. There were no radiological signs of loosening of the CMAI. The use of CMAI shows good results in patients with DDH. Extended capability for supplementary screw fixation is an excellent feature of such implants, allowing them to obtain reliable primary fixation. Further observation is required to assess CMAI in the long-term follow-up

Increasing the accuracy of information provided through X-Rays maximises pre-operative planning. Aim of this project is to determine the necessity of calibration probes that would improve the accuracy of pre-operative templating. This is a retrospective study involving leg length and pelvis X-Rays performed across the NHS Lanarkshire from 01/03/2023 until 31/04/2024. A total of 87 leg length X-Rays were identified, 18 had a calibration probe present. Leg length was measured on each and the X-Rays were calibrated against the existing probe. In 66.7% of cases there was a major leg length discrepancy of over 2cm between the pre-calibrated and post-calibrated X-Rays. Pelvic X-Rays of 80 patients that underwent total hip replacement were reviewed. Preoperative templating was compared to the implants inserted. An average of 1.94 discrepancy in the size of the acetabular implant was identified whilst in 30 cases the size of the femoral stem was incorrect by at least 1 size. Magnification of 119.7% on X-Rays was found to provide the most accurate templating. Seventy seven cases of pelvic X-Rays before and after hip hemiarthroplasty were also reviewed. The implant head was templated incorrectly in 74% of cases and the stem in 51%. It was identified that pelvic X-Ray magnification of 121.7% would provide the most accurate results. X-Rays with no calibration probes provide inaccurate measurements leading to faulty preoperative planning. Standardised use of a calibration sphere is strongly suggested and whenever that is not available, we suggest magnification of 121%

Introduction. Acetabular component loosening with associated bone loss is a challenge in revision hip arthroplasty. Trabecular Metal (TM) by Zimmer Biomet has been shown to have greater implant survivorship for all-cause acetabular revision in small cohort retrospective studies. Our study aims to review outcomes of acetabular TM implants locally. Method. This is a retrospective observational study using data from Auckland City and North Shore Hospitals from 1st of January 2010 to 31st of December 2020. Primary outcome is implant survivorship (re-revision acetabular surgery for any cause) demonstrated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary outcome is indication for index revision and re-revision surgery. Multivariate analysis used to identify statistically significant factors for re-revision surgery. Results. 225 cases used acetabular TM implants (shells and/or augments) over 10 years. Indications include aseptic loosening (63%), instability (15%) and infection (13%). Of these, 12% (n=28) had further re-revision for infection (54%) and instability (21%). Median time to re-revision was 156 days (range 11 – 2022). No cases of re-revision were due to failure of bony ingrowth or acetabular component loosening. Ethnicity, smoking status, and age were not risk factors for re-revision procedures. Additionally, previous prosthetic joint infection, ethnicity, sex and age were not significant risk factors for re-revision due to infection. Implant survivorship was 80% at 1 year, 71% at 5 years and 64% at 10 years. Discussion. Main indications for re-revision were infection and instability. Demographic factors and co-morbidities did not correlate with increased re-revision risk. Survivorship is poorer compared to cumulative survivorship reported by the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Explanations are multifactorial and possibly contributed by underestimation of true revision rates by registry data. Conclusions. We need to identify alternate causes for poorer survivorship and review the role of TM implants in acetabular revision within our specified population

Aims. Periprosthetic fracture and implant loosening are two of the major reasons for revision surgery of cementless implants. Optimal implant fixation with minimal bone damage is challenging in this procedure. This pilot study investigates whether vibratory implant insertion is gentler compared to consecutive single blows for acetabular component implantation in a surrogate polyurethane (PU) model. Methods. Acetabular components (cups) were implanted into 1 mm nominal under-sized cavities in PU foams (15 and 30 per cubic foot (PCF)) using a vibratory implant insertion device and an automated impaction device for single blows. The impaction force, remaining polar gap, and lever-out moment were measured and compared between the impaction methods. Results. Impaction force was reduced by 89% and 53% for vibratory insertion in 15 and 30 PCF foams, respectively. Both methods positioned the component with polar gaps under 2 mm in 15 PCF foam. However, in 30 PCF foam, the vibratory insertion resulted in a clinically undesirable polar gap of over 2 mm. A higher lever-out moment was achieved with the consecutive single blow insertion by 42% in 15 PCF and 2.7 times higher in 30 PCF foam. Conclusion. Vibratory implant insertion may lower periprosthetic fracture risk by reducing impaction forces, particularly in low-quality bone. Achieving implant seating using vibratory insertion requires adjustment of the nominal press-fit, especially in denser bone. Further preclinical testing on real bone tissue is necessary to assess whether its viscoelasticity in combination with an adjusted press-fit can compensate for the reduced primary stability after vibratory insertion observed in this study. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(6):272–278