Aims

The mean age of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has reduced with time. Younger patients have increased expectations following TKA. Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is the most common cause of failure of TKA in the UK. Interest in cementless TKA has re-emerged due to its encouraging results in the younger patient population. We review a large series of tantalum trabecular metal cementless implants in patients who are at the highest risk of revision surgery.

Aims

The survival of humeral hemiarthroplasties in patients with relatively intact glenoid cartilage could theoretically be extended by minimizing the associated postoperative glenoid erosion. Ceramic has gained attention as an alternative to metal as a material for hemiarthroplasties because of its superior tribological properties. The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro wear performance of ceramic and metal humeral hemiarthroplasties on natural glenoids.

Aims. The use of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to delay total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in young patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and constitutional deformity remains debated. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of TKA after HTO compared to TKA without HTO, using the time from the index OA surgery as reference (HTO for the study group, TKA for the control group). Methods. This was a case-control study of consecutive patients receiving a posterior-stabilized TKA for OA between 1996 and 2010 with previous HTO. A total of 73 TKAs after HTO with minimum ten years’ follow-up were included. Cases were matched with a TKA without previous HTO for age at the time of the HTO. All revisions were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using revision of metal component as the endpoint. The Knee Society Score, range of motion, and patient satisfaction were assessed. Results. Mean follow-up was 13 years (SD 3) after TKA in both groups. The 20-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 98.6% in TKA post-HTO group (HTO as timing reference) and 81.4% in control group (TKA as timing reference) (p = 0.030). There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, and complications at the last follow-up. Conclusion. At the same delay from index surgery (HTO or TKA), a strategy of HTO followed by TKA had superior knee survivorship compared to early TKA at long term in young patients. Level of evidence: III. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(2):62–71

Aims. Controversy about the use of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) in young arthritic patients relates to which is the ideal form of fixation for the glenoid component: cemented or cementless. This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of aTSA when used in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), and to compare the survival of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed glenoid components. Materials and Methods. A total of 69 consecutive aTSAs were performed in 67 patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Their mean age at the time of surgery was 54 years (35 to 60). Of these aTSAs, 46 were undertaken using a cemented polyethylene component and 23 were undertaken using a cementless metal-backed component. The age, gender, preoperative function, mobility, premorbid glenoid erosion, and length of follow-up were comparable in the two groups. The patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at a mean of 10.3 years (5 to 12, . sd. 26) postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision as the endpoint. Results. A total of 26 shoulders (38%) underwent revision surgery: ten (22%) in the polyethylene group and 16 (70%) in the metal-backed group (p < 0.0001). At 12 years’ follow-up, the rate of implant survival was 74% (. sd.  0.09) for polyethylene components and 24% (. sd.  0.10) for metal-backed components (p < 0.0002). Glenoid loosening or failure was the indication for revision in the polyethylene group, whereas polyethylene wear with metal-on-metal contact, instability, and insufficiency of the rotator cuff were the indications for revision in the metal-backed group. Preoperative posterior subluxation of the humeral head with a biconcave/retroverted glenoid (Walch B2) had an adverse effect on the survival of a metal-backed component. Conclusion. The survival of a cemented polyethylene glenoid component is three times higher than that of a cementless metal-backed glenoid component ten years after aTSA in patients aged < 60 years with primary glenohumeral OA. Patients with a biconcave (B2) glenoid have the highest risk of failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:485–92

Ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearing surfaces have consistently demonstrated reliable clinical results with when coupled with appropriated designed femoral stems and acetabular shells. Ceramic bearing surfaces are highly wettable and display both boundary and hydrodynamic fluid-film lubrication modes, which lead to extremely low wear rates. Furthermore, COC bearing couples have been shown to exhibit virtually no risk of adverse biologic reaction and have not been associated with corrosion-induced adverse tissue reactions that occur with metal taper junctions, particularly head-neck taper junctions. The relative brittleness of ceramics initially was thought to be a major disadvantage; however, four decades of improvement in the manufacture of ceramics and rigorous proof testing has led an extremely low risk of fracture, perhaps lower than that for cross-linked polyethylene. More recently it has become increasing appreciated that nearly all revisions for squeaking have been restricted to specific designs and materials, including the use of a titanium elevated metal rim on the acetabular side, and more flexible femoral components made of a beta-titanium alloy (TMZF) which had thin necks and relative small tapers. Multiple clinical studies document excellent long-term survival of COC bearing couples in young patients with revision for any reason as the primary endpoint. Our own experience with 341 hips with 2 to 15 and average 9.1 year f/u demonstrates a 95% overall survivorship (revision for any reason) at 13 years in patients under 50 years of age at the time of surgery. By contrast, cross-linked polyethylene bearings have not been studied so carefully and have not been shown to be superior to ceramic-ceramic bearings in young patients. These bearing surfaces represent a very heterogeneous group of products, with varying degrees of cross-linking, post-irradiation processing methods, and additives. Cross-linked polyethylenes in general have a lower fatigue strength than conventional polyethylene and are prone to fracture, especially when thin material is subjected to high stress. Some types of cross-linked polyethylenes are prone to in vivo oxidation, leading to further mechanical compromise over time. Studies also demonstrate the absence of reduction in femoral head penetration or risk of osteolysis in heads 32mm and larger, which are commonly used today. The most recent cross-linked polyethylene products have the least clinical support for their use. The long-term biologic effects of the smaller HXLPE wear particles and newer additives, including the more recently added vitamin E compounds are unknown. Indeed, in vitro, the debris has been shown to be cytotoxic. There is a paucity of survivorship data for hips utilising HXLPE, especially in younger, more active individuals. For these reasons, we believe that the ceramic-ceramic bearings are the gold standard for THA in the young patient and that cross-linked polyethylene bearing are being continually changed and have little long term clinical outcomes data to support their use

The most appropriate bearings in young patients remain highly debated. The aim of this metaanalysis was to summaries the best available evidence on relative success of the three most popular bearings [metal-on-poly (MOP), metal-on-metal (MOM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC)] used in total hip replacement (THR) in young active patients. All the relevant studies published in the English language were retrieved. Studies with THR in patients with mean age less than 55 years of age were selected. The survivorship analysis for the three important bearings at 10 years was evaluated. Ten-year survival rates suggest that MOM bearings performed significantly better than MOP (p=0.01) and COC (p=0.001). MOP revealed higher survival rates than COC bearings (p=0.05). Our findings support the use of MOM bearings in the management of the young arthritic hip. These findings, largely based upon observational studies should be taken in context to the limitations of such non-randomized study designs

Introduction. The treatment of glenohumeral arthritis in a young patient poses a significant challenge. Factors that affect decision making include higher activity levels, greater expectations, and concerns of implant longevity. Conflicting results have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to report on our results for resurfacing of the humeral head combined with a biologic glenoid resurfacing using a soft tissue allograft for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Methods. From 2003 to 2009 a retrospective multi-center review of 15 humeral and biologic glenoid resurfacing procedures with a mean age of 36.5 yrs. was performed. Indications for surgery included a diagnosis of glenohumeral arthritis non-responsive to conservative treatment. Exclusion criteria included major glenoid osseous deficiency, advanced rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic infection. Results. Mean follow-up of 57.1 months showed that on average active forward elevation improved from 126.8° to 136° and external rotation improved from 27.1° to 35.3°. The mean pre-operative and post-operative VAS score only improved from 7.9 to 5.1. Five (29%) patients were converted a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) at an average of 24 months with no complications in the remaining patients. Discussion. The clinical outcome of humeral head resurfacing with soft tissue resurfacing of the glenoid has not yielded encouraging results, as both pain and function are not significantly improved. Due to the disappointing results of this procedure and high revision rate, it is no longer these authors primary treatment option for OA in the young. Determining the optimal treatment for osteoarthritis in the young patient is still being investigated

Due to issues related to osteolysis which became increasingly evident in the 1990's, approaches to combat wear focused upon either improving ultra-high molecular grade polyethylene or to abandon it and employ alternative bearings: metal upon metal or ceramic upon ceramic (COC). Ceramics have played a role in hip bearings for decades with much of the experience coming from Europe. While there is consistent evidence of low wear rates in this bearing couple due to its surface hardness, wettability and resultant low friction, problems unique to this bearing couple were noted: a small but real incidence of fracture, surface damage due to metal transfer and stripe wear as well as the unique issue of squeaking. What we have learned is that these hard bearings (either COC or Metal on Metal) despite being able to use larger diameter heads, are exquisitely sensitive to component position and orientation. With the tremendous improvements in 2nd and now 3rd generation crosslinked polyethylenes demonstrating vastly reduced wear rates and having none of the issues of fracture, stripe wear, or squeaking, it remains unclear what role ceramic bearings have in modern use. Until the aforementioned issues are resolved, ceramic on ceramic bearings in the young patient should be used with caution. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: incidence of instability and noise

Introduction. The management of young patients with painful medial compartment osteoarthritis remains controversial. Opening wedge medial high-tibial osteotomy using a locking plate has shown good results in selected patients. This cohort of patients has high physical demands and previous studies have warned against operating on patients with increased body mass index (BMI). Patients and Methods. Thirty-five patients undergoing valgus high tibial osteotomy between Oct 2004 and Feb 2010. Surgical outcome was assessed using Oxford Knee score, pre- and post-operative pain scores, change in employment and patient satisfaction. Results. Mean age at the time of surgery was 41 (22 to 62), mean BMI was 30.9 (21 to 43) and mean Oxford score was 37/48 (16 to 48). Patients rated their overall satisfaction as 7.9/10. Three patients were lost to follow-up, two patients died of unrelated disease. Fifteen (50%) patients had heavy manual jobs and of these 12 (80%) returned to their previous employment post-operatively within 6 months. Seven patients had a BMI > 35 (Mean 39) with a mean weight of 126 Kg (105Kg to 144Kg). These patients had a mean Oxford Score of 42/48 and overall satisfaction of 90%. Pain improved from 8.4/10 pre-op to 1.5/10 post-op (P < 0.0001). None had further procedures. Conclusion. Opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy offers a successful alternative treatment of medial osteoarthritis in young patients with high BMI who place high demands on their knees

Introduction. The management of young patients with painful medial compartment osteoarthritis remains controversial. Opening wedge medial high-tibial osteotomy using a locking plate has shown good results in selected patients. This cohort of patients has high physical demands and previous studies have warned against operating on patients with increased body mass index (BMI). Patients and Methods. Thirty five patients undergoing valgus high tibial osteotomy between Oct 2004 and Feb 2010. Surgical outcome was assessed using Oxford Knee score, pre- and post-operative pain scores, change in employment and patient satisfaction. Results. Mean age at the time of surgery was 41 (22 to 62), mean BMI was 30.9 (21 to 43) and mean Oxford score was 37/48 (16 to 48). Patients rated their overall satisfaction as 7.9/10. Three patients were lost to follow-up, two patients died of unrelated disease. Fifteen (50%) patients had heavy manual jobs and of these 12 (80%) returned to their previous employment post-operatively within 6 months. Seven patients had a BMI > 35 (Mean 39) with a mean weight of 126 Kg (105Kg to 144Kg). These patients had a mean Oxford Score of 42/48 and overall satisfaction of 90%. Pain improved from 8.4/10 pre-op to 1.5/10 post-op (P < 0.0001). None had further procedures. Conclusion. Opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy offers a successful alternative treatment of medial osteoarthritis in young patients with high BMI who place high demands on their knees

A prospective study of Charnley low friction arthroplasty in patients under the age of 51 at the time of surgery. 1092 patients, 668 women and 424 men, mean age 41 years (12–51) at the time of surgery had 1434 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties carried out between November 1962 and December 1990. At mean follow-up 14.2 years (1 – 32), 742 patients (973 hips) are still attending and patients’ satisfaction with the outcome is 96.2%. Survivorship was 95.24% at 10 years and 58.67% at 27 years. Patients who had had previous hip surgery had revision rate 24.8% compared with 14.1%. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had fewer revisions than those with developmental hip dysplasia or primary osteoarthritis. Large 43 mm diameter cup gave lower revisions for aseptic cup loosening as compared with 40mm cup. Presence and preservation of subchondral plate, rim support compared to medialization of the cup, use of acetabular cement pressurizer and the reduced diameter neck (10mm) all made a contribution to reducing the incidence of revisions for aseptic cup loosening. Closing the medullary canal with bone block reduced the incidence of aseptic stem loosening. Use of the brace reamers did not affect the outcome and there appears to have been no advantage with the flanged stem. The long-term problem was the increasing incidence of revisions for aseptic cup loosening. This was exponentially related to the depth of cup penetration by the head of the femoral component. The long term clinical results of the Charnley LFA remain excellent even in young patients. Rim support of the cup, preservation of the subchondral bone of the acetabulum, cup flange and pressurising of the acetabular cement all make a significant contribution. Distal closure of the medullary canal and central position of the stem are of benefit, but reaming the medullary canal to cortex must be avoided. The long-term problem has been highlighted again as: wear and cup loosening

Aims. To discover how the management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the young patient (17-25) has changed, if at all, over the past six years. Methods. The same postal questionnaire was sent in 2002 and 2009 to 164 shoulder surgeons. Questions were asked about initial reduction, investigation undertaken, timing of surgery, preferred stabilisation procedure, period of immobilisation and rehabilitation programme instigated in first-time and recurrent traumatic dislocators. Summary of Results. Response rate - 92% (2009), 83% (2002). The most likely management of a young traumatic shoulder dislocation:. Reduction under sedation in A&E by A&E doctor (80%). Apart from X-ray, no investigations are performed (80%). Immobilisation for 3 weeks, followed by physiotherapy (82%). 68% would consider stabilisation surgery for first time dislocators (especially professional sportsmen) compared to 35% (2002). Of them, nearly 90% would perform an arthroscopic stabilisation vs. 57.5% (2002). For recurrent dislocators:. 75% would consider stabilisation after a second dislocation. 85% would investigate prior to surgery, choice of investigation being MR arthrogram (52%), compared to 50% (2002). 77% would perform arthroscopic stabilisation vs. 18% (2002), commonest procedure-arthroscopic Bankart repair using biodegradable bone anchors (62% 2009 vs. 27% in 2002). Immobilisation for 3 weeks, full range of motion 1-2 months and return to contact sports 6 - 12 months. Conclusion. There has been a remarkable change in practice compared to the previous survey. A significant proportion of Orthopaedic Surgeons would consider stabilisation in young first-time dislocators instead of conservative management. Arthroscopic stabilisation is now the preferred technique compared to open stabilisation whenever possible. Surgeons are using more investigations prior to listing the patient for surgery, namely the MR arthrogram. There is also an increased use of bio-degradable anchors as compared to metallic bone anchors in 2002

To discover how traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the young patient (17–25) is managed by shoulder surgeons in the UK. A comprehensive postal questionnaire was sent to 164 orthopaedic consultants, all members of BESS. Questions were asked about the initial reduction, investigations undertaken, timing of any surgery, preferred stabilization procedure, arthroscopic or open, detail of surgical technique, period of immobilization and rehabilitation programmes instigated in first-time and recur- rent traumatic dislocaters. The response rate was 82% (n=135). The most likely treatment of a young traumatic shoulder dislocation:. It will be reduced under sedation in A& E by the A& E doctor. Apart from x-ray, no investigations will be performed. It will be immobilised for 3 weeks, then given course of physiotherapy. Upon their second dislocation, they will be listed directly for an open Bankart procedure (with capsular shift as indicated) during which subscapularis will be detached and metallic bone anchors used. Following surgery, they will be immobilised for 3 to 4 weeks, before being permitted full range of movement at 2 to 3 months and allowed to return to contact sports at 6 to 12 months. On the other hand, 54% of surgeons indicated they would investigate prior to surgery, 18% said their first choice operation would be arthroscopic stabilisation, the number of dislocations normally permitted before surgery ranged from 1 to more than 4, and the period of immobilisation post operation from nil to 6 weeks. We now know how shoulder surgeons in the UK are treating this common injury. The results reveal that in Britain, we do not have a consistent approach, raising many discussion points. Open stabilisation remains the firm favourite. Does this mean arthroscopic stabilisation is regarded as an experimental procedure?

Aims: To discover how the management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in the young patient (17–25) has changed, if at all, over the past six years. Methods: The same postal questionnaire was used in 2003 and 2009, sent out to 164 members of British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Questions were asked about the initial reduction, investigation undertaken, timing of any surgery, preferred stabilization procedure, arthroscopic or open, detail of surgical technique, period of immobilization and rehabilitation programme instigated in first-time and recurrent traumatic dislocators. Summary of Results: The response rate were 92% (n=151) – 2009, 83% (n=131) – 2003 The most likely management of a young traumatic shoulder dislocation in the UK would be:. Reduction under sedation in A& E by the A& E doctor (80% of respondents). Apart from X-ray, no investigations are performed (80%). Immobilisation for 3 weeks, followed by physiotherapy (82%). 68 % of respondents would consider stabilisation surgery for first time dislocators (especially professional sportsmen) compared to 35% in 2003. Out of them nearly 90% would perform an arthroscopic stabilization vs. 57.5% in 2003. For recurrent dislocators:. 75% would consider stabilisation after a second dislocation. 85% would investigate prior to surgery, choice of investigation being MR arthrogram (52%), compared to 50% in 2003 that would chose to investigate. 77% would choose to perform arthroscopic stabilisation compared to 18% in 2003, the commonest procedure being arthroscopic Bankart repair using biodegradable bone anchors (62% compared to 27% in 2003). Following surgery, immobilisation would be for 3 weeks, full range of motion at 1 to 2 months and return to contact sports at 6 to 12 months. Conclusions: There has been a remarkable change in practice compared to the previous survey. A significant proportion of Orthopaedic Surgeons would consider stabilisation in young first time dislocators instead of conservative management. Arthroscopic stabilisation is now the preferred technique compared to open stabilisation whenever possible. Surgeons are using more investigations prior to listing the patient for surgery namely the MR arthrogram. There is also an increased use of bio-degradable anchors as compared to metallic bone anchors in 2003

This study retrospectively reviewed the pathology after the first traumatic incident of shoulder subluxation or dislocation in 12 male and four female patients with a mean age of 14.9 years (12 to 16). All had undergone surgery and were seen over a five-year period. Patients seen after a second traumatic dislocation were excluded.

All patients had been treated conservatively for between 4 and 18 months. When conservative treatment failed, all patients underwent examination and shoulder arthroscopy. All 16 had Hill-Sachs lesions of varying degrees. Bankart repairs were done in 14 patients with Bankart lesions. Two patients had more than 25% bone loss of the glenoid, and Latarjet procedures were undertaken. One SLAP-III and three SLAP-II repairs were done. The follow-up period varied from three months to five years.

All patients were either examined or interviewed by telephone. Failures were defined as recurrence of symptoms or redislocations. All patients resumed their sporting activities at similar or higher levels. Two patients with multidirectional shoulder laxity had further possible subluxations but were treated conservatively. One sustained a massive bony Bankart lesion a year after a Bankart repair and a Latarjet procedure was subsequently performed.

Patients in this age group should be considered at high risk for recurrence. If intensive short-term rehabilitation fails, they should be managed surgically immediately.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is relatively a common condition that can lead to early arthritis of the hip. Although total hip arthroplasty is the surgical treatment of choice for these patients with end stage arthritis, some patients afflicted with DDH may present early. Acetabular osteotomy, in particular Bernese or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO as described by Professor Ganz and Jeff Mast back in 1980s) may be an option with patients with symptomatic DDH who have joint space available. PAO has many advantages. First, it is performed through a single incision (modified Smith Peterson approach) without breaching the abductor mechanism. The periacetabular fragment has, hence, excellent blood supply and avascular necrosis of the acetabular portion is not an issue. In addition, the osteotomy is so versatile allowing for great mobility of the fragment to obtain coverage even in the worst of circumstances. The osteotomy does not affect the posterior column and hence allows for earlier weight bearing. Most joint preservation surgeons in North America and Europe prefer PAO to other types of osteotomy.

The indications for PAO are a patient with symptomatic DDH who has good joint space and a congruent joint. The congruency of the joint is usually determined by the abduction views (obtained at 30 degrees abduction and neutral rotation). Although the joint space may be measured on plain radiographs, in recent years some centers have been utilising cross sectional imaging, such as dGEMERIC for evaluation of the articular cartilage, which has been shown to be a good predictor of outcome for PAO.

Purpose: To understand the epidemiology and risk factors of an osteoporotic hip fracture in a non-elderly patient.

Methods: Retrospective study covering the period 1999–2004, assessing individual and family history, fracture type, hospital stay, time until surgery, type of treatment and possible study or treatment of bone fragility.

Results: 38 cases. 23 patients (60.5%) presented some risk factor related to osteoporosis: enolism 7, liver pathology 3, neuromuscular disease 13, steroid treatment 4 and anticonvulsant 3. Seven patients (18.4%) presented some type of psychiatric disorder. Mean hospitalisation time: 13 days. Time until surgery: 3 days. Fracture type: 20 (52.6%) pertrochanteric and 16 (42.10%) subcapital. Treatment: cannulated screws in 11 cases (29%), screw and plate in 21 (55.2%). We found no diagnosis of osteoporosis or related indications in the admission reports except in one patient. Patients over 50: hip fracture incidence 161.21/100,000 inhabitants, pertrochanteric in 54.9% and subcapital in 45.1%*.

*

A Torrijos, C Ojeda. Area 5 hip study group, La Paz Hospital

Conclusions:

Hip fractures resulting from low-energy trauma are uncommon in the population under the age of 50.

The aim of the present study was to report the midterm follow up results of second generation metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 50 years.

From December 1997 and January 2003, 91 metal-on-metal cementless primary total arthroplasties in 77 patients (who were younger than 50 years) were performed in our institution. Among them 72 hips in 63 patients could be followed more than 5 years. There were 18 women (22 hips) and 44 men (50 hips) with a mean age at surgery of 39 years (range 22 to 49 years) and a mean follow up of 7 years (range 5 to 10 years).

The most common cause of total hip replacement were avascular necrosis of femoral head (37 hips in 28 patients, 51%) and second one was osteoarthritis (13 hips in 13 patients, 18%). We used Fitmore (Zimmer, Winterthur, Switzerland) cup in all cases and used 28mm Metasul femoral head. About the femoral stem, CLS (Protek AG/Zimmer, Bern, Switzerland) stems were used in 48 hips and Cone prosthesis^® (Protek AG, Berne, Switzerland) were used in 24 hips.

We evaluated clinical result using Harris hip score (HSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) score and radiological evaluation was done using the method of DeLee and Charnley for the acetabular osteolysis and method of Gruen et al. for the femoral osteolysis.

The mean HSS improved from 58.9 (range 35 to 69) preoperatively to 92.2 (range 82 to 100) postoperatively. The mean WOMAC score improved from 72.2 (range 63 to 94) preoperatively to 29.2 (range 17 to 51) postoperatively. In radiological evaluation, all femoral and acetabular component were well fixed without loosening or subsidence. But osteolysis was observed in 10 (14%) of total 72 hips (Acetabular osteolysis in 5 cases-Zone 2; 2, Zone 3; 3, Femoral osteolysis in 6 cases-Zone 1; 6, Zone 7; 1).

About the major complications, there were immediate postoperative deep infection 1 case, delayed infection 1 case and recurrent dislocation 1 case. There was no revision case due to aseptic loosening.

The treatment of second generation metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 50 years showed favorable midterm results.

Aim

The aim of this study was to determine the medium term survivorship and function of the Exeter Universal Hip Replacement when used in younger patients, a group that is deemed to place high demands on their arthroplasties. Since 1988 The Exeter Hip Research Unit has prospectively gathered data on all patients who have had total hip replacements at the Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Hospital. There were 130 Exeter Universal total hip replacements (THR) in 107 patients who were 50 years or younger at the time of surgery and whose surgery was performed at least 10 years before. Mean age at surgery was 42 years (range 17-50 years.) Six patients who had 7 THRs had died, leaving 123 THRs for review. Patients were reviewed at an average of 12.5 years (range 10-17 years). No patient was lost to follow-up.

Purpose: Historically, there have been few surgical options for patients with focal full-thickness cartilage lesions in the knee who have failed or are too advanced in age for biologic resurfacing treatments, yet are also relatively too young or unwilling to undergo conventional total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The UniCAp knee resurfacing arthroplasty provides an option for these patients that is minimally invasive, preserves the menisci and cruciate ligaments, and retains the bony architecture of the knee joint, thereby providing the potential for a rapid recovery to more vigorous activities than might be permitted after conventional knee arthroplasty, while preserving range of motion. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical results of a patient cohort undergoing the UniCAP knee resurfacing in the medial compartment of the knee.

Method: Prospective patients were screened with history and clinical examination, weight-bearing radiographs, and MRI. Patients were offered UniCap knee resurfacing arthroplasty if they had symptomatic full-thickness cartilage lesions in the medial and/or patellofemoral compartments. The cohort included 38 cases in 35 patients who underwent the UniCAP knee resurfacing procedure in the knee with focal medial compartment (with or without patellofemoral) osteoarthritis in the knee joint. In addition, patients were assessed with validated and established outcome scales including the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Form, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale, which includes the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index.

Results: The average age of patients undergoing knee resurfacing was 48.25 years (Range: 23 to 80). There were 24 males and 12 females. Thirty-one patients underwent isolated medial compartment resurfacing and 7 patients received both a medial compartment resurfacing and trochlear resurfacing. Three patients underwent a concomitant ACL reconstruction and 1 patient underwent a concomitant high tibial osteotomy. The mean duration of follow up was 18 months (Range: 12 to 26 months). There was an overall mean improvement from the pre-operative to post-operative scores in the IKDS-SF (P < 0.01), KOOS (all domains, P < 0.01) and WOMAC Index (P < 0.01). There were no major complications such as deep infection, DVT, or implant failure. In addition, there was no evidence of mechanical symptoms/signs or radiographic evidence of loosening at any time point post-operatively.

Conclusion: The short-term results demonstrate that the UniCAP resurfacing arthroplasty in the knee is a viable treatment option for focal full thickness cartilage lesions in the medial compartment of the knee in patients who are no longer candidates for biologic resurfacing procedures and who are also relatively too young or unwilling to undergo conventional total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.