Summary Statement. A porcine model using Yucatan minipigs was found to be very promising for the investigation of healing around
Introduction. It is well known that blood flow is a critical key component of fracture repair. Previously, we demonstrated that
Aim: We have carried out a prospective study to compare duplex ultrasonography and
Aims. The Intraosseous
Intraosseous
Introduction and Objective. Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a frequent disease for which therapeutic possibilities are limited. In current recommendations, the first-line analgesic is acetaminophen. However, low efficacy of acetaminophen, frequently leads to the use of weak opioids (WO) despite their poor tolerance, especially in elderly patients. The primary objective was to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of a new wearable
Background: Osseointegrated amputation prostheses avoid soft tissue complications associated with traditional socket prostheses. Forces are transmitted directly to the skeleton resulting in improved function. However, approximately 50% of
Infection is the primary failure modality for
Traditional socket prosthesis (TSP) rehabilitation for amputees is associated with substantial dissatisfaction due to poor mobility and pain from soft tissue squeezing. Osseointegration (OI), eliminates skin compression and prosthesis fit issues, providing superior mobility and quality of life (QOL) for most amputees. The potential for OI to benefit patients with exceptionally poor mobility is understudied. To address this knowledge gap, this project investigated the mobility and QOL changes. A retrospective review was performed to identify transfemoral amputees who presented with wheelchair-bound mobility (K0) and had at least five years of post-osseointegration follow-up. Outcome measures included changes in mobility (K-level, daily prosthesis wear hours, Timed Up and Go (TUG), 6 minute walk test (6MWT)) and QOL (Questionnaire for persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (QTFA); Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF36). Adverse events recorded included debridement for infection, implant revision surgery, fractures, and implant failures. 9 patients with mean age 48.2±7.7 (range 34-59) years were included. The proportion of patients achieving K-level >2 improved from 0/9=0% to [9/9=100%], p<0.001. The 6MWT improved from 0±0 to 320.65±57 meters (p<0.001). The TUG improved from incapable to 10.68±2.7 seconds (p<0.001). Statistically significant QOL metrics included QTFA global score (33.33±31 vs 68.52±21, p=0.039), SF36 physical component score (30.03±6.3 vs 42.34±12, p=0.023) and the SF36 mental component score (47.89±8.8 vs 51.95±10.4, p=0.332). Six patients required operative intervention to address complications. Five developed infections: three had debridement, and 2 required implant removal and reimplantation. Osseointegration does confer significant sustained mobility and quality of life improvement for wheelchair bound transfemoral amputees. All 9 K0 patients had statistically improved mobility and QOL after osseointegrated reconstruction. This supports osseointegration as an effective rapid and long-term rehabilitation alternative for patients who have the neurologic and muscular capacity to walk but are unable due to issues related to their TSP.
To try and aid the formation of a soft tissue seal to promote dermal and epidermal attachment to Intraosseous
Introduction. Following amputation, residual stumps used to attach the external prostheses can be associated with sores, infection and skin necrosis. These problems could be overcome by off loading the soft tissues. Intraosseous
Patients with above knee amputation (AKA) often experience poor socket fit exacerbated by minor weight changes, sweating, and skin problems. A
According to the latest report from the German Arthroplasty Registry, aseptic loosening is the primary cause of implant failure following primary hip arthroplasty. Osteolysis of the proximal femur due to the stress-shielding of the bone by the implant causes loss of fixation of the proximal femoral stem, while the distal stem remains fixed. Removing a fixed stem is a challenging process. Current removal methods rely on manual tools such as chisels, burrs, osteotomes, drills and mills, which pose the risk of bone fracture and cortical perforation. Others such as ultrasound and laser, generate temperatures that could cause thermal injury to the surrounding tissues and bone. It is crucial to develop techniques that preserve the host bone, as its quality after implant removal affects the outcome of a revision surgery. A gentler removal method based on the
Summary Statement. A novel
Summary. Osseointegrated Amputation Prostheses can be functionalised by both biological augmentation and structural augmentation. These augmentation techniques may aid the formation of a stable skin-implant interface. Introduction. Current clinical options are limited in restoring function to amputees, and are associated with contact dermatitis and infection at the stump-socket interface. Osseointegrated Amputation Prosthesis attempts to solve issues at the stump-socket interface by directly transferring axial load to the prosthesis, via a skin-penetrating abutment. However, development is needed to achieve a seal at the skin-implant interface to limit infection. Fibronectin, an Extracellular Matrix protein, binds to integrins during wound healing, with the RGD tripeptide being part of the recognition sequence for its integrin binding domain. In vitro work has found silanization of RGD to polished titanium discs up regulates fibroblast attachment compared to polished control. Electron Beam Melting can produce porous titanium alloy implants, which may encourage tissue attachment. This study aims to test whether a combination of biological RGD coatings and porous metal manufacturing techniques can encourage the formation of a seal at the skin-implant interface. Materials and Methods. We developed four different augmented
Introduction. Osseointegration has emerged as a promising alternative to rehabilitating with a traditional socket mounted prosthesis. Advantages have been reported to include improved functional mobility, better osseoperception, improved comfort, reduced pain, better biomechanical alignment and better gait, which all lead to a less restricted lifestyle and significantly improved quality of life. A major concern of the Osseointegrated approach lies in the risk of infections occurring from the permanent
Introduction. Approximately 2,000 Skeletal
Introduction. Advantages of osseointegration have been reported to include improved functional mobility, better osseoperception, improved comfort, reduced pain, better biomechanical alignment and gait, which all lead to a less restricted lifestyle and significantly improved quality of life. A major concern of the Osseointegrated approach lies in the risk of infections occurring from the permanent
Introduction: