Aims

There are concerns regarding initial stability and early periprosthetic fractures in cementless hip arthroplasty using short stems. This study aimed to investigate stress on the cortical bone around the stem and micromotions between the stem and cortical bone according to femoral stem length and positioning.

Introduction. A stem extension improves fixation stability of a tibial component. We need caution not to contact the tibial cortex with an offset adaptor. A symmetric tibial stem design often requires the component's re-positioning with negative effects. Therefore, the objective of this study was to validate clinical efficacy of a tibial baseplate with asymmetric stemmed position (TB-ASP) using aligning outlier rate. We hypothesized that TB-ASP design will be better aligned without unessential offset adaptor than a tibial baseplate with symmetric stemmed position (TB-SSP). Methods. TB-ASP was designed based on the anthropometric standard model (58 female cadavers, 54.7±11.4 years)(Figure 1.). To validate the stem position, 3D bone models of 20 OA patients (71.8±7.2 years) was reconstructed. All virtual surgery has done by one surgeon with consistent surgical procedure for the analysis criteria. An analysis of TB-ASP's aligning outlier was proceeded by following steps; 1) aligning tibial baseplate to the line from medial 1/3 tuberosity to the center of PCL, 2) selecting tibial baseplate's size for maximal bone coverage without problematic overhang, 3) trying to displace tibial baseplate and stem extension(120mm long) not to contact tibial cortex. A case invading tibial cortex was considered to be an outlier. The ratio using offset adaptor was compared to those of TB-SSP. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test. Results. TB-ASP's stem was optimized 31% AP position from the anterior and 45% ML position from the lateral. Its aligning outlier rate was decreased by 35% comparing to that of TB-SSP. For the offset from tibial medullary center to the stem extension center, there was no significant difference(p=0.66<0.05) between TB-ASP(3.60±3.05) & TB-SSP(3.8±2.30). Discussion and Conclusion. TB-ASP design based on the standard model was better aligned with a proposed position of tibial stem. The findings from this study suggest that asymmetric tibial stem will improve the alignment without offset adaptor in total knee replacement. Significance. TB-ASP design can show better outlier rate and alignment comparing to TB-SSP. Our study results can expect to be used as basic data for TB-ASP design

Two critical steps in achieving optimal results and minimizing complications (dislocation, lengthening, and intraoperative fracture) are careful preoperative planning and more recently, the option of intraoperative imaging in order to optimise accurate and reproducible total hip replacement. The important issues to ascertain are relative limb length, offset and center of rotation. It is important to start the case knowing the patient's perception of their limb length. Patient perception is equally important, if not more important, than the radiographic assessment. On the acetabular side, the teardrop should be identified and the amount of reaming necessary to place the inferior margin of the acetabular component adjacent to the tear drop should be noted. Superiorly the amount of exposed metal that is expected to be seen during surgery should be measured in millimeters. Once the key issues of limb length, offset, center of rotation, and acetabular component position relative to the native acetabulum have been confirmed along with the expected sizing of the acetabular and femoral components, it is critical that the operative plan is reproduced at the time of surgery and this can best be consistently performed with the use of intraoperative imaging. Advances in digital imaging now make efficient, cost-effective assessment of hip replacement possible. Embedded software allows accurate confirmation of the preoperative plan intraoperatively when correction of potential errors is easily possible. Such technology is now mature after years of clinical use and studies have confirmed its success in avoiding outliers and achieving optimal results.

A pilot study at Washington University demonstrated that intraoperative imaging was able to eliminate outliers for acetabular inclination and anteversion. In addition, the ability to achieve accurate reproduction of femoral offset and limb length within 5mm was three times better with intraoperative imaging (P < 0.001).

Introduction: Stem alignment and cement mantle thickness influence stress distribution on the cement-bone and the bone-cement interfaces. Malposition of the implant and an incomplete cement mantle can lead to suboptimal long-term results. The proximal and distal centralisers that are currently available have shown severe limitations in their clinical application and do not centralise the stem in the lateral plane.

Aim: To evaluate a new stem-positioning system.

Method: One hundred Friendly (Lima LTO) stems implanted between October 1999 and October 2000 have been evaluated radiographically for stem centralisation and cement mantle thickness in both projections. One surgeon used the same technique in all patients and employed a newly designed set of proximal and distal centralisers.

Results: All cases had an acceptable and complete cement mantle. In only seven cases cement thickness was below 2mm in Gruen zone 14. Stem-bone contact was never observed. No patient had migration of the distal plug during pressurisation or complete cement defects. In eight cases mild (2 degrees to 4 degrees) valgus deviation of the stem was found. None of the distal centralisers failed whilst one of the proximal centralisers broke during insertion of the stem without influencing the final result.

Discussion: Cementing the stem is the most delicate phase of cemented total hip replacement. The use of proximal and distal centralisers is mandatory to prevent malposition which in turn results in incomplete cement mantle. The system employed in this series appears accurate and reproducible for stem alignment.

Objectives. Many reports were shown about the angle of the cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with CT-based navigation system. However, there are few reports about the position of the stem. We investigated the position of the stem in navigated THA. We evaluated the position and alignment of stem which were shown on intra-operative navigation system. Materials and Methods. We treated 10 hips in 10 patients (1 male and 9 females) by navigated THA. 7 osteoarthritis hips and 3 idiopathic osteonecrosis hips were performed THA with VectorVision Hip 2.5.1 navigation system (BrainLAB). Implants were AMS HA cups and PerFix stems (Japan Medical Materials, Osaka). The positions of stem were decided on the 3D model of femur before operation. According to the preoperative planning, we put the implants with navigation system and recorded the position. We measured the position and alignment of stem with 3D template software after operation. We checked for complications. Results. The average error of stem alignment was 0.9 degrees in anteroposterior direction, 1.2 degrees in mediolateral direction and 3.5 degrees in rotation. The average error of the distance between the tip of greater trochanter and the shoulder of stem was 1.6mm on postoperative CT. Though there were no infections and fractures, 7 cases had postoperative pain on the lesion where we insert tracker pin. Conclusions. The accuracy of longitudinal stem alignment was correct but the anteversion varies widely. We usually perform THA by minimally invasive technique. Therefore the reference points of proximal femur were restricted at narrow area for registration and the landmarks for deciding the rotational alignment were difficult to be picked up correctly

Aims: To compare the femoral stem position and alignment, using different methods of insertion. The Exeter stem has been compared with a new tri-tapered, polished, cannulated, cemented, femoral component. Method: We have reviewed 100 post operative AP and 50 lateral radiographs for each group. Analysis determined both stem tip position and stem alignment. The groups of subjects were of comparable age, sex and Body Mass Index. Results: Values for mean distance from canal centre were calculated, for the Exeter group this was 1.511 ± 1.226 and Tri-Taper group 0.778 ±. 0.748. This was statistically signiþcant (p=0.0059). In our Exeter series of results we have shown that 71% of stem tips had been inserted within 2mm of central, this compares with 94% in the Tri-Taper series. On the lateral radiographs of the Exeter series the mean posterior distance was 2.245 ± 1.316, the mean anterior distance was 1.068 ± 0.528. In the Tri-Taper series the mean posterior distance was 1.123 ± 0.926, the mean anterior distance was 1.057 ± 0.590. The difference between the two groups was not statistically signiþcant (p=0.054). The alignment results show that only 78% of stems are aligned neutrally compared with 91% of tri-taper stems (p= 0.0454). Conclusion: These results are comparable with previous cannulated and Exeter stem studies. This conþrms that optimal distal stem position and stem alignment can be achieved by using a cannulated stem rather than the application of a distal centralising device

Aims. Hip arthroplasty does not always restore normal anatomy. This is due to inaccurate surgery or lack of stem sizes. We evaluated the aptitude of four total hip arthroplasty systems to restore an anatomical and medialized hip rotation centre. Methods. Using 3D templating software in 49 CT scans of non-deformed femora, we virtually implanted: 1) small uncemented calcar-guided stems with two offset options (Optimys, Mathys), 2) uncemented straight stems with two offset options (Summit, DePuy Synthes), 3) cemented undersized stems (Exeter philosophy) with three offset options (CPT, ZimmerBiomet), and 4) cemented line-to-line stems (Kerboul philosophy) with proportional offsets (Centris, Mathys). We measured the distance between the templated and the anatomical and 5 mm medialized hip rotation centre. Results. Both rotation centres could be restored within 5 mm in 94% and 92% of cases, respectively. The cemented undersized stem performed best, combining freedom of stem positioning and a large offset range. The uncemented straight stem performed well because of its large and well-chosen offset range, and despite the need for cortical bone contact limiting stem positioning. The cemented line-to-line stem performed less well due to a small range of sizes and offsets. The uncemented calcar-guided stem performed worst, despite 24 sizes and a large and well-chosen offset range. This was attributed to the calcar curvature restricting the stem insertion depth along the femoral axis. Conclusion. In the majority of non-deformed femora, leg length, offset, and anteversion can be restored accurately with non-modular stems during 3D templating. Failure to restore hip biomechanics is mostly due to surgical inaccuracy. Small calcar guided stems offer no advantage to restore hip biomechanics compared to more traditional designs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):476–485

Aims. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal lip position for total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using a lipped liner. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal position, with substantial variability in surgeon practice. Methods. A model of a THA was developed using a 20° lipped liner. Kinematic analyses included a physiological range of motion (ROM) analysis and a provocative dislocation manoeuvre analysis. ROM prior to impingement was calculated and, in impingement scenarios, the travel distance prior to dislocation was assessed. The combinations analyzed included nine cup positions (inclination 30-40-50°, anteversion 5-15-25°), three stem positions (anteversion 0-15-30°), and five lip orientations (right hip 7 to 11 o’clock). Results. The position of the lip changes the ROM prior to impingement, with certain combinations leading to impingement within the physiological ROM. Inferior lip positions (7 to 8 o’clock) performed best with cup inclinations of 30° and 40°. Superior lip positions performed best with cup inclination of 50°. When impingement occurs in the plane of the lip, the lip increases the travel distance prior to dislocation. Inferior lip positions led to the largest increase in jump distance in a posterior dislocation provocation manoeuvre. Conclusion. The lip orientation that provides optimal physiological ROM depends on the orientation of the cup and stem. For a THA with stem anteversion 15°, cup inclination 40°, and cup anteversion 15°, the optimal lip position was posterior-inferior (8 o’clock). Maximizing jump distance prior to dislocation while preventing impingement in the opposite direction is possible with appropriate lip positioning. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(9):571–579

We have previously reported on the improved all-cause revision and improved revision for instability risk in lipped liner THAs using the NJR dataset. These findings corroborate studies from the Australian (AOANJRR) and New Zealand (NZOA) joint registries. The optimal orientation of the lip in THAs utilising a lipped liner remains unclear to many surgeons. The aim of this study was to identify impingement-free optimal liner orientations whilst considering femoral stem version, cup inclination and cup version. A cementless THA kinematic model was developed using a 20 degree XLPE liner. Physiological ROM and provocative dislocation manoeuvre analyses were performed. A total of 9 cup positions were analysed (inclination 30–40–50 degrees, anteversion 5-15-25 degrees) and combined with 3 stem positions (anteversion 0-15-30 degrees) and 5 lip orientations (right hip 11 to 7 o'clock). Some lip orientation/component position combinations lead to impingement within the physiological ROM range. Using a lipped liner increases the femoral head travel distance prior to dislocation when impingement occurs in the plane of the lip. In THAs with a cup inclination of 30 and 40 degrees, inferior lip orientations (7–8 o'clock for a right hip) performed best. Superior lip orientation performed best with a cup inclination of 50 degrees. Femoral stem version has a significant effect on the range of movement prior to impingement and hence the preferred lip orientation. The optimal orientation of the lip in lipped liner THA is dependent on the position of both the acetabular and femoral components. In the common component orientation combination of stem anteversion 15, cup inclination 40 and cup anteversion 15, the optimal lip orientation was postero-inferiorly (8 o'clock for a right hip). Preventing impingement during physiological ROM is possible with appropriate lip liner orientation

Aims. Pelvic tilt (PT) can significantly change the functional orientation of the acetabular component and may differ markedly between patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients with stiff spines who have little change in PT are considered at high risk for instability following THA. Femoral component position also contributes to the limits of impingement-free range of motion (ROM), but has been less studied. Little is known about the impact of combined anteversion on risk of impingement with changing pelvic position. Methods. We used a virtual hip ROM (vROM) tool to investigate whether there is an ideal functional combined anteversion for reduced risk of hip impingement. We collected PT information from functional lateral radiographs (standing and sitting) and a supine CT scan, which was then input into the vROM tool. We developed a novel vROM scoring system, considering both seated flexion and standing extension manoeuvres, to quantify whether hips had limited ROM and then correlated the vROM score to component position. Results. The vast majority of THA planned with standing combined anteversion between 30° to 50° and sitting combined anteversion between 45° to 65° had a vROM score > 99%, while the majority of vROM scores less than 99% were outside of this zone. The range of PT in supine, standing, and sitting positions varied widely between patients. Patients who had little change in PT from standing to sitting positions had decreased hip vROM. Conclusion. It has been shown previously that an individual’s unique spinopelvic alignment influences functional cup anteversion. But functional combined anteversion, which also considers stem position, should be used to identify an ideal THA position for impingement-free ROM. We found a functional combined anteversion zone for THA that may be used moving forward to place total hip components. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):834–841

Abstract. Objectives. Stem malalignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor long-term outcomes and increased complications (e.g. periprosthetic femoral fractures). Our understanding of the biomechanical impact of stem alignment in cemented and uncemented THA is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of stem fixation method, stem positioning, and compromised bone stock in THA. Methods. Validated FE models of cemented (C-stem – stainless steel) and uncemented (Corail – titanium) THA were developed to match corresponding experimental model datasets; concordance correlation agreement of 0.78 & 0.88 for cemented & uncemented respectively. Comparison of the aforementioned stems was carried out reflecting decisions made in the current clinical practice. FE models of the implant positioned in varus, valgus, and neutral alignment were then developed and altered to represent five different bone defects according to the Paprosky classification (Type I – Type IIIb). Strain was measured on the femur at 0mm (B1), 40mm (B2), and 80mm (B3) from the lesser trochanter. Results. Cemented constructs had lower strain on the implant neck, and higher overall stiffness and strain on bone compared to uncemented THA. Strain on the bone increased further down the shaft of the femoral diaphysis, and with progressing bone defect severity in all stem alignment cases. Highest strain on the femur was found at B2 in all stem alignment and bone defect models. Varus alignment showed higher overall femoral strain in both fixation methods. Interestingly, in uncemented models, highest strain was shown on femoral bone proximally (B1-B2) in varus alignment, but distally (B3) in neutral alignment. Conclusion. Varus stem alignment showed overall higher strain on femur compared to neutral and valgus. This highlights the crucial role of stem alignment in long term outcomes of THA. Differences between the two stem types should be taken in consideration when interpreting results from this study

Introduction. Successful designs of total hip replacement need to be robust to surgery-related variability. Until recently, only simple parametric studies have explored the influence of surgical variability [1]. This study presents a systematic method for quantifying the effect of variability in positioning on the primary stability of femoral stems using finite element (FE) models. Methods. Patient specific finite element models were generated of two femurs, one male and one female. An automated algorithm positioned and sized a Corail stem (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw) into each of the femurs to achieve maximum fill of the medullary canal without breaching into the cortical bone boundaries.. Peak joint contact and muscle forces associated with level gait were applied[2] and scaled to the body mass of each subject, whilst the distal femur was rigidly constrained. The space prone to surgical variation was defined by the “gap” between the stem and the inner boundary of the cortical bone. The anterior/posterior and the varus/valgus alignment of the stem within this “gap” was controlled by varying the location of the points defining the shaft axis. The points were taken at 20% and 80% of the stem length (Figure 1). The anteversion angle as well as the vertical and the medial position of the stem were controlled by changing the location of the head centre within the femoral head radius. The location of these points was varied using Latin Hypercube sampling to generate 200 models per femur, each with a unique stem position. The risk of failure was evaluated based on stem micromotion, equivalent strains, and percentage of the bone-prosthesis contact area experiencing more than 7000 µstrains [3]. Results. The range of positions covered in this study adhered to the anatomy of the subjects (Table 1) and none of the stem positions breached into the cortical bone of the femur. The 90th percentile peri-prosthetic strains were between 1770 – 4792 µstrains for the male subject, and 2710 – 11260µstrains for the female subject. The 90th percentile micromotion was between (15.6 – 47) µm for the male subject, and (42.4 – 102.4) µm for the female subject. The percentage of the contact area experiencing more than 7000 µstrains was between (0% – 0.33%) for the male subject, and (0% – 12%) for the female subject. Discussion. A systematic method for studying the effect of surgical-related variation on primary stability was presented its applicability demonstrated on two femurs. The study found that variation in stem position may result in large variation (up to 1.5 times the baseline position) in strains and micromotions. The magnitude Up to three times the magnitudes for the ideal stem position. This method can be applied to larger samples to understand the influence of different alignment parameters on the primary stability of femoral stems

The purpose of this study was to assess the variability in implant position between sides in patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA and whether variation from one side to the other affected patient-reported outcomes. A retrospective review was conducted on 207 patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA by the same surgeon from 2017–2022. Leg length, acetabular height, cup version, and coronal and sagittal stem angles were assessed radiographically and compared to the contralateral THA. Surgical approach and technology utilization were further assessed for their impact on variability. Linear regression was used to model the relationship between side-to-side variability and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). Between sides, mean radiographic leg length varied by 4.6mm (0.0–21.2), acetabular height varied by 3.3mm (0.0–13.7), anteversion varied by 8.2° (0.0 to 28.7), coronal stem alignment varied by 1.1° (0.0 to 6.9), and sagittal angulation varied by 2.3° (0.0 to 10.5). The anterior approach resulted in more variability in stem angle position in both the coronal (1.3° vs. 1.0°, p=0.036) and sagittal planes (2.8° vs. 2.0° p=0.012) compared to the posterior approach. The posterior approach generally led to more anteversion than the anterior approach. Use of robotics or navigation for acetabular positioning did not increase side-to-side variability in cup-related position or leg length. Despite considerable side-to-side variability, Hip dysfunction and osteoarthritis outcome scores (HOOS JR) were not affected by higher levels of position inconsistency. Staged, bilateral THA results in considerable variability in component position between sides. The anterior approach leads to more side-to-side variability in sagittal stem angle and cup anteversion than the posterior approach. Navigation and robotics do not improve the consistency of component position in bilateral THA. Variation in implant position was not associated with differences in PROMs, suggesting that despite variability, patients can tolerate these differences between sides

Background. Aseptic loosening is rare with most cementless tapered stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), however different factors can modify results. We ask if the shape and technique of three current different femoral components affects the clinical and radiological outcome after a minimum follow-up of ten years. Methods. 889 cementless tapered stems implanted from 1999 to 2007 were prospectively followed. Group 1 (273 hips) shared a conical shape and a porous-coated surface, group 2 (286 hips) a conical splined shape and group 3 (330 hips) a rectangular stem. Clinical outcome and anteroposterior and sagittal radiographic analysis were compared. Femoral type, stem position, femoral canal filling at three levels and the possible appearance of loosening and bone remodelling changes were assessed. Results. No thigh pain was reported in unrevised patients. Mean Harris Hip score was lower for patients in group 3 for pain and function at 6 months, two years and at latest follow-up. The survival rate of not having revision of the stem for any cause was 98.5% (95% CI 98.8–100) for group 1 at 12 years, 99.3 % ((95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 97.9–100) for group 2 at 16 years and 97.7% (95% (CI) 94–100) for group 3 at 14 years, and (log rank= 0.109). Thirteen stems from the latter were revised for aseptic loosening. No revision for aseptic loosening was found in the other designs. After controlling all confounding factors, the risk for aseptic loosening in group 3 was related to a lower femoral canal filling (p=0.039, Hazard Ratio (HR):0.918, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):0.846–0.996) and a stem position outside neutral limits in the sagittal alignment (p=0.048, HR:3.581, 95% CI:1.010–12.696). Conclusions. Conical tapered cementless stems are more reliable than rectangular straight designs in primary THA after ten years

Background and aim. Despite good survivorship analysis for most uncemented tapered straight stems, new proposals modifying stem design in total hip replacement (THR) are being introduced in order to facilitate femoral revision surgery. We have evaluated the clinical and radiological results of four different designs of uncemented tapered straight stems implanted in our institution in order to assess: operative complications, clinical results, survivorship analysis for aseptic loosening and radiographic findings. Methods. 1008 hips implanted from 1998 to 2006 were prospectively followed for a mean of 12 years (range, 10 to 17). Four uncemented femoral designs employing a tapered straight stem were included: 209 Alloclassic stems, 420 Cerafit, 220 SL-Plus and 159 Summit. All hips had a 28 or 32 mm femoral head, and polyethylene (PE)-on metal or ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surface. Radiological femoral type, stem position, femoral canal filling at three levels and the possible appearance of loosening and other bone remodelling changes were recorded in all hips. Results. The rate of intra- and post-operative peri-prosthetic fractures ranged from 0 to 2.5%. No thigh pain was reported in unrevised patients. Among all groups, a total of 15 stems were revised for any cause. The revision rates for any cause at 12 years ranged from 97.1 to 99.3%. (p=0.1). 10 femoral components were revised for aseptic loosening: 6 Alloclassic stems with PE liner sterilized by Nitrogen and 3 SL-Plus stems with standard PE. No revision for aseptic loosening was found in the other designs. The survival rate for stem aseptic loosening was 97.1% (95% CI 95.6–100) for the Alloclassic group at 17 years and 98.2% (95% CI 96.2–100) for the SL-Plus at 14 years. The percentage with a neutral stem position was lower in the Alloclassic and SL-Plus groups (p=0.04). We found that femoral canal filling depended on stem group and stem position at three levels A, B and C (p<0.001). Femoral canal filling was greater in the SL-Plus group at three levels than the others (p<0.001). Bone remodelling changes were more frequent in the SL-Plus group, radiolucent lines (p<0.001) and cortical hypertrophy (p<0.001). Conclusion. Uncemented tapered straight stems consistently provide excellent clinical outcome and bone fixation. Newer proposals must consider these results, avoiding changing successful characteristics and concentrate on improving the less successful aspects

Introduction. Cemented femoral fixation has been shown to carry a lower risk of peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF). The aim of this study was to determine whether adequate (1) stem position and (2) cement mantle (i.e. factors associated with outcome of cemented stems) can be achieved with the anterior approach as compared to the posterior approach. Methods. This is a prospective, multi-surgeon, single center, consecutive, case-matched series. Twenty patients/hips (age: 76±SD 14) that underwent cemented fixation of their femoral component via an anterior approach (AA) were matched with twenty hips that received the same cemented femoral components via the posterior approach by the same surgeons. Outcome measures of interest included Barrack classification (A, B, C or D), Coronal alignment defined as Varus (>5º), mild varus (3–5º), neutral, mild valgus (3–5º) and valgus (>5º) of the stem and sagittal component alignment defined as anterior to posterior, neutral, posterior to anterior (±3 degrees) and cement mantle thickness in all Gruen zones. Results. There was no difference between groups in the Barrack classification (DAA: A:12,B:7, D:1); (Posterior: A:13, B:7) [p=0.56]. Coronal alignment (DAA: 15 neutral, 5 mild varus/valgus); (Post:15 neutral, 3 mild varus/valgus, 2 valgus) [p=0.27] and sagittal alignment was similar between groups [p=0.07]. Cement mantle thickness per Gruen zone was also similar between groups in all zones with particular interest zones 8 [P=0.68] and 12 [p=0.3] confirming comparable sagittal cement mantle thickness. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that equivalent stem alignment and cement mantle quality can be achieved with both approaches. As such, patients undergoing the AA approach can benefit from a quick recovery and lower risk of peri-prosthetic femur fracture

We report on a cadaveric study and early experience using patient specific drill guides to prevent cortex perforations and reduce the need for a trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA. Mimic software (Materialise) was used for 3D analysis of the cement mantle and cement plug. Based on the CT findings a Cannulated drill guide with the shape of the femoral stem was printed in medical graded nylon intraoperative findings and complications were recorded on videotape using a standard 5mm laparoscope for medullary inspection. Surgical Technique was to attain a pre-operative CT scan with MARS protocol of the proximal femur to evaluate the femoral stem positioning, the 3D anatomy of the cement mantle, the length of the cement plug and the quality of the surrounding bone. Subsequent a 3D printing of patient specific cannulated drill guide with the shape of the removed femoral component but an eccentric cannulation was made. Endoscopic inspection was performed of the inside of the cement mantle, then insertion of the autoclaved cannulated drill guide in the existing cement mantle. After perforation of the distal plug through the PSI drill guide using either a long drill or an ultrasound plug perforation tool (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw) the excessive cement was removed with standard available flexible femoral shaft reamers (Zimmer Biomet). Further laproscopic examination of the femoral canal performed to verify completeness of the cement removal. Results. CT scans with 3D reconstruction of the existing cement mantle is possible using Modern CT with MARS protocols. After the training on sawbones and cadaveric bones a predictable plug perforation was obtained in all clinical cases. There were no intraoperative cortex perforations and no intraoperative femoral fractures. Conclusion. CT scan analysis of femoral cement mantles together with patient specific drill guides are promising tools to reduce the risk of femoral perforation in revision total hip arthroplasty

Introduction. The achieved anteversion of uncemented stems is to a large extent limited by the internal anatomy of the bone. A better understanding of this has recently become an unmet need because of the increased use of uncemented stems. We aimed to assess plan compliance in six degrees of freedom to evaluate the accuracy of PSI and guides for stem positioning in primary THAs. Materials and Methods. We prospectively collected 3D plans generated from preoperative CTs of 30 consecutive THAs (17 left and 13 right hips), in 29 patients with OA, consisting of 16 males and 13 females (median age 68 years, range 46–83 years). A single CT-based planning system and cementless type of implant were used. Post operatively, all patients had a CT scan which was reconstructed using state-of-the-art software solution: the plan and CT reconstruction models were. Outcome measures: 1) discrepancy between planned and achieved stem orientation angles Fig.2&3; 2) clinical outcome. Results. 1) The mean (±SD) discrepancy was low for: Varus-valgus −1.1 ± 1.4 deg (IQR −2.2 – 0.3 deg); Anterior-posterior 0.1 ± 1.6 deg (IQR −0.7 – 1.3 deg). The discrepancy was higher for femoral version −1.4 ± 8.2 deg (IQR −8.3 – 7.2 deg). 3D-CT planning correctly predicted sizes in 93% of the femoral components. 2) There was no intra-operative fracture, no case showed evidence of early periprosthetic osseous injury. Discussion. Surgeons and engineers should be cautious with their expectation of achieving the planned femoral stem version of an uncemented femoral stem from the pre-operative 3D-CT plan. Conclusion. This is the first study to 3D-mensionally evaluate 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation and guides for achieved femoral stem component orientation vis-à-vis to the plan. The tools allow accurate implant orientation, however there is still potential for improvement. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Porous metaphyseal cones are increasingly used for fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Both cemented shorter length stems and longer diaphyseal engaging stems are currently utilized with metaphyseal cones with no clear evidence of superiority. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with 3D printed titanium metaphyseal cones with both short cemented and longer cementless stems from a clinical and radiographic perspective. Methods. In total 136 3D printed titanium metaphyseal cones were implanted. The mean patient age was 63 and 48% were female. The mean BMI was 33 and the mean ASA class was 2.5. There were 42 femoral cones in which 28 cemented and 14 cementless stems were utilized. There were 94 tibial cones in which 67 cemented and 27 cementless stems were utilized. The choice for stem fixation was surgeon dependent and in general cones were utilized for AORI type 2 and 3 bone defects on the femur and tibia. The most common fixation scenario was short cemented stems on both the femur and tibia followed by cemented stem fixation on the tibia and cementless fixation on the femur. Clinical data such as revision, complication, and PRO was collected at last follow-up (minimum follow-up 1 year). Radiographic analysis included cone bony ingrowth and coronal and sagittal alignment on long-standing radiographs. Descriptive statistics were used to compare demographics between patients who had malalignment (HKA beyond +/− 3 degrees and flexion/extension beyond +/− 3 degrees). Adjusted logistic regression models were run to assess malalignment risk by stem type. Results. Patient reported outcomes demonstrated modest improvements with Pre-op KOOS improving from 44 pre-op to 59 post -op and PF-CAT improving from 33 to 37 post-op. PROMIS pain scores decreased significantly from 54 to 44 post-op. 36% of patients had malalignment in either the coronal or sagittal plane. Patients with malalignment were more likely to be female (66.7% vs 40.4%, p-value=0.02). After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, there was a significantly increased risk for coronal plane malalignment when both the femur and tibia had cementless compared to cemented stems (odds ratio=5.54, 95%CI=1.15, 26.80). There was no significantly increased risk when comparing patients with mixed stems to patients with cemented stems. Sagittal plane malalignment was more common with short cemented stems although both coronal plane and sagittal plane malalignment with either stem type was not associated with inferior clinical outcome. Overall cone survivorship was excellent with only two cones removed for infection. Conclusion. Metaphyseal titanium cones provide reliable fixation in revision TKA. However, PROs in this complex patient population show only modest improvement consistent with other variables such as co-morbidities and poor baseline physical function. Small cone inner diameter may adversely influence cementless stem position leading to coronal plane malalignment. Short cemented stems are subject to greater sagittal plane malalignment with no apparent influence on clinical outcome

Background. Despite the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA), there are still challenges including restoration of leg length, offset, and femoral version. The Tsolution One combines preoperative planning with an active robotic system to assist in femoral canal preparation during a THA. Purpose of Study. To demonstrate the use of an active robotic system in femoral implant placement and determine the accuracy of femoral implant position. This was evaluated in a cadaveric study. Study Design and Methods. Four THA's were performed in fresh frozen cadaveric hips with assistance of the TSolution One System for preparation of the femoral canal. CT scans of the hip were used as input for TPLAN preoperative planning software to position the implants in three-dimensions (3D). The intraoperative process includes exposure of the joint using a posterolateral approach, fixation of the femur relative to the TCAT system, and registration of the femur. TCAT then actively milled the femoral canal in each of the cases after which Depuy Trilock implants were inserted by the surgeon. Only the femoral stem implants were considered in this study. Postoperative CT was used to compare actual implant position with preoperatively planned implant position in 3D. The translations between the centroids of the implant positions were compared. Findings of Study. All femoral stems were successfully implanted with no complications. Implant position very closely matched the preoperative plan. Compared to the preoperative plan, the mean (± SD) positions of the centroid of the implant were off by 0.6 (±0.6) mm in the medial-lateral direction, 0.8 (±0.3) mm in the anterior-posterior direction, and 2.0 (±1.3) mm in the superior-inferior direction. No intraoperative fractures occurred. A sample of the preoperative planned position (left) and actual postoperative position (right) as seen on TPLAN can be seen in Figure 1. An example of the final 3D implant position in blue as compared to the preoperative implant position in red can be seen in Figure 2. Conclusions. Overall, the post-operative stems positions were superior compared to the preoperative plan and it is believed that this is likely a result of not impacting the stems enough during the procedure. The medial-lateral and anterior-posterior stem positions were within 1 mm of what was planned. Active robotics can successfully be used to improve accuracy, precision, and reproducibility when considering final implant position in THA. These improvements can reduce unwanted human error and reduce complications. Further in vivo study is planned to demonstrate the clinical benefits of such improved precision